AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

An intuitive parameterization method with inherently high-order differentiability for compressor blade sections based on ellipse hierarchical deformation

Chuanrui SIaJinxin CHENGbZhengqing ZHUa,( )Zhitong CHENa,c,dQinglong HAOa
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Zaozhuang Beihang Machine Tool Innovation Research Institute Co., Ltd, Zaozhuang 277500, China
Ningbo Institute of Technology, Beihang University, Ningbo 315832, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Shape parameterization has a crucial influence on the optimal solution of aerodynamic optimization. This paper proposes a novel parameterization method for compressor blade sections based on the three-level deformation of the ellipse, which simultaneously satisfies the requirements of flexibility, smoothness, intuitiveness, and compactness. In proposed method, the first-level deformation directly controls nine key geometric parameters to construct the blade section profile, and then the second- and third-level deformations are performed respectively to coarsely and finely modify the profile while keeping the key geometric parameters unchanged. These three levels of deformation effectively decompose the design space without destroying the ellipse’s infinite differentiability, allowing designers to work only with intuitive shape-related parameters to design blade sections with inherently high-order continuity. To verify the effectiveness, six existing blade sections are first fitted and then one of them is selected for a three-level optimization. The results show that the geometry and aerodynamic performance of the fitted and the original blade sections are in good agreement, and the loss coefficient of the optimized blade section is reduced by a total of 36.41%, with 27.34%, 8.45%, and 0.62% reductions for the first to the third level, respectively. Therefore, the proposed parameterization method facilitates the design of lower-loss and higher-load compressor blade sections.

References

1

Li ZH, Zheng XQ. Review of design optimization methods for turbomachinery aerodynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 2017;93:1–23.

2

Xiang H, Chen J. Aerothermodynamics optimal design of a multistage axial compressor in a gas turbine using directly manipulated free-form deformation. Case Stud Therm Eng 2021;26:101142.

3

Cheng JX, Chen J, Xiang H. A surface parametric control and global optimization method for axial flow compressor blades. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(7):1618–34.

4
Masters DA, Taylor NJ, Rendall T, et al. Review of aerofoil parameterisation methods for aerodynamic shape optimization. Reston: AIAA; 2015. Report No.: AIAA-2015-0761.
5

Agromayor R, Anand N, Müller JD, et al. A unified geometry parametrization method for turbomachinery blades. Comput Aided Des 2021;133:102987.

6

Zhu F, Qin N. Intuitive class/shape function parameterization for airfoils. AIAA J 2014;52(1):17–25.

7
Kulfan B, Bussoletti J. “Fundamental” parameteric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes. Reston: AIAA; 2006. Report No.: AIAA-2006-6948.
8

Korakianitis T, Papagiannidis P. Surface-curvature-distribution effects on turbine-cascade performance. J Turbomach 1993;115(2):334–41.

9

Korakianitis T. Hierarchical development of three direct-design methods for two-dimensional axial-turbomachinery cascades. J Turbomach 1993;115(2):314–24.

10

Corral R, Pastor G. Parametric design of turbomachinery airfoils using highly differentiable splines. J Propuls Power 2004;20(2):335–43.

11
Pritchard LJ. An eleven parameter axial turbine airfoil geometry model. New York: ASME; 1985. Report No.: GT1985-219.
12

Pierret S, van den Braembussche RA. Turbomachinery blade design using a Navier-Stokes solver and artificial neural network. J Turbomach 1999;121(2):326–32.

13

Ye ZQ. A systematic computational design system for turbine cascades, airfoil geometry and blade-to-blade analysis. J Eng Gas Turb Power 1983;106(3):3020–9.

14
Gräsel J, Keskin A, Swoboda M, et al. A full parametric model for turbomachinery blade design and optimisation. New York: ASME; 2004. Report No.: GT2004-57467.
15

Koini GN, Sarakinos SS, Nikolos IK. A software tool for parametric design of turbomachinery blades. Adv Eng Softw 2009;40(1):41–51.

16

Agromayor R, Anand N, Pini M, et al. Multirow adjoint-based optimization of NICFD turbomachinery using a computer-aided design-based parametrization. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2022;144(4):041008.

17

Korakianitis T, Hamakhan IA, Rezaienia MA, et al. Design of high-efficiency turbomachinery blades for energy conversion devices with the three-dimensional prescribed surface curvature distribution blade design (CIRCLE) method. Appl Energy 2012;89(1):215–27.

18
Nemnem AF, Turner MG, Siddappaji K, et al. A smooth curvature-defined meanline section option for a general turbomachinery geometry generator. New York: ASME; 2014. Report No.: GT2014-26363.
19

Walther B, Nadarajah S. Adjoint-based constrained aerodynamic shape optimization for multistage turbomachines. J Propuls Power 2015;31(5):1298–319.

20

Persico G, Rodriguez-Fernandez P, Romei A. High-fidelity shape optimization of non-conventional turbomachinery by surrogate evolutionary strategies. J Turbomach 2019;141(8):081010.

21

Mazaheri K, Khatibirad S. Using a shock control bump to improve the performance of an axial compressor blade section. Shock Waves 2017;27(2):299–312.

22

John A, Qin N, Shahpar S. Using shock control bumps to improve transonic fan/compressor blade performance. J Turbomach 2019;141(8):081003.

23

Hu HD, Yu JY, Song YP, et al. The application of support vector regression and mesh deformation technique in the optimization of transonic compressor design. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;112:106589.

24

Gagliardi F, Giannakoglou KC. RBF-based morphing of B-Rep models for use in aerodynamic shape optimization. Adv Eng Softw 2019;138:102724.

25

Dong YW, Zhang DH, Bu K, et al. Geometric parameter-based optimization of the die profile for the investment casting of aerofoil-shaped turbine blades. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2011;57:1245–58.

26

Hamakhan IA, Korakianitis T. Aerodynamic performance effects of leading-edge geometry in gas-turbine blades. Appl Energy 2010;87(5):1591–601.

27

Zhang WH, Zou ZP, Ye J. Leading-edge redesign of a turbomachinery blade and its effect on aerodynamic performance. Appl Energy 2012;93:655–67.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 74-90
Cite this article:
SI C, CHENG J, ZHU Z, et al. An intuitive parameterization method with inherently high-order differentiability for compressor blade sections based on ellipse hierarchical deformation. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(8): 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.12.004

38

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 04 July 2022
Revised: 04 August 2022
Accepted: 19 September 2022
Published: 14 December 2022
© 2022 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return