AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
Thin-walled aerostructural components frequently get distorted after the machining process. Reworking to correct distortions or eventually rejecting parts significantly increases the cost. This paper proposes a new approach to correct distortions in thin-walled components by strategically applying hammer peening on target surfaces of a machined component. Aluminium alloy 7475-T7351 was chosen for this research. The study was divided in two stages. First, the residual stresses (RS) induced by four different pneumatic hammer peening conditions (modifying the stepover distance and initial offset) were characterised in a test coupon, and one of the conditions was selected for the next stage. In the second stage, a FEM model was used to predict distortions caused by machining in a representative workpiece. Then, the RS induced by hammer peening were included in an FEM model to define two hammer peening strategies (varying the coverage area) to analyse the capability to reduce distortions. Two workpieces were machined and then treated with the simulated hammer peening strategies for experimental validation. Results in the test coupon showed that pneumatic hammer peening can generate high compressive RS (-50 to −350 MPa) up to 800 μm depth, with their magnitude increasing with a reduced stepover distance. Application of hammer peening over 4 % of the surface of the representative workpiece reduced the machining-induced distortions by 37 %, and a coverage area of 100 % led to and overcorrection by a factor of five. This confirms that hammer peening can be strategically applied (in target areas and changing the percentage of coverage) to correct low or severe distortions.
Dursun T, Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater Des(1980–2015) 2014;56:862–71.
Wang ZJ, Chen WY, Zhang YD, et al. Study on the machining distortion of thin-walled part caused by redistribution of residual stress. Chin J Aeronaut 2005;18(2):175–9.
Li JG, Wang SQ. Distortion caused by residual stresses in machining aeronautical aluminum alloy parts: recent advances. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;89:997–1012.
Costa MI, Leitão C, Rodrigues DM. Parametric study of friction stir welding induced distortion in thin aluminium alloy plates: a coupled numerical and experimental analysis. Thin-Walled Struct 2019;134:268–76.
Li Y, Gan W, Zhou W, et al. Review on residual stress and its effects on manufacturing of aluminium alloy structural panels with typical multi-processes. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(5):96–124.
Yang Y, Fan L, Li L, et al. Energy principle and material removal sequence optimization method in machining of aircraft monolithic parts. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(10):2770–81.
Akhtar W, Lazoglu I, Liang SY. Prediction and control of residual stress-based distortions in the machining of aerospace parts: a review. J Manuf Process 2022;76:106–22.
Weber D, Kirsch B, Chighizola CR, et al. Investigation on the scale effects of initial bulk and machining induced residual stresses of thin walled milled monolithic aluminum workpieces on part distortions: experiments and finite element prediction model. Procedia CIRP 2021;102:337–42.
Madariaga A, Perez I, Arrazola PJ, et al. Reduction of distortions in large aluminium parts by controlling machining-induced residual stresses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018;97:967–78.
Chantzis D, Van-der-Veen S, Zettler J, et al. An industrial workflow to minimise part distortion for machining of large monolithic components in aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP 2013;8:281–6.
Zhang Z, Li L, Yang Y, et al. Machining distortion minimization for the manufacturing of aeronautical structure. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2014;73:1765–73.
Cerutti X, Mocellin K. Influence of the machining sequence on the residual stress redistribution and machining quality: analysis and improvement using numerical simulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2016;83:489–503.
Barcenas L, Ledesma-Orozco E, Van-der-Veen S, et al. An optimization of part distortion for a structural aircraft wing rib: an industrial workflow approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2020;28:15–23.
Rodríguez-Sánchez AE, Ledesma-Orozco E, Ledesma S. Part distortion optimization of aluminum-based aircraft structures using finite element modeling and artificial neural networks. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2020;31:595–606.
Li X, Li L, Yang Y, et al. Machining deformation of single-sided component based on finishing allowance optimization. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(9):2434–44.
Aurrekoetxea M, Llanos I, Zelaieta O, et al. Towards advanced prediction and control of machining distortion: a comprehensive review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;122(7–8):2823–48.
Li B, Jiang X, Yang J, et al. Effects of depth of cut on the redistribution of residual stress and distortion during the milling of thin-walled part. J Mater Process Technol 2015;216:223–33.
Weber D, Kirsch B, Jonsson JE, et al. Simulation based compensation techniques to minimize distortion of thin-walled monolithic aluminum parts due to residual stresses. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2022;38:427–41.
Dong HY, Ke YL. Study on machining deformation of aircraft monolithic component by FEM and experiment. Chin J Aeronaut 2006;19(3):247–54.
Denkena B, Kaddour R, Dreier S. Methoden zur Simulation und Kompensation von eigenspannungsbedingtem Bauteilverzug. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 2013;108(4):208-11 [German].
La Monaca A, Murray JW, Liao Z, et al. Surface integrity in metal machining-Part Ⅱ: functional performance. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2021;164:103718.
Schulze V, Bleicher F, Groche P, et al. Surface modification by machine hammer peening and burnishing. CIRP Ann 2016;65(2):809–32.
Lin XH, Huang HB, Zhou CS, et al. Research on surface modification of anodized aluminum alloy using piezoelectric machine hammer peening. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;104:1211–9.
Madariaga A, Cuesta M, Dominguez E, et al. Enhancing surface integrity of A7050–T7451 aluminium alloy by pneumatic machine hammer peening. Procedia CIRP 2022;108:317–22.
Grant P, Lord J, Whitehead P, et al. The application of fine increment hole drilling for measuring machining-induced residual stresses. Appl Mech Mater 2005;3:105–11.
Cheng W, Finnie I. A method for measurement of axisymmetric axial residual stresses in circumferentially welded thin-walled cylinders. J Eng Mater Technol 1985;107(3):181–5.
Prime MB, Hill MR. Uncertainty, model error, and order selection for series-expanded, residual-stress inverse solutions. J Eng Mater Technol 2006;128(2):175–85.
Beghini M, Grossi T, Prime MB, et al. Ill-Posedness and the bias-variance tradeoff in residual stress measurement inverse solutions. Exp Mech 2023;63:495–516.
Pan X, Zhou L, Wang C, et al. Microstructure and residual stress modulation of 7075 aluminum alloy for improving fatigue performance by laser shock peening. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2023;184:103979.
Williams JA, Dwyer-Joyce RS. Contact between solid surfaces. Mod Tribol Hand 2021;1:121–62.
Wang T, Wang JB, Zhang XJ, et al. A study on bending deformation behavior induced by shot peening based on the energy equivalence. Thin-Walled Struct 2023;184:110519.
Gulpak M, Solter J, Brinksmeier E. Prediction of shape deviations in face milling of steel. Procedia CIRP 2013;8:15–20.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
京公网安备11010802044758号