AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (787.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Evaluation of the CROPGRO-Peanut model in simulating appropriate sowing date and phosphorus fertilizer application rate for peanut in a subtropical region of eastern India

Debjani Haldera( )Rabindra Kumar PandabRajiv Kumar SrivastavacShyamal Kheroard
Department of Agriculture, Government of West Bengal, Mathabhanga, Cooch Behar 736 146, West Bengal, India
School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 013, Odisha, India
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, West Bengal, India
Department of Agronomy, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar 736 165, West Bengal, India

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Projected changes in weather parameters, mainly temperature and rainfall, have already started to show their effect on agricultural production. To cope with the changing scenarios, adoption of appropriate management strategies is of paramount importance. A study was undertaken to evaluate the most appropriate combination of sowing date and phosphorus fertilization level for peanut crops grown in sandy loam soil in a subhumid region of eastern India. Field experiments were conducted during the summer seasons of 2012 and 2013 on peanut crops at the farm of the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. The DSSAT v4.5 CROPGRO-Peanut model was used to predict the phenology, growth, and yield of peanut crop under combinations of four sowing dates and four phosphorus fertilization levels. The model was calibrated with a 2012 dataset of growth, phenology, and yield parameters for estimating the genetic coefficients of cultivar TMV-2 and was validated with a 2013 dataset of the same parameters. Simulations of pod yield and other yield parameters using the calibrated model were found to be quite accurate. The model was able to reasonably simulate pod yield and final biomass with low normalized root mean square error (RMSEn), low absolute root mean square error (RMSEa) and high coefficient of determination (R2>0.7) over a wide range of sowing dates and different phosphorus fertilization levels sensitivity analysis indicated that sowing from the second week of January to the end of February with 30–50kgP2O5ha-1 would give the highest pod yield.

References

[1]

B.M. Sharma, J.S.P. Yaday, Availability of phosphorus to grain as influenced by phosphatic fertilization and irrigation regimes, Indian J. Agric Sci. 46 (1997) 205-210.

[2]

C. Putto, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, K. Pannangpetch, K.J. Boote, G. Hoogenboom, Determination of efficient test sites for evaluation of peanut breeding lines using the CSM CROPGRO peanut model, Field Crop Res. 110 (2009) 272-281.

[3]

C.J. Pigott, The effect of fertilizer on yield and quality of groundnuts in Sierra Leone, Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 28 (1960) 58-64.

[4]

D. Halder, R.K. Panda, Determination of appropriate planting dates and phosphorus fertilization strategy for peanut in eastern India, Afr. J. Agric. Res. 9 (2014) 2475-2487.

[5]

D. Wallach, B. Goffinet, Mean squared error of prediction in models for studying ecological and agronomic systems, Biometrics 43 (1987) 561-573.

[6]
G. Hoogenboom, J.W. Jones, P.W. Wilkens, C.H. Porter, W.D. Batchelor, L.A. Hunt, K.J. Boote, U. Singh, O. Uryasev, W.T. Bowen, A.J. Gijsman, A.S. Du Toit, J.W. White, G.Y. Tsuji, Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Version 4.0 [CD-ROM], University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 2004.
[7]
G. Hoogenboom, P.W. Wilkens, G.Y. Tsuji, DSSAT v3, vol. 4, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1999.
[8]
G.Y. Tsuji, G. Uehara, S. Balas, DSSAT v3, vols. 1–3, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1994.
[9]

J. Anothai, A. Patrothai, S. Jogloy, K. Pannagpeth, K.J. Boote, G. Hoogenboom, A sequential approach for determining the cultivar coefficients of peanut lines using an end of season data of crop performance trials, Field Crop Res. 108 (2008) 169-178.

[10]

J.H. Young, F.R. Cox, C.K. Martin, A peanut growth and development model, Peanut Sci. 6 (1979) 27-36.

[11]
J.H. Young, L.J. Rainey, Simulation of planting dates, irrigation treatments and defoliation effects on peanut yields using peanut, 1986 Proceedings of American Peanut Research and Education Society, Inc., July 15–18, 1986, Virginia Beach, Virginia 1986, p. 48.
[12]

J.W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom, C.H. Porter, K.J. Boote, W.D. Batchelor, L.A. Hunt, P.W. Wilkens, U. Singh, A.J. Gijsman, J.T. Ritchie, The DSSAT cropping system model, Eur. J. Agron. 18 (2003) 235-265.

[13]

K. Loague, R.E. Green, Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application, J. Contam. Hydrol. 7 (1991) 51-73.

[14]

N. Khan, M.I. Uddin Faridullah, Agronomic characters of groundnut (Arachis hypogeae L.) genotypes affected by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization under rainfed condition, Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. (2009) 61-68.

