AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Genome-wide association study identifies novel candidate loci or genes affecting stalk strength in maize

Shuhui Xua,c,1Xiao Tanga,1Xiaomin Zhangd,1Houmiao Wanga,bWeidong JiaChenwu Xua,bZefeng Yanga,b( )Pengcheng Lia,b( )
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Stalk strength increases resistance to stalk lodging, which causes maize (Zea mays L.) production losses worldwide. The genetic mechanisms regulating stalk strength remain unclear. In this study, three stalk strength-related traits (rind penetrometer resistance, stalk crushing strength, and stalk bending strength) and four plant architecture traits (plant height, ear height, stem diameter, stem length) were measured in three field trials. Substantial phenotypic variation was detected for these traits. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted using general and mixed linear models and 372,331 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A total of 94 quantitative trait loci including 241 SNPs were detected. By combining the GWAS data with public gene expression data, 56 candidate genes within 50 kb of the significant SNPs were identified, including genes encoding flavonol synthase (GRMZM2G069298, ZmFLS2), nitrate reductase (GRMZM5G878558, ZmNR2), glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase (GRMZM2G027955), and laccase (GRMZM2G447271). Resequencing GRMZM2G069298 and GRMZM5G878558 in all tested lines revealed respectively 47 and 2 variants associated with RPR. Comparison of the RPR of the zmnr2 EMS mutant and the wild-type plant under high- and low-nitrogen conditions verified the GRMZM5G878558 function. These findings may be useful for clarifying the genetic basis of stalk strength. The identified candidate genes and variants may be useful for the genetic improvement of maize lodging resistance.

References

[1]

X. Wang, Z. Shi, R. Zhang, X. Sun, J. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhao, A. Su, C. Li, R. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Song, J. Zhao, Stalk architecture, cell wall composition, and QTL underlying high stalk flexibility for improved lodging resistance in maize, BMC Plant Biol. 20 (2020) 515.

[2]

M.S. Zuber, M.S. Kang, Corn lodging slowed by sturdier stalks, Crops Soils 30 (1978) 13–15.

[3]

S.A. Flint-Garcia, C. Jampatong, L.L. Darrah, M.D. McMullen, Quantitative trait locus analysis of stalk strength in four maize populations, Crop Sci. 43 (2003) 13–22.

[4]

C.J. Baker, P.M. Berry, J.H. Spink, R. Sylvester-Bradley, J.M. Griffin, R.K. Scott, R. W. Clare, A method for the assessment of the risk of wheat lodging, J. Theor. Biol. 194 (1998) 587–603.

[5]

M. Zhang, W. Hui, Y. Yuan, J. Ding, X. Zhu, Effect of nitrogen levels and nitrogen ratios on lodging resistance and yield potential of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), PLoS ONE 12 (2017) e0187543.

[6]

Q. Sun, X. Liu, J. Yang, W. Liu, Q. Du, H. Wang, C. Fu, W.X. Li, MicroRNA528 affects lodging resistance of maize by regulating lignin biosynthesis under nitrogen-luxury conditions, Mol. Plant 11 (2018) 806–814.

[7]

I. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, X.N. Yang, X.P. Meng, B.P. Yang, T. Liu, Q.F. Han, R. Leegood, Effect of uniconazole and nitrogen level on lodging resistance and yield potential of maize under medium and high plant density, Plant Biol. 23 (2021) 485–496.

[8]

D.J. Robertson, M. Julias, S.Y. Lee, D.D. Cook, Maize stalk lodging: morphological determinants of stalk strength, Crop Sci. 57 (2017) 926–934.

[9]

J. Xue, R.Z. Xie, W.F. Zhang, KR. Wang, P. Hou, B.O. Ming, L. Gou, S. Li, Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and-density maize, J. Integr. Agric. 16 (2017) 2717–2725.

[10]

B. Shiferaw, B.M. Prasanna, J. Hellin, M. Bänziger, Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security, Food Secur. 3 (2011) 307–327.

[11]

B. Zhao, M. Xu, Y. Zhao, Y. Li, H. Xu, C. Li, D. Kong, Y. Xie, Z. Zheng, B. Wang, H. Wang, Overexpression of ZmSPL12 confers enhanced lodging resistance through transcriptional regulation of D1 in maize, Plant Biotechnol. J. 20 (2022) 622–624.

[12]

C. Liu, S. Zheng, J. Gui, C. Fu, H. Yu, D. Song, J. Shen, P. Qin, X. Liu, B. Han, Y. Yang, L. Li, Shortened basal internodes encodes a gibberellin 2-oxidase and contributes to lodging resistance in rice, Mol. Plant 11 (2018) 288–299.

