AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Chinese Journal of Aeronautics Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Payload-oriented control scheme for rotating payload satellite considering inertia uncertainties and measurement errors

Yatao ZHAO, Cheng WEI( ), Chengfei YUE, Xibin CAO
School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

For the remote sensing satellite with an unbalanced rotating payload suspended by an Active Magnetic Bearing (AMB), this paper proposes a payload-oriented control scheme where the high-precision payload attitude control is dominating. Firstly, to suppress the disturbances induced by payload inertia uncertainties and state measurement errors, an integrated framework of parameter identification and nonlinear predictive filtering is proposed to estimate payload inertia parameters and system states from multi-timescale, noise- and drift-contaminated measurement data, breaking the mutual constraint between identification and filter. Secondly, based on the estimation results, the control law and bearing electromagnetic force allocation strategy of the payload-oriented scheme are provided, so that the payload tracks the desired motion and the satellite platform follows payload to prevent the air gap of AMB from exceeding the safety threshold. Finally, the simulations are carried out to verify the advantages of the proposed control scheme in enhancing the payload control precision and isolating the platform vibration.

Keywords

Attitude controlIdentificationState estimationPayload-oriented schemeSatellites

References

1

Tang XM, Hu F, Wang M, et al. Inner FoV stitching of spaceborne TDI CCD images based on sensor geometry and projection plane in object space. Remote Sens 2014;6(7):6386–406.
Crossref Google Scholar
2

Lu Y, Wang KY, Fan GS. Photometric calibration and image stitching for a large field of view multi-camera system. Sensors 2016;16(4):516.
Crossref Google Scholar
3

Wu F, Cao XB, Butcher EA, et al. Dynamics and control of spacecraft with a large misaligned rotational component. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;87:207–17.
Crossref Google Scholar
4

Peijnenburg ATA, Vermeulen JPM, van Eijk J. Magnetic levitation systems compared to conventional bearing systems. Microelectron Eng 2006;83(4–9):1372–5.
Crossref Google Scholar
5

Han BC, Chen YL, Li MX, et al. Stable control of nutation and precession for the radial four-degree-of-freedom AMB-rotor system considering strong gyroscopic effects. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2021;68(11):11369–78.
Crossref Google Scholar
6

Zhao YT, Chen XQ, Wang F, et al. Modeling of active magnetic bearing in rotating payload satellite considering shaft motion coupling. J Mech Sci Technol 2020;34(11):4423–37.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

Zhang GW, Wang F, Chen J, et al. Fixed-time sliding mode attitude control of a flexible spacecraft with rotating appendages connected by magnetic bearing. Math Biosci Eng 2022;19(3):2286–309.
Crossref Google Scholar
8

Pedreiro N. Spacecraft architecture for disturbance-free payload. J Guid Contr Dyn 2003;26(5):794–804.
Crossref Google Scholar
9

Kong YF, Huang H. Performance enhancement of disturbance-free payload with a novel design of architecture and control. Acta Astronaut 2019;159:238–49.
Crossref Google Scholar
10

Zhang L, Wei CZ, Wu R, et al. Fixed-time extended state observer based non-singular fast terminal sliding mode control for a VTVL reusable launch vehicle. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;82–83:70–9.
Crossref Google Scholar
11

Yang T, Sun N, Chen H, et al. Adaptive optimal motion control of uncertain underactuated mechatronic systems with actuator constraints. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2023;28(1):210–22.
Crossref Google Scholar
12

Yang T, Chen H, Sun N, et al. Adaptive neural network output feedback control of uncertain underactuated systems with actuated and unactuated state constraints. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2022;52(11):7027–43.
Crossref Google Scholar
13

Ma O, Dang H, Pham K. On-orbit identification of inertia properties of spacecraft using a robotic arm. J Guid Contr Dyn 2008;31(6):1761–71.
Crossref Google Scholar
14

Xu WF, Hu ZH, Zhang Y, et al. On-orbit identifying the inertia parameters of space robotic systems using simple equivalent dynamics. Acta Astronaut 2017;132:131–42.
Crossref Google Scholar
15
Suo ML, Chen XL, Li SL. Identification of mass characteristic parameters for spacecraft based on differential evolution algorithm. 2015 fifth international conference on instrumentation and measurement, computer, communication and control (IMCCC). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2016. p.1967–71.
Crossref
16

Liu ZX, Huang PF, Lu ZY. Recursive differential evolution algorithm for inertia parameter identification of space manipulator. Int J Adv Rob Syst 2016;13(3):104.
Crossref Google Scholar
17

