AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

An interlaminar damage shell model for typical composite structures

Jie ZHOUaZhen WUa,b,( )Zhengliang LIUaXiaohui RENc
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity, Xi’an 710065, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Aeronautical University, Xi’an 710065, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA

Show Author Information

Abstract

Using the plate/shell elements in commercial software, accurate analysis of interlaminar initial damage in typical composite structures is still a challenging issue. To propose an accurate and efficient model for analysis of interlaminar initial damage, the following work is carried out: (A) A higher-order theory is firstly proposed by introducing the local Legendre polynomials, and then a novel shell element containing initial damage prediction is developed, which can directly predict transverse shear stresses without any postprocessing methods. Unknown variables at each node are independent of number of layers, so the proposed model is more efficient than the 3D-FEM. (B) Compression experiment is carried out to verify the capability of the proposed model. The results obtained from the proposed model are in good agreement with experimental data. (C) Several examples have been analyzed to further assess the capability of the proposed model by comparing to the 3D-FEM results. Moreover, accuracy and efficiency have been evaluated in different damage criterion by comparing with the selected models. The numerical results show that the proposed model can well predict the initial interlaminar damage as well as other damage. Finally, the model is implemented with UEL subroutine, so that the present approach can be readily utilized to analyze the initial damage in typical composite structures.

References

1

Caliri MF, Ferreira AJM, Tita V. A review on plate and shell theories for laminated and sandwich structures highlighting the Finite Element Method. Compos Struct 2016;156:63–77.

2

Ciarlet PG, Gratie L. Another approach to linear shell theory and a new proof of Korn’s inequality on a surface. Comptes Rendus Math 2005;340(6):471–8.

3

Jung WY, Han SC. A refined element-based Lagrangian shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis of shell structures. Adv Mech Eng 2015;7(4), 168781401558127.

4

Nguyen-Van H, Mai-Duy N, Tran-Cong T. Free vibration analysis of laminated plate/shell structures based on FSDT with a stabilized nodal-integrated quadrilateral element. J Sound Vib 2008;313(1–2):205–23.

5

Carrera E, Valvano S, Filippi M. Classical, higher-order, zig-zag and variable kinematic shell elements for the analysis of composite multilayered structures. Eur J Mech A/solids 2018;72:97–110.

6

Carrera E, Pagani A, Valvano S. Shell elements with through-the-thickness variable kinematics for the analysis of laminated composite and sandwich structures. Compos B Eng 2017;111:294–314.

7

Carrera E, Zappino E. Carrera unified formulation for free-vibration analysis of aircraft structures. AIAA J 2015;54(1):280–92.

8

Kumar A, Chakrabarti A, Bhargava P. Vibration analysis of laminated composite skew cylindrical shells using higher order shear deformation theory. J Vib Control 2015;21(4):725–35.

9

Versino D, Gherlone M, Di Sciuva M. Four-node shell element for doubly curved multilayered composites based on the Refined Zigzag Theory. Compos Struct 2014;118:392–402.

10

Liu B, Ferreira AJM, Xing YF, et al. Analysis of functionally graded sandwich and laminated shells using a layerwise theory and a differential quadrature finite element method. Compos Struct 2016;136:546–53.

11

Kumar A, Chakrabarti A, Bhargava P. Finite element analysis of laminated composite and sandwich shells using higher order zigzag theory. Compos Struct 2013;106:270–81.

12

Pagani A, Valvano S, Carrera E. Analysis of laminated composites and sandwich structures by variable-kinematic MITC9 plate elements. J Sandw Struct Mater 2018;20(1):4–41.

13

Li XY, Liu D. Generalized laminate theories based on double superposition hypothesis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1997;40(7):1197–212.

14

Wu Z, Chen WJ. A higher-order theory and refined three-node triangular element for functionally graded plates. Eur J Mech A/solids 2006;25(3):447–63.

15

Reddy JN. A refined nonlinear theory of plates with transverse shear deformation. Int J Solids Struct 1984;20(9–10):881–96.

16

Plagianakos TS, Saravanos DA. Higher-order layerwise laminate theory for the prediction of interlaminar shear stresses in thick composite and sandwich composite plates. Compos Struct 2009;87(1):23–35.

17

Cho M, Yoon JY. First-ply flexural failure analysis of symmetric cross-ply laminates by the postprocess method. Compos Struct 1997;40(2):115–27.

18

Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ, Soden PD. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions. Compos Sci Technol 2004;64(3–4):449–76.

19

Hoffman O. The brittle strength of orthotropic materials. J Compos Mater 1967;1(2):200–6.

20

Hill R. Theory of mechanical properties of fibre-strengthened materials: Ⅰ Elastic behaviour. J Mech Phys Solids 1964;12(4):199–212.

21

Tsai SW, Wu EM. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater 1971;5(1):58–80.

22

Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 1980;47(2):329–34.

23

Chang FK, Chang KY. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations. J Compos Mater 1987;21(9):834–55.

24

Hou JP, Petrinic N, Ruiz C, et al. Prediction of impact damage in composite plates. Compos Sci Technol 2000;60(2):273–81.

25

Puck A, Schürmann H. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol 2002;62(12–13):1633–62.