[13]

H.A. Esechie, Relationship of stalk morphology and chemical composition to lodging resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) in a rainforest zone, J. Agric. Sci. 104 (1985) 429–433.

[14]

R. Kumar, A. Gyawali, G.D. Morrison, C.A. Saski, R.S. Sekhon, Genetic architecture of maize rind strength revealed by the analysis of divergently selected populations, Plant Cell Physiol. 62 (2021) 1199–1214.

[15]

W.A. Berzonsky, J.A. Hawk, T.D. Pizzolato, Anatomical characteristics of three Inbred lines and two maize synthetics recurrently selected for high and low stalk crushing strength, Crop Sci. 26 (1986) 482–488.

[16]

Q. Wang, J. Xue, J. l. Chen, Y.H. Fan, G.Q. Zhang, R.Z. Xie, B.O. Ming, P. Hou, K.R. Wang, S.K. Li, Key indicators affecting maize stalk lodging resistance of different growth periods under different sowing dates, J. Integr. Agric. 19 (2020) 2419–2428.

[17]

M.S. Zuber, T.R. Colbert, L.L. Darrah, Effect of recurrent selection for crushing strength on several stalk components in maize, Crop Sci. 20 (1980) 711–717.

[18]

K. Li, J. Yan, J. Li, X. Yang, Genetic architecture of rind penetrometer resistance in two maize recombinant inbred line populations, BMC Plant Biol. 14 (2014) 152–162.

[19]

Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Lin, J. Wang, H. Liu, L. Zhou, S. Zhong, Y. Li, C. Zhu, J. Lai, X. Li, J. Yu, Z. Lin, A large transposon insertion in the stiff1 promoter increases stalk strength in maize, Plant Cell 32 (2020) 152–165.

[20]

J.A. Peiffer, S.A. Flint-Garcia, N.D. Leon, M. Mcmullen, S.M. Kaeppler, E.S. Buckler, The genetic architecture of maize stalk strength, PLoS ONE 8 (2013) e67066.

[21]

H. Hu, Y. Meng, H. Wang, H. Liu, S. Chen, Identifying quantitative trait loci and determining closely related stalk traits for rind penetrometer resistance in a high-oil maize population, Theor. Appl. Genet. 124 (2012) 1439–1447.

[22]

Y. Zhang, P. Liu, X. Zhang, Q.I. Zheng, M. Chen, F. Ge, Z. Li, W. Sun, Z. Guan, T. Liang, Y. Zheng, X. Tan, C. Zou, H. Peng, G. Pan, Y. Shen, Multi-locus genomewide association study reveals the genetic architecture of stalk lodging resistance-related traits in maize, Front. Plant Sci. 9 (2018) 611.

[23]

Y. Zhang, T. Liang, M. Chen, Y. Zhang, T. Wang, H. Lin, T. Rong, C. Zou, P. Liu, M. Lee, G. Pan, Y. Shen, T. Lübberstedt, Genetic dissection of stalk lodging-related traits using an IBM Syn10 DH population in maize across three environments (Zea mays L.), Mol. Genet. Genomics 294 (2019) 1277–1288.

[24]

Y.U. Guo, Y. Hu, H. Chen, P. Yan, Q. Du, Y. Wang, H. Wang, Z. Wang, D. Kang, W. X. Li, Identification of traits and genes associated with lodging resistance in maize, Crop J. 9 (2021) 1408–1417.

[25]

P. Li, T. Pan, H. Wang, J. Wei, M. Chen, X. Hu, Y. u. Zhao, X. Yang, S. Yin, Y. Xu, H. Fang, J. Liu, C. Xu, Z. Yang, Natural variation of ZmHKT1 affects root morphology in maize at the seedling stage, Planta 249 (2019) 879–889.

[26]

H. Wang, J. Wei, P. Li, Y. Wang, C. Xu, Integrating GWAS and gene expression analysis identifies candidate genes for root morphology traits in maize at the seedling stage, Genes 10 (2019) 773.

[27]

H. Wang, X. Tang, X. Yang, Y. Fan, Y. Xu, P. Li, C. Xu, Z. Yang, Exploiting natural variation in crown root traits via genome-wide association studies in maize, BMC Plant Biol. 21 (2021) 346.

[28]
R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021, https://www.R-project.org/.
[29]

S.J. Knapp, W.W. Stroup, W.M. Ross, Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis1, Crop Sci. 25 (1985) 192–194.

[30]

P.J. Bradbury, Z. Zhang, D.E. Kroon, T.M. Casstevens, Y. Ramdoss, E.S. Buckler, TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples, Bioinformatics 23 (2007) 2633–2635.

[31]

D.H. Alexander, J. Novembre, K. Lange, Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals, Genome Res. 19 (2009) 1655–1664.

