AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Review on heat-to-power conversion technologies for hypersonic vehicles

Yinke QIa,b,Xiaofeng MAa,bPeixue JIANGa,bYinhai ZHUa,b( )
Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Hypersonic vehicles have enormous military and economic value, while their power and thermal protection demands will increase substantially with the rise in Mach number and duration. Converting the tremendous high-quality heat on the vehicle surface and engine wall into electrical energy through heat-to-power technologies will not only play a role in thermal protection, but also supply power for the vehicle. This paper provides a comprehensive review of heat-to-power conversion technologies on hypersonic vehicles, including the indirect conversion of Brayton and Rankine cycles, direct conversion of thermoelectric materials, and combined conversion. For the open Brayton cycle with hydrocarbon fuel as the working fluid, the Power-to-Weight Ratio (PWR) can achieve the highest, at around 1.8, due to the high PWR of the hydrocarbon fuel turbine and the few components of the system. However, its work capacity is limited by the flow rate of the supplied fuel. The closed Brayton cycle can maintain a relatively high PWR, ranging from 0.2 to 0.8, while achieving relatively high output power and conversion efficiency. The Rankine cycle has a higher PWR, its range is close to that of the closed Brayton cycle, peaking at about 0.88. The thermoelectric materials technology has a small power generation level, making it more suitable for scenarios with low power demand. This review provides a basis for selecting and developing heat-to-power conversion technologies on hypersonic vehicles.

References

1

Zhu YH, Peng W, Xu RN, et al. Review on active thermal protection and its heat transfer for airbreathing hypersonic vehicles. Chin J Aeronaut 2018;31(10):1929–53.

2

Liu J, Yuan HC, Wang YF, et al. Unsteady supercritical/critical dual flowpath inlet flow and its control methods. Chin J Aeronaut 2017;30(6):1877–84.

3

van Heerden ASJ, Judt DM, Jafari S, et al. Aircraft thermal management: practices, technology, system architectures, future challenges, and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci 2022;128:100767.

4

Zuo LX, Zhang CL, Wang X, et al. Requirement of hypersonic aircraft power. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2021;42(8):525798 [Chinese].

5

Zhang YJ, Wang LL, Wang SN, et al. Auxiliary power unit failure prediction using quantified generalized renewal process. Microelectron Reliab 2018;84:215–25.

6

Saad MMM, Bin Mohd S, Zulkafli MF. A survey on the use of ram air turbine in aircraft. AIP Conf Proc 2017;1831(1):020048.

7

Polezhaev YV. Will there or will there not be a hypersonic airplane. J Eng Phys Thermophys 2000;73(1):3–8.

8

Wang JX, Li YZ, Liu XD, et al. Recent active thermal management technologies for the development of energy-optimized aerospace vehicles in China. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(2):1–27.

9
Zhao R. Investigation of flow and heat transfer instability and thermal cracking of supercritical pressure hydrocarbon fuel [dissertation]. Beijing: Tsinghua University; 2018 [Chinese].
10

Wu XY, Yang J, Zhang H, et al. System design and analysis of hydrocarbon scramjet with regeneration cooling and expansion cycle. J Therm Sci 2015;24(4):350–5.

11

Song J, Cui P, Li QL, et al. System scheme and thermal performance of a third fluid cooled rocket engine. Acta Astronaut 2022;191:204–15.

12
Chen F, Tam W, Shimp N, et al. An innovative thermal management system for a Mach 4 to Mach 8 hypersonic scramjet engine. Reston: AIAA; 1998. Report No.: AIAA-1998-3734.
13

Kanda T, Masuya G, Wakamatsu Y. Propellant feed system of a regeneratively cooled scramjet. J Propuls Power 1991;7(2):299–301.

14

Wang G, Liu YJ, Wang J. Discussion on integrated environment control/thermal management system concepts for hypersonic vehicle. Eng Sci 2007;9(2):44–8.

15
Cheng KL. Performance investigation of combined power generation system based on cold source cascade utilization for hypersonic vehicle [dissertation]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology; 2020 [Chinese].
16

Xiong ZQ, Mi ZT, Zhang XW, et al. Development of synthesized high-density hydrocarbon fuels. Prog Chem 2005;17(2):359–67.

17

Hou L, Liu Q, Zhang XW. Progress on endothermic reactions of hydrocarbon fuel for hypersonic flight. Chem Ind Eng 2022;39(5):1–10 [Chinese].

18

Bao W, Qin J, Zhou WX, et al. Parametric performance analysis of multiple Re-Cooled Cycle for hydrogen fueled scramjet. Int J Hydrog Energy 2009;34(17):7334–41.

