AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article

Myocardial Oxygenation Response to Stress Performing a Single-set Compared to Volume-Matched Multiple-Set of Leg Press in Untrained Young Adults

Junhai Xu1 ( ), Arnold G. Nelson1, James J. Tufano2, Juntao Wang3
School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
School of Sport Economic and Management, Central University of Finance & Economics, Beijing, P.R. China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Debates exist about the preference for single- or multiple-set resistance exercise (RE) on achieving similar training outcome, however, no study examined their effects on the heart, thus, this study was to examine the effect of volume-matched single- and multiple-set RE on the myocardial response through examining rate pressure product (RPP).

Methods

Fourteen healthy untrained college students performed two leg press exercises (4 × 10 and 1 × 40 at 150% body mass) on different days, and each was performed twice in a counterbalanced crossover order. Pre- and post-exercise SBP and HR were measured by auscultatory method, RPP was calculated as SBP × HR × 10−3, RPP difference (RPPdiff) was calculated by post-exercise RPP subtracting pre-exercise RPP.

Results

Single-set post-exercise RPP (17.48 ± 3.16 mmHg·beats/min), HR (123.86 ± 20.25 beats/min) was significantly greater than multiple-set post-exercise RPP (13.66 ± 3.04 mmHg·beats/min), HR (101.61 ± 19.14 beats/min), respectively. There was no significant difference of SBP (141.07 ± 9.37 vs. 134.29 ± 15.16 mmHg) between exercise protocols (P = 0.13). The RPPdiff of single-set (6.74 ± 2.86 mmHg·beats/min) was significantly greater than that of multiple-set (3.62 ± 2.90 mmHg·beats/min) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Single-set RE exerts a greater myocardial oxygenation response as compared to multiple-set, HR contributed more than SBP to the increase of RPP in RE. The results indicate that single-set RE can be warranted when wanting to train the heart, while multiple-set RE would appear best for those who should avoid heart stress.

Keywords

Heart rateResistance exerciseMyocardial oxygen consumptionRate pressure productSystolic blood pressure

References

1

Lamotte M, Fleury F, Pirard M, Jamon A, Borne P. Acute cardiovascular response to resistance training during cardiac rehabilitation: effect of repetition speed and rest periods. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(3):329–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e328332efdd.
Crossref Google Scholar
2

de Salles BF, Maior AS, Polito M, Novaes J, Alexander J, Rhea M, Simão R. Influence of rest interval lengths on hypotensive response after strength training sessions performed by older men. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(11):3049–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddb207.
Crossref Google Scholar
3

Fleck SJ, Kraemer W. Designing resistance training programs. 4th ed. Champagne, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2014.
4

Krieger JW. Single vs. multiple sets of resistance exercise for muscle hypertrophy: a meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(4):1150–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d4d436.
Crossref Google Scholar
5

Galvao DA, Taaffe DR. Resistance exercise dosage in older adults: single-versus multiset effects on physical performance and body composition. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(12):2090–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00494.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
6

Galvão DA, Taaffe DR. Single-vs. multiple-set resistance training: recent developments in the controversy. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):660–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200408000-00049.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

Mookerjee S, Welikonich MJ, Ratamess NA. Comparison of energy expenditure during single-set vs. multiple-set resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(5):1447–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001230.
Crossref Google Scholar
8

Haddock B, Wilkin L. Resistance training volume and post exercise energy expenditure. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(02):143–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865601.
Crossref Google Scholar
9

Heden T, Lox C, Rose P, Reid S, Kirk EP. One-set resistance training elevates energy expenditure for 72 h similar to three sets. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(3):477–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1666-5.
Crossref Google Scholar
10

Galvao DA, Taaffe DR. Resistance exercise dosage in older adults: single-versus multiset effects on physical performance and body composition. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(12):2090–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00494.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
11

Wolfe BL, Lemura LM, Cole PJ. Quantitative analysis of single-vs. multiple-set programs in resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(1):35–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200402000-00005.
Crossref Google Scholar
12

