AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Control of squealer-tip leakage flow with perforated-rib coolant injection in an axial turbine cascade

Shengchang ZHANGaQinqin WANGb,cXiaoming TANa,( )Jingzhou ZHANGa
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
AECC Sichuan Gas Turbine Research Establishment, Chengdu 610500, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

A novel perforated-rib configuration is proposed for controlling the tip leakage flow at the rotor tip of an axial turbine. Three perforated-rib layouts are considered, wherein a perforated rib is installed at (A) the Suction-Side squealer (SS-rib), (B) the Pressure-Side squealer (PS-rib), and (C) the additional squealer along the blade Camber Line (CL-rib). A numerical method is used to show how the novel rib layouts affect the aerodynamic performance of the tip leakage flow. Results show that the coolant jets issuing from the perforated-rib injection holes penetrate deeper into the tip clearance than those in the baseline squealer-tip case, and how the perforated-rib coolant injection affects the tip leakage flow depends strongly on the rib layout. The PS-rib and CL-rib layouts appear promising for controlling the tip leakage flow, playing a significant role in reducing the total pressure loss and improving the turbine blade’s isentropic efficiency. In particular, under an injection mass flow ratio of 1% and a tip clearance of 1% blade span, the PS-rib layout reduces the leakage mass flow rate by 27% and increases the isentropic efficiency by 1.25% compared with those in the baseline squealer-tip case. Meanwhile, the advantages of the PS-rib layout in tip leakage control are confirmed under small and large tip clearances.

References

1

Denton JD. Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. J Turbomach 1993;115(4):621–56.

2

Mohsen H, Wang ST, Feng GT, et al. Calculation of the energy loss for tip leakage flow in turbines. Chin J Aeronaut 2004;17(3):142–8.

3

Cho SY, Cho CH, Choi SK. An experimental study of partial admission losses with various blade tip clearances using a linear cascade. Energy 2017;122:627–37.

4

Serrano JR, Navarro R, García-Cuevas LM, et al. Turbocharger turbine rotor tip leakage loss and mass flow model valid up to extreme off-design conditions with high blade to jet speed ratio. Energy 2018;147:1299–310.

5

Ji LL, Li W, Shi WD, et al. Energy characteristics of mixed-flow pump under different tip clearances based on entropy production analysis. Energy 2020;199:117447.

6

Li W, Qiao WY, Sun DW. Tip clearance flows in turbine cascades. Chin J Aeronaut 2008;21(3):193–9.

7

Zou ZP, Xuan LM, Chen YM, et al. Effects of flow structure on heat transfer of squealer tip in a turbine rotor blade. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2020;114:104588.

8

Zeng F, Du JL, Huang L, et al. An experimental method for squealer tip flow field considering relative casing motion. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(7):1942–52.

9

Coull JD, Atkins NR, Hodson HP. Winglets for improved aerothermal performance of high pressure turbines. J Turbomach 2014;136(9):091007.

10

Lee SW, Cheon JH, Zhang Q. The effect of full coverage winglets on tip leakage aerodynamics over the plane tip in a turbine cascade. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2014;45:23–32.

11

Zhou C, Hodson H, Tibbott I, et al. Effects of winglet geometry on the aerodynamic performance of tip leakage flow in a turbine cascade. J Turbomach 2013;135(5):051009.

12

De Maesschalck C, Lavagnoli S, Paniagua G. Blade tip carving effects on the aerothermal performance of a transonic turbine. J Turbomach 2015;137(2):021005.

13

Maral H, Alpman E, Kavurmacıoğlu L, et al. A genetic algorithm based aerothermal optimization of tip carving for an axial turbine blade. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2019;143:118419.

14

Jiang S, Yu JY, Wang HW, et al. Experimental investigation of the bending clearance on the aerodynamic performance in turbine blade tip region. Energy 2020;197:117234.

15

Jiang S, Chen F, Yu JY, et al. Treatment and optimization of casing and blade tip for aerodynamic control of tip leakage flow in a turbine cascade. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;86:704–13.