19

Qin J, Bao W, Zhou WX, et al. Performance cycle analysis of an open cooling cycle for a scramjet. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G 2009;223(6):599–607.

20

Qin J, Zhou WX, Bao W, et al. Thermodynamic optimization for a scramjet with re-cooled cycle. Acta Astronaut 2010;66(9–10):1449–57.

21

Qin J, Bao W, Zhou WX. Comparison analysis between expander cycle and recooling cycle for a scramjet. J Aerosp Eng 2012;25(3):347–55.

22

Qin J, Zhang SL, Bao W, et al. Effect of recooling cycle on performance of hydrogen fueled scramjet. Int J Hydrog Energy 2012;37(23):18528–36.

23

Seyedmatin P, Karimian S, Rostamzadeh H, et al. Electricity and hydrogen co-production via scramjet multi-expansion open cooling cycle coupled with a PEM electrolyzer. Energy 2020;199:117364.

24
Seyedmatin P, Ebadollahi M, Bezaatpour M, et al. Optimization of multi-stage cooling system’s performance for hydrogen fueled scramjet. Synergy development in renewables assisted multi-carrier systems. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 311–33.
25
Villace VF, Steelant J. The thermal paradox of hypersonic cruisers. Reston: AIAA; 2015. Report No.: AIAA-2015-3643.
26

Villace VF, Steelant J. A generic thermodynamic assessment of reusable high-speed vehicles. Proceedings of space propulsion 2016, 2016.

27

Fusaro R, Ferretto D, Viola N, et al. A methodology for preliminary sizing of a Thermal and Energy Management System for a hypersonic vehicle. Aeronaut J 2019;123(1268):1508–44.

28

Viola N, Ferretto D, Fusaro R, et al. Performance assessment of an integrated environmental control system of civil hypersonic vehicles. Aerospace 2022;9(4):201.

29

Ferretto D, Viola N. Preliminary design and simulation of a thermal management system with integrated secondary power generation capability for a Mach 8 aircraft concept exploiting liquid hydrogen. Aerospace 2023;10(2):180.

30

Bao W, Qin J, Zhou WX, et al. Power generation and heat sink improvement characteristics of recooling cycle for thermal cracked hydrocarbon fueled scramjet. Sci China Technol Sci 2011;54(4):955–63.

31
Bao W, Zhang D, Qin J, et al. Performance analysis on fuel turbopump and motor system of scramjet engine. Reston: AIAA; 2012. Report No.: AIAA-2012-4159.
32

Li HW, Qin J, Bao W, et al. Performance improvement of gaseous hydrocarbon fuel driven thermal power generation systems for hypersonic vehicles. Energy Convers Manage 2019;199:111949.

33
Li HW, Wen B, Qin J, et al. Analysis on the power generation scheme for wide speed range super/hypersonic air-breathing propulsion system. Reston: AIAA; 2018. Report No.: AIAA-2018-4846.
34

Qin J, Zhou WX, Bao W, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and parametric study of a closed Brayton cycle thermal management system for scramjet. Int J Hydrog Energy 2010;35(1):356–64.

35

Li XC, Wang ZW, Ding G. Energy and exergy analysis of a closed Brayton cycle for power generation from the scramjet cooling heat. Int J Astronaut Aeronautical Eng 2021;6(2):053.

36

Cheng KL, Qin J, Dang CL, et al. Thermodynamic analysis for high-power electricity generation systems based on closed-Brayton-cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles. Int J Hydrog Energy 2018;43(31):14762–74.

37

Cheng KL, Qin J, Sun HC, et al. Performance comparison on wall cooling and heat supply for power generation between fuel- and liquid metal-cooled scramjet. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;93:105294.

38

Cheng KL, Qin J, Sun HC, et al. Performance assessment of a closed-recuperative-Brayton-cycle based integrated system for power generation and engine cooling of hypersonic vehicle. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;87:278–88.

39
Balland S, Villace VF, Steelant J. Thermal and energy management for hypersonic cruise vehicles─ Cycle analysis. Reston: AIAA; 2015. Report No.: AIAA-2015-3557.
40
Li XC. Research of the scramjet active cooling system scheme based on thermoelectric conversion [dissertation]. Changsha: National University of Defense and Technology; 2017 [Chinese].
41

Yang CB, Zhou H, Zhang JY. Performance simulation analysis of composite thermal management system for hypersonic vehicle. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2020;751(1):012078.

