AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Breeding effects on the genotype × environment interaction for yield of durum wheat grown after the Green Revolution: The case of Spain

Fadia Chairia,bNieves ApariciocMaria Dolores Serreta,bJosé Luis Arausa,b( )
Section of Plant Physiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
AGROTECNIO (Center of Research in Agrotechnology), Lleida, Spain
Instituto de Tecnología Agraria de Castilla y León (ITACyL), Valladolid, Spain

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This study evaluates the changes caused by breeding in the genotype by environment (G × E) interaction of the durum wheat varieties most widely cultivated in Spain after the Green Revolution. A set of 12 cultivars was tested in 27 environments, which are understood as the combination of different sites, years, and treatments (water regime and planting dates), representative of the durum wheat growing conditions in Spain with average grain yields (GY) ranging between 2.8 and 9.1 Mg ha−1. The most important environmental factors affecting the G × E interaction for yield were themaximum and the mean temperature during the entire crop cycle. An improvement in genetic yield was observed in warm environments and under optimal water conditions that resemble those where the germplasm originated (essentially as advanced lines) before its release in Spain. Therefore, the adaptation of semi-dwarf durum in Spain has shown a tendency to specific adaptation rather than large-scale adaptation. Two different patterns of selection have been reported due the G × E interaction and changes in the ranking of genotypes: in the high yielding environments (GY > 5 Mg ha−1), plants favor increased water uptake, with higher levels of transpiration and more open stomata (more negative values of carbon isotope composition, δ13C, and higher canopy temperature depression, CTD), whereas, in low yielding environments (GY < 5 Mg ha−1) plants close their stomata and favor greater water use efficiency (less negative δ13C values and lower CTD values).

References

[1]

C. Guzmán, J.E. Autrique, S. Mondal, R.P. Singh, V. Govindan, A. Morales-Dorantes, G. Posadas-Romano, J. Crossa, K. Ammar, R.J. Peña, Response to drought and heat stress on wheat quality, with special emphasis on bread-making quality, in durum wheat, Field Crops Res. 186 (2016) 157–165.

[2]

J.L. Araus, T. Amaro, J. Voltas, H. Nakkoul, M.M. Nachit, Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection criterion for grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions, Field Crops Res. 55 (1998) 209–223.

[3]

P. De Vita, A.M. Mastrangelo, L. Matteu, E. Mazzucotelli, N. Virzì, M. Palumbo, M. Lo Storto, F. Rizza, L. Cattivelli, Genetic improvement effects on yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy, Field Crops Res. 119 (2010) 68–77.

[4]

L.F. García Del Moral, Y. Rharrabti, S. Elhani, V. Martos, C. Royo, Yield formation in Mediterranean durum wheats under two contrasting water regimes based on path-coefficient analysis, Euphytica 146 (2005) 203–212.

[5]

D. Lobell, C. Field, D.B. Lobell, C.B. Field, Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming, Environ. Res. Lett. 2 (2007) 7.

[6]

C. Royo, F. Álvaro, V. Martos, A. Ramdani, J. Isidro, D. Villegas, L.F. García del Moral, Genetic changes in durum wheat yield components and associated traits in Italian and Spanish varieties during the 20th century, Euphytica 155 (2007) 259–270.

[7]

F. Álvaro, J. Isidro, D. Villegas, L.F. García del Moral, C. Royo, Old and modern durum wheat varieties from Italy and Spain differ in main spike components, Field Crops Res. 106 (2008) 86–93.

[8]

K.A.B. Aisawi, M.P. Reynolds, R.P. Singh, M.J. Foulkes, The physiological basis of the genetic progress in yield potential of CIMMYT spring wheat cultivars from 1966 to 2009, Crop Sci. 55 (2015) 1749–1764.

[9]

F. Chairi, O. Vergara-Diaz, T. Vatter, N. Aparicio, M.T. Nieto-Taladriz, S.C. Kefauver, J. Bort, M.D. Serret, J.L. Araus, Post-green revolution genetic advance in durum wheat: the case of Spain, Field Crops Res. 228 (2018) 158–169.

[10]

A. Del Pozo, I. Matus, M.D. Serret, J.L. Araus, A. Pozo, I. Matus, M.D. Serret, J.L. Araus, A. Del Pozo, I. Matus, M.D. Serret, J.L. Araus, Agronomic and physiological traits associated with breeding advances of wheat under high-productive Mediterranean conditions. The case of Chile, Environ. Exp. Bot. 103 (2014) 180–189.

[11]

J. Subira, F. Alvaro, L.F. García del Moral, C. Royo, Breeding effects on the cultivar × environment interaction of durum wheat yield, Eur. J. Agron. 68 (2015) 78–88.

[12]

M. Sanchez-Garcia, F. Álvaro, J.A. Martín-Sánchez, J.C. Sillero, J. Escribano, C. Royo, Breeding effects on the genotype × environment interaction for yield of bread wheat grown in Spain during the 20th century, Field Crops Res. 126 (2012) 79–86.

