AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Chinese Journal of Aeronautics Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Design-space adaptation method for multiobjective and multidisciplinary optimization

Jongho JUNGa, Kwanjung YEEa, Shinkyu JEONGb,( )
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyunghee University, Youngin 17104, Republic of Korea

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper developed a new method that adaptively adjusts a design space by considering the actual solution distribution of a problem to overcome the conventional design-space adaptation method that assumes the solutions distribution to be a normal distribution because the distributions of solutions are rarely normal distributions for real-world problems. The developed method was applied to nineteen multiobjective test functions that are widely used to evaluate the characteristics and performance of optimization approaches. The results showed that this method adapted the design space to an appropriate design space where the solution existence probability was high. The optimization performance achieved using the developed method was higher than that of the conventional methods. Furthermore, the developed method was applied to the conceptual design of an unmanned spacecraft to confirm its validity in real-world design and multidisciplinary-optimization problems. The results showed that the Pareto solutions of the developed method were superior to those of conventional methods. Additionally, the optimization efficiency with the developed method was improved by more than 1.4 times over that of the conventional methods. In this regard, the developed method has the potential to be applied to complicated real-world optimization problems to achieve better performance and efficiency.

Keywords

Multiobjective optimizationHypersonic vehicleMultiobjective genetic algorithmDesign-space adaptationMultidisciplinary optimization

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-37-8-166_ESM.pdf (4 MB)

References

1

Frenzel JF. Genetic algorithms. IEEE Potentials 1993;12(3):21–4.
Crossref Google Scholar
2

Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T. Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell 2007;1(1):33–57.
Crossref Google Scholar
3

Jung J, Yee K, Misaka T, et al. Low Reynolds number airfoil design for a Mars exploration airplane using a transition model. Trans Japan Soc Aero S Sci 2017;60(6):333–40.
Crossref Google Scholar
4

Hashimoto A, Jeong S, Obayashi S. Aerodynamic optimization of near-future high-wing aircraft. Trans Japan Soc Aero S Sci 2015;58(2):73–82.
Crossref Google Scholar
5

Singh RK, Ahmed MR, Zullah MA, et al. Design of a low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Renew Energy 2012;42:66–76.
Crossref Google Scholar
6

Jeong S, Sasaki T, Chae S, et al. Design exploration of helicopter blades for HSI noise and aerodynamic performance. Trans Japan Soc Aero S Sci 2011;54(184):153–9.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

Jeong S, Obayashi S, Minemura Y. Application of hybrid evolutionary algorithms to low exhaust emission diesel engine design. Eng Optim 2008;40(1):1–16.
Crossref Google Scholar
8

Jeong S, Kim H. Development of an efficient hull form design exploration framework. Math Probl Eng 2013;2013:1–12.
Crossref Google Scholar
9

Yang S, Lee SG, Yee K. Inverse design optimization framework via a two-step deep learning approach: Application to a wind turbine airfoil. Eng Comput 2023;39(3):2239–55.
Crossref Google Scholar
10

Amirjanov A. A changing range genetic algorithm. Num Meth Eng 2004;61(15):2660–74.
Crossref Google Scholar
11

Amirjanov A. The development of a changing range genetic algorithm. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2006;195(19–22):2495–508.
Crossref Google Scholar
12

Amirjanov A. Investigation of a changing range genetic algorithm in noisy environments. Num Meth Eng 2008;73(1):26–46.
Crossref Google Scholar
13

Amirjanov A, Sadikoglu F. Linear adjustment of a search space in genetic algorithm. Procedia Comput Sci 2017;120:953–60.
Crossref Google Scholar
14

Amirjanov A. The parameters setting of a changing range genetic algorithm. Nat Comput 2015;14(2):331–8.
Crossref Google Scholar
15

Amirjanov A. Modeling the dynamics of a changing range genetic algorithm. Procedia Comput Sci 2016;102:570–7.
Crossref Google Scholar
16