16

Gao J, Zheng Q, Yue GQ. Reduction of tip clearance losses in an unshrouded turbine by rotor-casing contouring. J Propuls Power 2012;28(5):936–45.

17

Wei ZJ, Qiao WY, Shi PJ, et al. Tip-leakage flow loss reduction in a two-stage turbine using axisymmetric-casing contouring. Chin J Aeronaut 2014;27(5):1111–21.

18

Behr T, Kalfas AI, Abhari RS. Control of rotor tip leakage through cooling injection from the casing in a high-work turbine. J Turbomach 2008;130(3):031014.

19

Wang W, Chu WL, Zhang HG, et al. Experimental and numerical study of tip injection in a subsonic axial flow compressor. Chin J Aeronaut 2017;30(3):907–17.

20

Gao J, Zheng Q, Dong P, et al. Control of tip leakage vortex breakdown by tip injection in unshrouded turbines. J Propuls Power 2014;30(6):1510–9.

21

Bae JW, Breuer KS, Tan CS. Active control of tip clearance flow in axial compressors. J Turbomach 2005;127(2):352–62.

22
Matsunuma T, Segawa T. Tip leakage flow reduction of a linear turbine cascade using string-type DBD plasma actuators. New York: ASME; 2018, Report No.: GT2018-76680.
23

Yu JY, Wang Z, Chen F, et al. Kriging surrogate model applied in the mechanism study of tip leakage flow control in turbine cascade by multiple DBD plasma actuators. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;85:216–28.

24

Krishnababu SK, Newton PJ, Dawes WN, et al. Aerothermal investigations of tip leakage flow in axial flow turbines—Part Ⅰ: Effect of tip geometry and tip clearance gap. J Turbomach 2009;131(1):011006.

25

Zhou C. Aerothermal performance of different tips in transonic turbine cascade with end-wall motion. J Propuls Power 2014;30(5):1316–27.

26

Camci C, Dey D, Kavurmacioglu L. Aerodynamics of tip leakage flows near partial squealer rims in an axial flow turbine stage. J Turbomach 2005;127(1):14–24.

27

Lee SE, Lee SW. Tip gap flow characteristics in a turbine cascade equipped with pressure-side partial squealer rims. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2014;50:369–77.

28

Lee SE, Lee SW. Over-tip leakage flow and loss in a turbine cascade equipped with suction-side partial squealers. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2016;61:575–84.

29

Zhou C, Hodson H. Squealer geometry effects on aerothermal performance of tip-leakage flow of cavity tips. J Propuls Power 2012;28(3):556–67.

30

Senel CB, Maral H, Kavurmacioglu LA, et al. An aerothermal study of the influence of squealer width and height near a HP turbine blade. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018;120:18–32.

31

Zou Z, Shao F, Li Y, et al. Dominant flow structure in the squealer tip gap and its impact on turbine aerodynamic performance. Energy 2017;138:167–84.

32

Couch E, Christophel J, Hohlfeld E, et al. Comparison of measurements and predictions for blowing from a turbine blade tip. J Propuls Power 2005;21(2):335–43.

33
Li W, Qiao WY, Xu KF, et al. Numerical simulation of tip clearance flow control in axial turbine rotor: Part 1—Active flow control injection from turbine blade tip. New York: ASME; 2008. Report No.: GT2008-50084.
34
Rao NM, Camci C. Axial turbine tip desensitization by injection from a tip trench: Part 1—Effect of injection mass flow rate. New York: ASME; 2004. Report No.: GT2004-53256.
35
Rao NM, Camci C. Axial turbine tip desensitization by injection from a tip trench: Part 2—Leakage flow sensitivity to injection location. New York: ASME; 2004. Report No.: GT2004-53258.
36

Niu MS, Zang SS. Parametric study of tip cooling injection in an axial turbine cascade: Influences of injection circumferential angle. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J Power Energy 2010;224(1):109–18.

37

Niu MS, Zang SS. Experimental and numerical investigations of tip injection on tip clearance flow in an axial turbine cascade. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2011;35(6):1214–22.

