AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Singularity analysis and avoidance for an SSRMS-type reconfigurable space manipulator with a non-spherical wrist and two lockable passive telescopic links

Zhiyuan ZHAO,Xiaohang YANGYuntao LIZichun XUJingdong ZHAO( )Hong LIU
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This study focuses on addressing kinematic singularity analysis and avoidance issues for a space station remote manipulator system (SSRMS)-type reconfigurable space manipulator. The manipulator is equipped with a non-spherical wrist and two lockable passive telescopic links (LPTLs), which enable it to have both active revolute and passive prismatic joints and operate in two distinct modes. To begin with the kinematic singularity analysis, the study derives the differential kinematic equations for the manipulator and identifies the dominant Jacobian matrix that causes singularities. Subsequently, an in-depth analysis of singularities from multiple perspectives is conducted. Firstly, a kinematic singularity map method is proposed to capture the distribution of singularities within the reachable workspace. Then, the influence of the two LPTLs on singularities is thoroughly examined. Finally, a new method based on the matrix rank equivalence principle is introduced to determine singularity conditions, enabling the identification of all the singular configurations for the SSRMS-type reconfigurable manipulator. Notably, this method significantly reduces computational complexity, and the singularity conditions obtained have more concise equations. For the singularity avoidance problem, a novel method is developed, which simultaneously addresses the requirements of real-time performance, high precision, and the avoidance of both kinematic singularities and joint limit constraints. Benefiting from these excellent properties, the proposed method can effectively resolve the singularity issues encountered separately by the SSRMS-type reconfigurable manipulator in its two operational modes. Several typical simulations validate the utility of all the proposed methods.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-37-8-435_ESM.pdf (598.9 KB)

References

1

Xue ZH, Liu JG, Wu CC, et al. Review of in-space assembly technologies. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(11):21–47.

2

Li WJ, Cheng DY, Liu XG, et al. On-orbit service (OOS) of spacecraft: A review of engineering developments. Prog. Aeosp. Sci 2019;108:32–120.

3

Ma BY, Jiang ZN, Liu Y, et al. Advances in space robots for on-orbit servicing: a comprehensive review. Adv Intell Syst 2023:2200397.

4

Xu WF, She Y, Xu YS. Analytical and semi-analytical inverse kinematics of SSRMS-type manipulators with single joint locked failure. Acta Astronaut 2014;105(1):201–17.

5

Zhao JD, Zhao ZY, Yang XH, et al. Inverse kinematics and workspace analysis of a novel SSRMS-type reconfigurable space manipulator with two lockable passive telescopic links. Mech Mach Theory 2023;180:105152.

6
Craig JJ. Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2018.
7

Nokleby SB, Podhorodeski RP. Reciprocity-based resolution of velocity degeneracies (singularities) for redundant manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 2001;36(3):397–409.

8

Oetomo D, Ang Jr MH. Singularity robust algorithm in serial manipulators. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 2009;25(1):122–34.

9

Cheng FT, Chen JS, Kung FC. Study and resolution of singularities for a 7-DOF redundant manipulator. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 1998;45(3):469–80.

10

Kong XW, Gosselin CM. A dependent-screw suppression approach to the singularity analysis of a 7-DOF redundant manipulator: Canadarm2. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 2005;29(4):593–604.

11

Chen G, Zhang L, Jia QX, et al. Singularity analysis of redundant space robot with the structure of Canadarm2. Math Probl Eng 2014;2014:1–9.

12

Wang XH, Zhang DW, Zhao C, et al. Singularity analysis and treatment for a 7R 6-DOF painting robot with non-spherical wrist. Mech Mach Theory 2018;126:92–107.

13

Nokleby SB. Singularity analysis of the Canadarm2. Mech Mach Theory 2007;42(4):442–54.

14

Xu WF, Zhang JT, Liang B, et al. Singularity analysis and avoidance for robot manipulators with nonspherical wrists. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2015;63(1):277–90.

