AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (597.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Maize response to elevated plant density combined with lowered N-fertilizer rate is genotype-dependent

Ahmed Medhat M. Al-Naggar( )Reda A. ShabanaMohamed M.M. AttaTarek H. Al-Khalil
Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Increasing plant density and improving N fertilizer rate along with the use of high density-tolerant genotypes would lead to maximizing maize (Zea mays L.) grain productivity per unit land area. The objective of this investigation was to match the functions of optimum plant density and adequate nitrogen fertilizer application to produce the highest possible yields per unit area with the greatest maize genotype efficiency. Six maize inbred lines differing in tolerance to low N and high density (D) [three tolerant (T); L-17, L-18, L-53, and three sensitive (S); L-29, L-54, L-55] were chosen for diallel crosses. Parents and crosses were evaluated in the 2012 and 2013 seasons under three plant densities: low (47,600), medium (71,400), and high (95,200) plants ha-1 and three N fertilization rates: low (no N addition), medium (285 kg N ha-1) and high (570 kg N ha-1). The T × T crosses were superior to the S × S and T × S crosses under the low N–high D environment in most studied traits across seasons. The relationships between the nine environments and grain yield per hectare (GYPH) showed near-linear regression functions for inbreds L54, L29, and L55 and hybrids L18 × L53 and L18 × L55 with the highest GYPH at a density of 47,600 plants ha-1 and N rate of 570 kg N ha-1 and a curvilinear relationship for inbreds L17, L18, and L53 and the rest of the hybrids with the highest GYPH at a density of 95,200 plants ha-1 combined with an N rate of 570 kg N ha-1. Cross L17 × L54 gave the highest grain yield in this study under both high N–high-D (19.9 t ha-1) and medium N–high-D environments (17.6 t ha-1).

References

[1]

Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation-Arab Republic of Egypt, Central Management of Agricultural Extension, Agronomic Practices of Maize, Ext. Bull. 1283 (2014).

[2]

A.M. Hashemi, S.J. Herbert, D.H. Putnam, Yield response of corn to crowding stress, Agron. J. 97 (2005) 839–846.

[3]

G.K. Huseyin, M.K. Omer, Effect of hybrid and plant density on grain yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.), Indian J. Agron. 48 (2003) 203–205.

[4]

D.N. Duvick, K.G. Cassman, Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States, Crop Sci. 39 (1999) 1622–1630.

[5]

M. Tollenaar, J. Wu, Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance, Crop Sci. 39 (1999) 1597–1604.

[6]
D.N. Duvick, J. Smith, M. Cooper, Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program, in: J. Janick (Ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2004, pp. 109–151.
[7]

C. Radenovic, K. Konstantinov, N. Delic, G. Stankovic, Photosynthetic and bioluminescence properties of maize inbred lines with upright leaves, Maydica 52 (2007) 347–356.

[8]

W.D. Widdicombe, D.Kurt. Thelen, Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern Corn Belt, Agron. J. 94 (2002) 1020–1023.

[9]

E.S. Bunting, Plant density and yield of grain maize in England, J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 81 (1973) 455–463.

[10]

F. Tetio-Kagho, F.P. Gardner, Response of maize to plant population density: Ⅱ. Reproductive developments, yield, and yield adjustment, Agron. J. 80 (1988) 935–940.

[11]

C.G. Poneleit, D.B. Egli, Kernel growth rate and duration in maize as affected by plant density and genotype, Crop Sci. 19 (1979) 385–388.

[12]

F.J. Betran, D. Beck, M. Banziger, G.O. Edmeades, Secondary traits in parental inbred and hybrids under stress and non stress environment in tropical maize, Field Crops Res 83 (2003) 51–56.

[13]

M.E. Otegui, Kernel set and flower synchrony within the ear of maize: plant population effects, Crop Sci. 37 (1997) 448–455.

[14]

D.L. Karlen, C.R. Camp, Row spacing, plant population and water management effects on corn in the Atlantic Coastal Plain, Agron. J. 77 (1985) 393–398.