[15]
K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, G. Burgeois, Validation of PNUTGRO, a crop growth simulation model for peanut, 1987 Proceedings of American Peanut Research and Education Society, Inc., vol. 19, 1988, p. 40 (July 14–17, 1987, Orlando, Florida).
[16]
K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom, N.B. Pickering, The CROPGRO model for grain legumes, in: G.Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, P.K. Thornton (Eds.), Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands 1998, pp. 99–128.
[17]
K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom, Research and management applications of the PNUTGRO crop growth model, in: J.R. Sholar (Ed.)1988 Proceedings of American Peanut Research and Education Society, Inc., vol. 20, 1988, p. 57 (July 12–15, 1988, Tulsa, Oklahoma).
[18]
K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, J.W. Mishoe, G.G. Wilkerson, Modeling growth and yield of groundnut, Agrometeorology of Groundnut, Proceedings of an International Symposium, ICRISAT Sahelian Center, Niamey, Niger, August 21–26, 1985, Patancheru, AP, India 1986, pp. 243–254.
[19]

L.A. Hunt, S. Pararajasingham, J.W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom, D.T. Imamura, R.M. Ogoshi, GENCALC: software to facilitate the use of crop models for analyzing field experiments, Agron. J. 85 (1993) 1090–1094.

[20]

M. Raychaudhury, S.V. Ngachan, S. Raychaudhury, A.L. Singh, Yield response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) to dual inoculation and liming of an acid hill ultisol of Manipur, Indian J. Agric. Sci. 73 (2003) 86-88.

[21]

M.J. Bell, Effect of sowing date on growth and development of irrigated peanuts, Arachis hypogea L. cv. Early Bunch, in a monsoonal tropical environment, Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37 (1986) 361-373.

[22]
P.S. Reddy, Studies on Groundnut Based Cropping Systems Under Well Irrigation(Ph.D. Dissertation) Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 1992.
[23]

P. Banterng, A. Patanothai, K. Pannagpetch, S. Jogly, G. Hoogenboom, Seasonal variation in the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut lines, J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 141 (2003) 51-62.

[24]

P. Singh, K.J. Boote, A.Y. Rao, M.R. Iruthayaraj, A.M. Sheikh, S.S. Hundal, R.S. Narang, P. Singh, Evaluation of the groundnut model PNUTGRO for crop response to water availability, sowing dates and seasons, Field Crops Res. 39 (1994) 147-162.

[25]

P.K. Bandyopadhyay, S. Mallick, S.K. Rana, Water balance and crop coefficients of summer-grown peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a humid tropical region of India, Irrig. Sci. 23 (2005) 161-169.

[26]

P.L. Patil, G.S. Dasog, R. Ranjit, Effect of lime and phosphorus levels on nutrient uptake by groundnut genotypes in acid soils of coastal agro eco system of Karnataka, Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 20 (2007) 631-633.

[27]
P.S. Kashyap, Effective Management of Irrigation Water for Potato in Subtropical Region(Ph.D. Thesis) Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, 2001.
[28]
C.R.S.P. Peanut, Improving Global Production and Use of Peanuts: Annual Report, 1996, University of Georgia, Griffin, USA, 1997.
[29]

R.W. Mozingo, T.A. Coffelt, F.S. Wright, The influence of planting and digging dates on yield, value and grade of four Virginia-type peanut cultivars, Peanut Sci. 18 (1991) 55-62.

[30]
S. Karmakar, B.N. Mittra, B.C. Ghosh, Comparative efficiency of organic and industrial wastes in improving productivity of acid lateritic soil under rice-groundnut cropping system, Proceedings of First All India Peoples' Technology Congress, February 21–23, Calcutta, India 1997, pp. 24–27.
[31]
S.M. Rao, Studies on Reproductive Efficiency and Timing Patterns of Developmental Stages in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)(Master Thesis) Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 1982.
[32]

S.S. Prihar, R.S. Tripathi, Dry matter, nodulation and nutrient uptake in chickpea as influenced by irrigation and phosphorus, Exp. Agric. 25 (1989) 349-355.

[33]
S.A. Paul, N.D. William, Microeconomics, 17th ed. McGrawHill, New York, USA, 2001 110.
[34]

T.T.T. Ha, Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on groundnut yield in poor alluvial and sandy soils of Thua Thien Hue, Better Crops Int. 17 (2003) 16-17.

[35]
V. Pandey, A.M. Shekh, R.P. Vadodaria, B.K. Bhatt, Evaluation of CROPGRO peanut model for two genotypes under different environment, Paper Presented at the National Seminar on Agro Meteorological Research for Sustainable Agricultural Production at Gujrat Agricultural University, Anand, India, 2001.
The Crop Journal
Pages 317-325
Cite this article:
Halder D, Panda RK, Srivastava RK, et al. Evaluation of the CROPGRO-Peanut model in simulating appropriate sowing date and phosphorus fertilizer application rate for peanut in a subtropical region of eastern India. The Crop Journal, 2017, 5(4): 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.02.005

240

Views

1

Downloads

5

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

10

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 28 August 2016
Revised: 04 February 2017
Accepted: 09 February 2017
Published: 01 April 2017
© 2017 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return