AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Local and range-wide distribution of song types suggest Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla) have song neighborhoods but not macro-dialects

Patrick M. JagielskiJennifer R. Foote( )
Department of Biology, Algoma University, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada
Show Author Information

Abstract

The song systems of oscine passerines (songbirds) are complex and diverse. Because songs are used for both mate attraction and territory defense and are therefore important signals for survival and reproduction, comprehensive knowledge of within and among species song structure and distribution is informative for understanding the evolution of song repertoires and vocal behaviour. In this study, we explored variation in the song structure of the Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla), a widespread warbler (Family Parulidae) found in North American forests. We analyzed recordings from the 2021 breeding season to assess song type variation at a local (n ​= ​158 birds; Sault Ste. Marie, ON) and breeding range scale (n ​= ​512 birds; eBird). We characterized the local song types and tested whether Ovenbirds share song types with their neighbors more often than expected by chance. We then characterized song types of Ovenbirds across the breeding range to determine whether any geographic pattern of song clustering exists (i.e., macro-dialects). We found 10 distinct song types and some evidence for song type clustering at the local study site (i.e., song neighborhoods). We found 7 of those 10 song types throughout the breeding range and identified an additional 24 types that were not recorded in our local population. We found no evidence for song dialects across the Ovenbird breeding range. This study contributes to our understanding of Ovenbird song while simultaneously adding to our understanding of geographic structuring of warbler repertoires. Our work contributes to delineating a more comprehensive understanding of factors affecting dialect development for this diverse group of songbirds.

References

 

Baker, M.C., Gammon, D.E., 2008. Vocal memes in natural populations of chickadees: why do some memes persist and others go extinct? Anim. Behav. 75, 279-289.

 

Baptista, L.F., Morton, M.L., 1988. Song learning in montane white-crowned sparrows: from whom and when. Anim. Behav. 36, 1753-1764.

 

Beecher, M.D., Brenowitz, E.A., 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 143-149.

 

Bell, D., Slabbekoorn, H., Jesse, A., 2003. Microgeographic song variation in island populations of the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys nutalli): innovation through recombination. Behaviour 140, 947-963.

 

Bryan, K., Moldenhauer, R., Kroodsma, D.E., 1987. Geographic uniformity in songs of the Prothonotary Warbler. Wilson Bull. 99, 369-376.

 
Canty, A., Ripley, B., 2021. Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R Package Version 1, pp. 3–28.
 
Catchpole, C.K., Slater, P.J., 2003. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 

Ehnes, M., Foote, J.R., 2015. Comparison of autonomous and manual recording methods for discrimination of individually distinctive Ovenbird songs. Bioacoustics 24, 111-121.

 

Hann, H.W., 1937. Life history of the Oven-bird in southern Michigan. Wilson Bull. 49, 145-237.

 

Hannah, K.C., Bayne, E.M., Sánchez, N.V., 2020. First description of the structure and geographic patterns in the songs of the Connecticut Warbler (Oporornis agilis). Wilson J. Ornithol. 132, 598-607.

 

Heinemann, D., 1981. Song dialects, migration, and population structure of Puget Sound white-crowned sparrows. Auk 98, 512-521.

 

Hensel, A.L., Dobney, S.L., Doucet, S.M., Norris, D.R., Newman, A.E., Williams, H., et al., 2022. Microgeographical variation in birdsong: Savannah sparrows exhibit microdialects in an island population. Anim. Behav. 188, 119-131.

 

Holmes, S.B., Sanders, C.J., Fillman, D., Welsh, D.A., 2009. Changes in a forest bird community during an outbreak cycle of the spruce budworm in northwestern Ontario. Bird Popul. 9, 13-28.

 

Ince, S.A., Slater, P.J.B., Weismann, C., 1980. Changes with time in the songs of a population of chaffinches. Condor 82, 285-290.

 

Janes, S.W., Ryker, L., 2016. Nashville Warblers (Oreothlypis ruficapilla) use a single song type in southwestern Oregon with widely distributed song variants. Wilson J. Ornithol. 128, 412-418.

 

Ju, C., Geller, F.C., Mundinger, P.C., Lhati, D.C., 2019. Four decades of cultural evolution in House Finch songs. Auk 136, uky012.

 
Kroodsma, D.E., 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In: Marler, P., Slabbekoorn, H. (Eds.), Nature's Music: the Science of Birdsong. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, pp. 108–131.
 

Kroodsma, D.E., 1980. Winter Wren singing behavior: a pinnacle of song complexity. Condor 82, 357-365.

 

Lambrechts, M., Dhondt, A.A., 1986. Male quality, reproduction, and survival in the great tit (Parus major). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 57-63.

 

Lein, M.R., 1981. Display behavior of Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapillus) Ⅱ. Song variation and singing behavior. Wilson Bull. 93, 21-41.

 

Lemon, R.E., 1975. How birds develop song dialects. Condor 77, 385-406.

 

Liu, W.C., Kroodsma, D.E., 2006. Song learning by chipping sparrows: when, where, and from whom. Condor 108, 509-517.

 

Marler, P., 1970. A comparative approach to vocal learning: song development in white-crowned sparrows. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 71, 1-25.

 

Marler, P., Tamura, M., 1962. Song “dialects” in three populations of White-crowned Sparrows. Condor 4, 368-377.

 

McGregor, P.K., 1991. The singer and the song: on the receiving end of bird song. Biol. Rev. 66, 57-81.

 

McGregor, P.K., Krebs, J.R., 1982. Song types in a population of great tits (Parus major): their distribution, abundance and acquisition by individuals. Behaviour 79, 126-152.