42

Ma Z, Zhang XJ, Yang CX. Analysis of brayton thermoelectric conversion method for thermal protection of hypersonic aircraft. Tactical Missile Technol 2014;4:20–5.

43

Huang YL, Jiang PX, Zhu YH. Analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system by integrating of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and transcritical ejector refrigeration cycle. Energy Convers Manage 2022;269:116081.

44

Kim MS, Ahn Y, Kim B, et al. Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle. Energy 2016;111:893–909.

45

Ma Y, Xie GN, Manca O. Thermodynamic analysis and the recuperator’s effects on two cycle systems aiming for hypersonic vehicles. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2022;34:101432.

46

Cheng KL, Qin J, Sun HC, et al. Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles. Energy 2019;181:1189–201.

47

Jiang PX, Zhang FZ, Xu RN, et al. Integrated thermal protection and power generation system of hypersonic vehicle engine. J Aerosp Power 2021;36(1):1–7 [Chinese].

48

Miao HY, Wang ZW, Niu YB. Key issues and cooling performance comparison of different closed Brayton cycle based cooling systems for scramjet. Appl Therm Eng 2020;179:115751.

49

Cheng KL, Xu J, Dang CL, et al. Performance evaluation of fuel indirect cooling based thermal management system using liquid metal for hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet. Energy 2022;260:125068.

50

Guo L, Pang LP, Yang XD, et al. A power and thermal management system for long endurance hypersonic vehicle. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(2):29–40.

51

Guo LA, Pang LP, Zhao JQ, et al. Optimization of power and thermal management system of hypersonic vehicle with finite heat sink of fuel. Energies 2022;15(15):5332.

52

Dang CL, Cheng KL, Fan JH, et al. Performance analysis of fuel vapor turbine and closed-Brayton-cycle combined power generation system for hypersonic vehicles. Energy 2023;266:126426.

53

Ma XF, Jiang PX, Zhu YH. Performance analysis and dynamic optimization of integrated cooling and power generation system based on supercritical CO2 cycle for turbine-based combined cycle engine. Appl Therm Eng 2022;215:118867.

54

Ma XF, Jiang PX, Zhu YH. Modeling and performance analysis of a pre-cooling and power generation system based on the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle on turbine-based combined cycle engines. Energy 2023;284:128540.

55
Zhang J. Research on aerodynamic heat collection and conversion technology based on thermal management of hypersonic aircraft structure[dissertation]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology; 2019 [Chinese].
56
Sforza P. Electric power generation onboard hypersonic aircraft. Reston: AIAA; 2009. Report No.: AIAA-2009-5119.
57

Li XC, Wang ZW, Niu YB. Study the performance of an organic Rankine cycle for thermal absorption and recovery from the scramjet cooling heat. Int J Aeronaut Sci Aerosp Res 2019;6(3):192–9.

58

Li XC, Wang ZW, Niu YB. Performance parameters analysis of an organic Rankine cycle for power generation from the heat of cooling scramjet. Int J Sci Res Arch 2020;1(2):9–21.

59
Wang BY. Research on the design of a new cooling cycle for scramjet based on Rankine cycle [dissertation]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology; 2018 [Chinese].
60

Wang BY, Pan Y, Wang N. Exergy analysis of water cooling cycle system for scramjet engine. J Phys: Conf Ser 2018;1064:012001.

61
Payne N, Wolff M, Roberts R, et al. Experimental validation of a combined thermal management and power generation system using a multi-mode Rankine cycle. Reston: AIAA; 2020. Report No.: AIAA-2020-3951.
62
Cao LW. Study on wall surface thermoelectric conversion system of hypersonic vehicle under large area aerodynamic heat [dissertation]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology; 2019[Chinese].
63
Li XC. Research of the scheme for multi-functional structures based on thermoelectric technology [dissertation]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology; 2013 [Chinese].
64

Sun HC, Qin J, Li HW, et al. Research of a combined power and cooling system based on fuel rotating cooling air turbine and organic Rankine cycle on hypersonic aircraft. Energy 2019;189:116183.

65

Cheng KL, Feng Y, Lv CW, et al. Performance evaluation of waste heat recovery systems based on semiconductor thermoelectric generators for hypersonic vehicles. Energies 2017;10(4):570.

66

Cheng KL, Zhang D, Qin J, et al. Performance evaluation and comparison of electricity generation systems based on single- and two-stage thermoelectric generator for hypersonic vehicles. Acta Astronaut 2018;151:15–21.

67

Cheng KL, Qin J, Jiang YG, et al. Performance assessment of multi-stage thermoelectric generators on hypersonic vehicles at a large temperature difference. Appl Therm Eng 2018;130:1598–609.

