AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Process-based deep learning model: 3D prediction method for shot peen forming of an aircraft panel

Ziyu WANGaPeng ZHANGb,( )Qun ZHANGaLijuan ZHOUcRaneen Abd ALIdWenliang CHENaLingling XIEe
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China
AVIC XAC Aerostructure (Hanzhong) Manufacturing Co., Ltd, Hanzhong 723000, China
Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Techniques Engineering Department, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Babylon 51001, Iraq
School of Metallurgical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Shot peen-forming is a more precise method of forming aircraft panels than conventional methods. The traditional method of acquiring the process parameters relies mainly on prior theoretical knowledge and trial-and-error. Despite the finite element method's ability to replace some experimentation, it still cannot realize the design of shot peen forming processes parameters of an aircraft panel based on a known contour. This study uses an innovative model-based deep learning approach to predict aircraft panel deformation and active design the shot peening parameters. The prediction time is less than 1 second, resulting in a significant reduction in computational time. The shot peen forming process parameters and the geometric structure characteristics of the aircraft panel are divided into independent channels to establish a high-dimensional feature map, which are used to train the deep learning model. The forming contours of the 2024-T351 high-strength aluminum alloy panel are predicted under different shot peening processes. In addition, the process parameters are designed according to the known contour of the forming process. To verify the precision of the proposed method, the designed shot peen forming process is used to manufacture a single curvature aircraft panel with a curvature radius of 3500 mm. There is good agreement between the forming contour and the theoretical design contour. The maximum deformation error is less than 1 mm and its mean error is 7.8%. The mean curvature radius error is 5.668%. The proposed method provides a new and practical reference to the precise design of the shot peen-forming process.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-36-11-500_ESM.pdf (2.4 MB)

References

1

Wu DX, Yao CF, Zhang DH. Surface characterization and fatigue evaluation in GH4169 superalloy: comparing results after finish turning; shot peening and surface polishing treatments. Int J Fatigue 2018;113: 222–35.

2

Bianchetti C, Delbergue D, Bocher P, et al. Analytical fatigue life prediction of shot peened AA 7050–T7451. Int J Fatigue 2019;118: 271–81.

3

Liu C, Zhao ZY, Zhang XJ, et al. A progressive approach to predict shot peening process parameters for forming integral panel of Al7050-T7451. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(5): 617–27.

4

Miao HY, Demers D, Larose S, et al. Experimental study of shot peening and stress peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 2010;210(15): 2089–102.

5
Pashkov AE, Koltsov VP, Pashkov AA. Complex method of peen forming and shot peening of aircraft structural components. In: Proceedings of the International Conference \“Actual Issues of Mechanical Engineering\” 2017 (AIME 2017). 2017;133: 585–91.
6

Xiao XD, Li Y, Sun Y, et al. Prediction of peen forming stress and curvature with dynamic response of compressively prestressed target. J Mater Eng Perform 2020;29(5):3079–91.

7

Zhang T, Li L, Lu SH, et al. Simulation of prestressed ultrasonic peen forming on bending deformation and residual stress distribution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018;98(1):385–93.

8

Zhang QL, Li H, Zhai MG, et al. Numerical and experimental study on the deformation of aluminum alloy ring treated by ultrasonic shot peen forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;113(9):2791–804.

9

Wang C, Lai YB, Wang L, et al. Dislocation-based study on the influences of shot peening on fatigue resistance. Surf Coat Technol 2020;383:125247.

10

Wang Z, Gan J, He JX, et al. Investigation of the effects of shot overlap and rigid body assumptions on surface layer characteristics in shot peening simulation. Surf Coat Technol 2021;425:127737.

11

Tao XF, Gao YK. Effects of wet shot peening on microstructures and mechanical properties of a 2060–T8 aluminum-lithium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 2022;832:142436.

12

Kang X, Wang T, Platts J. Multiple impact modelling for shot peening and peen forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 2010;224(5):689–97.

13

Grasty LV, Andrew C. Shot peen forming sheet metal: Finite element prediction of deformed shape. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 1996;210:361–6.

14

Wang T, Platts MJ, Levers A. A process model for shot peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 2006;172(2):159–62.

15

Gariépy A, Larose S, Perron C, et al. Shot peening and peen forming finite element modelling - Towards a quantitative method. Int J Solids Struct 2011;48(20):2859–77.

16

Gariépy A, Cyr J, Levers A, et al. Potential applications of peen forming finite element modelling. Adv Eng Softw 2012;52:60–71.

