AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Chatter suppression techniques in milling processes: A state of the art review

Zhenmin LIaQinghua SONGa,b( )Peijian JINaZhanqiang LIUa,bBing WANGa,bHaifeng MAa,b
Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Chatter in the machining system can result in a decrease in tool life, poor surface finish, conservative cutting parameters, etc. Despite many review papers promoting the understanding and research of this area, chatter suppression techniques are generally discussed within limited pages in the framework of comprehensive chatter-related problems. In recent years, the developments of smart materials, advanced sensing techniques, and more effective control strategies have led to some new progress in chatter suppression. Meanwhile, the widely used thin-walled parts present more and more severe machining challenges in their milling processes. Considering the above deficiencies, this paper summarizes the current state of the art in milling chatter suppression. New classifications of chatter suppression techniques are proposed according to the working principle and control target. Based on the new classified framework, the mechanism and comparisons of different chatter suppression strategies are reviewed. Besides, the current challenges and potential tendencies of milling chatter suppression techniques are highlighted. Intellectualization, integration, compactness, adaptability to workpiece geometry, and the collaboration of multiple control methods are predicted to be important trends in the future.

References

1

Taylor FW. On the art of cutting metals. Trans ASME 1907;28:231–48.

2

Munoa J, Beudaert X, Dombovari Z, et al. Chatter suppression techniques in metal cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2016;65(2):785–808.

3

Mohring HC, Wiederkehr P, Lerez C, et al. Sensor integrated CFRP structures for intelligent fixtures. Procedia Technol 2016;26:120–8.

4

Brouckaert JF, Mirville F, Phuah K, et al. Clean sky research and demonstration programmes for next-generation aircraft engines. Aeronaut J 2018;122(1254):1163–75.

5

Xiang JF, Yi J. Deformation mechanism in wax supported milling of thin-walled structures based on milling forces stability. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2021;32:356–69.

6

Yang Y, Zhang WH, Ma YC, et al. An efficient decomposition-condensation method for chatter prediction in milling large-scale thin-walled structures. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;121:58–76.

7

Ding H, Ding Y, Zhu LM. On time-domain methods for milling stability analysis. Chin Sci Bull 2012;57(33):4336–45.

8

Altintas Y, Stepan G, Budak E, et al. Chatter stability of machining operations. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2020;142(11):110801.

9

Feng J, Liu XT. Mechanism and modeling of machining process damping: A review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2023;127(3–4):1045–69.

10

Vasanth XA, Paul PS, Lawrance G, et al. Vibration control techniques during turning process: a review. Aust J Mech Eng 2021;19(2):221–41.

11

Korkmaz ME, Gupta MK, Li ZX, et al. Indirect monitoring of machining characteristics via advanced sensor systems: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;120(11–12):7043–78.

12

Kounta CAKA, Arnaud L, Kamsu-Foguem B, et al. Review of AI-based methods for chatter detection in machining based on bibliometric analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;122(5–6):2161–86.

13

Wang WK, Wan M, Zhang WH, et al. Chatter detection methods in the machining processes: a review. J Manuf Process 2022;77:240–59.

14

Navarro-Devia JH, Chen Y, Dao DV, et al. Chatter detection in milling processes-a review on signal processing and condition classification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2023;125:3943–80.

15

Quintana G, Ciurana J. Chatter in machining processes: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2011;51(5):363–76.

16

Siddhpura M, Paurobally R. A review of chatter vibration research in turning. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2012;61:27–47.

17

Muhammad BB, Wan M, Feng J, et al. Dynamic damping of machining vibration: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89(9–12):2935–52.

18

Yuan L, Pan ZX, Ding DH, et al. A review on chatter in robotic machining process regarding both regenerative and mode coupling mechanism. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 2018;23(5):2240–51.

19

Urbikain G, Olvera D, de Lacalle LNL, et al. Prediction methods and experimental techniques for chatter avoidance in turning systems: a review. Appl Sci-Basel 2019;9(21):4718.

20

Yue CX, Gao HN, Liu XL, et al. A review of chatter vibration research in milling. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(2):215–42.

21

Zhu LD, Liu CF. Recent progress of chatter prediction, detection and suppression in milling. Mech Syst Sig Process 2020;143:106840.

22

Heitz T, He N, Chen N, et al. A review on dynamics in micro-milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;122(9–10):3467–91.

23

Liu B, Liu CF, Yu XL, et al. Prediction, detection, and suppression of regenerative chatter in milling. Adv Mech Eng 2022;14(10):1–26.

24

Sun YW, Zheng M, Jiang SL, et al. A state-of-the-art review on chatter stability in machining thin-walled parts. Machines 2023;11(3):359.

