AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Influence of differential longitudinal cyclic pitch on flight dynamics of coaxial compound helicopter

Yanqin ZHAOaYe YUANbRenliang CHENa( )
National Key Laboratory of Helicopter Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea city SA1 8EN, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Differential Longitudinal Cyclic Pitch (DLCP) in coaxial compound helicopter is found to be useful in mitigating low-speed rotor interactions and improving flight performance. The complex mutual interaction is simulated by a revised rotor aerodynamics model, where an improved Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) is proposed. Comparisons with the rotor inflow distributions and aircraft trim results from literature validate the accuracy of the model. Then, the influence of the DLCP on the flight dynamics of the aircraft is analysed. The trim characteristics indicate that a negative DLCP can reduce collective and differential collective inputs in low speed forward flight, and the negative longitudinal gradient is alleviated. Moreover, a moderate DLCP can reduce the rotor and total power consumption by 4.68% and 2.9%, respectively. As DLCP further increases, the increased propeller power and unbalanced thrust allocation offset the improvement. In high-speed flight, DLCP does not improve the performance except for extra lateral and heading stick displacements. In addition, the tip clearance is degraded throughout the speed envelope due to the differential pitching moment and the higher thrust from the lower rotor. Meanwhile, the changed rotor efficiency and induced velocity alter low-speed dynamic stability and controllability. The pitch and roll subsidences are slightly degraded with the DLCP, while the heave subsidence, dutch roll and phugoid modes are improved. Lastly, the on-axis controllability, including collective, differential collective pitch, longitudinal and lateral cyclic pitches, varies with DLCP due to its effect on rotor efficiency and inflow distribution. In conclusion, a reasonable DLCP is recommended to adjust the rotor interaction and improve aircraft performance, and further to alter the flight dynamics and aerodynamics of aircraft.

References

1
Johnson W. Influence of lift offset on rotorcraft performance. Moffett Field(CA): Ames Research Center; 2009. Report No.: NASA/TP–2009-215404.
2

Yuan Y, Thomson D, Chen RL. Investigation of lift offset on flight dynamics characteristics for coaxial compound helicopters. J Aircr 2019;56(6):2210–22.

3

Schmaus JH, Chopra I. Aeromechanics of rigid coaxial rotor models for wind-tunnel testing. J Aircr 2017;54(4):1486–97.

4

Deng JH, Fan F, Liu PA, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of rigid coaxial rotor by wind tunnel test and numerical calculation. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(3):568–76.

5

Jacobellis G, Gandhi F, Floros M. Using control redundancy for power and vibration reduction on a coaxial rotor helicopter at high speeds. J Am Helicopter Soc 2019;64(3):1–15.

6
Ruddell AJ. Advancing blade concept (ABCTM) development. Sikorsky: Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corporation; 1981. Report No.: USAAVRADCOM-TR-81-D-5.
7
Ruddell A. Advancing blade concept/ABC/development test program. 1st flight test conference; Las Vegas NV, USA. Reston: AIAA; 1981.
8
Walsh D, Weiner S, Arifian K, et al. High airspeed testing of the Sikorsky X2 technology demonstrator. American helicopter society 67th annual forum; Virginia Beach, VA. 2011.
9
Eller E. X2TM load alleviating controls. American helicopter society 68th annual forum; Fort Worth, TX. 2012.
10
Lorber PF, Law GK, O’Neill JJ. Overview of S-97 RaiderTM scale model tests. American helicopter society 72th annual forum; West Palm Beach, Florida, USA. 2016.
11

Lorber PF, Zhao J, Bowles P, et al. S-97 Raider® wake-empennage interaction flight data and correlation. Vertical flight society (VFS) 77th annual forum & technology display. 2021.

12

Jia ZQ, Lee S. Impulsive loading noise of a lift-offset coaxial rotor in high-speed forward flight. AIAA J 2020;58(2):687–701.

13

Chen RL, Yuan Y, Thomson D. A review of mathematical modelling techniques for advanced rotorcraft configurations. Prog Aerosp Sci 2021;120:100681.