[13]

H.C. Becker, L. Leon, Stability analysis in plant breeding, Plant Breed. 101 (1988) 1–23.

[14]
M.P. Reynolds, S. Rajaram, A. McNab, Increasing Yield Potential in Wheat: Breaking the Barriers, Proceedings of a workshop held in Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, Mexico, March, 1996, CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F, Mexico, https://repository.cimmyt.org/bitstream/handle/10883/1216/62227.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on February 14, 2020).
[15]

S. Ceccarelli, S. Grando, Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder, Plant Growth Regul. 20 (1996) 149–155.

[16]

J.L. Araus, G.A. Slafer, M.P. Reynolds, C. Royo, Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 925–940.

[17]
C. Royo, G.A. Briceño-Félix, Spanish wheat pool, in: A.P. Bojean, W.J. Angus, M. van Ginkel (Eds.), The World Wheat Book. A History of Wheat Breeding, vol 2, Lavoisier, Paris, France 2011, pp. 121–154.
[18]

J.C. Zadoks, T.T. Chang, C.F. Konzak, A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, Weed Res. 14 (1974) 415–421.

[19]
T.B. Coplen, Explanatory glossary of terms used in expression of relative isotope ratios and gas ratios, IUPAC recommendations, http://old.iupac.org/reports/provisional/abstract08/coplen_prs.pdf 2008, Accessed date: 28 November 2017.
[20]
H.G.J. Gauch, Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1992.
[21]
A. Pacheco, M. Vargas, G. Alvarado, F. Rodríguez, J. Crossa, J. Burgueño, GEA-R (Genotype × Environment Analysis with R for Windows) Version 4.0, CIMMYT, 2015 (hdl: 11529/10203, CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network, V16).
[22]

K.G. Biometrika, The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis, Biometrika 58 (1971) 453–467.

[23]

J. Crossa, P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram, H.G. Gauch, AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial, Theor. Appl. Genet. 81 (1991) 27–37.

[24]

C. Royo, M. Maccaferri, F. Álvaro, M. Moragues, M.C. Sanguineti, R. Tuberosa, F. Maalouf, L.F. Garcia del Moral, A. Demontis, S. Rhouma, M. Nachit, N. Nserallah, D. Villegas, Understanding the relationships between genetic and phenotypic structures of a collection of elite durum wheat accessions, Field Crops Res. 119 (2010) 91–105.

[25]

S. Fukai, M. Cooper, Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice, Field Crops Res. 40 (1995) 67–86.

[26]

M.R. Bellon, Crop research to benefit poor farmers in marginal areas of the developing world: a review of technical challenges and tools, CAB Rev. 1 (2006) 1–11.

[27]

E. Acevedo, P.Q. Craufurd, P. Pérez-Marco, R.B. Austin, Traits associated with high yield in barley in low-rainfall environments, J. Agric. Sci. 116 (1991) 23–36.

[28]

S. Ceccarelli, S. Grando, Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research, Euphytica 155 (2007) 349–360.

[29]

S. Ceccarelli, W. Erskine, J. Hamblin, S. Grando, Genotype by environment interaction and international breeding programmes, Exp. Agric. 30 (1994) 177–187.

[30]

S. Gbegbelegbe, D. Cammarano, S. Asseng, R. Robertson, U. Chung, M. Adam, O. Abdalla, T. Payne, M. Reynolds, K. Sonder, B. Shiferaw, G. Nelson, Baseline simulation for global wheat production with CIMMYT mega-environment specific cultivars, Field Crops Res. 202 (2017) 122–135.

[31]

J.L. Araus, J. Bort, P. Steduto, D. Villegas, C. Royo, Breeding cereals for Mediterranean conditions: ecophysiological clues for biotechnology application, Ann. Appl. Biol. 142 (2003) 129–141.

[32]

A. Blum, Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress, Field Crops Res. 112 (2009) 119–123.

[33]

R.A. Fischer, D. Rees, K.D. Sayre, Z.M. Lu, A.G. Condon, A.L. Saavedra, Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies, Crop Sci. 38 (1998) 1467–1475.

[34]

P. Monneveux, M.P. Reynolds, R. Trethowan, H. González-Santoyo, R.J. Peña, F. Zapata, Relationship between grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat under four water regimes, Eur. J. Agron. 22 (2005) 231–242.

[35]

W.J. Choi, J.H. Kwak, S.S. Lim, H.J. Park, S.X. Chang, S.M. Lee, M.A. Arshad, S.I. Yun, H.Y. Kim, Synthetic fertilizer and livestock manure differently affect δ15N in the agricultural landscape: a review, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 237 (2017) 1–15.

The Crop Journal
Pages 623-634
Cite this article:
Chairi F, Aparicio N, Serret MD, et al. Breeding effects on the genotype × environment interaction for yield of durum wheat grown after the Green Revolution: The case of Spain. The Crop Journal, 2020, 8(4): 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.01.005

221

Views

1

Downloads

32

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

30

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 18 October 2019
Revised: 17 December 2019
Accepted: 19 February 2020
Published: 21 March 2020
© 2019 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return