AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Avian Research Article
PDF (2.1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Seasonal changes in Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) song syntax

Sean P. Roacha( ), Luke C. McLeana, Jeff W. MacLeodb, Leslie S. Phillmoreb
Psychology Department, University of New Brunswick Saint John, 100 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, NB, Canada
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford St, Halifax, NS, B3H 4J1, Canada
Show Author Information

Abstract

In many songbird species, birdsong features phonological syntax, meaning that the units within their vocal sequences are ordered in a non-random way that adheres to a rule. While such syntactical patterns have been richly described in many species, comparatively little is known about how those patterns contribute to song achieving its important functions. For each of song's main functions, territorial defense and mate attraction, evidence of a role for syntax is limited. One species for which syntax has been thoroughly described is the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus), which presents song types from their repertoires in a semi-predictable order and, in doing so, rapidly cycle up and down the frequency spectrum. The objective of the present study was to explore the importance of song syntax in the Hermit Thrush through a within-subject examination of how measures of syntax, such as the predictability of song type order within song sequences, shift over the breeding season. We hypothesized that, if such syntactical characteristics are important to breeding behaviour, they would be most prominent at the start of the breeding season when activity associated with territory establishment and mate attraction is most intense. Analysis revealed that, as predicted, the rigidness of song type ordering within sequences was highest at the start of the season and declined thereafter. That song type sequences were most predictable at the vitally important early part of the breeding season fit our hypothesis that this aspect of song syntax is important to song's functions related to territory establishment and/or mate attraction. Future work will clarify whether that role relates to one of song's two main functions or serves song transmission in some broader way.

Keywords

BirdsongSeasonal changeSyntaxHermit ThrushStereotypy

References

 

Alward, B.A., Balthazart, J., Ball, G.F., 2017. Dissociable effects on birdsong of androgen signaling in cortex-like brain regions of canaries. J. Neurosci. 37, 8612–8624. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3371-16.2017.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Alward, B.A., Cornil, C.A., Balthazart, J., Ball, G.F., 2018. The regulation of birdsong by testosterone: Multiple time-scales and multiple sites of action. Horm. Behav. 104, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.010.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Annan, O., 1962. Sequence of migration, by sex, age, and species, of thrushes of the genus Hylocichla, through Chigago. Bird-banding 33, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/4510944.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ballentine, B., Badyaev, A., Hill, G.E., 2003. Changes in song complexity correspond to periods of female fertility in blue grosbeaks (Guiraca caerulea). Ethology 109, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00852.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ballentine, B., Hyman, J., Nowicki, S., 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol. 15, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg090.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bartsch, C., Weiss, M., Kipper, S., 2015. Multiple song features are related to paternal effort in common nightingales. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0390-5.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Berwick, R.C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G.J., Bolhuis, J.J., 2011. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Brennan, C.L., Jones, A.W., 2016. Song structure and cadence of the Veery (Catharus fuscescens) in the Appalachian Mountains. Wilson J. Ornithol. 128, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1676/wils-128-01-75-85.1.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Briefer, E.F., Rybak, F., Aubin, T., 2013. Does true syntax or simple auditory object support the role of skylark song dialect? Anim. Behav. 86, 1131–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.019.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Byers, B.E., Kroodsma, D.E., 2009. Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Anim. Behav. 77, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.003.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Cardoso, G.C., Mota, P.G., 2004. Female serin (Serinus serinus) responses to song do not favour the predominant song syntax. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 16, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2004.9522624.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Catchpole, C.K., Slater, P.J.B., 2008. Bird Song Biological Themes and Variations, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511754791.
Crossref
 

Chew, S.J., Mello, C., Nottebohm, F., Jarvis, E., Vicario, D.S., 1995. Decrements in auditory responses to a repeated conspecific song are long-lasting and require two periods of protein synthesis in the songbird forebrain. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3406–3410. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.8.3406.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ciaburri, I., Williams, H., 2019. Context-dependent variation of house finch song syntax. Anim. Behav. 147, 33–42.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Dellinger, R., Wood, P.B., Jones, P.W., Donovan, T.M., 2020. Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus), version 1.0. In: Poole, A.F. (Ed. ), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.herthr.01.
Crossref
 

DeMerchant, K., Roach, S.P., 2022. Vocal responses of Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) males to territorial playback of conspecific song. Ibis 164, 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13044.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Dilger, W.C., 1956. Hostile behavior and reproductive isolating mechanisms in the avian genera Catharus and Hylocichla. Auk 73, 313–353. https://doi.org/10.2307/4082003.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Emlen, S.T., 1972. An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour 41, 130–171. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1163/156853972X00248.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N., Studer, M., 2011. Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i04.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Gil, D., Slater, P.J., 2000. Song organisation and singing patterns of the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Behaviour 137, 759–782. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4535737.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Goymann, W., Landys, M.M., 2011. Testosterone and year-round territoriality in tropical and non-tropical songbirds. J. Avian Biol. 42, 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2011.05464.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Hedley, R.W., 2016. Complexity, predictability and time homogeneity of syntax in the songs of Cassin's vireo (Vireo cassinii). PLoS One 11, e0150822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150822.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Hedley, R.W., Denton, K.K., Weiss, R.E., 2017. Accounting for syntax in analyses of countersinging reveals hidden vocal dynamics in a songbird with a large repertoire. Anim. Behav. 131, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.021.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Hiebert, S.M., Stoddard, P.K., Arcese, P., 1989. Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Anim. Behav. 37, 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90115-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Holland, J., Dabelsteen, T., Paris, A.L., 2000. Coding in the song of the wren: importance of rhythmicity, syntax and element structure. Anim. Behav. 60, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1529.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ivanitskii, V.V., Marova, I.M., Antipov, V.A., 2017. Sequential organization in the song of thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia): clustering and sequential order of the song types. Bioacoustics 26, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2016.1239132.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Jones, D.F., 2006. Voice-printing the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus). Can. Acoust. 34, 14–15.
Google Scholar
 

