AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home The Crop Journal Article
PDF (1.7 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Salt-induced difference between Glycine cyrtoloba and G. max in anti-oxidative ability and K+ vs. Na+ selective accumulation

Kaixing Lua( ), Wona Dinga, Shihua Zhua, De'an Jiangb( )
College of Science & Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

To characterize differences in soybean resistance to salt stress, two soybean species, the wild salt-tolerant soybean Glycine cyrtoloba (serial number ACC547) and the cultivated salt-sensitive soybean G. max (cv. Melrose) were treated with 0, 50, 100, or 150 mmol L−1 NaCl for 5 days. A series of physiological parameters were determined in both shoots and roots, including content of chlorophyll (Chl) and malondialdehyde (MDA); electrolyte leakage (EL); hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentration; superoxide oxygen radical (O2−) production rate; activities of several enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD); and selective ion (Na+ and K+) accumulation. Our results showed that the relative salt tolerance of ACC547 was associated with lower loss of Chl content; lower MDA content, EL, H2O2 concentration, and O2− production rate in both shoots and roots; higher POD activity caused by new isoforms in roots; and higher K+ concentration and K+/Na+ ratio in shoots. These results suggested that relative lower membrane injury, efficient K+ vs. Na+ selective accumulation, and newly induced POD isoenzymes are mechanisms of salt tolerance in soybean.

Keywords

NaClSoybeanAnti-oxidative abilityIon accumulationCell membrane permeability

References

[1]

E.D. Silva, R.J. Nogueira, F.P. Araújo, N.F. Mdlo, A.D. Azevedo Neto, Physiological responses to salt stress in young umbu plants, Environ. Exp. Bot. 63 (2008) 147-157.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]

H. Mercedes, F.G. Nieves, D.V. Pedro, O.A. Enrique, Different role for hydrogen peroxide and the antioxidative system under short and long salt stress in Brassica oleracea roots, J. Exp. Bot. 61 (2010) 521-535.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]

S. Piotr, N.J. Giles, Contrasting responses of photosynthesis to salt stress in the glycophyte Arabidopsis and the halophyte Thellungiella: role of the plastid terminal oxidase as an alternative electron sink, Plant Physiol. 149 (2009) 1154-1165.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

J. Chen, W.H. Wang, T.W. Liu, F.H. Wu, H.L. Zheng, Photosynthetic and antioxidant responses of Liquidambar formosana and Schima superba seedlings to sulfuric-rich and nitric-rich simulated acid rain, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 64 (2013) 41-51.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]

N.B. Amor, A. Jiménez, W. Megdiche, Response of antioxidant systems to NaCl stress in the halophyte Cakile maritima, Physiol. Plant. 126 (2006) 446-457.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]

P.S. Reddy, G. Jogeswar, G.K. Rasineni, M. Maheswari, A.R. Reddy, R.K. Varshney, P.B.K. Kisho, Proline over-accumulation alleviates salt stress and protects photosynthetic and antioxidant enzyme activities in transgenic sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], Plant Physiol. Biochem. 94 (2015) 104-113.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]

V. Mittova, M. Tal, M. Volokita, M. Guy, Up-regulation of the leaf mitochondrial and peroxisomal antioxidative systems in responses to salt-induced oxidative stress in the wild salt-tolerant tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii, Plant Cell Environ. 26 (2003) 845-856.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

D.H. Lee, Y.S. Kim, C.B. Lee, The inductive responses of the antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in the rice (Oryza sativa L.), J. Plant Physiol. 158 (2001) 737-745.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

N. Chaparzadeh, M.L. D'Amico, R.A. Khavari-Nejad, R. Izzo, F. Navari-Izzo, Antioxidative responses of Calendula offıcinalis under salinity conditions, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42 (2004) 695-701.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]

A.M.M. Mekawy, D.V.M. Assaha, H. Yahagi, Y. Tada, A. Ueda, H. Saneoka, Growth, physiological adaptation, and gene expression analysis of two Egyptian rice cultivars under salt stress, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 87 (2015) 17-25.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

X.H. Puyang, M.Y. An, L.B. Han, X.Z. Zhang, Protective effect of spermidine on salt stress induced oxidative damage in two Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) cultivars, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 117 (2015) 96-106.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]

W.X. Wei, P.E. Bilsborrow, P. Hooley, D.A. Fincham, E. Lombi, B.P. Forster, Salinity-induced differences in growth, ion distribution and partitioning in barley between the cultivar Maythorpe and its derived mutant Golden Promise, Plant Soil 250 (2003) 183-191.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
K.F. Zhao, H. Fan, J. Song, Species, types, vegetation ofhalophytes in China and its economic potential, in: X.J. Liu, M.Y. Liu (Eds.), Utilization of Halophytes and SustainableDevelopment of Local Agriculture, China MeteorologicalPress, Beijing 2002, pp. 1–9.
[14]

