AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Chinese Journal of Aeronautics Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Improvement of titanium alloy TA19 fatigue life by submerged abrasive waterjet peening: Correlation of its process parameters with surface integrity and fatigue performance

Gongyu WANGa, Shulei YAOa, Yuxin CHIa, Chengcheng ZHANGb, Ning WANGa( ), Yalong CHENb, Rongsheng LUa, Zhuang LIa, Xiancheng ZHANGa
Key Laboratory of Pressure Systems and Safety, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
AECC Commercial Aircraft Engine Co. LTD, Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Commercial Aircraft Engine, Shanghai 201108, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Submerged abrasive waterjet peening (SAWJP) is an effective anti-fatigue manufacturing technology that is widely used to strengthen aeroengine components. This study investigated the correlation of SAWJP process parameters on surface integrity and fatigue life of titanium alloy TA19. SAWJP with different water pressures and standoff distances (SoDs) was conducted on the TA19 specimens. The surface integrity of the specimens before and after SAWJP with different process parameters was experimentally studied, including microstructure, surface roughness, microhardness, and compressive residual stress (CRS). Finally, fatigue tests of the specimens before and after SAWJP treatment with different process parameters were carried out at room temperature. The results highlighted that the fatigue life of the TA19 specimen can be increased by 5.46, 5.98, and 6.28 times under relatively optimal process parameters, which is mainly due to the improved surface integrity of the specimen after SAWJP treatment. However, the fatigue life of specimens treated with improper process parameters is decreased by 0.55 to 0.69 times owing to the terrible surface roughness caused by the material erosion. This work verifies that SAWJP can effectively improve the surface integrity and fatigue life of workpieces, and reveals the relationship between process parameters, surface integrity, and fatigue life, which provides support for the promotion of SAWJP in the manufacturing fields.

Keywords

Process parametersSurface treatmentSurface integrityFatigue testingSubmerged abrasive waterjet peeningTitanium alloy TA19

References

1

Javidi A, Rieger U, Eichlseder W. The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life. Int J Fatigue 2008;30(10–11):2050–5.
Crossref Google Scholar
2

Thakur A, Gangopadhyay S. State-of-the-art in surface integrity in machining of nickel-based super alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2016;100:25–54.
Crossref Google Scholar
3

Ulutan D, Ozel T. Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2011;51(3):250–80.
Crossref Google Scholar
4

Zhang XC, Zhang YK, Lu JZ, et al. Improvement of fatigue life of Ti–6Al–4V alloy by laser shock peening. Mater Sci Eng A 2010;527(15):3411–5.
Crossref Google Scholar
5

Li W, Chen HT, Huang WY, et al. Optimization of multiple laser shock peening on high-cycle fatigue performance of aluminized AISI 321 stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 2021;153:106505.
Crossref Google Scholar
6

Jia WJ, Hong Q, Zhao HZ, et al. Effect of laser shock peening on the mechanical properties of a near-α titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 2014;606:354–9.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

Al-obaid YF. Shot peening mechanics: experimental and theoretical analysis. Mech Mater 1995;19(2):251–60.
Crossref Google Scholar
8

Wang Y, Pan XY, Wang XB, et al. Influence of laser shock peening on surface integrity and tensile property of high strength low alloy steel. Chinese J Aeronau 2021;34(6):199–208.
Crossref Google Scholar
9

Abrão AM, Denkena B, Köhler J, et al. The influence of deep rolling on the surface integrity of AISI 1060 high carbon steel. Procedia CIRP 2014;13:31–6.
Crossref Google Scholar
10

Liu YX, Zhang CC, Wang RZ, et al. Quantitative evaluations of improved surface integrity in ultrasonic rolling process for selective laser melted in-situ TiB2/Al composite. J Manuf Process 2022;77:412–25.
Crossref Google Scholar
11

Altenberger I. Alternative mechanical surface treatments for fatigue strength enhancement. Mater Sci Forum 2005;490:328–33.
Crossref Google Scholar
12

Peyre P, Fabbro R. Laser shock and processing: a review of the physics and applications. Opt Quant Electron 1995;27(12):1213–2129.
Crossref Google Scholar
13

Peyre P, Fabbro R, Merrien P, et al. Laser shock processing of aluminium alloys. Application to high cycle fatigue behaviour. Mater Sci Eng A 1996;210(1–2):102–13.
Crossref Google Scholar
14

Montross CS, Wei T, Ye L, et al. Laser shock processing and its effects on microstructure and properties of metal alloys: a review. Int J Fatigue 2002;24(10):1021–36.
Crossref Google Scholar
15

Muñoz-Cubillos J, Coronado JJ, Rodríguez SA. Deep rolling effect on fatigue behavior of austenitic stainless steels. Int J Fatigue 2017;95:120–31.
Crossref Google Scholar
16

Wagner L. Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 1999;263(2):210–26.
Crossref Google Scholar
17

Soyama H, Macodiyo DO. Fatigue strength improvement of gears using cavitation shotless peening. Tribol Lett 2005;18(2):181–4.
Crossref Google Scholar
18

Srivastava M, Hloch S, Tripathi R, et al. Ultrasonically generated pulsed waterjet peening of austenitic stainless-steel surfaces. J Manuf Process 2018;32:455–68.
Crossref Google Scholar
19

Arolad D, Mccain ML, Kunaporn S, et al. Waterjet and abrasive waterjet surface treatment of titanium: a comparison of surface texture and residual stress. Wear 2001;249(10):943–50.
Crossref Google Scholar
20

Soyama H, Chighizola CR, Hill MR. Effect of compressive residual stress introduced by cavitation peening and shot peening on the improvement of fatigue strength of stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 2021;288:116877.
Crossref Google Scholar
21