Chen ZJ, Cao HY, Ye K, et al. Improved particle swarm optimization-based form-finding method for suspension bridge installation analysis. J Comput Civ Eng 2015;29(3):04014047.
Crossref Google Scholar
17

Jeong S, Obayashi S, Yamamoto K. A Kriging-based probabilistic optimization method with an adaptive search region. Eng Optim 2006;38(5):541–55.
Crossref Google Scholar
18

Kitayama S, Yamazaki K, Arakawa M. Adaptive range particle swarm optimization. Optim Eng 2009;10(4):575–97.
Crossref Google Scholar
19

Arakawa M, Hagiwara I. Development of adaptive real range (ARRange) genetic algorithms. JSME Int J, Ser C 1998;41(4):969–77.
Crossref Google Scholar
20
Arakawa M, Hagiwara I. Nonlinear integer, discrete and continuous optimization using adaptive range genetic algorithms. Proceedings of ASME 1997 design engineering technical conferences; Sacramento, California, USA; 2021.
Crossref
21

Oyama A, Obayashi S, Nakahashi K. Real-coded adaptive range genetic algorithm and its application to aerodynamic design. JSME Int J 2000;43(2):124–9.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

Oyama A, Obayashi S, Nakamura T. Real-coded adaptive range genetic algorithm applied to transonic wing optimization. Appl Soft Comput 2001;1(3):179–87.
Crossref Google Scholar
23
Oyama A, Obayashi S, Nakahashi K. Wing design using realcoded adaptive range genetic algorithm. 1999 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028); Tokyo, Japan. Piscataway: IEEE; 2002. p. 475–80.
Crossref
24

Sasaki D, Obayashi S. Efficient search for trade-offs by adaptive range multi-objective genetic algorithms. J Aerosp Comput Inf Commun 2005;2(1):44–64.
Crossref Google Scholar
25
Obayashi S, Sasaki D. Multi-objective optimization for aerodynamic designs by using ARMOGAs. Proceedings of seventh international conference on high performance computing and grid in Asia Pacific Region; Tokyo, Japan. Piscataway: IEEE; 2004. p. 396–403.
Crossref
26

Skinner SN, Zare-Behtash H. State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods. Appl Soft Comput 2018;62:933–62.
Crossref Google Scholar
27

Jung S, Choi W, Martins-Filho LS, et al. An implementation of self-organizing maps for airfoil design exploration via multi-objective optimization technique. JAerosp Technol Manag 2016;8(2):193–202.
Crossref Google Scholar
28
Chiba K, Yoda H, Ito S, et al. Visualization of design-space constitution for single-stage hybrid rocket with rigid body in view of extinction-reignition. 2015 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence; Cape Town, South Africa. Piscataway: IEEE; 2016. p. 933–40.
Crossref
29

Pohl J, Thompson HM, Schlaps RC, et al. Innovative turbine stator well design using a kriging-assisted optimization method. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2017;139(7):072603.
Crossref Google Scholar
30

Choi W, Park H. Optimized design and analysis of composite flexible wing using aero-nonlinear structure interaction. Compos Struct 2019;225:111027.
Crossref Google Scholar
31

Horii H. Multi-objective optimization of vehicle occupant restraint system by using evolutionary algorithm with response surface model. Int J CMEM 2017;5(2):163–70.
Crossref Google Scholar
32

Yang LC, Li XB, Zhang L, et al. Application of multiobjective optimization and multivariate analysis in multiple energy systems: A case study of CGAM. Int Trans Electr Energ Syst 2020;30(7):1–19.
Crossref Google Scholar
33

Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput 2000;8(2):173–95.
Crossref Google Scholar
34

Reddy MJ, Kumar DN. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Water Resour Manage 2006;20(6):861–78.
Crossref Google Scholar
35

Bandyopadhyay S, Pal SK, Aruna B. Multiobjective GAs, quantitative indices, and pattern classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 2004;34(5):2088–99.
Crossref Google Scholar
36

