Nestlings of two parrotbill species can independently evaluate the presence of predators based on acoustic cues
)Abstract
Nest predation is the leading cause of reproductive failure in birds and a major driving force in the evolution of anti-predation strategies. Current studies on the anti-predation strategies of birds driven by predation pressure have mainly focused on adults. However, the detection and behavioral responses of nestlings toward predation risk require further investigation. In this study, we examined nestling responses to predator sounds. Two species of nestlings, the Reed Parrotbill (Paradoxornis heudei) and Vinous-throated Parrotbill (Sinosuthora webbiana), were exposed to the Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus, less common) and Oriental Magpie (Pica serica, more common), which are predator species, the Oriental Turtle Dove (Streptopelia orientalis), which is a commonly found harmless species, and background noise. Our findings revealed that compared to pre-playback of natural begging and playback of background noise and Oriental Turtle Dove sounds, playback of the two predator types decreased the total begging time and total number of calls of the two nestlings species, with the calls of the Sparrowhawk leading to greater suppression of nestling begging behavior than those of the Oriental Magpie. Therefore, our results indicated that these nestlings were able to distinguish predators from harmless species based on auditory cues.
References
Amo, L., Galván, I., Tomás, G., Sanz, J.J., 2008. Predator odour recognition and avoidance in a songbird. Funct. Ecol. 22, 289–293.
Barati, A., McDonald, P.G., 2017. Nestlings reduce their predation risk by attending to predator-information encoded within conspecific alarm calls. Sci. Rep. 7, 11736.
Berger, J., Swenson, J.E., Persson, I.-L., 2001. Recolonizing carnivores and naive prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science 291, 1036–1039.
Bernath-Plaisted, J., Yasukawa, K., 2011. Effect of alarm calling by male Red-winged Blackbirds on nestling begging and female provisioning behavior. J. Field Ornithol. 82, 395–405.
Blumstein, D.T., Cooley, L., Winternitz, J., Daniel, J.C., 2008. Do yellow-bellied marmots respond to predator vocalizations? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 457–468.
Briskie, J.V., Martin, P.R., Martin, T.E., 1999. Nest predation and the evolution of nestling begging calls. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 2153–2159.
Carlson, N.V., Healy, S.D., Templeton, C.N., 2017. Hoo are you? Tits do not respond to novel predators as threats. Anim. Behav. 128, 79–84.
Caro, T.M., 2005. Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Chivers, D.P., Ferrari, M.C.O., 2013. Tadpole antipredator responses change over time: what is the role of learning and generalization? Behav. Ecol. 24, 1114–1121.
Congdon, J.V., Hahn, A.H., Campbell, K.A., Scully, E.N., Yip, D.A., Bayne, E.M., et al., 2020. Acoustic discrimination of predators by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus). Anim. Cogn. 23, 595–611.
Dessborn, L., Englund, G., Elmberg, J., Arzél, C., 2012. Innate responses of mallard ducklings towards aerial, aquatic and terrestrial predators. Behaviour 149, 1299–1317.
Fallow, P.M., Pitcher, B.J., Magrath, R.D., 2013. Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122539.
Fluck, E., Hogg, S., Mabbutt, P.S., File, S.E., 1996. Behavioural and neurochemical responses of male and female chicks to cat odour. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 54, 85–91.
Fuchs, R., Veselý, P., Nácarová, J., 2019. Predator Recognition in Birds: the Use of Key Features. Springer, Cham.
Ghalambor, C., Martin, T., 2001. Fecundity-survival trade-offs and parental risk-taking in birds. Science 292, 494–497.
Gill, S.A., Neudorf, D.L., Sealy, S.G., 1997. Host responses to cowbirds near the nest: cues for recognition. Anim. Behav. 53, 1287–1293.
Göth, A., 2001. Innate predator-recognition in Australian brush-turkey (Alectura lathami, Megapodiidae) hatchlings. Behaviour 138, 117–136.
Griffin, A.S., 2009. Temporal limitations on social learning of novel predators by Indian mynahs, Acridotheres tristis. Ethology 115, 287–295.
Haff, T.M., Magrath, R.D., 2010. Vulnerable but not helpless: nestlings are fine-tuned to cues of approaching danger. Anim. Behav. 79, 487–496.
Haff, T.M., Magrath, R.D., 2011. Calling at a cost: elevated nestling calling attracts predators to active nests. Biol. Lett. 7, 493–495.
Haskell, D., 1994. Experimental evidence that nestling begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proc. R. Soc. B 257, 161–164.
He, S., Lin, M., Shi, L., Chen, D., 2022. Occurrence, distribution, and ecological risk assessment of contaminants in Baiyangdian Lake. China. Water 14, 3352.