25

Ji W, Wang LH. Industrial robotic machining: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;103(1–4):1239–55.

26

Del Sol I, Rivero A, de Lacalle LNL, et al. Thin-wall machining of light alloys: a review of models and industrial approaches. Materials 2019;12(12):2012.

27

Fei JX, Xu FF, Lin B, et al. State of the art in milling process of the flexible workpiece. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;109(5–6):1695–725.

28

Wu G, Li GX, Pan WC, et al. A state-of-art review on chatter and geometric errors in thin-wall machining processes. J Manuf Process 2021;68:454–80.

29

Bao Y, Wang B, He ZX, et al. Recent progress in flexible supporting technology for aerospace thin-walled parts: a review. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(3):10–26.

30

Wang X, Zhao B, Ding WF, et al. A short review on machining deformation control of aero-engine thin-walled casings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;121(5–6):2971–85.

31

Zhu ZR, Tang XW, Chen C, et al. High precision and efficiency robotic milling of complex parts: challenges, approaches and trends. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(2):22–46.

32

Yan BL, Hao YP, Zhu LD, et al. Towards high milling accuracy of turbine blades: a review. Mech Syst Sig Process 2022;170:108727.

33

Wei WH, Shang YY, Peng Y, et al. Research progress of noise in high-speed cutting machining. Sensors 2022;22(10):3851.

34

Wang WB, Guo Q, Yang ZB, et al. A state-of-the-art review on robotic milling of complex parts with high efficiency and precision. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 2023;79:102436.

35

Zhao B, Ding WF, Shan ZD, et al. Collaborative manufacturing technologies of structure shape and surface integrity for complex thin-walled components of aero-engine: status, challenge and tendency. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(7):1–24.

36

Meng QY, Guo B, Zhao QL, et al. Modelling of grinding mechanics: a review. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(7):25–39.

37

Marui E, Ema S, Hashimoto M, et al. Plate insertion as a means to improve the damping capacity of a cutting tool system. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 1998;38(10–11):1209–20.

38

Kim NH, Won D, Ziegert JC. Numerical analysis and parameter study of a mechanical damper for use in long slender endmills. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2006;46(5):500–7.

39

Ziegert JC, Stanislaus C, Schmitz TL, et al. Enhanced damping in long slender end mills. J Manuf Process 2006;8(1):39–46.

40

Madoliat R, Hayati S, Ghalebahman AG. Investigation of chatter suppression in slender endmill via a frictional damper. Sci Iran 2011;18(5):1069–77.

41

Madoliat R, Hayati S, Ghalebahman AG. Modeling and analysis of frictional damper effect on chatter suppression in a slender endmill tool. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 2011;5(2):115–28.

42

Galarza FAM, de Albuquerque MV, Antonialli AIS, et al. Design and experimental evaluation of an impact damper to be used in a slender end mill tool in the machining of hardened steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106(5–6):2553–67.

43

Saciotto VR, Diniz AE. An experimental evaluation of particle impact dampers applied on the tool for milling of hardened steel complex surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;119(11–12):7579–97.

44

Saadabad NA, Moradi H, Vossoughi G. Global optimization and design of dynamic absorbers for chatter suppression in milling process with tool wear and process damping. Procedia CIRP 2014;21:360–6.

45

Shakeri S, Samani FS. Application of linear and nonlinear vibration absorbers in micro-milling process in order to suppress regenerative chatter. Nonlinear Dyn 2017;89(2):851–62.

46

Yang YQ, Wang YF, Liu Q. Design of a milling cutter with large length-diameter ratio based on embedded passive damper. J Vib Control 2019;25(3):506–16.

47

Ma WS, Yang YQ, Jin XL. Chatter suppression in micro-milling using shank-mounted two-DOF tuned mass damper. Precis Eng 2021;72:144–57.

48

Ma WS, Yu JJ, Yang YQ, et al. Optimization and tuning of passive tuned mass damper embedded in milling tool for chatter mitigation. J Manuf Mater Process 2021;5(1):2.

49

Patel A, Talaviya DK, Law M, et al. Optimally tuning an absorber for a chatter-resistant rotating slender milling tool holder. J Sound Vib 2022;520:116594.

50

Liu Y, Liu ZQ, Song QH, et al. Development of constrained layer damping toolholder to improve chatter stability in end milling. Int J Mech Sci 2016;117:299–308.

51

Ma WS, Yang YQ, Yu JJ. General routine of suppressing single vibration mode by multi-DOF tuned mass damper: application of three-DOF. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;121:77–96.

