AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (275.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Diallel analyses of soluble sugar content in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)

Maina Antoine Nassouroua( )Tchiagam Jean Baptiste NoubissiéaYanou Nicolas Njintanga,bJoseph Martin Bellc
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 454, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, ENSAI, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 455, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon
Genetics and Plant Breeding Unit, Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The content of soluble sugar in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) seeds is important for their acceptability to consumers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic control of soluble sugar content in cowpea using diallel analysis. For this purpose, half-diallel crosses were made among seven diverse parents. The amount of total soluble sugar was estimated by the phenol sulfuric acid reagent method and reducing sugar were measured by the DNS (3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid) reagent method. The total soluble sugar ranged from 11.12 (VYA) to 40.79 mg g−1 (IT93K-693-2) with a mean of 22.31 mg g−1. Reducing soluble sugar showed a mean value of 9.11 mg g−1 and ranged from 13.61 (TVx 3236) to 4.98 mg g−1 (Lori niébé). Diallel analysis showed that both additive and non-additive gene effects were significant in the genetic control of these traits. However, dominance variance was greater than additive variance for soluble sugar. The traits were controlled mainly by an overdominance model, suggesting the advantage of delaying selection to later generations. Soluble sugar content was found to be highly heritable, with broad-sense heritability ranging from 0.987 to 0.976. Narrow-sense heritability ranged from 0.154 to 0.422 and revealed the lower importance of additive variance. Parents and F1 hybrids differed significantly on the basis of their general and specific combining abilities, respectively. Recessive alleles had positive effects on total soluble sugar and reducing soluble sugar. These results could help cowpea breeders improve the acceptability of cowpea seeds and cowpea-based foods by appropriate selection.

References

[1]

E.A. Hall, N. Cissé, S. Thiaw, H.O.A. Elawad, J.D. Ehlers, A.M. Ismail, R.L. Fery, P.A. Roberts, L.W. Kitch, L.L. Murdock, O. Boukar, R.D. Phillips, K.H. Mc Watters, Development of cowpea cultivars and germplasm by the bean/cowpea CRSP, Field Crops Res. 82 (2003) 103-134.

[2]

I.M. Vasconcelos, F.M.M. Maia, D.F. Farias, C.C. Campello, A.F.U. Carvalho, R. de Azevedo Moreira, J.T.A. de Oliveira, Protein fractions, amino acid composition and antinutritional constituents of high-yielding cowpea cultivars, J. Food Compos. Anal. 23 (2010) 54-60.

[3]

Y.N. Sreerama, V.B. Sashikala, V.M. Pratape, V. Singh, Nutrients and antinutrients in cowpea and horse gram flours in comparison to chickpea flour: evaluation of their flour functionality, Food Chem. 131 (2012) 462-468.

[4]

L.W. Kitch, O. Boukar, C. Endondo, L.L. Murdock, Farmer acceptability criteria in breeding cowpea, Exp. Agric. 34 (1998) 475-486.

[5]

M. Sugimoto, H. Goto, K. Otomo, M. Ito, H. Onuma, A. Suzuki, M. Sugawara, S. Abe, M. Tomita, T. Soga, Metabolomic profiles and sensory attributes of edamame under various storage duration and temperature conditions, J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 (2010) 8418-8425.

[6]

A. Hou, P. Chen, J. Alloatti, D. Li, L. Mozzoni, B. Zhang, A. Shi, Genetic variability of seed sugar content in worldwide soybean germplasm collections, Crop Sci. 49 (2009) 903-912.

[7]

Y.S. Li, M. Du, Q.Y. Zhang, G.H. Wang, M. Hashemi, X.B. Liu, Greater differences exist in seed protein, oil, total soluble sugar and sucrose content of vegetable soybean genotypes [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] in Northeast China, Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 6 (2012) 1681-1686.

[8]

Mb.D. Faye, A. Jooste, J. Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. Fulton, Impact of sucrose contents and cooking time on cowpea prices in Senegal, South Africa, J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 9 (2006) 207-212.

[9]

J.B.N. Tchiagam, E. Youmbi, N.Y. Njintang, J.M. Bell, A.N. Maina, Generation means analysis of seed sucrose content in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.), Asian J. Agric. Sci. 3 (2011) 475-480.

[10]

P.J. Maughan, M.A. Saghai-Maroof, G.R. Buss, Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling sucrose content in soybean (Glycine max), Mol. Breed. 6 (2000) 105-111.