[32]

Y.M. Zhang, Z. Jia, J.M. Dunwell, Editorial: the applications of new multi-locus GWAS methodologies in the genetic dissection of complex traits, Front. Plant Sci. 10 (2019) 100.

[33]

F. Chang, C. Guo, F. Sun, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Kong, Q. He, R.A. Sharmin, T. Zhao, Genome-wide association studies for dynamic plant height and number of nodes on the main stem in summer sowing soybeans, Front. Plant Sci. 9 (2018) 1184.

[34]

Y. Zheng, F. Yuan, Y. Huang, Y. Zhao, X. Jia, L. Zhu, J. Guo, Genome-wide association studies of grain quality traits in maize, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 9797.

[35]

C. Zhang, S.S. Dong, J.Y. Xu, W.M. He, T.L. Yang, PopLDdecay: a fast and effective tool for linkage disequilibrium decay analysis based on variant call format files, Bioinformatics 35 (2018) 1786–1788.

[36]

M. Love, W. Huber, S. Anders, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2, Genome Biol. 15 (2014) 1–21.

[37]

M. Choi, U.I. Scholl, W. Ji, T. Liu, I.R. Tikhonova, P. Zumbo, A. Nayir, A. Bakkaloğlu, S. Özen, S. Sanjad, C. Nelson-Williams, A. Farhi, S. Mane, R.P. Lifton, Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 19096–19101.

[38]

K. Katoh, K.I. Kuma, H. Toh, T. Miyata, MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment, Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) 511–518.

[39]

T.V. Perneger, What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments, Br. Med. J. 316 (1998) 1236–1238.

[40]

X. Lu, J. Liu, W. Ren, Q. Yang, Z. Chai, R. Chen, L. Wang, J. Zhao, Z. Lang, H. Wang, Y. Fan, J. Zhao, C. Zhang, Gene-indexed mutations in maize, Mol. Plant 11 (2018) 496–504.

[41]

K.R. Lamkey, Fifty years of recurrent selection in the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic maize population, Maydica 37 (1992) 19–28.

[42]

J.N. Cobb, G. Declerck, A. Greenberg, R. Clark, S. Mccouch, Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement, Theor. Appl. Genet. 126 (2013) 867–887.

[43]

R.S. Sekhon, C.N. Joyner, A.J. Ackerman, C.S. Mcmahan, D.J. Robertson, Stalk bending strength is strongly associated with maize stalk lodging incidence across multiple environments, Field Crops Res. 249 (2020) 107737.

[44]

T.C. Helms, W.A. Compton, Ear height and weight as related to stalk lodging in maize, Crop Sci. 24 (1984) 923–924.

[45]

X. Liu, X. Hu, K. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Wu, H. Wang, C. Huang, Genetic mapping and genomic selection for maize stalk strength, BMC Plant Biol. 20 (2020) 196.

[46]

P. Li, X. Yang, H. Wang, T. Pan, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, C. Xu, Z. Yang, Genetic control of root plasticity in response to salt stress in maize, Theor. Appl. Genet. 134 (2021) 1475–1492.

[47]

R.J. Schaefer, J.M. Michno, J. Jeffers, O. Hoekenga, B. Dilkes, I. Baxter, C.L. Myers, Integrating coexpression networks with GWAS to prioritize causal genes in maize, Plant Cell 30 (2018) 2922–2942.

[48]

R.S. Sekhon, C. Saski, R. Kumar, B.S. Flinn, F. Luo, T.M. Beissinger, A.J. Ackerman, M.W. Breitzman, W.C. Bridges, N. de Leon, S.M. Kaeppler, Integrated genomescale analysis identifies novel genes and networks underlying senescence in maize, Plant Cell 31 (2019) 1968–1989.

[49]

T. Tohge, L.P. de Souza, A.R. Fernie, Current understanding of the pathways of flavonoid biosynthesis in model and crop plants, J. Exp. Bot. 68 (2017) 4013–4028.

[50]

R. Khobra, S. Sareen, B.K. Meena, A. Kumar, V. Tiwari, G.P. Singh, Exploring the traits for lodging tolerance in wheat genotypes: a review, Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25 (2019) 589–600.

[51]

M. Mateusz, R. Stéphanie, The role of auxin in cell wall expansion, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (2018) 951–971.

The Crop Journal
Pages 220-227
Cite this article:
Xu S, Tang X, Zhang X, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel candidate loci or genes affecting stalk strength in maize. The Crop Journal, 2023, 11(1): 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2022.04.016

419

Views

10

Downloads

9

Crossref

7

Web of Science

8

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 23 November 2021
Revised: 26 April 2022
Accepted: 28 April 2022
Published: 07 June 2022
© 2022 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return