AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Friction measurement of aircraft wing based on optimized FlowNet2.0

Hongjiang QIANaZhiyong HUANGa( )Jian WANGaYeting XUbXiucheng DONGbJiebin SHENa
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
School of Electrical Engineering and Electronic Information, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Few studies have applied the deep optical flows model to global friction measurements of aircraft wing. This study used an optimized FlowNet2.0 model to measure friction of wing based on fluorescent oil film, which achieved the first integration of deep learning and friction measurement. Two input images of the traditional FlowNet2.0 model were extended to multiple images so that more flow features and details could be with them. It is the specific part of optimization that will also further improve the measurement accuracy of FlowNet2.0. Simulation experimental results show that the optimized FlowNet2.0 model reduces the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) error by 8.51% and increases Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) by only 0.0138 when compared to the hybrid optical flow method, which indicate that the optimized FlowNet2.0 model has great potential for friction measurement. Measurements in continuous transonic wind tunnel tests demonstrate that FlowNet2.0 can calculate clearer and more accurate flow velocity than hybrid optical flow, and the solved friction magnitude distribution is consistent with the actual flow, which will be of great practical application in wind tunnel engineering.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-36-11-91_ESM.pdf (2.1 MB)

References

1

Cai ZM, Salazar DM, Chen T, et al. Determining surface pressure from skin friction. Exp Fluids 2022;63(9):1-18.

2

Liu YL, Xu GQ, Fu YC, et al. Frictional resistance of supercritical pressure RP-3 flowing in a vertically downward tube at constant heat fluxes. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(9):117-28.

3

Liu TS, Chen T, Salazar DM, et al. Skin friction and surface optical flow in viscous flows. Phys Fluids 2022;34(6):067101.

4

Su Z, Zong HH, Liang H, et al. Minimizing airfoil drag at low angles of attack with DBD-based turbulent drag reduction methods. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(4):104-19.

5

Liu TS, Montefort J, Stanfield S, et al. Inverse heat transfer methods for global heat flux measurements in aerothermodynamics testing. Prog Aerosp Sci 2019;107:1-18.

6

Qian HJ, Dong XC, Zhang ZY. Research on stability of gray value of excited-state fluorescent oil film based on variable light vector angle. Math Probl Eng 2021;2021:8632992.

7

Zhu ZQ, Wu ZC, Ding JC. Laminar flow control technology and application. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2011;32(5):765-84 [Chinese].

8

Liu HK, Zhang SS, Zou Y, et al. Uncertainty analysis of turbulence model in capturing flows involving laminarization and retransition. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(10):148-64.

9

Zou YF, Zhang ZY, Wang XY, et al. Velocity measurement of fluorescent oil film path movement on wind tunnel testing model surface. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2019;40(6):122595 [Chinese].

10

Liu TS, Salazar DM, Crafton J, et al. Extraction of skin friction topology of turbulent wedges on a swept wing in transonic flow from surface temperature images. Exp Fluids 2021;62(10):1-24.

11

Qian HJ, Dong XC, Zhang ZY. Improved prediction model of gray and thickness of fluorescent oil film based on Hankel matrix. J Aerosp Power 2021;36(10):2061-71 [Chinese].

12

Liu TS, Montefort J, Woodiga S, et al. Global luminescent oil-film skin-friction meter. AIAA J 2008;46(2):476-85.

13

Kayser FM, Goulart J, Guellouz MS, et al. Experimental assessment of the gap width effect on turbulent flow and forced convective heat transfer around a single rod suspended in a channel. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2022;136:110661.

14

Rezaeiravesh S, Vinuesa R, Liefvendahl M, et al. Assessment of uncertainties in hot-wire anemometry and oil-film interferometry measurements for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Eur J Mech Fluids 2018;72:57-73.

15

Tauviqirrahman M, Ismail R, Jamari J, et al. Friction reduction in lubricated-MEMS with complex slip surface pattern. Procedia Eng 2013;68:331-7.

16

Gimpl V, Fantetti A, Klaassen SWB, et al. Contact stiffness of jointed interfaces: A comparison of dynamic substructuring techniques with frictional hysteresis measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 2022;171:108896.

17

Liu TS, Shen LX. Fluid flow and optical flow. J Fluid Mech 2008;614:253-91.

18

Liu TS, Woodiga S, Montefort J, et al. Global skin friction diagnostics in separated flows using luminescent oil. J Flow Vis Image Proc 2009;16(1):19-39.

19

Li P, Ming X. Fluorescent oil film method for global surface friction measurement of wind turbine blades. J Nanjing U Aeronaut Astronaut 2011;43(5):581-5 [Chinese].

20

Wang HW, Huang Z, Gong J, et al. The optical flow method research of particle image velocimetry. Procedia Eng 2015;99:918-24.

21

Osman AB, Ovinis M, Hashim FM, et al. Wavelet-based optical velocimetry for oil spill flow rate estimation. Measurement 2019;138:485-96.

22

González-Acuña RG, Dávila A, Gutiérrez-Vega JC. Optical flow of non-integer order in particle image velocimetry techniques. Signal Process 2019;155:317-22.

23

Corpetti T, Heitz D, Arroyo G, et al. Fluid experimental flow estimation based on an optical-flow scheme. Exp Fluids 2006;40(1):80-97.

24

Cassisa C, Simoens S, Prinet V, et al. Subgrid scale formulation of optical flow for the study of turbulent flow. Exp Fluids 2011;51(6):1739-54.

25

Cai SZ, Zhou SC, Xu C, et al. Dense motion estimation of particle images via a convolutional neural network. Exp Fluids 2019;60(4):73.

26

Liu TS, Salazar DM. OpenOpticalFlow_PIV: An open source program integrating optical flow method with cross- correlation method for particle image velocimetry. J Open Res Softw 2021;9(1):3.

27

Wang C, Dong XC, Gu SF, et al. Global velocity measurement of fluorescent oil film based on deep learning optical flow method. J Aerosp Power 2022;37(7):1539-49 [Chinese].

28

Delibasoglu I, Kosesoy I, Kotan M, et al. Motion detection in moving camera videos using background modeling and FlowNet. J Vis Commun Image Represent 2022;88:103616.

29

Wang XT, Zhang K, Zhang XM, et al. Aerial infrared object tracking via an improved long-term correlation filter with optical flow estimation and SURF matching. Infrared Phys Technol 2021;116:103790.

30

Zhai ML, Xiang XZ, Lv N, et al. Optical flow and scene flow estimation: A survey. Pattern Recognit 2021;114:107861.

31
Dosovitskiy A, Fischer P, Ilg E, et al. FlowNet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks. 2015 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV). Piscataway: IEEE; 2016. p. 2758–66.
32
Ilg E, Mayer N, Saikia T, et al. FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. 2017 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR). Piscataway: IEEE; 2017. p. 1647–55.
33

Han J, Tao J, Wang CL. FlowNet: A deep learning framework for clustering and selection of streamlines and stream surfaces. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2020;26(4):1732-44.

34

Zhai ML, Xiang XZ, Zhang RF, et al. Optical flow estimation using channel attention mechanism and dilated convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 2019;368:124-32.

35

Zheng QP, Li Y, Zheng L, et al. Progressively real-time video salient object detection via cascaded fully convolutional networks with motion attention. Neurocomputing 2022;467:465-75.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 91-101
Cite this article:
QIAN H, HUANG Z, WANG J, et al. Friction measurement of aircraft wing based on optimized FlowNet2.0. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(11): 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.09.012

76

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 26 October 2022
Revised: 27 November 2022
Accepted: 03 January 2023
Published: 18 September 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return