AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
A new type of guidance strategy, combining linear quadratic and norm-bounded game theory, is proposed for the scenario of an attacker against active defense aircraft in three-player engagement. The problem involves three players, an attacker, a defender and a target. The differential game theory and the solution of Hamiltonian equation are utilized to obtain the combined guidance strategy for each player with arbitrary-order dynamics. The game process is divided into 4 phases, C1-C4, according to the switching time. The linear quadratic differential game guidance scheme is employed to reduce the fuel cost in the game parts of C1 and C3. The norm-bounded game guidance strategy is adopted to satisfy the constraint of control input in the game stages C2 and C4. Furthermore, zero-effort miss distance is introduced to meet the constraints of game space and defender’s killing radius in the guidance strategy, which guarantees that the attacker is able to avoid the interception of the defender and hit the target with lower fuel cost and maximum acceleration. And it is proved that the proposed guidance strategy satisfies the Nash equilibrium condition. Finally, the feasibility and superiority of combined guidance strategy are respectively illustrated by nonlinear numerical simulation and verified by comparing with linear quadratic and norm-bounded differential game guidance strategies.
Faruqi FA. Differential game theory with applications to missiles and autonomous systems guidance. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons; 2017. p. 102–3.
Boyell RL. Defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst AES 1976;12(4):522–6.
Ratnoo A, Shima T. Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn 2011;34(2):522–32.
Rubinsky S, Gutman S. Vector guidance approach to three-player conflict in exoatmospheric interception. J Guid Control Dyn 2015;38(12):2270–86.
Kumar SR, Mukherjee D. Cooperative active aircraft protection guidance using line-of-sight approach. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2021;57(2):957–67.
Luo HB, Tan GY, Yan H, et al. Cooperative line-of-sight guidance with optimal evasion strategy for three-body confrontation. ISA Trans 2023;133:262–72.
Sinha A, Kumar SR, Mukherjee D. Three-agent time-constrained cooperative pursuit-evasion. J Intell Robot Syst 2022;104(2):28.
Yan XD, Lyu S. A two-side cooperative interception guidance law for active air defense with a relative time-to-go deviation. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;100:105787.
Ratnoo A, Shima T. Guidance strategies against defended aerial targets. J Guid Control Dyn 2012;35(4):1059–68.
Rubinsky S, Gutman S. Three-player pursuit and evasion conflict. J Guid Control Dyn 2014;37(1):98–110.
Weiss M, Shima T, Castaneda D, et al. Combined and cooperative minimum-effort guidance algorithms in an active aircraft defense scenario. J Guid Control Dyn 2017;40(5):1241–54.
Turetsky V, Shinar J. Missile guidance laws based on pursuit-evasion game formulations. Autom J IFAC 2003;39(4):607–18.
Perelman A, Shima T, Rusnak I. Cooperative differential games strategies for active aircraft protection from a homing missile. J Guid Control Dyn 2011;34(3):761–73.
Shaferman V, Shima T. Linear quadratic guidance laws for imposing a terminal intercept angle. J Guid Control Dyn 2008;31(5):1400–12.
Shaferman V, Shima T. Cooperative optimal guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle. J Guid Control Dyn 2015;38(8):1395–408.
Shaferman V, Shima T. Cooperative differential games guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle. J Guid Control Dyn 2017;40(10):2465–80.
Weiss M, Shima T. Linear quadratic optimal control-based missile guidance law with obstacle avoidance. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2019;55(1):205–14.
Kumar SR, Weiss M, Shima T. Minimum-effort intercept angle guidance with multiple-obstacle avoidance. J Guid Control Dyn 2018;41(6):1355–69.
Yan T, Cai YL, Xu B. Evasion guidance algorithms for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles in three-player pursuit-evasion games. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(12):3423–36.
Liu YF, Qi NM, Tang ZW. Linear quadratic differential game strategies with two-pursuit versus single-evader. Chin J Aeronaut 2012;25(6):896–905.
Liu F, Dong XW, Li QD, et al. Cooperative differential games guidance laws for multiple attackers against an active defense target. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(5):374–89.
Kumar SR, Shima T. Cooperative nonlinear guidance strategies for aircraft defense. J Guid Control Dyn 2017;40(1):124–38.
Shima T. Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile. J Guid Control Dyn 2011;34(2):414–25.
Qi NM, Sun QL, Zhao J. Evasion and pursuit guidance law against defended target. Chin J Aeronaut 2017;30(6):1958–73.
Sun QL, Shen MH, Gu XL, et al. Evasion-pursuit strategy against defended aircraft based on differential game theory. Int J Aerosp Eng 2019;2019:1–12.
Sun QL, Qi NM, Xiao LX, et al. Differential game strategy in three-player evasion and pursuit scenarios. J Syst Eng Electron 2018;29(2):352–66.
Sun QL, Zhang CF, Liu N, et al. Guidance laws for attacking defended target. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(10):2337–53.
Sun QL, Qi NM, Huo MY. Optimal strategy for target protection with a defender in the pursuit-evasion scenario. Journal Defense Modeling & Simulation 2018;15(3):289–301.
Turetsky V, Weiss M, Shima T. A combined linear–quadratic/bounded control differential game guidance law. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2021;57(5):3452–62.
Hayoun SY, Weiss M, Shima T. A mixed L2/L∞ differential game approach to pursuit-evasion guidance. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2016;52(6):2775–88.
Turetsky V, Hayoun SY, Shima T, et al. On the value of differential game with asymmetric control constraints. IFAC-Papers On Line 2018;51(32):799–804.
Yan T, Cai YL, Xu B. Evasion guidance for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles against unknown pursuer dynamics. Neural Comput Appl 2022;34(7):5213–24.
Glizer VY, Turetsky V. Complete solution of a differential game with linear dynamics and bounded controls. Appl Math Res Express 2008;2008:abm012.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
京公网安备11010802044758号