52

Fu QL, Lorite GS, Rashid MMU, et al. Suppressing tool chatter with novel multi-layered nanostructures of carbon based composite coatings. J Mater Process Technol 2015;223:292–8.

53

Bolsunovsky S, Vermel V, Gubanov G, et al. Reduction of flexible workpiece vibrations with dynamic support realized as tuned mass damper. Procedia CIRP 2013;8:230–4.

54

Yang YQ, Xie RC, Liu Q. Design of a passive damper with tunable stiffness and its application in thin-walled part milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89(9–12):2713–20.

55

Yang Y, Munoa J, Altintas Y. Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers to suppress machine tool chatter. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2010;50(9):834–42.

56

Nakano Y, Takahara H, Kondo E. Countermeasure against chatter in end milling operations using multiple dynamic absorbers. J Sound Vib 2013;332(6):1626–38.

57

Kolluru K, Axinte D, Becker A. A solution for minimising vibrations in milling of thin walled casings by applying dampers to workpiece surface. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2013;62(1):415–8.

58

Kono I, Miyamoto T, Utsumi K, et al. Study on machining vibration suppression with multiple tuned mass dampers: vibration control for long fin machining. Int J Auto Technol 2017;11(2):206–14.

59

Wan M, Dang XB, Zhang WH, et al. Optimization and improvement of stable processing condition by attaching additional masses for milling of thin-walled workpiece. Mech Syst Sig Process 2018;103:196–215.

60

Qin P, Liu YA, Wang M, et al. Milling vibration control of semiconical shell workpiece with multiple distribution tuned mass dampers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;115(7–8):2175–90.

61

Yang YQ, Dai W, Liu Q. Design and implementation of two-degree-of-freedom tuned mass damper in milling vibration mitigation. J Sound Vib 2015;335:78–88.

62

Yang YQ, Dai W, Liu Q. Design and machining application of a two-DOF magnetic tuned mass damper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89(5–8):1635–43.

63

Ma WS, Yu JJ, Yang YQ. Graphical design methodology of multi-degrees-of-freedom tuned mass damper for suppressing multiple modes. J Vib Acoust 2021;143(1):011008.

64

Kolluru KV, Axinte DA, Raffles MH, et al. Vibration suppression and coupled interaction study in milling of thin wall casings in the presence of tuned mass dampers. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 2014;228(6):826–36.

65

Aoyama T, Kakinuma Y. Development of fixture devices for thin and compliant workpieces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2005;54(1):325–38.

66

Kolluru K, Axinte D. Novel ancillary device for minimising machining vibrations in thin wall assemblies. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2014;85:79–86.

67

Wang X, Ma PJ, Peng XL, et al. Study on vibration suppression performance of a flexible fixture for a thin-walled casing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106(9–10):4281–91.

68

Yuan H, Wan M, Yang Y, et al. Mitigation of chatter in thin-wall milling by using double-side support device. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;115(1–2):213–32.

69

Zeng SS, Wan XJ, Li WL, et al. A novel approach to fixture design on suppressing machining vibration of flexible workpiece. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2012;58:29–43.

70

Wan XJ, Zhang Y, Huang XD. Investigation of influence of fixture layout on dynamic response of thin-wall multi-framed work-piece in machining. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2013;75:87–99.

71

Wang T, Zha J, Jia Q, et al. Application of low-melting alloy in the fixture for machining aeronautical thin-walled component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2016;87(9–12):2797–807.

72

Liu HB, Wang CX, Han LS, et al. The influence of ice-based fixture on suppressing machining-induced deformation of cantilever thin-walled parts: a novel and green fixture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;117(1–2):329–41.

73

Ma JJ, Zhang DH, Wu BH, et al. Vibration suppression of thin-walled workpiece machining considering external damping properties based on magnetorheological fluids flexible fixture. Chin J Aeronaut 2016;29(4):1074–83.

74

Liu HB, Wang JP, Luo Q, et al. Effect of controllable magnetic field-induced MRF solidification on chatter suppression of thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;109(9–12):2881–90.

75

Jiang XH, Wu K, Zhang Y, et al. Improved vibration suppression modeling for reinforcement clamping by eco-friendly magnetorheological fluid during milling of annular thin-walled workpiece. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 2022;9(6):1511–26.

76

Guo WC, Zhang Y, Jiang XH, et al. Improvement of stiffness during milling thin-walled workpiece based on mechanical/magnetorheological composite clamping. J Manuf Process 2021;68:1047–59.

77

Fei JX, Lin B, Xiao JL, et al. Investigation of moving fixture on deformation suppression during milling process of thin-walled structures. J Manuf Process 2018;32:403–11.

