AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Resonance mechanism of flapping wing based on fluid structure interaction simulation

Yueyang GUOa,b,Wenqing YANGa,b,c( )Yuanbo DONGaDong XUEa,b,c
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerodynamic Design and Research, School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’ an 710072, China
Research & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518063, China
Yangtze River Delta Research Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Taicang 215400, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Certain insect species have been observed to exploit the resonance mechanism of their wings. In order to achieve resonance and optimize aerodynamic performance, the conventional approach is to set the flapping frequency of flexible wings based on the Traditional Structural Modal (TSM) analysis. However, there exists controversy among researchers regarding the relationship between frequency and aerodynamic performance. Recognizing that the structural response of wings can be influenced by the surrounding air vibrations, an analysis known as Acoustic Structure Interaction Modal (ASIM) is introduced to calculate the resonant frequency. In this study, Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) simulations are employed to investigate the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings at modal frequencies derived from both TSM and ASIM analyses. The performance is evaluated for various mass ratios and frequency ratios, and the findings indicate that the deformation and changes in vortex structure exhibit similarities at mass ratios that yield the highest aerodynamic performance. Notably, the flapping frequency associated with the maximum time-averaged vertical force coefficient at each mass ratio closely aligns with the ASIM frequency, as does the frequency corresponding to maximum efficiency. Thus, the ASIM analysis can provide an effective means for predicting the optimal flapping frequency for flexible wings. Furthermore, it enables the prediction that flexible wings with varying mass ratios will exhibit similar deformation and vortex structure changes. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the ongoing debate concerning the resonance mechanism of Flexible Flapping Wings (FFWs) and proposes an effective methodology for predicting their aerodynamic performance.

References

1

Liu D, Song BF, Yang WQ, et al. Unsteady characteristic research on aerodynamic interaction of slotted wingtip in flapping kinematics. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(4):82–101.

2

Yang XW, Song BF, Yang WQ, et al. Study of aerodynamic and inertial forces of a dovelike flapping-wing MAV by combining experimental and numerical methods. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(6):63–76.

3

Heathcote S, Gursul I. Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 2007;45(5):1066–79.

4

Nakata T, Liu H. A fluid-structure interaction model of insect flight with flexible wings. J Comput Phys 2012;231(4):1822–47.

5

Nakata T, Liu H. Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: A computational approach. Proc Biol Sci 2012;279(1729):722–31.

6

Addo-Akoto R, Han JS, Han JH. Roles of wing flexibility and kinematics in flapping wing aerodynamics. J Fluids Struct 2021;104:103317.

7

Chen L, Yang FL, Wang YQ. Analysis of nonlinear aerodynamic performance and passive deformation of a flexible flapping wing in hover flight. J Fluids Struct 2022;108:103458.

8

Qin SY, Hang HT, Xiang Y, et al. Reynolds-number scaling analysis on lift generation of a flapping and passive rotating wing with an inhomogeneous mass distribution. Chin J Aeronaut 2024;37(2):259–69.

9

Olivier M, Dumas G. A parametric investigation of the propulsion of 2D chordwise-flexible flapping wings at low Reynolds number using numerical simulations. J Fluids Struct 2016;63:210–37.

10

Ishihara D. Role of fluid-structure interaction in generating the characteristic tip path of a flapping flexible wing. Phys Rev E 2018;98(3):032411.

11

Ishihara D. Computational approach for the fluid-structure interaction design of insect-inspired micro flapping wings. Fluids 2022;7(1):26.

12

Karásek M. Good vibrations for flapping-wing flyers. Sci Robot 2020;5(46): eabe4544.

13

Sane SP, Dieudonné A, Willis MA, et al. Antennal mechanosensors mediate flight control in moths. Science 2007;315(5813):863–6.

14

Masoud H, Alexeev A. Resonance of flexible flapping wings at low Reynolds number. Phys Rev E 2010;81(5):056304.

15

Blake RE. Basic vibration theory. Shock and vibration handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1961. p.1:2-8.

16

Ozaki T, Hamaguchi K. Bioinspired flapping-wing robot with direct-driven piezoelectric actuation and its takeoff demonstration. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2018;3(4):4217–24.

17

Helps T, Romero C, Taghavi M, et al. Liquid-amplified zipping actuators for micro-air vehicles with transmission-free flapping. Sci Robot 2022;7(63): eabi8189.

18

Dudley R. The evolutionary physiology of animal flight: Paleobiological and present perspectives. Annu Rev Physiol 2000;62:135–55.

19

Ha NS, Truong QT, Goo NS, et al. Relationship between wingbeat frequency and resonant frequency of the wing in insects. Bioinspir Biomim 2013;8(4):046008.

20

Thiria B, Godoy-Diana R. How wing compliance drives the efficiency of self-propelled flapping flyers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2010;82(1 Pt 2):015303.

21

Ramananarivo S, Godoy-Diana R, Thiria B. Rather than resonance, flapping wing flyers may play on aerodynamics to improve performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(15):5964–9.

22

Vanella M, Fitzgerald T, Preidikman S, et al. Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. J Exp Biol 2009;212(1):95–105.