Miyachi M, Kawano H, Sugawara J, Takahashi K, Hayashi K, Yamazaki K, Tabata I, Tanaka H. Unfavorable effects of resistance training on central arterial compliance: a randomized intervention study. Circulation. 2004;110(18):2858–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000146380.08401.99.
Crossref Google Scholar
13

MacDougall J, Tuxen D, Sale D, Moroz J, Sutton J. Arterial blood pressure response to heavy resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58(3):785–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1985.58.3.785.
Crossref Google Scholar
14

Sugawara J, Komine H, Miyazawa T, Imai T, Fisher JP, Ogoh S. Impact of chronic exercise training on the blood pressure response to orthostatic stimulation. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(11):1891–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01460.2011.
Crossref Google Scholar
15

Sonnenblick EH, Ross J, Braunwald E. Oxygen consumption of the heart: newer concepts of its multifactoral determination. Am J Cardiol. 1968;22(3):328–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(68)90117-3.
Crossref Google Scholar
16

Rowell LB. Human cardiovascular adjustments to exercise and thermal stress. Physiol Rev. 1974;54(1):75–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1974.54.1.75.
Crossref Google Scholar
17

Nelson RR, Gobel FL, Jorgensen CR, Wang K, Wang Y, Taylor HL. Hemodynamic predictors of myocardial oxygen consumption during static and dynamic exercise. Circulation. 1974;50(6):1179–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.50.6.1179.
Crossref Google Scholar
18

Baller D, Schenk H, Strauer B, Hellige G. Comparison of myocardial oxygen consumption indices in man. Clin Cardiol. 1980;3(2):116–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.1980.3.2.116.
Crossref Google Scholar
19

Rafie AHS, Sungar GW, Dewey FE, Hadley D, Myers J, Froelicher VF. Prognostic value of double product reserve. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15(5):541–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e328305deef.
Crossref Google Scholar
20

Villella M, Villella A, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Maggioni AP, behalf of the GISSI O. Prognostic significance of double product and inadequate double product response to maximal symptom-limited exercise stress testing after myocardial infarction in 6296 patients treated with thrombolytic agents. Am Heart J. 1999;137(3):443–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70490-4.
Crossref Google Scholar
21

Feigenbaum MS, Pollock ML. Prescription of resistance training for health and disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(1):38–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199901000-00008.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

Dollard MD, Pontell D, Hallivis R. Preconditioning principles for preventing sports injuries in adolescents and children. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2006;23(1):191–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2005.10.003.
Crossref Google Scholar
23

Shephard RJ. PAR-Q, Canadian Home Fitness Test and exercise screening alternatives. Sports Med. 1988;5(3):185–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198805030-00005.
Crossref Google Scholar
24

Monnard CR, Grasser EK. Water ingestion decreases cardiac workload time-dependent in healthy adults with no effect of gender. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7939. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08446-4.
Crossref Google Scholar
25

Iglesias-Soler E, Boullosa DA, Carballeira E, Sánchez-Otero T, Mayo X, Castro-Gacio X, Dopico X. Effect of set configuration on hemodynamics and cardiac autonomic modulation after high-intensity squat exercise. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015;35(4):250–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12158.
Crossref Google Scholar
26

da Silva RP, Novaes J, Oliveira RJ, Gentility P, Wagner G, Bottaro M. High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: effects on cardiovascular response. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6(4):560–7.
Google Scholar
27

Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, Chaitman B, Eckel R, Fleg J, Froelicher VF, Leon AS, Piña IL, Rodney R. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104(14):1694–740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/hc3901.095960.
Crossref Google Scholar
28

Zapfe G. Clinical efficacy of Crataegus extract WS® 1442 in congestive heart failure NYHA class Ⅱ. Phytomedicine. 2001;8(4):262–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-7113-00041.
Crossref Google Scholar
29

