AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Perspective | Open Access

From science-policy interface to science-policy panel: The United Nations’ strengthening of the sustainable life cycle management of chemicals

Qiaoyun Zhanga,bHairong ZhaocYuan Chenb,d( )
Basel Convention Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific, Beijing 100084, China
School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
School of Finance and Economics, Qinghai University, Qinghai 810016, China
Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for Capacity-building and the Transfer of Technology in Asia and the Pacific, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In recent years, the chemical production and waste generation have been rapidly increasing, presenting substantial hazards to the ecosystem and human well-being. To address this issue, a series of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) have been developed internationally, that provide essential decision-making support for the appropriate governance of chemicals and wastes in the participating countries. MEAs have established subsidiary bodies known as science-policy interface (SPI) institutions to provide evidence-based support and scientific assessments for environmental policies. However, the existing SPIs face limitations that hinder their ability to tackle the obstacles presented by the vast quantities of chemicals and wastes currently found in the environment. Therefore, the fifth session of the United Nations Environment Assembly made the decision to establish a science-policy panel to promote the effective management of chemicals and waste and to prevent pollution (SPP-CWP). This panel is intended to be an independent intergovernmental body, similar to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. The United Nations Environment Programme convened an ad hoc open-ended working group (OEWG) to design strategies for the SPP-CWP. Since 2022, three OEWG meetings have been conducted, and draft documents outlining the panel's scope, functions, operational principles, conflict of interest policy, institutional setup, work processes, and procedures have been formulated. In this article, we analyzed the background and development of the SPP-CWP and provided updates regarding the progress of the panel's establishment. We also suggested future trends for the SPP-CWP. We concluded that SPP-CWP will be a comprehensive and authoritative international body, providing policymakers with exhaustive reports, consequently strengthening the capacity of life cycle management of chemicals. Thus, the panel will effectively reduce or prevent waste production and pollution, promote material circulation, and minimize resource consumption, making significant contributions to the establishment of a circular economy and an environmentally friendly society.

References

 

Andersen, S. O., Halberstadt, M. L., & Borgford-Parnell, N. (2013). Stratospheric ozone, global warming, and the principle of unintended consequences—an ongoing science and policy success story. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 63, 607–647.

 

Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., et al. (2015). The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1–16.

 

Eckley, N. (2001). TRAVELING TOXICS the science, policy, an management of persistent organic pollutants. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 43, 24–36.

 
Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Urban development series knowledge papers, no. 15. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/302341468126264791/what-a-waste-a-global-review-of-solid-waste-management.
 
International Panel on Chemical Pollution. (2019). Strengthening the science-policy interface in international chemicals governance: A mapping and gap analysis. Available at: https://zenodo.org/records/2559189.
 

Leivestad, H., & Muniz, I. P. (1976). Fish kill at low pH in a Norwegian River. Nature, 259, 391–392.

 
OECD. (2018). Considerations for assessing the risks of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/considerations-for-assessing-the-risks-of-combined-exposure-to-multiple-chemicals-ceca15a9-en.htm.
 

Stanaway, J., Afshin, A., Gakidou, E., Lim, S. S., Abate, D., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., et al. (2018). Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. The Lancet, 392, 1923–1994.

 
UNEP. (2015). Global waste management outlook. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-waste-management-outlook.
 
UNEP. (2019). Global chemicals outlook Ⅱ: From legacies to innovative solutions. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-chemicals-outlook-ⅱ-legacies-innovative-solutions.
 
UNEP. (2020). Assessment of options for strengthening the science-policy interface at the international level for the sound management of chemicals and waste. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/assessment-options-strengthening-science-policy-interface-international-level.
 
UNEP. (2021). Reflecting on the past and imagining the future: A contribution to the dialogue on the science-policy interface. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/38118.
 
UNEP. (2022). Programme of work and budget for 2022–2023 (POW) - annex 1 of for people and planet. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/programme-work-and-budget-pow.
 

van den Hove, S. (2007). A rationale for science–policy interfaces. Futures, 39, 807–826.

 

Wang, Z., Altenburger, R., Backhaus, T., Covaci, A., Diamond, M., Grimalt, J., … Suzuki, N. (2021). We need a global science-policy body on chemicals and waste. Science, 371, 774–776.

Circular Economy
Cite this article:
Zhang Q, Zhao H, Chen Y. From science-policy interface to science-policy panel: The United Nations’ strengthening of the sustainable life cycle management of chemicals. Circular Economy, 2024, 3(2): 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2024.100090

213

Views

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 05 March 2024
Revised: 12 May 2024
Accepted: 29 May 2024
Published: 18 June 2024
© 2024 The Author(s).

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return