26

Davila CG, Camanho PP, Rose CA. Failure criteria for FRP laminates. J Compos Mater 2005;39(4):323–45.

27

Spottswood SM, Palazotto AN. Progressive failure analysis of a composite shell. Compos Struct 2001;53(1):117–31.

28

Reddy JN, Pandey AK. A first-ply failure analysis of composite laminates. Comput Struct 1987;25(3):371–93.

29

Kam TY, Sher HF, Chao TN, et al. Predictions of deflection and first-ply failure load of thin laminated composite plates via the finite element approach. Int J Solids Struct 1996;33(3):375–98.

30

Kelly G, Hallström S. Strength and failure mechanisms of composite laminates subject to localised transverse loading. Compos Struct 2005;69(3):301–14.

31

Panigrahi SK, Pradhan B. Three dimensional failure analysis and damage propagation behavior of adhesively bonded single lap joints in laminated FRP composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 2007;26(2):183–201.

32

Zhang ZF, Chen HR, Ye L. Progressive failure analysis for advanced grid stiffened composite plates/shells. Compos Struct 2008;86(1–3):45–54.

33

Amabili M, Reddy JN. The nonlinear, third-order thickness and shear deformation theory for statics and dynamics of laminated composite shells. Compos Struct 2020;244:112265.

34

Yadav A, Amabili M, Panda SK, et al. Nonlinear analysis of cylindrical sandwich shells with porous core and CNT reinforced face-sheets by higher-order thickness and shear deformation theory. Eur J Mech A/solids 2021;90:104366.

35

Carrera E, de Miguel AG, Filippi M, et al. Global-local plug-in for high-fidelity composite stress analysis in Femap/NX Nastran. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2021;28(11):1121–7.

36

Carrera E, de Miguel AG, Filippi M, et al. Global-local plug-in for high-fidelity composite stress analysis in ABAQUS. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2021;28(14):1445–50.

37

Carrera E. Developments, ideas, and evaluations based upon Reissner’s Mixed Variational Theorem in the modeling of multilayered plates and shells. Appl Mech Rev 2001;54(4):301–29.

38

Carrera E, Cinefra M, Lamberti A, et al. Results on best theories for metallic and laminated shells including Layer-Wise models. Compos Struct 2015;126:285–98.

39

Cinefra M, Carrera E. Shell finite elements with different through-the-thickness kinematics for the linear analysis of cylindrical multilayered structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2013;93(2):160–82.

40

Cinefra M, Carrera E, Della Croce L, et al. Refined shell elements for the analysis of functionally graded structures. Compos Struct 2012;94(2):415–22.

41

Carrera E, Pagani A, Azzara R, et al. Vibration of metallic and composite shells in geometrical nonlinear equilibrium states. Thin Walled Struct 2020;157:107131.

42

Azzara R, Carrera E, Pagani A. Nonlinear and linearized vibration analysis of plates and shells subjected to compressive loading. Int J Non Linear Mech 2022;141:103936.

43

Foroutan K, Ahmadi H, Carrera E. Free vibration analysis of a sandwich cylindrical shell with an FG core based on the CUF. Smart Struct Syst 2022;30(2):121–33.

44

Carrera E, Pagani A, Augello R, et al. Popular benchmarks of nonlinear shell analysis solved by 1D and 2D CUF-based finite elements. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2020;27(13):1098–109.

45

Carrera E, Zozulya VV. Carrera unified formulation (CUF) for the micropolar plates and shells. Ⅰ. Higher order theory. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2022;29(6):773–95.

46

Carrera E, Zozulya VV. Carrera unified formulation (CUF) for the micropolar plates and shells. Ⅱ. Complete linear expansion case. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2022;29(6):796–815.

47

Zozulya VV, Carrera E. Carrera unified formulation (CUF) for the micropolar plates and shells. Ⅲ. Classical models. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2022;29(27):6336–60.

48

Petrolo M, Carrera E. Selection of element-wise shell kinematics using neural networks. Comput Struct 2021;244:106425.

49

Zhang P, Tan SY, Hu XF, et al. A double-phase field model for multiple failures in composites. Compos Struct 2022;293:115730.

50

Min L, Hu XF, Yao WA, et al. On realizing specific failure initiation criteria in the phase field model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2022;394:114881.

51

Hu XF, Xu HQ, Xi X, et al. Meso-scale phase field modelling of reinforced concrete structures subjected to corrosion of multiple reinforcements. Constr Build Mater 2022;321:126376.

52

Bui TQ, Hu XF. A review of phase-field models, fundamentals and their applications to composite laminates. Eng Fract Mech 2021;248:107705.

53

Cheung YK, Chen WJ. Refined nine-parameter triangular thin plate bending element by using refined direct stiffness method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1995;38(2):283–98.

54

Bazeley GP, Cheung YK, Irons BM, et al. Triangular elements in plate bending Conforming and nonconforming solutions. Proc Conf Matrix Methods Struct Mech 1965;7(3):547–76.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 118-137
Cite this article:
ZHOU J, WU Z, LIU Z, et al. An interlaminar damage shell model for typical composite structures. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(1): 118-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.05.027

118

Views

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 10 October 2022
Revised: 26 October 2022
Accepted: 28 November 2022
Published: 02 June 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return