Home Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article

Knee Joint Function in Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Collegiate Female Lacrosse Players: A Pilot Study

Shelby A. Peel1 (), Christine D. Walck2, Jeffrey B. Taylor3, Anh-Dung Nguyen3,4, Audrey E. Westbrook3, Emma Alfred3, Mary Mahon3, Kevin R. Ford3
School of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive #5142, Hattiesburg, MS 39402, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA
Department of Physical Therapy, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA
Division of Athletic Training, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate knee joint function during an unanticipated cutting task between healthy and ACL-reconstructed (ACL-R) females within the same NCAA Division Ⅰ collegiate female lacrosse team (WLAX) via knee mechanics and estimated vasti and hamstring muscle forces.

Methods

Knee mechanics during three unanticipated cutting trials were observed using 3D motion analysis techniques for 26 healthy female lacrosse players, five which had previous history of ACL-R. Knee flexion angle and knee extensor moment were calculated via Visual3D. Modified musculoskeletal models were used to estimated vasti and hamstrings muscle forces obtained from static optimization. The 2 × 2 (group × limb) repeated measures ANOVAs were used to identify differences in knee mechanics, and vasti and hamstring muscle groups among healthy/ACL-R between their preferred and involved limbs.

Results

There was an interaction between group and limb for knee extensor moment. ACL-R females had less knee extensor moments in their involved limb compared to their uninvolved limb (P < 0.001). There was also a group main effect found for knee flexion angle. ACL-R females cut with less knee flexion angle compared to healthy females (P < 0.013). No significant differences were found for estimated vasti or hamstring forces.

Conclusions

These pilot results indicate that despite all female WLAX players undergoing the same strength and conditioning programming, training sessions, with the same coaching staff, differences in knee joint mechanics still exist between healthy and ACL-R players. These data should help inform larger-scaled studies investigating the impact of ACL-R on athletes within the same sports team.

Keywords

Knee biomechanicsLacrosseOpenSimMuscle FunctionACL-Reconstruction

References

1

Agel J, Rockwood T, Klossner D. Collegiate ACL injury rates across 15 sports: national collegiate athletic association injury surveillance system data update (2004–2005 through 2012–2013). Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(6):518–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000290.

Crossref Google Scholar
2

Barber Foss KD, le Cara E, McCambridge T, Hinton RY, Kushner A, Myer GD. Epidemiology of injuries in women’s lacrosse: implications for sport-, level-, and sex-specific injury prevention strategies. Clin J Sport Med. 2018;28(4):406–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000458.

Crossref Google Scholar
3

Braun HJ, Shultz R, Malone M, Leatherwood WE, Silder A, Dragoo JL. Differences in ACL biomechanical risk factors between field hockey and lacrosse female athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(4):1065–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2873-0.

Crossref Google Scholar
4

Brown SR, Washabaugh EP, Dutt-Mazumder A, Wojtys EM, Palmieri-Smith RM, Krishnan C. Functional resistance training to improve knee strength and function after acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case study. Sports Health. 2021;13(2):136–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738120955184.

Crossref Google Scholar
5

Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(81)90035-X.

Crossref Google Scholar
6

Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(11):1940–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.901024.

Crossref Google Scholar
7

Devine NF, Hegedus EJ, Nguyen AD, Ford KR, Taylor JB. External match load in women’s collegiate lacrosse. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(2):503–7. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003451.

Crossref Google Scholar
8

Elias ARC, Hammill CD, Mizner RL. Changes in quadriceps and hamstring cocontraction following landing instruction in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(4):273–80. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5335.

Crossref Google Scholar
9

Ford KR, Myer GD, Toms HE, Hewett TE. Gender differences in the kinematics of unanticipated cutting in young athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(1):124–9. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000150087.95953.C3.

Crossref Google Scholar
10

Ford KR, Nguyen AD, Hegedus EJ, Taylor JB. Vertical jump biomechanics altered with virtual overhead goal. J Appl Biomech. 2017;33(2):153–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0179.

Crossref Google Scholar
11

Ford KR, Schmitt LC, Hewett TE, Paterno MV. Identification of preferred landing leg in athletes previously injured and uninjured: a brief report. Clin Biomech. 2016;31:113–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.020.