Kao, M.H., Brainard, M.S., 2006. Lesions of an avian basal ganglia circuit prevent context-dependent changes to song variability. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01138.2005.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ketterson, E.D., Nolan Jr, V., Wolf, L., Ziegenfus, C., 1992. Testosterone and avian life histories: effects of experimentally elevated testosterone on behavior and correlates of fitness in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). Am. Nat. 140, 980–999. https://doi.org/10.1086/285451.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Kunc, H.P., Amrhein, V., Naguib, M., 2005. Acoustic features of song categories and their possible implications for communication in the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behaviour 142, 1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853905774405317.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H., 2017. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Magoolagan, L., Mawby, P.J., Whitehead, F.A., Sharp, S.P., 2019. The structure and context of male and female song in White-throated Dippers. J. Ornith. 160, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-018-1599-z.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Marler, P., 1977. The structure of animal communication sounds. In: Bullock, T.H. (Ed. ), Recognition of Complex Acoustic Signals: Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Recognition of Complex Acoustic Signals. Abakon-Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp. 17–35.
 

Marler, P., Peters, S., Ball, G.F., Dufty Jr, A.M., Wingfield, J.C., 1988. The role of sex steroids in the acquisition and production of birdsong. Nature 336, 770–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/336770a0.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

McLean, L.C., Roach, S.P., 2021. Markov dependencies in the song syntax of Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus). J. Ornithol. 162, 469–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01840-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Meitzen, J., Moore, I.T., Lent, K., Brenowitz, E.A., Perkel, D.J., 2007. Steroid hormones act transsynaptically within the forebrain to regulate neuronal phenotype and song stereotypy. J. Neurosci. 27, 12045–12057. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3289-07.2007.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mizuhara, T., Okanoya, K., 2020. Do songbirds hear songs syllable by syllable? Behav. Process. 174, 104089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104089.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Nelson, D.A., Marler, P., 1989. Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong. Science 244, 976–978. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2727689.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Nesbitt, M., Soosaar, K., Roach, S., 2022. Responses of Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) males to conspecific playback with typical and atypical syntactical patterns. Behav. Process. 203, 104764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104764.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Otter, K., Ratcliffe, L., 1993. Changes in singing behavior of male black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) following mate removal. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170256.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Parris, K.M., Velik-Lord, M., North, J.M., 2009. Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecol. Soc. 14, 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-02687-140125.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
R Core Team, 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
 

Rivers, J.W., Kroodsma, D.E., 2000. Singing behavior of the Hermit Thrush. J. Field Ornithol. 71, 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.3.467.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Roach, S.P., Johnson, L., Phillmore, L.S., 2012. Repertoire composition and singing behaviour in two eastern populations of the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus). Bioacoustics 21, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2012.699254.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Robinson, C.M., Creanza, N., 2019. Species-level repertoire size predicts a correlation between individual song elaboration and reproductive success. Ecol. Evol. 9, 8362–8377. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5418.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Scharff, C., Nottebohm, F., 1991. A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 11, 2896–2913. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.11-09-02896.1991.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Searcy, W.A., 1992. Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Am. Zool. 32, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/32.1.71.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Searcy, W.A., Nowicki, S., Peters, S., 1999. Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires. Anim. Behav. 58, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1128.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Searcy, W.A., Soha, J., Peters, S., Nowicki, S., 2022. Long-distance dependencies in birdsong syntax. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20212473. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2473.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Sossinka, R., Böhner, J., 1980. Song types in the zebra finch Poephila guttata castanotis. Z. Tierpsychol. 53, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1980.tb01044.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Stanley, C.Q., Walter, M.H., Venkatraman, M.X., Wilkinson, G.S., 2016. Insect noise avoidance in the dawn chorus of Neotropical birds. Anim. Behav. 112, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.003.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Taylor, C.E., Brumley, J.T., Hedley, R.W., Cody, M.L., 2017. Sensitivity of California thrashers (Toxostoma redivivum) to song syntax. Bioacoustics 26, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2016.1274917.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

van Duyse, E., Pinxten, R., Eens, M., 2003. Seasonal fluctuations in plasma testosterone levels and diurnal song activity in free-living male great tits. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 134, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00213-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Weiss, M., Hultsch, H., Adam, I., Scharff, C., Kipper, S., 2014. The use of network analysis to study complex animal communication systems: a study on nightingale song. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140460. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0460.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Wingfield, J.C., Hahn, T.P., 1994. Testosterone and territorial behaviour in sedentary and migratory sparrows. Anim. Behav. 47, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1009.
Crossref Google Scholar
Avian Research
Volume 15 Issue 2,
June 2024
Article number: 100171
DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100171
Cite this article:
Roach SP, McLean LC, MacLeod JW, et al. Seasonal changes in Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) song syntax. Avian Research, 2024, 15(2): 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100171

125

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 31 August 2023
Revised: 01 March 2024
Accepted: 03 March 2024
Published: 15 March 2024
© 2024 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Return