Hua, F., Sieving, K., Fletcher, R., Wright, C., 2014. Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance. Behav. Ecol. 25, 509–519.
Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Magrath, R.D., Oteyza, J.C., Chalfoun, A.D., Haff, T.M., Schmidt, K.A., et al., 2015. Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives. J. Ornithol. 156, 247–262.
Khayutin, S.N., 1985. Sensory factors in the behavioral ontogeny of altricial birds. Adv. Stud. Behav. 15, 105–152.
Kullberg, C., Lind, J., 2002. An experimental study of predator recognition in great tit fledglings. Ethology 108, 429–441.
Lawson, S.L., Enos, J.K., Mendes, N.C., Gill, S.A., Hauber, M.E., 2020. Heterospecific eavesdropping on an anti-parasitic referential alarm call. Commun. Biol. 3, 143–150.
Leonard, M.L., Horn, A.G., Mukhida, A., 2005. False alarms and begging in nestling birds. Anim. Behav. 69, 701–708.
Madden, J.R., Kilner, R.M., Davies, N.B., 2005a. Nestling responses to adult food and alarm calls: 1. Species-specific responses in two cowbird hosts. Anim. Behav. 70, 619–627.
Madden, J.R., Kilner, R.M., Davies, N.B., 2005b. Nestling responses to adult food and alarm calls: 2. Cowbirds and red-winged blackbirds reared by eastern phoebe hosts. Anim. Behav. 70, 629–637.
Magrath, R.D., Pitcher, B.J., Dalziell, A.H., 2007. How to be fed but not eaten: nestling responses to parental food calls and the sound of a predator’s footsteps. Anim. Behav. 74, 1117–1129.
Maloney, R.F., Mclean, I.G., 1995. Historical and experimental learned predator recognition in free-living New Zealand robins. Anim. Behav. 50, 1193–1201.
McLean, I.G., Hölzer, C., Studholme, B.J., 1999. Teaching predator-recognition to a naive bird: implications for management. Biol. Conserv. 87, 123–130.
Rainey, H.J., Zuberbühler, K., Slater, P.J.B., 2004. Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 755–759.
Schaller, G.B., Emlen, J.T., 1961. The development of visual discrimination patters in the crouching reactions of nestling grackles. Auk 78, 125–137.
Schneider, N.A., Griesser, M., 2014. Within-season increase in parental investment in a long-lived bird species: investment shifts to maximize successful reproduction? J. Evol. Biol. 28, 512–520.
Shang, Y., 2018. Behavioral Ecology, second ed. Peking University Press, Beijing.
Sih, A., Englund, G., Wooster, D., 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 350–355.
Slabbekoorn, H., Smith, T.B., 2002. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 357, 493–503.
Steindler, L.A., Blumstein, D.T., West, R., Moseby, K.E., Letnic, M., 2020. Exposure to a novel predator induces visual predator recognition by naïve prey. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 74, 102.
Suzuki, T.N., 2011. Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats. Curr. Biol. 21, R15–R16.
Trnka, A., Trnka, M., Grim, T., 2015. Do rufous common cuckoo females indeed mimic a predator? An experimental test. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 116, 134–143.
Veen, T., Richardson, D.S., Blaakmeer, K., Komdeur, J., 2000. Experimental evidence for innate predator recognition in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 2253–2258.
Wang, C., Zhao, X., Tao, B., Peng, J., Wang, H., Yu, J., et al., 2024a. Do domestic budgerigars perceive predation risk? Anim. Cognit. 27, 8.
Wang, J., Ma, L., Chen, X., Yang, C., 2022. Common cuckoo nestling adapts its begging behavior to the alarm signaling system of a host. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 830441.
Wang, J., Zhou, Q., Zuo, T., Wang, L., Ma, L., Hou, J., 2024b. Three sympatric host nestlings eavesdrop on cuckoo nestling distress calls. Ecol. Evol. 14, e11437.
Węgrzyn, E., Leniowski, K., 2015. Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla nestlings do not produce begging calls until they are able to escape from predators. Ibis 157, 356–368.
Whittingham, M.J., Butler, S.J., Quinn, J.L., Cresswell, W., 2004. The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines. Oikos 106, 377–385.
Wright, J., Leonard, M.L., 2002. The Evolution of Begging: Competition, Cooperation and Communication. Springer, Dordrecht.
Yasukawa, K., Sollenberger, J., Lindsey-Robbins, J., DeBruyn, E., 2020. Calling in the face of danger: do nestling Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) suppress begging in response to predator playbacks? Auk 137, ukz071.
Yu, J., Wang, L., Xing, X., Yang, C., Ma, J., Moller, A., et al., 2016. Barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) differentiate between common cuckoo and sparrowhawk in China: alarm calls convey information on threat. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 175–188.
京公网安备11010802044758号