Crossref Google Scholar
12

Gokeler A, Hof AL, Arnold MP, Dijkstra PU, Postema K, Otten E. Abnormal landing strategies after ACL reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(1):12–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00873.x.

Crossref Google Scholar
13

Hall M, Stevermer CA, Gillette JC. Muscle activity amplitudes and co-contraction during stair ambulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(2):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.01.007.

Crossref Google Scholar
14

Hamner SR, Seth A, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running. J Biomech. 2010;43(14):2709–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.025.

Crossref Google Scholar
15

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

Crossref Google Scholar
16

Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278.

Crossref Google Scholar
17

Hubley-Kozey CL, Hill NA, Rutherford DJ, Dunbar MJ, Stanish WD. Co-activation differences in lower limb muscles between asymptomatic controls and those with varying degrees of knee osteoarthritis during walking. Clin Biomech. 2009;24(5):407–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.02.005.

Crossref Google Scholar
18

King E, Richter C, Franklyn-Miller A, Daniels K, Wadey R, Jackson M, Moran R, Strike S. Biomechanical but not timed performance asymmetries persist between limbs 9 months after ACL reconstruction during planned and unplanned change of direction. J Biomech. 2018;81:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.09.021.

Crossref Google Scholar
19

Lai AKM, Arnold AS, Wakeling JM. Why are antagonist muscles co-activated in my simulation? A musculoskeletal model for analysing human locomotor tasks. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:2762–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-017-1920-7.

Crossref Google Scholar
20

Lai CCH, Ardern CL, Feller JA, Webster KE. Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates, graft rupture rates and performance outcomes. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(2):128–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096836.

Crossref Google Scholar
21

Lustosa LP, Ocarino JM, Andrade MAP, de Pertence AE, de Bittencourt NFNM, Fonseca ST. Muscle co-contraction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: influence of functional level. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21(6):1050–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.09.001.

Crossref Google Scholar
22

Lu TW, O’Connor JJ. Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. J Biomech. 1999;32(2):129–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00158-4.

Crossref Google Scholar
23

Maniar N, Schache AG, Cole MH, Opar DA. Lower-limb muscle function during sidestep cutting. J Biomech. 2019;82:186–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.021.

Crossref Google Scholar
24

Millard M, Uchida T, Seth A, Delp SL. Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. J Biomech Eng. 2013;135(2):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023390.

Crossref Google Scholar
25

Mokhtarzadeh H, Perraton L, Fok L, Muñoz MA, Clark R, Pivonka P, Bryant AL. A comparison of optimisation methods and knee joint degrees of freedom on muscle force predictions during single-leg hop landings. J Biomech. 2014;47(12):2863–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.027.

Crossref Google Scholar
26

Mokhtarzadeh H, Yeow CH, Hong Goh JC, Oetomo D, Malekipour F, Lee PVS. Contributions of the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles to the anterior cruciate ligament loading during single-leg landing. J Biomech. 2013;46(11):1913–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.010.

Crossref Google Scholar
27

Palmieri-Smith RM, Thomas AC, Wojtys EM. Maximizing quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27(3):405–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2008.02.001.

Crossref Google Scholar
28

Paterno MV, Ford KR, Myer GD, Heyl R, Hewett TE. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(4):258–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e31804c77ea.

Crossref Google Scholar
29

Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Effects of sex on compensatory landing strategies upon return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(8):553–9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3591.

Crossref Google Scholar
30

Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, Hewett TE. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):1968–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510376053.

Crossref Google Scholar
31

Segawa H, Omori G, Koga Y. Long-term results of non-operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee. 2001;8(1):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(00)00062-4.

Crossref Google Scholar
32
US Lacrosse. US Lacrosse Participation Report. In: US Lacrosse. Available via US Lacrosse. 2018. https://www.uslacrosse.org/sites/default/files/public/documents/about-us-lacrosse/2018-participation-report.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2022.
33

Walker PS, Rovick JS, Robertson DD. The effects of knee brace hinge design and placement on joint mechanics. J Biomech. 1988;21(11):965–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90135-2.

Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Volume 6 Issue 2,
May 2024
Pages 140-145
DOI: 10.1007/s42978-023-00223-2
Cite this article:
Peel SA, Walck CD, Taylor JB, et al. Knee Joint Function in Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Collegiate Female Lacrosse Players: A Pilot Study. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2024, 6(2): 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-023-00223-2
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Return