Soyama H. Cavitation peening: a review. Metals-Basel 2020;10(2):270.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

Odhiambo D, Soyama H. Cavitation shotless peening for improvement of fatigue strength of carbonized steel. Int J Fatigue 2003;25(9–11):1217–22.
Crossref Google Scholar
23

Srivastava M, Hloch S, Gubeljak N, et al. Surface integrity and residual stress analysis of pulsed waterjet peened stainless steel surfaces. Measurement 2019;143:81–92.
Crossref Google Scholar
24

Arola DD, McCain ML. Abrasive waterjet peening: a new method of surface preparation for metal orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53(5):536–46.
Crossref Google Scholar
25

Balaji DS, Jeyapoovan T. Optimization of process parameters in waterjet peening on Al 6063–T6 alloy using grey relational analysis. Mater Today: Process 2021;45:2556–60.
Crossref Google Scholar
26

Arola DD, Alade AE, Weber W. Improving fatigue strength of metals using abrasive waterjet peening. Mach Sci Technol 2006;10(2):197–218.
Crossref Google Scholar
27

Azhari A, Schindler C, Hilbert K, et al. Influence of waterjet peening and smoothing on the material surface and properties of stainless steel 304. Surf Coat Technol 2014;258:1176–82.
Crossref Google Scholar
28

Soyama H, Sanders D. Use of an abrasive water cavitating jet and peening process to improve the fatigue strength of titanium alloy 6al-4v manufactured by the electron beam powder bed melting (ebpb) additive manufacturing method. JOM 2019;71(12):4311–8.
Crossref Google Scholar
29

Yao SL, Wang GY, Li KS, et al. Cavitation abrasive integrated waterjet peening process and the effect of process parameters on the surface integrity of titanium alloy TA19. Surf Coat Technol 2022;440:128477.
Crossref Google Scholar
30

Yao SL, Wang GY, Yu H, et al. Influence of submerged micro-abrasive waterjet peening on surface integrity and fatigue performance of titanium alloy TA19. Int J Fatigue 2022;164:107076.
Crossref Google Scholar
31

Yuan YM, Chen JF, Gao H, et al. An investigation into the abrasive waterjet milling circular pocket on titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;107(11–12):4503–15.
Crossref Google Scholar
32

Zou Y, Xu YF, Li JK. Evaluation of surface integrity in 18CrNiMo7-6 steel after multiple abrasive waterjet peening process. Metals-Basel 2020;10(6):844.
Crossref Google Scholar
33

Balaji DS, Jeyapoovan T. Multi-objective optimization in abrasive water jet peening on AA6063 alloy. Mater Today: Process 2021;45:1928–33.
Crossref Google Scholar
34

Zou SK, Wu JF, Zhang YK, et al. Surface integrity and fatigue lives of Ti17 compressor blades subjected to laser shock peening with square spots. Surf Coat Technol 2018;347:398–406.
Crossref Google Scholar
35

Suraratchal M, Limido J, Mabru C, et al. Modelling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy. Int J Fatigue 2008;30(12):2119–26.
Crossref Google Scholar
36

Soyama H. Comparison between the improvements made to the fatigue strength of stainless steel by cavitation peening, waterjet peening, shot peening and laser peening. J Mater Process Technol 2019;269:65–78.
Crossref Google Scholar
37

Oh G, Akiniwa Y. Residual and assembling stress analyses on fillet welded joints of flange pipes and the fatigue strength prediction. Thin Wall Struct 2019;136:138–49.
Crossref Google Scholar
38

Shiozaki T, Tamai Y, Urabe T. Effect of residual stresses on fatigue strength of high strength steel sheets with punched holes. Int J Fatigue 2015;80:324–31.
Crossref Google Scholar
39

Lieblich M, Barriuso S, Ibáñez J, et al. On the fatigue behavior of medical Ti6Al4V roughened by grit blasting and abrasiveless waterjet peening. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;63:390–8.
Crossref Google Scholar
40

Yao CF, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, et al. Experimental study on surface integrity changes during turning-ultrasonic impact of nickel alloy 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;112(5):1359–71.
Crossref Google Scholar
41

Azhari A, Schindler C, Kerscher E, et al. Improving surface hardness of austenitic stainless steel using waterjet peening process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012;63(9):1035–46.
Crossref Google Scholar
42

Zou Y, Sang ZK, Wang QL, et al. Improving the mechanical properties of 304 stainless steel using waterjet peening. Mater Sci-Medzg 2020;26(2):161–7.
Crossref Google Scholar
43

Ginting A, Nouari M. Surface integrity of dry machined titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2009;49(3):325–32.
Crossref Google Scholar
44

Zhang HJ, Zhao XH, Liu Y. Effect of high frequency impacting and rolling on fatigue crack growth of 2A12 aluminum alloy welded joint. Int J Fatigue 2021;147:106172.
Crossref Google Scholar
45

Wu JF, Che ZG, Zou SK, et al. Surface integrity of TA19 notched simulated blades with laser shock peening and its effect on fatigue strength. J Mater Eng Perform 2020;29(8):5184–94.
Crossref Google Scholar
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Volume 37 Issue 1,
January 2024
Pages 377-390
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.033
Cite this article:
WANG G, YAO S, CHI Y, et al. Improvement of titanium alloy TA19 fatigue life by submerged abrasive waterjet peening: Correlation of its process parameters with surface integrity and fatigue performance. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(1): 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.033

129

Views

4

Crossref

2

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 06 December 2022
Revised: 30 December 2022
Accepted: 12 February 2023
Published: 21 March 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Return