AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (577.9 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighbors affect the reproductive success of tits

Yiting Jiang1Yujia Bi1Ruiyao MaJing ZhangDongmei Wan( )
Laboratory of Animal Resource and Epidemic Prevention, School of Life Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China

1 The two authors contributed equally to the project.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighboring birds (conspecific and heterospecific) may influence reproduction and the effects differ across species. In this study, we investigated intra- and inter-specific spatial distribution of breeding via artificial nestboxes and examined whether overlap with neighbors affected reproductive success of the focal breeding pair. Regarding spatial distribution, Varied Tits (Sittiparus varius) and Cinereous Tits (Parus cinereus) showed similar pattern: distances of nestboxes containing conspecific tits were greater than those with heterospecific ones. In terms of breeding behavior, reproductive success was not significantly related to the distance from their neighbor’s nest. The reproductive success of Varied Tits was significantly related to that of their neighbors, while in Cinereous Tits, no strong link was found to any recorded reproductive behavior of the neighbors. These findings explain spatial variation in nest site selection of Varied Tits and Cinereous Tits. Reproductive success rate of Varied Tits is affected by that of the neighbors while that of Cinereous Tits is not. The results highlight that there are differences in reproductive outcome among related species and offer suggestions on the use of artificial nestboxes in experiment and conservation programs.

References

 

Birkhead TR, Johnson SD, Nettleship DN. Extra-pair matings and mate guarding in the Common Murre Uria Aalge. Anim Behav. 1985; 33: 608-619

 
Boucher-Lalonde, V., Morin, A., Currie, D.J.A consistent occupancy–climate relationship across birds and mammals of the AmericasOikos20141231029103610.1111/oik.01277

Boucher-Lalonde V, Morin A, Currie DJ. A consistent occupancy-climate relationship across birds and mammals of the Americas. Oikos. 2014; 123:1029-1036

 

David M, Auclair Y, Cezilly F. Personality predicts social dominance in Female Zebra Finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. Anim Behav. 2011; 81:219-224

 

Deeming DC, Biddle LE, Christopher RF. Interspecific and intraspecific spatial separation by birds breeding in nest boxes. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2017; 12:1

 

Dhondt, A.A., 1977. Interspecific competition between Great and Blue Tit. Nature 268, 521–523

 
Dhondt, A.A.Effects of competition on great and blue tit reproduction: intensity and importance in relation to habitat qualityJ. Anim. Ecol.20107925726510.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01624.x

Dhondt AA. Effects of competition on great and blue tit reproduction: Intensity and importance in relation to habitat quality. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 79: 257-265

 
Dhondt, A.A., 2012. Interspecific competition in birds. In: Birkhead, T.R. (Ed.), Oxford Avian Biology Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
 

Evans MR, Lank DB, Boyd WS, Cooke FA. Comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s Goldeneye and Bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. The Condor. 2002; 104:610-619

 

Finch DM. Effects of predation and competitor interference on nesting success of house wrens and tree swallows. The Condor. 1990; 92:674-687

 
Fowler, J., Cohen, L., Jarvis, P., 1998. Practical Statics for Field Biology, second ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
 
Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L.L., Wallace, A., Walsh, J.S.A meta-analysis of competition in field experimentsAm. Nat.199214053957210.1086/285428

Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am Nat. 1992; 140:539-572

 
Krüger, O., Chakarov, N., Nielsen, J.T., Looft, V., Grünkorn, T., Struwe-Juhl, B., et al.Population regulation by habitat heterogeneity or individual adjustment?J. Anim. Ecol.20128133034010.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01904.x

Kruger O, Chakarov N, Nielsen JT, Looft V, Grunkorn T, Struwe-Juhl B, et al. Population regulation by habitat heterogeneity or individual adjustment? J Anim Ecol. 2012; 81:330-340

 
Laube, I., 2011. Avian Range Dynamics: Traits, Biotic Interactions and Niches. Ph.D thesis. Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt.
 

Mand RV, Tilgar A, Lohmus, Leivits A. Providing nest boxes for hole-nesting birds - does habitat matter? Biodiver Conserv. 2005; 14:1823-1840

 

Martin TE. Nest predation and nest sites new perspectives on old patterns. BioScience. 1993; 43:523-532

 

Martin TE. Food as a limit on breeding birds: A life-history perspective. Ann Rev Ecol System. 1987; 18:453-487

 

Martinez-Rivera CC, Gerhardt HC. Advertisement-call modification, male competition, and female preference in the bird-voiced treefrog Hla avivoca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2008; 63:195-208

 
Minot, E.O., Perrins, C.M.Interspecific interference competition – nest sites for blue and great titsJ. Anim. Ecol.19865533135010.2307/4712

Minot EO, Perrins CM . Interspecific interference competition - nest sites for blue and great tits. J Anim Ecol. 1986; 55: 331-350

 

Moeller AP, Adriaensen F, Artemyev A, Banbura J, Barba E, Biard C. Clutch-size variation in western Palaearctic secondary hole-nesting passerine birds in relation to nest box design. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5:353-362

 
Møller, A.P., Balbontín, J., Dhondt, A.A., Remeš, V., Adriaensen, F., Biard, C.Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birdsJ. Anim. Ecol.2018871738174810.1111/1365-2656.12896

Moeller AP, Balbontin J, Dhondt AA, Remes V, Adriaensen F, Biard C. Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birds. J Anim Ecol. 2018; 87:1738-1748

 

Schoener TW. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat. 1983; 122:240-285

 

Szabo ND, Algar AC, Kerr JT. Reconciling topographic and climatic effects on widespread and range-restricted species richness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2009; 18:735-744

 

Tarjuelo R, Morales MB, Arroyo B, Manosa S, Bota G, Casas F. Intraspecific and interspecific competition induces dependent habitat niche shifts in an endangered steppe bird. Ecol Evol. 2017; 7:9720-9730

 

Teather KL. An experimental study of competition for food between male and female nestlings of the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1992; 31:81-87

 

Zhang L, Wang J, Wan DM, Bi YJ, Zhang L. Narrow or wide distribution? A comparison of behavioral traits between the Varied Tit (Sittiparus varius) and Great Tit (Parus cinereus). Chin J Zool. 2019; 54:471-477

Avian Research
Article number: 100010
Cite this article:
Jiang Y, Bi Y, Ma R, et al. The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighbors affect the reproductive success of tits. Avian Research, 2022, 13(1): 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100010

696

Views

21

Downloads

0

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 15 March 2021
Accepted: 26 December 2021
Published: 24 February 2022
© 2022 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return