Huband S, Hingston P, Barone L, et al. A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2006;10(5):477–506.
Crossref Google Scholar
37
Huband S, Barone L, While L, et al. A scalable multi-objective test problem toolkit. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer; 2005.p. 280–95.
Crossref
38

Custódio AL, Madeira JFA, Vaz AIF, et al. Direct multisearch for multiobjective optimization. SIAM J Optim 2011;21(3):1109–40.
Crossref Google Scholar
39

Aprovitola A, Iuspa L, Viviani A. Thermal protection system design of a reusable launch vehicle using integral soft objects. Int J Aerosp Eng 2019;2019:1–14.
Crossref Google Scholar
40

Viviani A, Iuspa L, Aprovitola A. Multi-objective optimization for re-entry spacecraft conceptual design using a free-form shape generator. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;71:312–24.
Crossref Google Scholar
41

Viviani A, Iuspa L, Aprovitola A. An optimization-based procedure for self-generation of re-entry vehicles shape. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;68:123–34.
Crossref Google Scholar
42

Aprovitola A, Iuspa L, Pezzella G, et al. Phase-a design of a reusable re-entry vehicle. Acta Astronaut 2021;187:141–55.
Crossref Google Scholar
43

Tsuchiya T, Mori T. Optimal design of two-stage-to-orbit space planes with airbreathing engines. J Spacecr Rockets 2005;42(1):90–7.
Crossref Google Scholar
44

Tsuchiya T, Mori T. Optimal conceptual design of two-stage reusable rocket vehicles including trajectory optimization. J Spacecr Rockets 2004;41(5):770–8.
Crossref Google Scholar
45

Jung J, Yang H, Kim K, et al. Conceptual design of a reusable unmanned space vehicle using multidisciplinary optimization. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2018;19(3):743–50.
Crossref Google Scholar
46

Harloff GJ, Berkowitz BM. Hypersonic aerospace sizing analysis for the preliminary design of aerospace vehicles. J Aircr 1990;27(2):97–8.
Crossref Google Scholar
47
George C. X-37 demonstrator to test future launch technologies in orbit and reentry environments. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 2003. Report No.: NASA FS-2003-05-65-MSFC.
48
Rohrschneider R. Development of a mass estimating relationship database for launch vehicle conceptual design [dissertation]. Atlanta(GA): Georgia Institute of Technology; 2002.
49
Anderson JD. Modern compressible flow with historical perspective. 3rd ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
50
Williams JE, Vukelich S. The USAF stability and control digital DATCOM. volume I. users manual. St. Louis, Missouri: Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab; 1979. Report No. AFFDL-TR-76-45-VOL-1, AD-A045 171.
51

Zoby EV, Moss JN, Sutton K. Approximate convective-heating equations for hypersonic flows. J Spacecr Rockets 1981;18(1):64–70.
Crossref Google Scholar
52
Hamilton H, Weilmuenster J, DeJarnette F. Improved approximate method for computing convective heating on hypersonic vehicles using unstructured grids. Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ASME joint thermophysics and heat transfer conference; San Francisco, California. Reston: AIAA; 2006.
Crossref
53
Hamilton HH, Weilmuenster KJ, DeJarnette F. Approximate method for computing laminar and turbulent convective heating on hypersonic vehicles using unstructured grids. Proceedings of the 41st AIAA thermophysics conference; San Antonio, Texas. Reston: AIAA; 2009.
Crossref
54
Doug M. The Coming U.S. Small Launch Crash, Thanks to SpaceX Rideshare. Spaceitbridge; 2021. Available from: https://www.spaceitbridge.com/the-coming-u-s-small-launch-crash-thanks-to-spacex-rideshare.htm.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Volume 37 Issue 8,
August 2024
Pages 166-189
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.12.029
Cite this article:
JUNG J, YEE K, JEONG S. Design-space adaptation method for multiobjective and multidisciplinary optimization. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 166-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.12.029

19

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 19 August 2023
Revised: 11 September 2023
Accepted: 14 November 2023
Published: 23 December 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Return