38
Wang JH, Liu YL, Wang XC, et al. Characteristics of tip leakage flow of the turbine blade with cutback squealer and coolant injection. New York: ASME; 2010. Report No.: GT2010-22566.
39

Mercan B, Dogan E, Ostovan Y, et al. Effects of camberwise varying tip injection on loss and wake characteristics of a low pressure turbine blade. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2015;54:119–30.

40

Gao J, Zheng Q, Zhang ZY, et al. Aero-thermal performance improvements of unshrouded turbines through management of tip leakage and injection flows. Energy 2014;69:648–60.

41
Liu H, Romagnoli A, Martinez-Botas R, et al. Multi-injection turbine housing: A novel concept for tip-leakage improvement in radial turbines. New York: ASME; 2017. Report No.: GT2017-63975.
42

Sarallah A, Afshin G. Parametric study of injection from the casing in an axial turbine. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J Power Energy 2020;234(5):582–93.

43

Wang YB, Song YP, Yu JY, et al. Effect of the injection orientation and position on the leakage flow in a honeycomb-tip turbine cascade. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2019;144:118633.

44

El-Ghandour M, Ibrahim MK, Mori K, et al. Control of leakage flow by triple squealer configuration in axial flow turbine. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 2010;53(179):1–7.

45
Park JS, Lee SH, Kwak JS, et al. Measurement of blade tip heat transfer and leakage flow in a turbine cascade with a multi-cavity squealer tip. New York: ASME; 2013. Report No.: TBTS2013-2072.
46
Volino RJ. Experiments with a new ribbed blade tip and endwall geometry on a high pressure turbine blade. New York: ASME; 2015. Report No.: GT2015-44065.
47

Arisi A, Phillips J, Ng WF, et al. An experimental and numerical study on the aerothermal characteristics of a ribbed transonic squealer-tip turbine blade with purge flow. J Turbomach 2016;138(10):101007.

48

Jiang SJ, Li ZG, Li J, et al. Effects of the novel rib layouts on the tip leakage flow pattern and heat transfer performance of turbine blade. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2020;234(8):1446–59.

49

Wang YB, Yu JY, Song YP, et al. Parameter optimization of the composite honeycomb tip in a turbine cascade. Energy 2020;197:117236.

50
Behr T. Control of rotor tip leakage and secondary flow by casing air injection in unshrouded axial turbines[dissertation]. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; 2007.
51

Lee SW, Kim SU. Tip gap height effects on the aerodynamic performance of a cavity squealer tip in a turbine cascade in comparison with plane tip results: Part 1—tip gap flow structure. Exp Fluids 2010;49(5):1039–51.

52

Cheng FN, Zhang JZ, Chang HP, et al. Investigations of film-cooling effectiveness on the squealer tip with various film-hole configurations in a linear cascade. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018;117:344–57.

53

Acharya S, Moreaux L. Numerical study of the flow past a turbine blade tip: Effect of relative motion between blade and shroud. J Turbomach 2014;136(3):031015.

54

Gao J, Zheng Q, Dong P, et al. Effects of flow incidence on aerothermal performance of transonic blade tip clearance flows. Energy 2017;139:196–209.

55
Acharya S, Kramer G, Moreaux L, et al. Squealer tip heat transfer with film cooling. New York: ASME; 2010. Report No.: GT2010-23688.
56

Wang J, Sundén B, Zeng M, et al. Influence of different rim widths and blowing ratios on film cooling characteristics for a blade tip. J Heat Transf 2012;134(6):061701.

57

Cheng FN, Chang HP, Zhang JY, et al. Effect of film-hole configuration on film-cooling effectiveness of squealer tips. J Therm Sci Technol 2017;12(1):JTST0004.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 54-73
Cite this article:
ZHANG S, WANG Q, TAN X, et al. Control of squealer-tip leakage flow with perforated-rib coolant injection in an axial turbine cascade. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(8): 54-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.04.015

44

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 04 July 2022
Revised: 31 July 2022
Accepted: 19 September 2022
Published: 17 April 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return