[11]

T. Mebrahtu, T.E. Devine, Diallel analysis of sugar composition of 10 vegetable soybean lines, Plant Breed. 128 (2009) 249-252.

[12]
K. Mather, J.L. Jinks, Biometrical Genetics: The Study ofContinuous Variation, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1982.
[13]

E.A. Baryeh, Physical properties of bambara groundnuts, J. Food Eng. 47 (2001) 321-326.

[14]

M.A. Nassourou, Y.N. Njintang, T.J.B. Noubissié, R.M. Nguimbou, J.M. Bell, Genetics of seed flavonoid content and antioxidant activity in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.), Crop J. 4 (2016) 391-397.

[15]

R.D. Phillips, M.S. Chinnan, A.L. Branch, J. Miller, K.H. McWatters, Effects of treatment on functional and nutritional properties of cowpea meal, J. Food Sci. 53 (1988) 805-809.

[16]

V.P. Meena, M.C. Meena, S.L. Sharma, Quantitative estimation of some metabolites and enzymes in insect induced leaf galls of Ficus religiosa, Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res. 4 (2014) 1-7.

[17]

M. Dubois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers, F. Smith, Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances, Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 350-356.

[18]

G.L. Miller, Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar, Anal. Chem. 31 (1959) 426-428.

[19]
Manugistics, Statgraphics Plus 5.0 for Windows, ManugisticsInc., Rockville, Maryland, USA, 1997.
[20]

Y. Ukai, A microcomputer program DIALL for diallel analysis of quantitative characters, Jpn. J. Breed. 39 (1989) 107-109.

[21]

D.E. Walters, J.R. Morton, On the analysis of variance of a half diallel table, Biometrics 34 (1978) 91-94.

[22]

B.I. Hayman, The theory and analysis of diallel crosses, Genetics 39 (1954) 789-809.

[23]

B. Griffing, A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance, Heredity 30 (1956) 31-51.

[24]

S. Fonsecca, F.L. Patterson, Hybrid vigour in seven parent diallel cross of common wheat (T. aestivum L.), Crop Sci. 2 (1968) 85-88.

[25]

D.F. Apata, Effect of cooking methods on available and unavailable carbohydrates of some tropical grain legumes, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7 (2008) 2940-2945.

[26]

R. Koffi-Nevry, M. Koussémon, W.A.M. Alloue-Boraud, K. Kouassi, Assessing the microbiological level and the incidence of water-soaking on the proximate composition of two cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) grains grown in Côte d'Ivoire, Brit. Microbiol. Res. J. 3 (2013) 206-217.

[27]

M.A.M. Mune, S.R. Minka, I. Lape Mbome, Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of a cowpea protein concentrate, Glob. Adv. Res. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2 (2013) 35-43.

[28]

K. Sadaiah, V.N. Reddy, S.S. Kumar, Heterosis and combining ability studies for sugar content in sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata L.), Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 3 (2013) 1-5.

[29]

K.E. McPhee, R.S. Zemetra, J. Brown, J.R. Myers, Genetic analysis of the raffinose family oligosaccharides in common bean, J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127 (2002) 376-382.

[30]
J.D. Ehlers, R.L. Fery, A.E. Hall, Cowpea breeding in the USA: new varieties and improved germplasm, in: C.A. Fatokun, S.A. Tarawali, B.B. Singh, P.M. Kormawa, M. Tamò (Eds.), Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing SustainableCowpea Production. Proceedings of the World CowpeaConference III Held at the International Institute of TropicalAgriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 4–8 September 2000, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria 2002, pp. 62–77.
[31]

B.K. Wahba, H.E.M. Zaki, Y.M.M. Moustafa, Y.Y. Abdel Ati, S.H. Gadelhak, Quantitative inheritance of total soluble solids and flour color in sweet-field corn crosses, Nat. Sci. 13 (2015) 137-145.

[32]

G. Angenon, J. De Clercq, W. Dillen, A. Gossens, J. Kapila, M. Zambre, M. Van Montagu, Strategies for improving the nutritional quality of Phaseolus beans through gene engineering, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 3 (1999) 233-236.

The Crop Journal
Pages 553-559
Cite this article:
Nassourou MA, Noubissié TJB, Njintang YN, et al. Diallel analyses of soluble sugar content in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). The Crop Journal, 2017, 5(6): 553-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.05.005

227

Views

2

Downloads

7

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

8

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 27 December 2016
Revised: 07 May 2017
Accepted: 07 May 2017
Published: 29 June 2017
© 2017 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return