AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (602.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Partitioning between primary and secondary metabolism of carbon allocated to roots in four maize genotypes under water deficit and its effects on productivity

Alyne Oliveira Lavinskya( )Paulo César MagalhãesaRoniel Geraldo Ávilaa,bMariana Melo Diniza,cThiago Corrêa de Souzad
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, CEP: 35701-970, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, CEP 37200-000, Brazil
Universidade Federal de São João Del Rey, Sete Lagoas, MG, CEP 35701-970, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, CEP 37130-000, Brazil

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Plants may respond to drought by altering biomass allocation to shoots and roots or by changing the metabolic activities in these organs. To determine how drought changes the partitioning of carbon allocated to growth and secondary metabolism in maize roots and how it affects photosynthesis (A) and productivity in maize, we evaluated leaf gas exchange, yield componentes, root morphology, and primary and secondary metabolites including total soluble sugars (TSS), starch (S), phenolics (PHE), and lignin (LIG). Data were collected from pot-grown plants of four maize genotypes: BRS 1010 and 2B710 (sensitive genotypes) and DKB390 and BRS1055 (tolerant genotypes) under two soil water tensions: field capacity (FC, −18 kPa) and water deficit (WD, −138 kPa). WD was applied at the pre-flowering stage for 12 days and then the water supply was restored and maintained at optimum levels until the end of the cycle. For genotype BRS 1055 under FC, the greatest A did not result in greater grain biomass (DGB) because the accumulated photoassimilates had already filled the cells, and thus the excessive TSS synthesized in leaves was allocated to roots in large amounts. However, the sharp decrease in A caused by WD imposition in this genotype did not affect the influx pressure of leaf TSS, which was due largely to conversion of primary metabolites to PHE compounds to increase the length of fine roots. In leaves of DKB390 under WD, both S and TSS were reduced, whereas PHE were increased to prevent excessive water loss and xylem cavitation. Under WD, both BRS1010 and 2B710 genotypes displayed reduced allocation of biomass to shoots and roots and LIG content in leaves, as well as lower A and DGB values. In BRS1010 this response was coupled to S decrease in leaves and TSS increase in roots, whereas in 2B710 there was a concomitant S increase in roots.

References

[1]
IPCC, Summary for policymakers, in: S. Solomon, D. Qin, M.Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L.Miller (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical ScienceBasis, Contribution of Working Group Ⅰ to the FourthAssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel onClimate ChangeCambridge University Press, United Kingdomand New York 2007, pp. 1–18.
[2]
W.E. Easterling, P.K. Aggarwal, P. Batima, L.M. Brander, L.Erda, S.M. Howden, Food, fiber and forest products, in: M.L.Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. Van der Linden, C.E.Hanson (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation andVulnerability, Contribution of Working Group Ⅱ to the FourthAssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel onClimate ChangeCambridge University Press, United Kingdom2007, pp. 273–313.
[3]

T.N. Tubiello, G. Fischer, Reducing climate change impacts on agriculture: global and regional effects of mitigation 2000–2080, Technol. Forecast. Soc. 74 (2007) 1030–1056.

[4]

D.B. Lobell, M.B. Burke, C. Tebaldi, M.D. Mastrandrea, W.P. Falcon, R.L. Naylor, Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030, Science 319 (2008) 607–610.

[5]

A.P. Gutierrez, N.L. Engle, E.D. Nys, C. Molejón, E.S. Martins, Drought preparedness in Brazil, Weather Clim. Extreme 3 (2014) 95–106.

[6]

F.O.M. Durães, P.C. Magalhães, A.C. Oliveira, Índice de colheita genético e as possibilidades da genética fisiológica para melhoramento do rendimento do milho, Rev. Bras. Milho Sorgo 1 (2002) 33–40.

[7]

P.C. Magalhães, T.C. Souza, F.R. Cantão, Early evaluation of root morphology of maize genotypes under phosphorus deficiency, Plant Soil Environ. 57 (2011) 135–138.

[8]

R. Brouwer, Distribution of dry matter in the plant, Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 10 (1962) 399–408.

[9]

H. Poorter, O. Nagel, The role of biomass allocation in the growth responses of plants to different levels of light, CO2 and water: a quantitative review, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27 (2000) 595–607.

[10]

Y. Uga, K. Sugimoto, S. Satoshi, S. Ogawa, J. Rane, M. Ishitani, N. Hara, Y. Kitomi, Y. Inukai, K. Ono, N. Kanno, H. Inoue, H. Takehisa, R. Motoyama, Y. Nagamura, J. Wu, T. Matsumoto, T. Takai, K. Okuno, M. Yano, Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions, Nat. Genet. 45 (2013) 1097–1105.

[11]

W.J. Davies, J. Zhang, Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42 (1991) 55–76.

[12]

F. Fort, C. Jouany, P. Cruz, Root and leaf functional trait relations in Poaceae species: implications of differing resource-acquisition strategies, J. Plant Ecol. 2 (2012) 1–9.

[13]

S.A. Martin, Disorders of primary metabolites in response to drought may increase the synthesis of natural products for medicinal purposes: South American herbs — a case study, Rec. Pat. Biotechnol. 8 (2014) 36–46.

[14]
D.F. Rhoades, R.G. Cates, Toward a general theory of plantsantiherbivore chemistry, in: J.W. Wallace, R.L. Mansell (Eds.), Biochemical Interactions Between Plants and Insects: RecentAdvances in Phytochemistry, Plenum Press, New York 1976, pp. 168–213.
[15]

P.D. Coley, J.P. Briant, F.S. Chapin, Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense, Science 230 (1985) 895–899.