78

Wan M, Dang XB, Zhang WH, et al. Chatter suppression in the milling process of the weakly-rigid workpiece through a moving fixture. J Mater Process Technol 2022;299:117293.

79

Smith S, Wilhelm R, Dutterer B, et al. Sacrificial structure preforms for thin part machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2012;61(1):379–82.

80

Vaughan D, Saldana C, Kurfess T, et al. Implementation of sacrificial support structures for hybrid manufacturing of thin walls. J Manuf Mater Process 2022;6(4):70.

81

Rubio-Mateos A, Casuso M, Rivero A, et al. Vibrations characterization in milling of low stiffness parts with a rubber-based vacuum fixture. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(6):54–66.

82

Zhang Z, Li HG, Meng G, et al. Milling chatter suppression in viscous fluid: a feasibility study. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2017;120:20–6.

83

Zhang Z, Li HG, Liu XB, et al. Chatter mitigation for the milling of thin-walled workpiece. Int J Mech Sci 2018;138–139:262–71.

84

Dang XB, Wan M, Zhang WH, et al. Chatter analysis and mitigation of milling of the pocket-shaped thin-walled workpieces with viscous fluid. Int J Mech Sci 2021;194:106214.

85

Wang SQ, He CL, Li JG, et al. Vibration-free surface finish in the milling of a thin-walled cavity part using a corn starch suspension. J Mater Process Technol 2021;290:116980.

86

Yuan X, Wang ST, Mao XY, et al. Forced vibration mechanism and suppression method for thin-walled workpiece milling. Int J Mech Sci 2022;230:107553.

87

Shi JH, Song QH, Liu ZQ, et al. Formulating a numerically low-cost method of a constrained layer damper for vibration suppression in thin-walled component milling and experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci 2017;128:294–311.

88

Munoa J, Mancisidor I, Loix N, et al. Chatter suppression in ram type travelling column milling machines using a biaxial inertial actuator. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2013;62(1):407–10.

89
Law M, Wabner M, Frieß U, et al. Improving machining performance of in-use machine tools with active damping devices. In: 3rd International Chemnitz Manufacturing Colloquium; 2014 Apr 8-9; Chemnitz, Germany. 2014. p. 393-412.
90

Kleinwort R, Schweizer M, Zaeh MF. Comparison of different control strategies for active damping of heavy duty milling operations. Procedia CIRP 2016;46:396–9.

91

Mancisidor I, Beudaert X, Aguirre G, et al. Development of an active damping system for structural chatter suppression in machining centers. Int J Auto Technol 2018;12(5):642–9.

92
Bilbao-Guillerna A, Barrios A, Mancisidor I, et al. Control laws for chatter suppression in milling using an inertial actuator. In: Proceedings of ISMA 2010 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering; 2010 Sep 20-22; Leuven, Belgium. 2010. p. 1-12.
93

Ozsoy M, Sims ND, Ozturk E. Robotically assisted active vibration control in milling: a feasibility study. Mech Syst Sig Process 2022;177:109152.

94

Li DH, Cao HR, Liu JX, et al. Milling chatter control based on asymmetric stiffness. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2019;147:103458.

95

Li DH, Cao HR, Zhang XW, et al. Model predictive control based active chatter control in milling process. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;128:266–81.

96

Wang CX, Zhang XW, Liu YL, et al. Stiffness variation method for milling chatter suppression via piezoelectric stack actuators. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2018;124:53–66.

97

Wang CX, Zhang XW, Liu JX, et al. Adaptive vibration reshaping based milling chatter suppression. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2019;141:30–5.

98

Zhang XW, Wang CX, Liu J, et al. Robust active control based milling chatter suppression with perturbation model via piezoelectric stack actuators. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;120:808–35.

99

Li DH, Cao HR, Chen XF. Active control of milling chatter considering the coupling effect of spindle-tool and workpiece systems. Mech Syst Sig Process 2022;169:108769.

100

Monnin J, Kuster F, Wegener K. Optimal control for chatter mitigation in milling-Part 1: modeling and control design. Control Eng Pract 2014;24:156–66.

101

Wan SK, Li XH, Su WJ, et al. Active chatter suppression for milling process with sliding mode control and electromagnetic actuator. Mech Syst Sig Process 2020;136:106528.

102

Drossel WG, Wittstock V. Adaptive spindle support for improving machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2008;57(1):395–8.

103

Denkena B, Gummer O. Process stabilization with an adaptronic spindle system. Prod Eng 2012;6:485–92.

104

Dohner JL, Lauffer JP, Hinnerichs TD, et al. Mitigation of chatter instabilities in milling by active structural control. J Sound Vib 2004;269(1–2):197–211.