Jin CD, Kang GH, Guo YJ, et al. On-orbit intelligent identification of combined spacecraft’s inertia parameter based on deep learning. Chin Space Sci Technol 2019;39(2):1–12 [Chinese].
Google Scholar
18

Leboutet Q, Roux J, Janot A, et al. Inertial parameter identification in robotics: A survey. Appl Sci 2021;11(9):4303.
Crossref Google Scholar
19

Liu XF, Zhang XY, Chen PR, et al. Inertia parameter identification for an unknown satellite in precapture scenario. Int J Aerosp Eng 2020;2020:1–18.
Crossref Google Scholar
20

Meng QL, Liang JX, Ma O. Identification of all the inertial parameters of a non-cooperative object in orbit. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;91:571–82.
Crossref Google Scholar
21

Liu XD, Xin X, Li Z, et al. Parameter identification–based attitude stabilization control of spacecraft with multiaccessories during orbital maneuver. J Aerosp Eng 2017;30(3):04016099.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

Yang ZG, Zhu XC, Cai ZM, et al. A real-time calibration method for the systematic errors of a star sensor and gyroscope units based on the payload multiplexed. Optik 2021;225:165731.
Crossref Google Scholar
23
Fan ZR, Yang J. A research of gyro/star-sensor integrated attitude determination based on particle filter. In: 2013 third international conference on instrumentation, measurement, computer, communication and control. Piscataway:IEEE Press; 2014.p.256–61.
24

Wang DY, Li MD, Huang XY, et al. Kalman filtering for a quadratic form state equality constraint. J Guid Contr Dyn 2014;37(3):951–8.
Crossref Google Scholar
25

Zhou ZX, Gao YN, Chen LB. Unscented Kalman filter for SINS alignment. J Syst Eng Electron 2007;18(2):327–33.
Crossref Google Scholar
26

Arasaratnam I, Haykin S, Hurd TR. Cubature Kalman filtering for continuous-discrete systems: Theory and simulations. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2010;58(10):4977–93.
Crossref Google Scholar
27

Gao BB, Hu GG, Zhu XH, et al. A robust cubature Kalman filter with abnormal observations identification using the mahalanobis distance criterion for vehicular INS/GNSS integration. Sensors 2019;19(23):5149.
Crossref Google Scholar
28

Gao BB, Hu GG, Li WM, et al. Maximum likelihood-based measurement noise covariance estimation using sequential quadratic programming for cubature Kalman filter applied in INS/BDS integration. Math Probl Eng 2021;2021:1–13.
Crossref Google Scholar
29

Qian HM, Huang W, Qian LC, et al. Robust extended Kalman filter for attitude estimation with multiplicative noises and unknown external disturbances. IET Contr Theory Appl 2014;8(15):1523–36.
Crossref Google Scholar
30

Gao BB, Li WM, Hu GG, et al. Mahalanobis distance-based fading cubature Kalman filter with augmented mechanism for hypersonic vehicle INS/CNS autonomous integration. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(5):114–28.
Crossref Google Scholar
31

Gao BB, Hu GG, Zhong YM, et al. Cubature Kalman filter with both adaptability and robustness for tightly-coupled GNSS/INS integration. IEEE Sens J 2021;21(13):14997–5011.
Crossref Google Scholar
32

Crassidis JL, Markley FL. Predictive filtering for nonlinear systems. J Guid Contr Dyn 1997;20(3):566–72.
Crossref Google Scholar
33

Gao BB, Hu GG, Zhong YM, et al. Cubature rule-based distributed optimal fusion with identification and prediction of kinematic model error for integrated UAV navigation. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;109:106447.
Crossref Google Scholar
34

Fang JC, Gong XL. Predictive iterated Kalman filter for INS/GPS integration and its application to SAR motion compensation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2010;59(4):909–15.
Crossref Google Scholar
35

Wie B, Weiss H, Arapostathis A. Quarternion feedback regulator for spacecraft eigenaxis rotations. J Guid Contr Dyn 1989;12(3):375–80.
Crossref Google Scholar
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Volume 36 Issue 10,
October 2023
Pages 335-352
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.06.037
Cite this article:
ZHAO Y, WEI C, YUE C, et al. Payload-oriented control scheme for rotating payload satellite considering inertia uncertainties and measurement errors. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(10): 335-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.06.037

76

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 19 September 2022
Revised: 04 January 2023
Accepted: 22 February 2023
Published: 05 July 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Return