AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Early chatter identification based on optimized VMD with multi-band information fusion and compression method in robotic milling process

Sichen CHENaZhiqiang LIANGa,b( )Yuchao DUaZirui GAOaHaoran ZHENGaZhibing LIUaTianyang QIUaXibin WANGa
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Beijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Chongqing 401120, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Undesirable self-excited chatter has always been a typical issue restricting the improvement of robotic milling quality and efficiency. Sensitive chatter identification based on processing signals can prompt operators to adjust the machining process and prevent chatter damage. Compared with the traditional machine tool, the uncertain multiple chatter frequency bands and the band-moving of the chatter frequency in robotic milling process make it more challenging to extract chatter information. This paper proposes a novel method of chatter identification using optimized variational mode decomposition (OVMD) with multi-band information fusion and compression technology (MT). During the robotic milling process, the number of decomposed modes k and the penalty coefficient α are optimized based on the dominant component of frequency scope partition and fitness of the mode center frequency. Moreover, the mayfly optimization algorithm (MA) is employed to obtain the global optimal parameter selection. In order to conquer information collection about the uncertain multiple chatter frequency bands and the band-moving of the chatter frequency in robotic milling process, MT is presented to reduce computation and extract signal characteristics. Finally, the cross entropy of the image (CEI) is proposed as the final chatter indicator to identify the chatter occurrence. The robotic milling experiments are carried out to verify the proposed method, and the results show that it can distinguish the robotic milling condition by extracting the uncertain multiple chatter frequency bands and overcome the band-moving of the chatter frequency in robotic milling process.

References

1

Quintana G, Ciurana J. Chatter in machining processes: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2011;51(5):363–76.

2

Mejri S, Gagnol V, Le TP, et al. Dynamic characterization of machining robot and stability analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2016;82(1–4):351–9.

3

Uekita M, Takaya Y. Tool condition monitoring technique for deep-hole drilling of large components based on chatter identification in time-frequency domain. Meas 2017;103:199–207.

4

Zhu ZR, Tang XW, Chen C, et al. High precision and efficiency robotic milling of complex parts: Challenges, approaches and trends. Chinese J Aeronaut 2022;35(2):22–46.

5

Mousavi S, Gagnol V, Bouzgarrou BC, et al. Dynamic modeling and stability prediction in robotic machining. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2017;88(9–12):3053–65.

6

Niu JB, Xu JT, Ren F, et al. A short review on milling dynamics in low-stiffness cutting conditions: modeling and analysis. J Adv Manuf Sci Technol 2021;1(1):2020004.

7

Dang XB, Wan M, Yang Y. Prediction and suppression of chatter in milling of structures with low-rigidity: a review. J Adv Manuf Sci Technol 2021;1(3):2021010.

8

Mou WP, Zhu SW, Jiang ZX, et al. Vibration signal-based chatter identification for milling of thin-walled structure. Chinese J Aeronaut 2022;35(1):204–14.

9

Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, et al. Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 2010;59(2):717–39.

10

Siddhpura M, Paurobally R. A review of chatter vibration research in turning. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2012;61(2):27–47.

11

Zhu LD, Liu CF. Recent progress of chatter prediction, detection and suppression in milling. Mech Syst Sig Process 2020;143:106840.

12

Yue CX, Xie ZL, Liu XL, et al. Chatter prediction of milling process for titanium alloy thin-walled workpiece based on EMD-SVM. J Adv Manuf Sci Technol 2022;2(2):2022010.

13

Cao HR, Lei YG, He ZJ. Chatter identification in end milling process using wavelet packets and Hilbert-Huang transform. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2013;69:11–9.

14

Yao ZH, Mei DQ, Chen ZC. On-line chatter detection and identification based on wavelet and support vector machine. J Mater Process Technol 2010;210(5):713–9.

15

Liu HQ, Chen QH, Li B, et al. On-line chatter detection using servo motor current signal in turning. Sci China-Technol Sci 2011;54(12):3119–29.

16

Ji YJ, Wang XB, Liu ZB, et al. Early milling chatter identification by improved empirical mode decomposition and multi-indicator synthetic evaluation. J Sound Vib 2018;433:138–59.

17

Dragomiretskiy K, Zosso D. Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2014;62(3):531–44.

18

Yang K, Wang GF, Dong Y, et al. Early chatter identification based on an optimized variational mode decomposition. Mech Syst Sig Process 2019;115:238–54.

