AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Experimental investigation on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of Fenestron

Bo WANGa,( )Wei ZHANGa,bFei WANGbQijun ZHAOaChenkai CAOaYuan GAOa
National Key Laboratory of Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
China Helicopter Research and Development Institute, Jingdezhen 333001, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

It is difficult to simulate the strong interference and serious flow separation of Fenestron by the CFD method based on the widely used RANS equation, and the detailed experimental data, which could be used to validate the aerodynamic and noise numerical methods, is unavailable. The experimental investigation on the aerodynamic and noise characteristics of Fenestron is carried out. In view of the complex internal flow field in duct and the relative motion between the stationary duct and the rotating rotor, a comprehensive aerodynamics and pressure measurement scheme is designed based on the bottom support rig. In this measurement scheme, the thrust generated by the rotating rotor can be measured by the rotating shaft balance, the thrusts from Fenestron are measured by the external balance and the pressures on duct inner wall are monitored by a pressure measuring system. To fully capture the noise directionality of Fenestron, a series of noise observers located at an arc array are arranged. In terms of the Fenestron test models, the baseline model, the performance improvement model based on the high-performance tail rotor and the noise reduction model based on the non-uniform blade distribution are designed respectively. By the designed measurement scheme, aerodynamic forces and pressure distributions and noise were measured for the three different Fenestron models. The results show that the aerodynamic thrusts of the tail rotor and duct increase greatly and the noise increases slightly for the performance improvement model because of the larger aerodynamics. The rotor aerodynamic performance of the noise reduction model is reduced, but the modulation effect of the tail rotor improves the forces of the duct. The noise radiated by the noise reduction model is reduced and a good noise reduction result is obtained in frequency domain.

References

1
Schneider S, Heger R, Konstanzer P. Bluecopter demonstrator: The state-of-the-art in low noise design. The 42nd European rotorcraft forum; Lille, France. 2016.
2
D’Alascio A, Chuiton FL, Mouterde E, et al. Aerodynamic study of the EC135 Fenestron in hovering flight conditions by means of CFD. American helicopter society 64th annual forum; Montréal, Canada. 2008.
3
Basset P, Brocard M. A Fenestron model for improving the helicopter yaw dynamics flight simulation. The 30th European rotorcraft forum; Lille, France. 2004.
4
Chaderjian NM, Ahmad JU. Detached eddy simulation of the UH-60 rotor wake using adaptive mesh refinement. American helicopter society 68th annual forum; Fort Worth, TX. 2012.
5
Marino M, Gourdain N, Boussuge JF, et al. A large eddy simulation of the Fenestron® at high blade pitch angle. The 6th European conference for aeronautics and space sciences (EUCASS); Kraków, Poland. 2015.
6
Denton JD. Some limitations of turbomachinery CFD. ASME turbo expo 2010, power for lanc sea and air volume7: Tubomachinery, Parts A, B and C; Glasgow, UK. New York: ASME; 2010.
7

Tomko JR, Stephens DB, Economon T, et al. Experiments and analysis of the internal wall pressure of a ducted rotor. J Sound Vib 2019;451(7):84–98.

8
Falissard F, Desmerger F, Gardarein P, et al. Aeroacoustic flight test and data analysis for the validation of Fenestron noise computations. The 67th American helicopter society annual forum; Virginia Beach, Virginia, US. 2011.
9

Olsman WFJ. Experimental investigation of fenestron noise. J Am Helicopter Soc 2022;67(3):16–27.

10
Lafargue M. The shrouded tail rotor——“FENESTRON”. Second European rotorcraft and powered lift aircraft forum. 1976.
11

Mouille R. The “fenestron”, shrouded tail rotor of the SA. 341 gazelle. J Am Helicopter Soc 1970;15(4):31–7.

12
Fairchild E, Batra NN, Capt RL, et al. Influence of design parameters on fan-in-fin static performance. The 29th annual national forum of the American helicopter society. 1973.
13
Keys C, Sheffer M, Weiner S, et al. LH wind tunnel testing: Key to advanced aerodynamic design. American helicopter society 47th annual forum; Phoenix, Arizona. 1991.
14
Roger M, Fournier F. An analysis of in-fin tail rotor noise. 12th European rotorcraft forum. 1986. p. 1–16.
15

Prouty RW. The angle on the scissors rotor. Rotor Wing 1996;46.

16
Shahady P, Lyon C, Schauer J, et al. The effects of modulated blade spacing on static rotor acoustics and performance. Proceedings of the aeroacoustics conference; Seattle, WA, USA. Reston: AIAA; 1973.
17

Bu YP, Song WP, Han ZH, et al. Aerodynamic/aeroacoustic variable-fidelity optimization of helicopter rotor based on hierarchical Kriging model. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(2):476–92.

18
Riley RG. Effects of uneven blade spacing on Fenestron acoustics. The American helicopter society 52nd annual forum; Washington, D.C. 1996.
19

Johnson W. Helicopter theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1980.

20

Chen SY, Zhao QJ, Ma YY. An adaptive integration surface for predicting transonic rotor noise in hovering and forward flights. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(9):2047–58.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 88-101
Cite this article:
WANG B, ZHANG W, WANG F, et al. Experimental investigation on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of Fenestron. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(12): 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.08.005

86

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 14 November 2022
Revised: 04 December 2022
Accepted: 01 February 2023
Published: 12 August 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return