AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Characteristics of penetration and distribution of a liquid jet in a divergent cavity-based combustor

Yaozhi ZHOUaZun CAIa( )Qinglian LIaChenyang LIbMingbo SUNaShaotian GONGa
Hypersonic Technology Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
Beijing Institute of Tracking and Telecommunication Technology, Beijing 100094, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The atomization process of a liquid jet in a divergent cavity-based combustor was investigated experimentally using high-speed photography and schlieren techniques under a Mach number 2.0 supersonic crossflow. Gas-liquid flow field was studied at different divergent angles and injection schemes. It is found that complex wave structures exist in the divergent cavity-based combustor. The spray field can be divided into three distinct zones: surface wave-dominated breakup zone, rapid atomization zone and cavity mixing zone. A dimensionless spray factor is defined to describe the concentration of spray inside the cavity qualitatively. As a result, it is revealed that for the large divergent angle cavity, the injection scheme near the upstream inlet has a higher penetration depth but a lower spray distribution, where the injection scheme near the cavity has a more spray distribution. For the small divergent angle cavity, the injection scheme near the upstream inlet also has a higher penetration depth and the injection scheme near the start point of the divergent section has a more sufficient spray distribution. The small divergent angle cavity-based combustor with the upstream wall transverse injection is an optimized injection scheme to improve both penetration and spray distribution inside the cavity. Finally, a penetration depth formula is proposed to explain the spray and distribution behaviors in the divergent cavity-based combustor.

References

1

Curran ET. Scramjet engines: The first forty years. J Propuls Power 2001;17(6):1138–48.

2

Idris AC, Saad MR, Zare-Behtash H, et al. Luminescent measurement systems for the investigation of a scramjet inlet-isolator. Sensors (Basel) 2014;14(4):6606–32.

3

Urzay J. Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2018;50:593–627.

4

Vanyai T, Bricalli M, Brieschenk S, et al. Scramjet performance for ideal combustion processes. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;75:215–26.

5

Chang JT, Zhang JL, Bao W, et al. Research progress on strut-equipped supersonic combustors for scramjet application. Prog Aerosp Sci 2018;103:1–30.

6

Huang W, Du ZB, Yan L, et al. Flame propagation and stabilization in dual-mode scramjet combustors: A survey. Prog Aerosp Sci 2018;101:13–30.

7
Tishkoff J, Drummond J, Edwards T, et al. Future directions of supersonic combustion research─Air Force/NASA workshop on supersonic combustion. Reston: AIAA; 1997. Report No.: AIAA-1997-1017.
8

Watanabe J, Kouchi T, Takita K, et al. Characteristics of hydrogen jets in supersonic crossflow: Large-eddy simulation study. J Propuls Power 2013;29(3):661–74.

9

Huang W, Qin H, Luo SB, et al. Research status of key techniques for shock-induced combustion ramjet (shcramjet) engine. Sci China Ser E-Technol Sci 2010;53(1):220–6.

10
Segal C. The scramjet engine: Processes and characteristics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 2–4.
11

Lee J, Lin KC, Eklund D. Challenges in fuel injection for high-speed propulsion systems. AIAA J 2015;53(6):1405–23.

12

Huang W, Pourkashanian M, Ma L, et al. Investigation on the flameholding mechanisms in supersonic flows: Backward-facing step and cavity flameholder. J Visualization 2011;14(1):63–74.

13

Yang YX, Wang ZG, Sun MB, et al. Numerical simulation on ignition transients of hydrogen flame in a supersonic combustor with dual-cavity. Int J Hydrog Energy 2016;41(1):690–703.

14

Cai Z, Zhu JJ, Sun MB, et al. Spark-enhanced ignition and flame stabilization in an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor with a rear-wall-expansion geometry. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2018;92:306–13.

15

Sun MB, Wang HB, Cai Z, et al. Unsteady supersonic combustion. Singapore: Springer; 2020.

16

Li PB, Li CY, Wang HB, et al. Distribution characteristics and mixing mechanism of a liquid jet injected into a cavity-based supersonic combustor. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;94:105401.

17

Tan ZP, Bibik O, Shcherbik D, et al. The regimes of twin-fluid jet-in-crossflow at atmospheric and jet-engine operating conditions. Phys Fluids 2018;30(2):025101.

18

Tan ZP. The physics of twin-fluid jet-in-crossflow at atmospheric and jet-engine operating conditions. Phys Fluids 2019;31(4):045106.