23

Zhang JE, Liu NS, Lu XY. Locomotion of a passively flapping flat plate. J Fluid Mech 2010;659:43–68.

24

Spagnolie SE, Moret L, Shelley MJ, et al. Surprising behaviors in flapping locomotion with passive pitching. Phys Fluids 2010;22(4):041903.

25

Chen JS, Chen JY, Chou YF. On the natural frequencies and mode shapes of dragonfly wings. J Sound Vib 2008;313(3–5):643–54.

26

Song F, Lee KL, Soh AK, et al. Experimental studies of the material properties of the forewing of cicada(Homóptera, Cicàdidae). J Exp Biol 2004;207(17):3035–42.

27

Wang L, Song BF, Sun ZC, et al. Review on ultra-lightweight flapping-wing nano air vehicles: Artificial muscles, flight control mechanism, and biomimetic wings. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(6):63–91.

28

Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. Ⅱ. Morphological parameters. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1984;305(1122):17–40.

29

Byrne DN, Buchmann SL, Spangler HG. Relationship between wing loading, wingbeat frequency and body mass in homopterous insects. J Exp Biol 1988;135(1):9–23.

30

Shyy W, Aono H, Kang CK, et al. An introduction to flapping wing aerodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

31

Wood R, Nagpal R, Wei GY. Flight of the robobees. Sci Am 2013;308(3):60–5.

32
Keennon M, Klingebiel K, Won H. Development of the nano Hummingbird: A tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. Proceedings of the 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition; Nashville, Tennessee. Reston: AIAA; 2012.
33

Roshanbin A, Altartouri H, Karásek M, et al. COLIBRI: A hovering flapping twin-wing robot. Int J Micro Air Veh 2017;9(4):270–82.

34

Ma ZD, Hagiwara I. Sensitivity analysis methods for coupled acoustic-structural systems part Ⅰ: Modal sensitivities. AIAA J 1991;29(11):1787–95.

35
Zienkiewicz O. Coupled vibrations of a structure submerged in a compressible fluid. Proc of symposium on finite element techniques held at the University of Stuttgart, 1969.
36

Inman DJ, Singh RC. Engineering vibration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994.

37

Singiresu SR. Mechanical vibrations. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley; 1995.

38

Guo YY, Yang WQ, Dong YB, et al. Numerical investigation of an insect-scale flexible wing with a small amplitude flapping kinematics. Phys Fluids 2022;34(8):081903.

39

Yoon SH, Cho H, Lee J, et al. Effects of camber angle on aerodynamic performance of flapping-wing micro air vehicle. J Fluids Struct 2020;97:103101.

40

Chen L, Wang LY, Zhou C, et al. Effects of Reynolds number on leading-edge vortex formation dynamics and stability in revolving wings. J Fluid Mech 2022;931:A13.

41

Li CY, Dong HB, Cheng B. Tip vortices formation and evolution of rotating wings at low Reynolds numbers. Phys Fluids 2020;32(2):021905.

42
Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Wu P, et al. A computational and experimental studies of flexible wing aerodynamics. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition; Orlando, Florida. Reston: AIAA; 2010.
43

Shahzad A, Tian FB, Young J, et al. Effects of flexibility on the hovering performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios. J Fluids Struct 2018;81:69–96.

44

Kweon J, Choi H. Sectional lift coefficient of a flapping wing in hovering motion. Phys Fluids 2010;22(7):071703.

45

Lua KB, Lee YJ, Lim TT, et al. Wing–wake interaction of three-dimensional flapping wings. AIAA J 2017;55(3):729–39.

46

Ellington CP. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. Ⅵ. Lift and power requirements. Philos Trans Roy Soc London B, Biol Sci 1997;305(1122):145–81.

47

Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J Experimental Bbiol 2002;205(1):55–70.

48

Zhang YN, Liu KH, Xian HZ, et al. A review of methods for vortex identification in hydroturbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;81:1269–85.

49
Holmén V. Methods for vortex identification. Master’s theses in mathematical sciences; 2012.
50

Savage N. Aerodynamics: vortices and robobees. Nature 2015;521(7552):S64–5.

51

Shyy W, Trizila P, Kang CK, et al. Can tip vortices enhance lift of a flapping wing? AIAA J 2009;47(2):289–93.

52

Han JS, Chang JW, Cho HK. Vortices behavior depending on the aspect ratio of an insect-like flapping wing in hover. Exp Fluids 2015;56(9):1–16.

53

Walker SM, Thomas ALR, Taylor GK. Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies. J R Soc Interface 2010;7(42):131–42.

54

Chen L, Zhou C, Werner NH, et al. Dual-stage radial–tangential vortex tilting reverses radial vorticity and contributes to leading-edge vortex stability on revolving wings. J Fluid Mech 2023;963:A29.

55

Zhang JD, Huang WX. On the role of vortical structures in aerodynamic performance of a hovering mosquito. Phys Fluids 2019;31(5):051906.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 243-262
Cite this article:
GUO Y, YANG W, DONG Y, et al. Resonance mechanism of flapping wing based on fluid structure interaction simulation. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(5): 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.01.011

133

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 02 June 2023
Revised: 20 August 2023
Accepted: 29 October 2023
Published: 11 January 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return