105

Monnin J, Kuster F, Wegener K. Optimal control for chatter mitigation in milling-Part 2: experimental validation. Control Eng Pract 2014;24:167–75.

106

Wan SK, Li XH, Su WJ, et al. Active damping of milling chatter vibration via a novel spindle system with an integrated electromagnetic actuator. Precis Eng 2019;57:203–10.

107

Li XH, Wan SK, Yuan JP, et al. Active suppression of milling chatter with LMI-based robust controller and electromagnetic actuator. J Mater Process Technol 2021;297:117238.

108

Liu XL, Su CY, Li ZJ, et al. Adaptive neural-network-based active control of regenerative chatter in micromilling. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2018;15(2):628–40.

109
Gao S, Peng FY, Tang XW, et al. Active control of chatter for five-axis milling based on piezoelectric actuator. In: Liu HH, Yin ZP, Liu LQ, et al. editors. Intelligent robotics and applications. 15th International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications; 2022 Aug 1-3; Harbin, China. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 3-14.
110

Budak E, Tunc LT, Alan S, et al. Prediction of workpiece dynamics and its effects on chatter stability in milling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2012;61(1):339–42.

111

Wang MH, Gao L, Zheng YH. Prediction of regenerative chatter in the high-speed vertical milling of thin-walled workpiece made of titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2014;72(5–8):707–16.

112

Muhammad BB, Wan M, Liu Y, et al. Active damping of milling vibration using operational amplifier circuit. Chin J Mech Eng-En 2018;31(1):90.

113

Beudaert X, Erkorkmaz K, Munoa J. Portable damping system for chatter suppression on flexible workpieces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2019;68(1):423–6.

114

Wang SY, Song QH, Liu ZQ. Vibration suppression of thin-walled workpiece milling using a time-space varying PD control method via piezoelectric actuator. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;105(7–8):2843–56.

115

Wang XJ, Song QH, Gupta MK, et al. Active vibration control of thin-walled milling based on ANFIS parameter optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;114(1–2):563–77.

116

Du JA, Long XH. Chatter suppression for milling of thin-walled workpieces based on active modal control. J Manuf Process 2022;84:1042–53.

117
Cai CT, Zhao T. Active vibration control of thin plate milling using piezoelectric actuator. In: 4th World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing; 2021 Nov 12-14; Shanghai, China. 2021. p. 62-9.
118

Dong XJ, Tu GW, Hu L, et al. Suppress chatter in milling of thin-walled parts via fixture with active support. J Vib Control. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463231161389 (in press).

119

Sallese L, Innocenti G, Grossi N, et al. Mitigation of chatter instabilities in milling using an active fixture with a novel control strategy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89(9–12):2771–87.

120

Rashid A, Nicolescu CM. Active vibration control in palletised workholding system for milling. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2006;46(12–13):1626–36.

121

Abele E, Hanselka H, Haase F, et al. Development and design of an active work piece holder driven by piezo actuators. Prod Eng 2008;2(4):437–42.

122

Brecher C, Manoharan D, Ladra U, et al. Chatter suppression with an active workpiece holder. Prod Eng 2010;4(2):239–45.

123

Papastathis T, Bakker O, Ratchev S, et al. Design methodology for mechatronic active fixtures with movable clamps. Procedia CIRP 2012;3:323–8.

124

Sallese L, Scippa A, Grossi N, et al. Investigating actuation strategies in active fixtures for chatter suppression. Procedia CIRP 2016;46:311–4.

125

Long XH, Jiang H, Meng G. Active vibration control for peripheral milling processes. J Mater Process Technol 2013;213(5):660–70.

126

Du JA, Liu XB, Long XH. Coupled LQG with robust control for milling chatter suppression. Int J Mech Sci 2023;243:108051.

127

Paul S, Morales-Menendez R. Active control of chatter in milling process using intelligent PD/PID control. IEEE Access 2018;6:72698–713.

128

Vashisht RK, Peng QJ. Fractional calculus-based energy efficient active chatter control of milling process using small size electromagnetic actuators. J Vib Acoust 2021;143(1):011005.

129

Nguyen V, Johnson J, Melkote S. Active vibration suppression in robotic milling using optimal control. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2020;152:103541.

130

Moradi H, Vossoughi G, Movahhedy MR, et al. Suppression of nonlinear regenerative chatter in milling process via robust optimal control. J Process Contr 2013;23(5):631–48.

131

Li XH, Liu SJ, Wan SK, et al. Active suppression of milling chatter based on LQR-ANFIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;111(7–8):2337–47.