[15]

F. Bavec, M. Bavec, Effect of maize plant double row spacing on nutrient up take, leaf area index and yield, Rost. Vyroba. 47 (2002) 135–140.

[16]

W. Liu, M. Tollenaar, G. Stewart, W. Deen, Response of corn grain yield to spatial and temporal variability in emergence, Crop Sci. 44 (2004) 847–854.

[17]

T.D. Biswas, S.K. Mukherjee, Text Book of Soil Science, 5th ed Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1993. 170–197.

[18]

N.C. Brady, R.R. Weil, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th ed. Pearson Education Ltd., USA, 2002.

[19]

M. Banziger, H.R. Lafitte, Efficiency of secondary traits for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments, Crop Sci. 37 (1997) 1110–1117.

[20]
M. Banziger, G.O. Edmeades, D. Beck, M. Bellon, Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: from theory to practice (online), 2000. 68 (Available at http://www.cimmyt.mx/, Mexico, D.F., CIMMYT).
[21]

M. Banziger, G.O. Edmeades, H.R. Lafitte, Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels, Crop Sci. 39 (1999) 1035–1040.

[22]

P.S. Bhatt, Response of sweet corn hybrid to varying plant densities and nitrogen levels, Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7 (2012) 6158–6166.

[23]
R.A. Clark, Hybrid and plant density effects on nitrogen response in corn(MS Thesis) Fac. Graduate, Illinois State University, Urbana, 2013.
[24]

M.I. Tajul, M.M. Alam, S.M.M. Hossain, K. Naher, M.Y. Rafii, M.A. Latif, Influence of plant population and nitrogen-fertilizer at various levels on growth and growth efficiency of maize, Sci. World J. 1 (2013) 1–9.

[25]

P.M. O'Neill, J.F. Shanahan, J.S. Schepers, B. Caldwell, Agronomic responses of corn hybrids from different eras to deficit and adequate levels of water and nitrogen, Agron. J. 96 (2004) 1660–1667.

[26]

C.R. Boomsma, J.B. Santini, M. Tollenaar, T.J. Vyn, Maize morphophysiological responses to intense crowding and low nitrogen availability: an analysis and review, Agron. J. 101 (2009) 1426–1448.

[27]

R.H. Moll, E.J. Kamprath, W.A. Jackson, Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of N utilization, Agron. J. 74 (1982) 562–564.

[28]

G.W. Snedecor, W.G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1989.

[29]

R.G.D. Steel, G.H. Torrie, D.A. Dickey, Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, third ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.

[30]

T.A. Khaliq, A.H. Ahmad, M.A. Ali, Maize hybrid response to nitrogen rates at multiple locations in semiarid environment, Pak. J. Bot. 41 (2009) 207–224.

[31]

A.Y. Kamara, A. Menkir, I. Kureh, L.O. Omoigui, F. Ekeleme, Performance of old and new maize hybrids grown at high plant densities in the tropical Guinea savanna, Commun. Biometry Crop Sci. 1 (2006) 41–48.

[32]

A.M.M. Al-Naggar, R. Shabana, T.H. Al-Khalil, Tolerance of 28 maize hybrids and populations to low-nitrogen, Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 14 (2010) 103–114.

[33]

A.M.M. Al-Naggar, R. Shabana, A.M. Rabie, Per se performance and combining ability of 55 new maize inbred lines developed for tolerance to high plant density, Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 15 (2011) 59–84.

[34]

L.R.F. Rodrigues, N. Da Silva, E.S. Mori, Baby corn single-cross hybrids yield in two plant densities, Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 3 (2003) 177–184.

[35]

P. Monneveux, P.H. Zaidi, C. Sanchez, Population density and low nitrogen affects yield-associated traits in tropical maize, Crop Sci. 45 (2005) 535–545.

[36]

H.R. Lafitte, G.O. Edmeades, Association between traits in tropical maize inbred lines and their hybrids under high and low soil nitrogen, Maydica 40 (1995) 259–267.

[37]

G. Shieh, C. Ho, H. Lu, The effect of nitrogen rate on the combining ability and heterosis in maize traits, J. Agric. Res. China 44 (1995) 15–25.