 

Mehta C.R., Patel, N.R., 1983. A network algorithm for performing Fisher's exact test in r × c contingency tables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78, 427-434.

 
Naguib, M., Riebel, K., 2014. Singing in space and time: the biology of birdsong. In: Witzany, G. (Ed.), Biocommunication of Animals. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 233–247.
 

Nelson, D.A., Hallberg, K.I., Soha, J.A., 2004. Cultural evolution of Puget sound white-crowned sparrow song dialects. Ethology 110, 879-908.

 

Nelson, D.A., Marler, P., 1994. Selection-based learning in bird song development. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10498-10501.

 

Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A., Hughes, M., Podos, J., 2001. The evolution of bird song: male and female response to song innovation in swamp sparrows. Anim. Behav. 62, 1189-1195.

 

Otter, K.A., Mckenna, A., LaZerte, S.E., Ramsay, S.M., 2020. Continent-wide shifts in song dialects of white-throated sparrows. Curr. Biol. 30, 3231-3235.

 

Payne, R.B., Payne, L.L., Doehlert, S.M., 1988. Biological and cultural success of song memes in indigo buntings. Ecology 69, 104-117.

 

Peters, S., Nowicki, S., 2017. Overproduction and attrition: the fates of songs memorized during song learning in songbirds. Anim. Behav. 124, 255-261.

 

Pitocchelli, J., Guerra, D., Kender, J., 2018. Macrogeographic variation in song of the MacGillivray’s Warbler (Geothlypis tolmiei). Wilson J. Ornithol. 130, 716-729.

 
Porneluzi, P., Van Horn, M.A., Donovan, T.M., 2020. Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla), version 1.0. In: Poole, A.F. (Ed.), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.ovenbi1.01.
 
R Core Team, 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
 

Searcy, W.A., McArthur, P.D., Yasukawa, K., 1985. Song repertoire size and male quality in song sparrows. Condor 87, 222-228.

 

Searcy, W.A., Andersson, M., 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 17, 507-533.

 

Searfoss, A.M., Liu, W.C., Creanz, N., 2020. Geographically well-distributed citizen science data reveals range-wide variation in the chipping sparrow’s simple song. Anim. Behav. 161, 63-76.

 

Shonfield, J., Bayne, E., 2017. Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 12, 14.

 

Slater, P.J., 1989. Bird song learning: causes and consequences. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1, 19-46.

 

Slater, P.J.B., Ince, S.A., 1979. Cultural evolution in chaffinch song. Behaviour 71, 146-166.

 
Smith, S.M., 1991. The Black-Capped Chickadee: Behavioral Ecology and Natural History.Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
 
Spector, D.A., 1992. Wood-warbler song systems. In: Power, D.M. (Ed.), CurrentOrnithology, 9. Springer, Boston, pp. 199–238.
 

Sullivan, B.L., Aycrigg, J.L., Barry, J.H., Bonney, R.E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C.B., et al., 2014. The eBird enterprise: an integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biol. Conserv. 169, 31-40.

 

Thomas, I.P., Doucet, S.M., Norris, D.R., Newman, A.E., Williams, H., Mennill, D.J., 2021. Vocal learning in Savannah sparrows: acoustic similarity to neighbours shapes song development and territorial aggression. Anim. Behav. 176, 77-86.

 

Thompson, M.J., Pearse, K.A., Foote, J.R., 2020. Seasonal and diel plasticity of song type use in individual ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla). Ethology 126, 824-838.

 

Tsipoura, N., Morton, E.S., 1988. Song-type distribution in a population of Kentucky Warblers. Wilson Bull. 100, 9-16.

 

Venier, L.A., Holmes, S.B., 2010. A review of the interaction between forest birds and eastern spruce budworm. Environ. Rev. 18, 191-207.

 

Weeden, J.S., Falls, J.B., 1959. Differential responses of male ovenbirds to recorded songs of neighboring and more distant individuals. Auk 76, 343-351.

 

Wheelwright, N.T., Swett, M.B., Levin, I.I., Kroodsma, D.E., Freeman-Gallant, C.R., Williams, H., 2008. The influence of different tutor types on song learning in a natural bird population. Anim. Behav. 75, 1479-1493.

 

Wilson, P.L., Towner, M.C., Vehrencamp, S.L., 2000. Survival and song-type sharing in a sedentary subspecies of the song sparrow. Condor 102, 355-363.

 

Wildenthal, J.L., 1965. Structure in primary song of the mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Auk 82, 161-189.

 

Williams, H., 2004. Birdsong and singing behavior. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1016, 1-30.

 

Williams, H., Robins, C.W., Norris, D.R., Newman, A.E.M., Freeman-Gallant, C.R., Wheelwright, N.T., et al., 2019. The buzz segment of Savannah sparrow song is a population marker. J. Ornithol. 160, 217-227.

 

Williams, H., Schar, A., Ryba, A.R., Norris, D.R., Mennill, D.J., Newman, A.E.M., et al., 2022. Cumulative cultural evolution and mechanisms for cultural selection in wild bird songs. Nat. Commun. 13, 4001.

 

Wright, T.F., Dahlin, C.R., Salinas-Melgoza, A., 2008. Stability and change in vocal dialects of the yellow-naped amazon. Anim. Behav. 76, 1017-1027.

Avian Research
Article number: 100096
Cite this article:
Jagielski PM, Foote JR. Local and range-wide distribution of song types suggest Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla) have song neighborhoods but not macro-dialects. Avian Research, 2023, 14(2): 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100096

428

Views

9

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 17 November 2022
Revised: 15 March 2023
Accepted: 15 March 2023
Published: 24 March 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return