132

Bahari Kordabad A, Gros S. Lyapunov-based robust optimal control for time-delay systems with application in milling process. Int J Dynam Control. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01217-2 (in press).

133

Huang T, Zhu LJ, Du SL, et al. Robust active chatter control in milling processes with variable pitch cutters. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2018;140(10):101005.

134

van Dijk NJM, van de Wouw N, Doppenberg EJJ, et al. Robust active chatter control in the high-speed milling process. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 2012;20(4):901–17.

135

Ruttanatri P, Cole MOT, Pongvuthithum R. Structural vibration control using delayed state feedback via LMI approach: With application to chatter stability problems. Int J Dynam Control 2021;9:85–96.

136

Ruttanatri P, Cole MOT, Pongvuthithum R, et al. H-infinity controller design for chatter suppression in machining based on integrated cutting and flexible structure model. Automatica 2021;130:109643.

137

Wu Y, Zhang HT, Huang T, et al. Robust chatter mitigation control for low radial immersion machining processes. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2018;15(4):1972–9.

138

Wan SK, Li XH, Su WJ, et al. Milling chatter mitigation with projection-based robust adaptive controller and active magnetic bearing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2022;23(12):1453–63.

139

Paul S, Morales-Menendez R. Chatter mitigation in milling process using discrete time sliding mode control with type 2-fuzzy logic system. Appl Sci-Basel 2019;9(20):4380.

140

Zhang HT, Wu Y, He DF, et al. Model predictive control to mitigate chatters in milling processes with input constraints. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2015;91:54–61.

141

Yuan Y, Zhang HT, Wu Y, et al. Bayesian learning-based model-predictive vibration control for thin-walled workpiece machining processes. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 2017;22(1):509–20.

142

Du JA, Liu XB, Long XH. Time delay feedback control for milling chatter suppression by reducing the regenerative effect. J Mater Process Technol 2022;309:117740.

143

Li JT, Chen ZB, Li SB. Selection of the number of effective singular values for noise reduction. Mech Syst Sig Process 2023;191:110175.

144

Cao L, Huang T, Shi DM, et al. Active chatter suppression in low immersion intermittent milling process. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2020;142(10):101005.

145

Wu Y, Zhang HT, Huang T, et al. Adaptive chatter mitigation control for machining processes with input saturations. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 2016;26(14):3088–100.

146

Zhang H, Ni J. Internal energy based analysis on mechanism of spindle speed variation for regenerative chatter control. J Vib Control 2010;16(2):281–301.

147

Nam S, Hayasaka T, Jung HJ, et al. Proposal of novel chatter stability indices of spindle speed variation based on its chatter growth characteristics. Precis Eng 2020;62:121–33.

148

Li ZM, Song QH, Liu ZQ, et al. Chatter suppression mechanism and parameters configuration of the spindle speed variation with piecewise characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;122(7–8):3041–55.

149

Zatarain M, Bediaga I, Munoa J, et al. Stability of milling processes with continuous spindle speed variation: analysis in the frequency and time domains, and experimental correlation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2008;57(1):379–84.

150

Albertelli P, Musletti S, Leonesio M, et al. Spindle speed variation in turning: technological effectiveness and applicability to real industrial cases. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012;62(1–4):59–67.

151

Wang CX, Zhang XW, Yan RQ, et al. Multi harmonic spindle speed variation for milling chatter suppression and parameters optimization. Precis Eng 2019;55:268–74.

152

Bediaga I, Munoa J, Hernandez J, et al. An automatic spindle speed selection strategy to obtain stability in high-speed milling. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2009;49(5):384–94.

153

Albertelli P, Braghieri L, Torta M, et al. Development of a generalized chatter detection methodology for variable speed machining. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;123:26–42.

154

Totis G, Albertelli P, Sortino M, et al. Efficient evaluation of process stability in milling with spindle speed variation by using the Chebyshev collocation method. J Sound Vib 2014;333(3):646–68.

155

Hajikolaei KH, Moradi H, Vossoughi G, et al. Spindle speed variation and adaptive force regulation to suppress regenerative chatter in the turning process. J Manuf Process 2010;12:106–15.

156

Jin G, Qi HJ, Li ZJ, et al. Dynamic modeling and stability analysis for the combined milling system with variable pitch cutter and spindle speed variation. Commun Nonlinear Sci 2018;63:38–56.

157

Radulescu R, Kapoor SG, DeVor RE. An investigation of variable spindle speed face milling for tool-work structures with complex dynamics, Part 1: simulation results. J Manuf Sci Eng 1997;119:266–72.