[38]
J.G. Kling, S.O.O. Keh, H.A. Akintoy, H.T. Heuberger, W.J. Horst, Potential for developing nitrogen use efficient maize for low input agriculture system in the moist Savannas of Africa, Proceedings of a conference on Developing Drought and Low N Tolerant Maize, March 25–29, 1997, pp. 490–501 (El-Battan, Mexico).
[39]

E.E. Gama, I.E. Marriel, P.E.O. Guimaraes, S.N. Parentoni, M.X. Santos, C.A.P. Pacheco, W.F. Meireles, P.H.E. Ribeiro, A.C.D. Oliveira, Combining ability for nitrogen use in a selected set of inbred lines from a tropical maize population, Rev. Bras. Milho Sorgo 1 (2002) 68–77.

[40]

J.C. William, Corn silage and grain yield responses to plant densities, J. Prod. Agric. 10 (1997) 405–409.

[41]

G.O. Edmeades, J. Bolanos, M. Hernandez, S. Bello, Causes for silk delay in a lowland tropical maize population, Crop Sci. 33 (1993) 1029–1035.

[42]

L.C. Miller, B.L. Vasilas, R.W. Taylor, T.A. Evans, C.M. Gempesaw, Plant population and hybrid consideration for dryland corn production on drought-sensitive soils, Can. J. Plant Sci. 75 (1995) 87–91.

[43]

E.W. Dow, T.B. Daynard, J.F. Muldoon, D.J. Major, G.W. Thurtell, Resistance to drought and density stress in Canadian and European maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids, Can. J. Plant Sci. 64 (1984) 575–583.

[44]

G.O. Edmeades, J. Bolanos, S.C. Chapman, H.R. Lafitte, M. Banziger, Selection improves drought tolerance in a tropical maize population: gains in biomass, grain yield and harvest index, Crop Sci. 39 (1999) 1306–1315.

[45]

L.L. Buren, J.J. Mock, I.C. Anedrson, Morphological and physiological traits in maize associated with tolerance to high plant density, Crop Sci. 14 (1974) 426–429.

[46]
D.L. Beck, J. Betran, M. Banziger, M. Willcox, G.O. Edmeades, From landrace to hybrid: Strategies for the use of source populations and lines in the development of drought tolerant cultivars, Proceedings of a Symposium held on 25–29 March, 1997, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, 1997, pp. 369–382.
[47]

B.D. Mansfield, R.H. Mumm, Survey of plant density tolerance in U.S. maize germplasm, Crop Sci. 54 (2014) 157–173.

[48]
S.K. Vasal, H. Cordova, D.L. Beck, G.O. Edmeades, Choices among breeding procedures and strategies for developing stress tolerant maize germplasm, Proceedings of Symposium held on March 25–29, 1996, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, D.F., 1997, pp. 336–347.
[49]

H.R. Lafitte, G.O. Edmeades, Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize: I. Selection criteria, Field Crops Res. 39 (1994) 1–14.

[50]

A.M.M. Al-Naggar, R. Shabana, A.M. Rabie, Genetics of maize rapid silk extrusion and anthesis-silking synchrony under high plant density, Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 16 (2012) 173–194.

[51]

B. Sattelmacher, W.J. Horst, H.C. Becker, Factors that contribute to genetic variation for nutrient efficiency of crop plants, Z. fur Planzenernährung und Bodenkunde 157 (1994) 215–224.

[52]

C.A. Shapiro, C.S. Wortmann, Corn response to nitrogen rate, row spacing and plant density in Eastern Nebraska, Agron. J. 98 (2006) 529–535.

The Crop Journal
Pages 96-109
Cite this article:
Al-Naggar AMM, Shabana RA, Atta MM, et al. Maize response to elevated plant density combined with lowered N-fertilizer rate is genotype-dependent. The Crop Journal, 2015, 3(2): 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.002

250

Views

4

Downloads

33

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

44

Scopus

6

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 01 July 2014
Revised: 06 January 2015
Accepted: 16 February 2015
Published: 21 February 2015
© 2015 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS. All rights reserved.
Return