[16]

P.D. Coley, Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of ant–herbivore defense, Oecologia 74 (1988) 531–536.

[17]
L.J. Guimarães, F.F. Mendes, S.N. Parentoni, P.E.O. Guimarães, C.A.P. Pacheco, J.R.A. Machado, W.F. Meirelles, A.R. Silva, Desempenho de Híbridos de Milho quanto à Tolerância àSeca, XXIX Congresso Nacional de Milho e Sorgo, Águas deLindóia–26 a 30 de Agosto de, 2012.
[18]

T.C. Souza, E.M. Castro, P.C. Magalhães, L.O. Lino, L.E.T. Alves, P. Albuquerque, Morphophysiology, morphoanatomy, and grain yield under field conditions for two maize hybrids with contrasting response to drought stress, Acta Physiol. Plant. 35 (2013) 3201–3211.

[19]

R.N. Trethewey, P. Geigenberger, K. Riedel, M.R. Hajirezaei, U. Sonnewald, M. Stitt, J.W. Riesmeier, L. Willmitzer, Combined expression of glucokinase and invertase in potato tubers leads to a dramatic reduction in starch accumulation and a stimulation of glycolysis, Plant J. 15 (1998) 109–118.

[20]

M. Stitt, R.M.C. Lilley, R. Gerhardt, H.W. Heldt, Metabolite levels in specific cells and subcellular compartments of plant leaves, Methods Enzymol. 174 (1989) 518–552.

[21]

R. Budini, D. Tonelli, S. Girotti, Analysis of total phenols using the Prussian blue method, J. Agric. Food Chem. 28 (1980) 1236–1238.

[22]

J.L. Gomide, B.J. Demuner, Determinação do teor de lignina em material lenhoso método Klason modificado, Papel. 47 (1986) 36–38.

[23]

S.P. Long, X.G. Zhu, S.L. Naidu, D.R. Ort, Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ. 29 (2006) 315–330.

[24]

P.C. Magalhães, R. Jones, Aumento de fotoassimilados na taxa de crescimento e peso final dos grãos de milho, Pesq. Agrop. Brasileira 25 (1990) 1747–1754.

[25]

T.C. Souza, P.C. Magalhães, E.M. Castro, N.P. Carneiro, F.A. Padilha, C.C. Gomes-Jr, ABA application to maize hybrids contrasting for drought tolerance: changes in water parameters and in antioxidant enzyme activity, Plant Growth Regul. 73 (2014) 205–217.

[26]

J. Boyer, M.E. Westgate, Grain yields with limited water, J. Exp. Bot. 55 (2004) 2385–2394.

[27]

E.F. Coelho, F.D.C. Oliveira, E.C.E. Araújo, L.F.L. Vasconcelos, Distribuição de raízes de laranja ‘Pêra’ sob sequeiro e irrigação por microaspersão em solo arenoso, Pesq. Agrop. Brasileira 37 (2002) 603–611.

[28]

G. Liu, G.T. Frescher, X. Pan, J.H.C. Cornelissen, Y. Li, M. Dong, Coordinated variation in leaf and root traits across multiple spatial scales in Chinese semi-arid and arid ecosystems, New Phytol. 188 (2010) 543–553.

[29]

M.T. Tyree, J.S. Sperry, Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Plant Physiol. 88 (1988) 574–580.

[30]

J. Zhu, K.M. Brown, P.J. Lynch, Root cortical aerenchyma improves the drought tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.), Plant Cell Environ. 33 (2010) 740–749.

[31]

M. Iijima, T. Higuchi, P.H. Barlow, Contribution of root cap mucilage and presence of an intact root cap in maize (Zea mays) to the reduction of soil mechanical impedance, Ann. Bot. 94 (2004) 473–477.

[32]

N. Bellaloui, A. Mengistu, L.H.S. Zobiole, H.K. Abbas, A. Kassen, Soybean seed phenolics, sugars, and minerals are altered by charcoal rot infection in MG Ⅲ soybean cultivars, Food Nutr. Sci. 5 (2014) 1843–1859.

[33]

D. Vincent, C. Lapierre, B. Pollet, G. Cornic, L. Negroni, M. Zivy, Water deficits affect caffeate O-methyltransferase, lignification, and related enzymes in maize leaves. A proteomic investigation, Plant Physiol. 137 (2005) 949–960.

[34]

R. Hasibeder, L. Fuchslueger, A. Richter, M. Bahn, Summer drought alters carbon allocation to roots and root respiration in mountain grassland, New Phytol. 3 (2015) 1117–1127.

[35]

C. Wijewardana, M. Hock, B. Henry, K.R. Reddy, Screening corn hybrids for cold tolerance using morphological traits for early-season seeding, Crop Sci. 55 (2015) 851–867.

[36]

R. Tuberosa, Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era, Front. Physiol. 3 (2012) 347.

The Crop Journal
Pages 379-386
Cite this article:
Lavinsky AO, Magalhães PC, Ávila RG, et al. Partitioning between primary and secondary metabolism of carbon allocated to roots in four maize genotypes under water deficit and its effects on productivity. The Crop Journal, 2015, 3(5): 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.04.008

235

Views

2

Downloads

21

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

20

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 22 January 2015
Revised: 26 March 2015
Accepted: 01 June 2015
Published: 06 June 2015
© 2015 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return