17

Marini M, Piona F, Fontanari V, et al. A new challenge in the DEM/FEM simulation of the shot peening process: the residual stress field at a sharp edge. Int J Mech Sci 2020;169:105327.

18

Tu FB, Delbergue D, Miao HY, et al. A sequential DEM-FEM coupling method for shot peening simulation. Surf Coat Technol 2017;319:200–12.

19

Zhang JB, Lu SH, Wu TR, et al. An evaluation on SP surface property by means of combined FEM-DEM shot dynamics simulation. Adv Eng Softw 2018;115:283–96.

20

Bhuvaraghan B, Srinivasan SM, Maffeo B, et al. Shot peening simulation using discrete and finite element methods. Adv Eng Softw 2010;41(12):1266–76.

21

Yang JY, Kang GZ, Liu YJ, et al. A novel method of multiaxial fatigue life prediction based on deep learning. Int J Fatigue 2021;151:106356.

22

Gao Y, Liu XY, Huang HZ, et al. A hybrid of FEM simulations and generative adversarial networks to classify faults in rotor-bearing systems. ISA Trans 2021;108:356–66.

23

You GJ, Zhao HN, Gao D, et al. Predictive models of tensile strength and disintegration time for simulated Chinese herbal medicine extracts compound tablets based on artificial neural networks. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2020;60:102025.

24

Maleki E, Unal O, Reza KK. Fatigue behavior prediction and analysis of shot peened mild carbon steels. Int J Fatigue 2018;116:48–67.

25

Wang ZY, Cai S, Chen WL, et al. Analysis of critical velocity of cold spray based on machine learning method with feature selection. J Therm Spray Tech 2021;30(5):1213–25.

26

Khan A, Ko DK, Lim SC, et al. Structural vibration-based classification and prediction of delamination in smart composite laminates using deep learning neural network. Compos B Eng 2019;161:586–94.

27

Yang C, Kim Y, Ryu S, et al. Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks. Mater Des 2020;189:108509.

28

Wei AR, Xiong J, Yang WD, et al. Deep learning-assisted elastic isotropy identification for architected materials. Extreme Mech Lett 2021;43:101173.

29

Tan RK, Zhang NL, Ye WJ. A deep learning-based method for the design of microstructural materials. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2020;61(4):1417–38.

30

Fan SJ, Zhang JM, Wang B, et al. A deep learning method for fast predicting curing process-induced deformation of aeronautical composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 2023;232:109844.

31

Oh S, Jin HK, Joe SJ, et al. Prediction of structural deformation of a deck plate using a GAN-based deep learning method. Ocean Eng 2021;239:109835.

32

Liu YZ, Chen YL, Ding B. Deep learning in frequency domain for inverse identification of nonhomogeneous material properties. J Mech Phys Solids 2022;168:105043.

33

Oommen V, Shukla K, Goswami S, et al. Learning two-phase microstructure evolution using neural operators and autoencoder architectures. NPJ Comput Mater 2022;8:190.

34
Wang TC, Liu MY, Zhu JY, et al. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional GANs2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. p. 8798–807.
35

Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13(4):600–12.

36

Caglar B, Broggi G, Ali MA, et al. Deep learning accelerated prediction of the permeability of fibrous microstructures. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2022;158:106973.

37

Yang ZZ, Yu CH, Guo K, et al. End-to-end deep learning method to predict complete strain and stress tensors for complex hierarchical composite microstructures. J Mech Phys Solids 2021;154:104506.

38

Lin QJ, Liu HJ, Zhu CC, et al. Effects of different shot peening parameters on residual stress, surface roughness and cell size. Surf Coat Technol 2020;398:126054.

39

Wang C, Wang L, Wang XG, et al. Numerical study of grain refinement induced by severe shot peening. Int J Mech Sci 2018;146–147:280–94.

40

Hassani-Gangaraj SM, Cho KS, Voigt HJL, et al. Experimental assessment and simulation of surface nanocrystallization by severe shot peening. Acta Mater 2015;97:105–15.

41

Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Eng Fracture Mechanics 1983;21:541–8.

42

Han K, Perić D, Owen DRJ, et al. A combined finite/discrete element simulation of shot peening processes–Part Ⅱ: 3D interaction laws. Eng Comput 2000;17(6):680–702.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 500-514
Cite this article:
WANG Z, ZHANG P, ZHANG Q, et al. Process-based deep learning model: 3D prediction method for shot peen forming of an aircraft panel. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(11): 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.02.001

94

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 31 October 2022
Revised: 11 December 2022
Accepted: 03 January 2023
Published: 08 February 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return