14

Yuan Y, Chen RL, Li P. Trim investigation for coaxial rigid rotor helicopters using an improved aerodynamic interference model. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;85:293–304.

15

Ho JC, Yeo H. Analytical study of an isolated coaxial rotor system with lift offset. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;100:105818.

16

Makeev PV, Ignatkin YM, Shomov AI. Numerical investigation of full scale coaxial main rotor aerodynamics in hover and vertical descent. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(5):666–83.

17

Zhao JG, He CJ. A finite state dynamic wake model enhanced with vortex particle method–derived modeling parameters for coaxial rotor simulation and analysis. J Am Helicopter Soc 2016;61(2):1-9.

18
Valkov T. Aerodynamic loads computation on coaxial hingeless helicopter rotors. 28th aerospace sciences meeting; Reno, NV, USA. Reston: AIAA; 1990.
19
Leishman JG, Ananthan S. Aerodynamic optimization of a coaxial proprotor. American helicopter society 62th annual forum; Phoenix, AZ, United States 2006.
20
Lee S, Dassonville M. Iterative blade element momentum theory for a coaxial rotor. Vertical flight society (VFS) 75th annual forum & technology display; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2019.
21
Kong YB. Development of a finite state coaxial rotor dynamic inflow model [dissertation]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2018.
22

Ferguson K, Thomson D. Flight dynamics investigation of compound helicopter configurations. J Aircr 2015;52(1):156–67.

23
Gaonkar G, Peters D. Review of dynamic inflow modeling for rotorcraft flight dynamics. 27th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; San Antonio, TX, USA. Reston: AIAA; 1986.
24

Yan XF, Chen RL. Augmented flight dynamics model for pilot workload evaluation in tilt-rotor aircraft optimal landing procedure after one engine failure. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(1):92–103.

25
Pleasants WA. A rotor technology assessment of the advancing blade concept. Moffett Field(CA):Ames Research Center; 1983. Report No.: NASA-TM-84298.
26

Landgrebe AJ. The wake geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor and its influence on rotor performance. J Am Helicopter Soc 1972;17(4):3-15.

27

Leishman JG. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

28

Innocenti M. Helicopter flight dynamics: the theory and application of flying qualities and simulation modeling. J Guid Control Dyn 1999;22(2):383–4.

29
Kim FD. Formulation and validation of high-order mathematical models of helicopter flight dynamics [dissertation]. Maryland: University of Maryland; 1991.
30

Xin H, Zhang C, Black A, et al. S-97 Raider® GENHEL model development and correlation with flight test data. Vertical flight society 77th annual forum 2021.

31
Klingloff RF. Rigid coaxial (ABC) TM rotor system stability and control characteristics. 32nd annual national forum of the Amercian helicopter society; Washington, D.C. 1976.
32
Felker F. Performance and loads data from a wind tunnel test of a full-scale, coaxial, hingeless rotor helicopter. Moffett Field(CA): Ames Research Center; 1981. Report No.: NASA-TM-81329.
33

Kim HW, Kenyon AR, Brown RE, et al. Interactional aerodynamics and acoustics of a hingeless coaxial helicopter with an auxiliary propeller in forward flight. Aeronaut J 2009;113(1140):65–78.

34

Yuan Y, Thomson D, Chen RL. Propeller control strategy for coaxial compound helicopters. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2019;233(10):3775–89.

35

Yuan Y, Thomson D, Chen RL, et al. Heading control strategy assessment for coaxial compound helicopters. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(9):2037–46.

36
Chen RTN. Effects of primary rotor parameters on flapping dynamics. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1980. Report No.: NASA-TP-1431.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 207-220
Cite this article:
ZHAO Y, YUAN Y, CHEN R. Influence of differential longitudinal cyclic pitch on flight dynamics of coaxial compound helicopter. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(9): 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.06.002

44

Views

5

Crossref

4

Web of Science

7

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 01 September 2022
Revised: 20 October 2022
Accepted: 17 December 2022
Published: 08 June 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return