158

Al-Regib E, Ni J, Lee SH. Programming spindle speed variation for machine tool chatter suppression. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2003;43(12):1229–40.

159

Wu D, Chen K. Chatter suppression in fast tool servo-assisted turning by spindle speed variation. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2010;50(12):1038–47.

160

Ding LY, Sun YX, Xiong ZH. Online chatter suppression in turning by adaptive amplitude modulation of spindle speed variation. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2018;140(12):121003.

161

Ding LY, Sun YX, Xiong ZH. Active chatter suppression in turning by simultaneous adjustment of amplitude and frequency of spindle speed variation. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2020;142(2):021004.

162

Seguy S, Insperger T, Arnaud L, et al. Suppression of period doubling chatter in high-speed milling by spindle speed variation. Mach Sci Technol 2011;15(2):153–71.

163

Sims ND, Mann B, Huyanan S. Analytical prediction of chatter stability for variable pitch and variable helix milling tools. J Sound Vib 2008;317(3–5):664–86.

164

Sellmeier V, Denkena B. Stable islands in the stability chart of milling processes due to unequal tooth pitch. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2011;51(2):152–64.

165

Nie WY, Zheng ML, Zhang W, et al. Analytical prediction of chatter stability with the effect of multiple delays for variable pitch end mills and optimization of pitch parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2023;124:2645–58.

166

Jin G, Qi HJ, Lou LY. Stability prediction and dynamics analysis of milling with variable pitch cutter in low radial immersion. Adv Mater Research 2014;952:176–80.

167

Zhang XJ, Xiong CH, Ding Y, et al. Variable-step integration method for milling chatter stability prediction with multiple delays. Sci China Technol Sci 2011;54(12):3137–54.

168
Niu JB, Ding Y, Zhu LM, et al. A generalized runge-kutta method for stability prediction of milling operations with variable pitch tools. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2014 Nov 14-20; Montreal, Canada. 2014. p. V02AT02A060.
169

Huang JW, Deng PF, Li H, et al. Stability analysis for milling system with variable pitch cutters under variable speed. J Vibroeng 2019;21(2):331–47.

170

Zhan DN, Jiang SL, Niu JB, et al. Dynamics modeling and stability analysis of five-axis ball-end milling system with variable pitch tools. Int J Mech Sci 2020;182:105774.

171

Wang Y, Wang TY, Yu ZQ, et al. Chatter prediction for variable pitch and variable helix milling. Shock Vib 2015;2015:419172.

172

Jiang SL, Zhan DN, Liu Y, et al. Modeling of variable-pitch/helix milling system considering axially varying dynamics with cutter runout offset and tilt effects. Mech Syst Sig Process 2022;168:108674.

173

Sims ND. Fast chatter stability prediction for variable helix milling tools. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 2016;230(1):133–44.

174

Guo Q, Zhang MY, Lee YS, et al. Study on the stability for non-uniform helix angle tools in the milling process. J Ind Prod Eng 2020;37(8):387–93.

175

Otto A, Rauh S, Ihlenfeldt S, et al. Stability of milling with non-uniform pitch and variable helix tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89(9–12):2613–25.

176

Bari P, Kilic ZM, Law M. Rapid stability analysis of variable pitch and helix end mills using a non-iterative multi-frequency solution. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054221126967 (in press).

177

Niu JB, Ding Y, Zhu LM, et al. Mechanics and multi-regenerative stability of variable pitch and variable helix milling tools considering runout. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2017;123:129–45.

178

Dombovari Z, Altintas Y, Stepan G. The effect of serration on mechanics and stability of milling cutters. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2010;50(6):511–20.

179

Koca R, Budak E. Optimization of serrated end mills for reduced cutting energy and higher stability. Procedia CIRP 2013;8:570–5.

180

Bari P, Kilic ZM, Law M, et al. Rapid stability analysis of serrated end mills using graphical-frequency domain methods. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2021;171:103805.

181

Farahani ND, Altintas Y. Chatter stability of serrated milling tools in frequency domain. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2022;144(3):031013.

182

Budak E. An analytical design method for milling cutters with nonconstant pitch to increase stability, Part 2: application. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2003;125(1):35–8.

183

Budak E. An analytical design method for milling cutters with nonconstant pitch to increase stability, Part Ⅰ: theory. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 2003;125(1):29–34.

184

Song QH, Ai X, Zhao J. Design for variable pitch end mills with high milling stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2011;55(9):891–903.

185

Suzuki N, Ishiguro R, Kojima T. Design of irregular pitch end mills to attain robust suppression of regenerative chatter. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2016;65(1):129–32.