68

Cheng KL, Qin J, Jiang YG, et al. Performance comparison of single- and multi-stage onboard thermoelectric generators and stage number optimization at a large temperature difference. Appl Therm Eng 2018;141:456–66.

69

Gong CL, Gou JJ, Hu JX, et al. A novel TE-material based thermal protection structure and its performance evaluation for hypersonic flight vehicles. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;77:458–70.

70

Gao G, Gou JJ, Gong CL, et al. A novel mechanical-thermal-electrical thermal protection system concept and its multi-scale performance evaluation for hypersonic launch vehicles. Compos Struct 2021;268:113962.

71

Gou JJ, Yan ZW, Hu JX, et al. The heat dissipation, transport and reuse management for hypersonic vehicles based on regenerative cooling and thermoelectric conversion. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;108:106373.

72

Gao G, Li D, Gou JJ, et al. A study of interfacial electrical contact resistances of thermoelectric generators for hypersonic vehicles by experimental measurements and two-scale numerical simulations. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;131:107966.

73

Gou JJ, Hu JX, Yan ZW, et al. Effects of physical dimensions, temperature ranges and interfacial thermal contacts on the multi-stage thermoelectric generators for a hypersonic vehicle. Int J Energy Res 2022;46(14):20021–38.

74

Jia XD, Fan SF, Zhang Z, et al. Performance assessment of thermoelectric generators with application on aerodynamic heat recovery. Micromachines 2021;12(11):1399.

75

Sun YJ, Chen G, Bai GH, et al. Analysis of thermal power generation capacity for a skutterudite-based thermoelectric functional structure. J Electron Mater 2017;46(5):2832–8.

76

Wang ZH, Ma YJ, Tang GH, et al. Integration of thermal insulation and thermoelectric conversion embedded with phase change materials. Energy 2023;278:127784.

77

Wang YL, Cheng KL, Dang CL, et al. Performance and experimental investigation for a novel heat storage based thermoelectric harvester for hypersonic vehicles. Energy 2023;263:125885.

78
Hanquist KM, Boyd ID. Effectiveness of thermionic emission for cooling hypersonic vehicle surfaces. Reston: AIAA; 2018. Report No.: AIAA-2018-1714.
79
Hanquist KM. Modeling of electron transpiration cooling for leading edges of hypersonic vehicles [dissertation]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 2017.
80

Khrapko VY. The concept of the combined thermal protection system for leading edges of hypersonic vehicles with use of thermionic emission. KnE Eng 2018;3(3):465–72.

81

Shi J, Zhang XJ, Li FY, et al. Research on the method of aerodynamic heat utilization for hypersonic vehicle. Tactical Missile Technol 2015;1:31–6 [Chinese].

82
Li XC, Wang ZW. Analysis of heat transfer and thermoelectric conversion on scramjet wall. The 37th technical exchange conference and the first joint conference on aerospace power of china aerospace information network. 2016. p.125-30 [Chinese].
83

Li XC, Wang ZW. Exergy analysis of integrated TEG and regenerative cooling system for power generation from the scramjet cooling heat. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;66:12–9.

84

Li XC, Wang ZW. Parametric of an integrated thermoelectric generation thermal management system for hypersonic vehicle. J Natl Univ Def Technol 2016;38(2):43–7, 86 [Chinese].

85

Shi R, Zhang LN, Ma W, et al. Applicability of combined generation technology based on Brayton cycle and semiconductor thermoelectric principle for vehicles. Spacecr Environ Eng 2018;35(1):66–70 [Chinese].

86

Cheng KL, Qin J, Sun HC, et al. Performance assessment of an integrated power generation and refrigeration system on hypersonic vehicles. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;89:192–203.

87

Cheng KL, Qin J, Zhang D, et al. Performance evaluation for a combined power generation system of closed-Brayton-cycle and thermoelectric generator with finite cold source at room temperature on hypersonic vehicles. Energy 2022;254:124444.

88

Cheng KL, Wang YL, Xu J, et al. A novel liquid metal MHD enhanced Closed-Brayton-Cycle power generation system for hypersonic vehicles: Thermodynamic analysis and performance evaluation with finite cold source. Energy Convers Manage 2022;268:116068.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 148-179
Cite this article:
QI Y, MA X, JIANG P, et al. Review on heat-to-power conversion technologies for hypersonic vehicles. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(5): 148-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.11.002

157

Views

4

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 17 May 2023
Revised: 18 June 2023
Accepted: 21 September 2023
Published: 09 November 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return