19

Mert A. ECG feature extraction based on the bandwidth properties of variational mode decomposition. Physiol Meas 2016;37(4):530–43.

20

Liu CF, Zhu LD, Ni CB. Chatter detection in milling process based on VMD and energy entropy. Mech Syst Sig Process 2018;105:169–82.

21

Rahul S, Sunitha R. Dominant electromechanical oscillation mode identification using modified variational mode decomposition. Arab J Sci Eng 2021;46(10):10007–21.

22

Wang Y, Zhang MK, Tang XW, et al. A kMap optimized VMD-SVM model for milling chatter detection with an industrial robot. J Intell Manuf 2022;33(5):1483–502.

23

Chen QZ, Zhang CR, Hu TL, et al. Online chatter detection in robotic machining based on adaptive variational mode decomposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;117(1–2):555–77.

24

Yang B, Guo K, Zhou Q, et al. Early chatter detection in robotic milling under variable robot postures and cutting parameters. Mech Syst Sig Process 2023;186:109860.

25

Li K, He SP, Li B, et al. A novel online chatter detection method in milling process based on multiscale entropy and gradient tree boosting. Mech Syst Sig Process 2020;135:106385.

26

Cao HR, Yue YT, Chen XF, et al. Chatter detection in milling process based on synchrosqueezing transform of sound signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89(9–12):2747–55.

27

Yang B, Guo K, Sun J. Chatter detection in robotic milling using entropy features. Appl Sci 2022;12(16):8276.

28

Han ZY, Zhuo Y, Yan YZ, et al. Chatter detection in milling of thin-walled parts using multi-channel feature fusion and temporal attention-based network. Mech Syst Sig Process 2022;179:1093679.

29

Sener B, Gudelek MU, Ozbayoglu AM, et al. A novel chatter detection method for milling using deep convolution neural networks. Meas 2021;182(12):109689.

30

Cao HR, Zhou K, Chen XF. Chatter identification in end milling process based on EEMD and nonlinear dimensionless indicators. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2015;92:52–9.

31

Chen D, Zhang XJ, Zhao H, et al. Development of a novel online chatter monitoring system for flexible milling process. Mech Syst Sig Process 2021;159:107799.

32

Cen CL, Melkote SN, Castle J, et al. A method for mode coupling chatter detection and suppression in robotic milling. J Manuf Sei Eng-Trans ASME 2018;140(8):081015.

33

Zervoudakis K, Tsafarakis S. A mayfly optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 2020;145:23.

34

Chen GS, Zheng QZ. Online chatter detection of the end milling based on wavelet packet transform and support vector machine recursive feature elimination. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018;95(1–4):775–84.

35

Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Statist 1951;22:79–86.

36

De Boer PT, Kroese DP, Mannor S, et al. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method. Ann Oper Res 2005;134(1):19–67.

37

Mousavi S, Gagnol V, Bouzgarrou BC, et al. Control of a multi degrees functional redundancies robotic cell for optimization of the machining stability. Proc CIRP 2017;58(6):269–74.

38

Cordes M, Hintze W, Altintas Y. Chatter stability in robotic milling. Rob Comput-Integr Manuf 2019;55:11–8.

39

Wang T, Gao XF, Zhu JP, et al. Chatter online monitoring of robotic longitudinal-torsional edge trimming. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2023;44(13), 427919, [Chinese].

40

Morita H, Yamashita T. Tracing and visualizing variation of chatter for in-process identification of preferred spindle speeds. Proc CIRP 2012;4:11–6.

41

Pan ZX, Zhang H, Zhu ZQ, et al. Chatter analysis of robotic machining process. J Mater Process Technol 2006;173(3):301–9.

42

Chen ZZ, Li ZL, Niu JB, et al. Chatter detection in milling processes using frequency-domain Rényi entropy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106(3–4):877–90.

43

Sun YX, He JL, Ma HF, et al. Online chatter detection considering beat effect based on Inception and LSTM neural networks. Mech Syst Sig Process 2022;184:1.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 464-484
Cite this article:
CHEN S, LIANG Z, DU Y, et al. Early chatter identification based on optimized VMD with multi-band information fusion and compression method in robotic milling process. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6): 464-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.10.009

57

Views

2

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 24 June 2023
Revised: 29 June 2023
Accepted: 25 August 2023
Published: 16 October 2023
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return