186

Iglesias A, Dombovari Z, Gonzalez G, et al. Optimum selection of variable pitch for chatter suppression in face milling operations. Materials 2019;12(1):112.

187

Li MY, Zhao W, Li L, et al. Investigation of variable pitch tool design for chatter suppression in milling of Ti-6Al-4V: a comparison of simulation and experimental results. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;121(5):3841–55.

188

Li MY, Zhao W, Li L, et al. Chatter suppression during milling of Ti-6Al-4V based on variable pitch tool and process damping effect. Machines 2022;10(4):222.

189

Nie WY, Zheng ML, Yu HB, et al. Analysis of vibration reduction mechanism for variable pitch end mills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;119(11–12):7787–97.

190

Yusoff AR, Sims ND. Optimisation of variable helix tool geometry for regenerative chatter mitigation. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2011;51(2):133–41.

191

Comak A, Budak E. Modeling dynamics and stability of variable pitch and helix milling tools for development of a design method to maximize chatter stability. Precis Eng 2017;47:459–68.

192

Guo Y, Lin B, Wang WQ. Optimization of variable helix cutter for improving chatter stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;104(5–8):2553–65.

193

Sanz M, Iglesias A, Munoa J, et al. The effect of geometry on harmonically varied helix milling tools. J Manuf Sci Eng 2020;142(7):074501.

194

Bari P, Law M, Wahi P. Geometric models of non-standard serrated end mills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;111(11–12):3319–42.

195

Tehranizadeh F, Koca R, Budak E. Investigating effects of serration geometry on milling forces and chatter stability for their optimal selection. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2019;144:103425.

196

Pelayo GU, Trejo DO. Model-based phase shift optimization of serrated end mills: Minimizing forces and surface location error. Mech Syst Sig Process 2020;144:106860.

197

Ozturk E, Barrios A, Sun C, et al. Robotic assisted milling for increased productivity. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2018;67(1):427–30.

198

Xiao JL, Zhang QY, Liu HT, et al. Research on vibration suppression by a multi-point flexible following support head in thin-walled parts mirror milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106(7–8):3335–44.

199

Fei JX, Lin B, Huang T, et al. Thin floor milling using moving support. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;120(1–2):1385–97.

200

Ma SJ, Xiao JL, Liu HT, et al. Modeling and analysis for time-varying dynamics of thin-walled workpieces in mirror milling considering material removal. Sci China Technol Sci 2023;66(7):1883–98.

201

Shamoto E, Mori T, Nishimura K, et al. Suppression of regenerative chatter vibration in simultaneous double-sided milling of flexible plates by speed difference. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2010;59(1):387–90.

202

Fu R, Curley P, Higgins C, et al. Double-sided milling of thin-walled parts by dual collaborative parallel kinematic machines. J Mater Process Technol 2022;299:117395.

203

Zhang JJ, Xie FG, Ma ZJ, et al. Design of parallel multiple tuned mass dampers for the vibration suppression of a parallel machining robot. Mech Syst Sig Process 2023;200:110506.

204

Chen F, Zhao H. Design of eddy current dampers for vibration suppression in robotic milling. Adv Mech Eng 2018;10(11):1–15.

205

Yuan L, Sun SS, Pan ZX, et al. Mode coupling chatter suppression for robotic machining using semi-active magnetorheological elastomers absorber. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;117:221–37.

206

Zhang RN, Wang Z, Keogh P. H-infinity optimised control of external inertial actuators for higher precision robotic machining. In J Comput Integr Manuf 2022;35(2):129–44.

207

Sheng XJ, Zhang X. Fuzzy adaptive hybrid impedance control for mirror milling system. Mechatronics 2018;53:20–7.

208

Guo K, Zhang YR, Sun J. Towards stable milling: Principle and application of active contact robotic milling. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 2022;182:103952.

209

Chai S, Ouyang L, Bi Q, et al. An adaptive fixture for suppress vibrations and measuring workpiece deformation of thin-walled casings. Procedia CIRP 2021;101:322–5.

210

He Y, Chen XA, Liu Z, et al. Piezoelectric self-sensing actuator for active vibration control of motorized spindle based on adaptive signal separation. Smart Mater Struct 2018;27(6):065011.

211

Huang FQ, Jin XL. Surface texture generation using high-feed milling with spindle speed modulation. Precis Eng 2021;72:13–24.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 1-23
Cite this article:
LI Z, SONG Q, JIN P, et al. Chatter suppression techniques in milling processes: A state of the art review. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.10.001

228

Views

10

Crossref

8

Web of Science

9

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 13 July 2023
Revised: 02 August 2023
Accepted: 20 September 2023
Published: 10 October 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return