Y. Yang, C.Q. Yan, B.H. Cao, H.X. Xu, J.P. Chen, D.A. Jiang, Some photosynthetic responses to salinity resistance are transferred into the somatic hybrid descendants from the wild soybean Glydine cyrtoloba ACC547, Physiol. Plant. 38 (2007) 1-12.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]

K.X. Lu, Y. Yang, Y. He, D.A. Jiang, Induction of cyclic electron flow around photosystem 1 and state transition are correlated with salt tolerance in soybean, Photosynthetica 46 (2008) 10-16.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]

K.X. Lu, B.H. Cao, X.P. Feng, Y. He, D.A. Jiang, Photosynthetic response of salt-tolerant and sensitive soybean varieties, Photosynthetica 47 (2009) 381-387.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]

R.J. Porra, W.A. Thompson, P.E. Kriedemann, Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy, BBA Bioenergetics 975 (1989) 384-394.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]

M.L. Dionisio-Sese, S. Tobita, Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress, Plant Sci. 135 (1998) 1-9.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]

I. Cakmak, W.J. Horst, Effect of aluminum on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max), Physiol. Plant. 83 (1991) 463-468.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]

S. Jana, M. Choudhuri, Glycolate metabolism of three submerged aquatic angiosperms during aging, Aquat. Bot. 12 (1981) 345-354.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]

S. Verma, S.N. Mishra, Putrescine alleviation of growth in salt stressed Brassica juncea by inducing antioxidative defense system, J. Plant Physiol 162 (2005) 669-677.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]

H. Thordal-Christensen, Z.G. Zhang, Y.D. Wei, D.B. Collinge, Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley–powdery mildew interaction, Plant J. 11 (1997) 1187-1194.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]

M.M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding, Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248-254.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]

G.N. Giannopolitis, S.K. Ries, Superoxide dismutase I: occurrence in higher plants, Plant Physiol. 59 (1977) 309-315.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]

Z.A. Huang, D.A. Jiang, Y. Yang, J.W. Sun, S.H. Jin, Effects of nitrogen deficiency on gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of rice plants, Photosynthetica 42 (2004) 357-364.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]

H. Urbanek, E. Kuzniak-Gebarowska, K. Herka, Elicitation of defense responses in bean leaves by Botrytis cinerea polygalacturonase, Acta Physiol. Plant. 13 (1991) 43-50.
Google Scholar
[27]

F.M. Seevers, J.M. Daly, F.F. Catedral, The role of peroxidase isozymes in resistance to wheat stem rust disease, Plant Physiol. 48 (1971) 353-360.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]

R.L. Thomas, R.W. Sheard, J.R. Moyer, Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion, Agron. J. 59 (1967) 240-243.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]

K.L. Liu, L. Shen, J.Q. Wang, J.P. Sheng, Rapid inactivation of chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase is responsible for oxidative modification to rubisco in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under cadmium stress, J. Integr. Plant Biol. 50 (2008) 15-26.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]

S.Y. Kim, J.H. Lim, M.R. Park, Y.J. Kim, T.I. Park, Y.W. Seo, K.G. Choi, S.J. Yun, Enhanced antioxidant enzymes are associated with reduced hydrogen peroxide in Barley roots under saline stress, J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38 (2005) 218-224.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]

M. Juan, R.M. Rivero, L. Romero, J.M. Ruiz, Evaluation of some nutritional and biochemical indicators in selecting salt-resistant tomato cultivars, Environ. Exp. Bot. 54 (2005) 93-201.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]

C.W. Yang, D.C. Shi, D.L. Wang, Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of an alkali-resistant halophyte Suaeda glauca (Bge.), Plant Growth Regul. 56 (2008) 179-190.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]

R. Munns, R.A. James, A. Läuchli, Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals, J. Exp. Bot. 57 (2006) 1025-1043.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]

X. Zhao, X.J. Yang, Y. Shi, M.Z. He, H.J. Tan, X.R. Li, Ion absorption and distribution of symbiotic Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerine seedlings under NaCl stress, Acta Ecol. Sin. 34 (2014) 963-972 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Crossref Google Scholar
The Crop Journal
Volume 4 Issue 2,
April 2016
Pages 129-138
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.01.002
Cite this article:
Lu K, Ding W, Zhu S, et al. Salt-induced difference between Glycine cyrtoloba and G. max in anti-oxidative ability and K+ vs. Na+ selective accumulation. The Crop Journal, 2016, 4(2): 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.01.002

208

Views

1

Downloads

12

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

13

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 23 September 2015
Revised: 29 October 2015
Accepted: 02 February 2016
Published: 10 February 2016
© 2016 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Return