19

Li FY, Shi WD, Hu C, et al. Global characteristics of transverse jets of aviation kerosene-long-chain alcohol blends. Phys Fluids 2020;32(8):087103.

20

Wu LY, Wang ZG, Li QL, et al. Study on transient structure characteristics of round liquid jet in supersonic crossflows. J Visualization 2016;19(3):337–41.

21

Wu LY, Wang ZG, Li QL, et al. Investigations on the droplet distributions in the atomization of kerosene jets in supersonic crossflows. Appl Phys Lett 2015;107(10):104103.

22

Li CY, Li C, Xiao F, et al. Experimental study of spray characteristics of liquid jets in supersonic crossflow. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;95:105426.

23

Li P, Wang Z, Bai X, et al. Three-dimensional flow structures and droplet-gas mixing process of a liquid jet in supersonic crossflow. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;90:140–56.

24

Zhou YZ, Xiao F, Li QL, et al. Simulation of elliptical liquid jet primary breakup in supersonic crossflow. Int J Aerosp Eng 2020;2020:1–12.

25

Huang JK, Zhao X, Jiang H. Numerical simulation of the atomization of liquid transverse jet in supersonic airflow. Phys Fluids 2021;33(5):052114.

26

Pan Y, Dai JF, Bao H. Effect of scramjet combustor configuration on the distribution of transverse injection kerosene. J Mech Sci Technol 2014;28(12):4997–5002.

27

Li XP, Liu WD, Pan Y, et al. Characterization of kerosene distribution around the ignition cavity in a scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2017;134:11–6.

28

Choubey G, Devarajan Y, Huang W, et al. Recent advances in cavity-based scramjet engine─A brief review. Int J Hydrog Energy 2019;44(26):13895–909.

29

Choubey G, Solanki M, Bhatt T, et al. Numerical investigation on a typical scramjet combustor using cavity floor H2 fuel injection strategy. Acta Astronaut 2023;202:373–85.

30

Choubey G, Yadav PM, Devarajan Y, et al. Numerical investigation on mixing improvement mechanism of transverse injection based scramjet combustor. Acta Astronaut 2021;188:426–37.

31

Dong MZ, Liao J, Choubey G, et al. Influence of the secondary flow control on the transverse gaseous injection flow field properties in a supersonic flow. Acta Astronaut 2019;165:150–7.

32

Hu RS, Li QL, Li CY, et al. Effects of an accompanied gas jet on transverse liquid injection in a supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronaut 2019;159:440–51.

33

Jenny P, Roekaerts D, Beishuizen N. Modeling of turbulent dilute spray combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2012;38(6):846–87.

34

Zhao JF, Tong YH, Ren YJ, et al. Structures of liquid jets in supersonic crossflows in a rectangular channel with an expansion section. Phys Fluids 2020;32(11):111704.

35

Li XY, Soteriou MC. High fidelity simulation and analysis of liquid jet atomization in a gaseous crossflow at intermediate Weber numbers. Phys Fluids 2016;28(8):082101.

36

Behzad M, Ashgriz N, Karney BW. Surface breakup of a non-turbulent liquid jet injected into a high pressure gaseous crossflow. Int J Multiph Flow 2016;80:100–17.

37
Lin KC, Kennedy P, Jackson T. Penetration heights of liquid jets in high-speed crossflows. Reston: AIAA; 2002. Report No.: AIAA-2002-0873.
38
Lin KC, Kennedy P, Jackson T. Structures of water jets in a Mach 1.94 supersonic crossflow. Reston: AIAA; 2004. Report No.: AIAA-2004-0971.
39

Yang H, Li F, Sun B. Trajectory analysis of fuel injection into supersonic cross flow based on schlieren method. Chin J Aeronaut 2012;25(1):42–50.

40
Wu LY, Chang Y, Zhang KL, et al. Model for three-dimensional distribution of liquid fuel in supersonic crossflows. Reston: AIAA; 2017. Report No.: AIAA-2017-2419.
41

Sathiyamoorthy K, Danish TH, Iyengar VS, et al. Penetration and combustion studies of tandem liquid jets in supersonic crossflow. J Propuls Power 2020;36(6):920–30.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 139-150
Cite this article:
ZHOU Y, CAI Z, LI Q, et al. Characteristics of penetration and distribution of a liquid jet in a divergent cavity-based combustor. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(12): 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.006

68

Views

7

Crossref

5

Web of Science

7

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 27 November 2022
Revised: 21 December 2022
Accepted: 03 January 2023
Published: 08 March 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return