Adams J, Hubbard M, McCullough T, Cheng D, Simms K, Hartman J, Strauss D, Anderson V, Lawrence A, Malorzo E. Comparision of Daily Rate Pressure Product Values Between Treadmill Exercise and Resistance Training in Post MI, PCI, and MI/PCI Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(4):277–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HCR.0000327225.98558.f4.
Crossref Google Scholar
30

Robinson BF. Relation of heart rate and systolic blood pressure to the onset of pain in angina pectoris. Circulation. 1967;35(6):1073–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.35.6.1073.
Crossref Google Scholar
31

Polito MD, Simao R, Lira VA, Nóbrega A, Farinatti P. Discontinuous sets of knee extensions induce higher cardiovascular responses in comparison to continuous ones. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008;90(6):350–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2008000600001.
Crossref Google Scholar
32

de Freitas Brito A, de Oliveira CVC, do Brasileiro-Santos S, da Cruz Santos MA. Resistance exercise with different volumes: blood pressure response and forearm blood flow in the hypertensive elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2151–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S53441.
Crossref Google Scholar
33

Gotshall R, Gootman J, Byrnes W, Fleck S, Valovich T. Noninvasive Characterization of the Blood Pressure Response to the Double-Leg Press Exercise. Med Sci Sport Exer. 1999;31(5):58
Crossref Google Scholar
34

Graves JE, Franklin BA. Resistance training for health and rehabilitation. Champagne, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2001.
35

Moreira O, Oliveira C, Matos D, Silva S, Hickner R, Aidar F. Cardiovascular response to strength training is more affected by intensity than volume in healthy subjects. Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ramd.2017.01.002.
Crossref Google Scholar
36

Berne RM. Regulation of coronary blood flow. Physiol Rev. 1964;44(1):1–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1964.44.1.1.
Crossref Google Scholar
37

Guth BD, Heusch G, Seitelberger R, Ross J Jr. Elimination of exercise-induced regional myocardial dysfunction by a bradycardiac agent in dogs with chronic coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1987;75(3):661–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.75.3.661.
Crossref Google Scholar
38

Colin P, Ghaleh B, Monnet X, Su J, Hittinger L, Giudicelli JF, Berdeaux A. Contributions of heart rate and contractility to myocardial oxygen balance during exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ. 2003;284(2):H676–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00564.2002.
Crossref Google Scholar
39

Goldstein RE, Epstein SE. The use of indirect indices of myocardial oxygen consumption in evaluating angina pectoris. Chest. 1973;63(3):302–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.63.3.302-a.
Crossref Google Scholar
40

Wolfe BL, LeMura LM, Cole PJ. Quantitative analysis of single- vs. multiple-set programs in resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(1):35–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200402000-00005.
Crossref Google Scholar
41

Holland W, Humerfelt S. Measurement of blood-pressure: comparison of intra-arterial and cuff values. Br Med J. 1964;2(5419):1241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5419.1241.
Crossref Google Scholar
42

Rasmussen PH, Driscoll DJ, Beck KC, Bonekat HW, Wilcox WD. Direct and indirect blood pressure during exercise. Chest. 1985;87(6):743–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.87.6.743.
Crossref Google Scholar
43

Sagiv M, Hanson PG, Ben-Ska D, Nagle FJ. Direct vs. indirect blood pressure at rest and during isometric exercise in normal subjects. Int J Sports Med. 1995;16(08):514–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-973046.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Volume 5 Issue 2,
May 2023
Pages 174-181
DOI: 10.1007/s42978-022-00175-z
Cite this article:
Xu J, Nelson AG, Tufano JJ, et al. Myocardial Oxygenation Response to Stress Performing a Single-set Compared to Volume-Matched Multiple-Set of Leg Press in Untrained Young Adults. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2023, 5(2): 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-022-00175-z

243

Views

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 24 September 2021
Accepted: 31 May 2022
Published: 21 October 2022
© Beijing Sport University 2022
Return