15
Xu WF, Zhang JT, Qian HH, et al. Identifying the singularity conditions of Canadarm2 based on elementary Jacobian transformation. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2013 Nov 3–7; Tokyo, Japan. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2013. p. 795–800.
16

Chiaverini S, Siciliano B, Egeland O. Review of the damped least-squares inverse kinematics with experiments on an industrial robot manipulator. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 1994;2(2):123–34.

17

Chiaverini S. Singularity-robust task-priority redundancy resolution for real-time kinematic control of robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 1997;13(3):398–410.

18

Klein CA, Kee KB. The nature of drift in pseudoinverse control of kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 1989;5(2):231–324.

19

Wang JG, Li YM, Zhao XH. Inverse kinematics and control of a 7-DOF redundant manipulator based on the closed-loop algorithm. Int J Adv Rob Syst 2010;7(4):37.

20

Siciliano B. A closed-loop inverse kinematic scheme for on-line joint-based robot control. Robotica 1990;8(3):231–43.

21

Yoshikawa T. Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. Int J Rob Res 1985;4(2):3–9.

22
Marani G, Kim J, Yuh J, et al. A real-time approach for singularity avoidance in resolved motion rate control of robotic manipulators. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2002 May 11–15; Washington, DC, USA. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2002. p. 1973–78.
23
Kim J, Marani G, Chung WK, et al. A general singularity avoidance framework for robot manipulators: task reconstruction method. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2004 Apr 26–May 1; New Orleans, LA, USA. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2004. p. 4809–14.
24

Xu WF, Liang B, Xu YS. Practical approaches to handle the singularities of a wrist-partitioned space manipulator. Acta Astronaut 2011;68(1–2):269–300.

25
Taki S, Nenchev D. A novel singularity-consistent inverse kinematics decomposition for S-R-S type manipulators. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2014 May 31–Jun 7; Hong Kong, China. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2014. p. 5070–75.
26

Colomé A, Torras C. Closed-loop inverse kinematics for redundant robots: comparative assessment and two enhancements. IEEE-ASME Trans. Mechatron 2014;20(2):944–55.

27
Aghili F, Parsa K. Design of a reconfigurable space robot with lockable telescopic joints. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2006 Oct 9–15; Beijing, China. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2006. p. 4608–14.
28

Aghili F, Parsa K. A reconfigurable robot with lockable cylindrical joints. IEEE Trans Rob 2009;25(4):785–97.

29

Liu XJ, Wang JS, Pritschow G. Kinematics, singularity and workspace of planar 5R symmetrical parallel mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory 2006;41(2):145–69.

30

Milenkovic P. Continuous path control for optimal wrist singularity avoidance in a serial robot. Mech Mach Theory 2019;140:809–24.

31

Patel S, Sobh T. Manipulator performance measures-a comprehensive literature survey. J Intell Rob Syst 2015;77(3):547–70.

32

Merlet JP. Jacobian, manipulability, condition number, and accuracy of parallel robots. J Mech Des 2006;128(1):199–206.

33
Kim JO, Khosla K. Dexterity measures for design and control of manipulators. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 1991 Nov 3–5; Osaka, Japan. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 1991. p. 758–63.
34
Zhao ZY, He S, Zhao YP, et al. Workspace analysis for a 9-DOF hyper-redundant manipulator based on an improved Monte Carlo method and voxel algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation; 2018 Aug 5–8; Changchun, China. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2018. p. 637–42.
35

Horn RA, Johnson CR. Matrix analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

36

Liegeois A. Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multibody mechanisms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1977;7(12):868–71.

37
Dubey RV, Euler JA, Babcock SM. An efficient gradient projection optimization scheme for a seven-degree-of-freedom redundant robot with spherical wrist. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 1988 Apr 24–29; Philadelphia, PA, USA. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 1988. p. 28–36.
38

Chan TF, Dubey RV. A weighted least-norm solution based scheme for avoiding joint limits for redundant joint manipulators. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 1995;11(2):286–92.

39

Faria C, Ferreira F, Erlhagen W, et al. Position-based kinematics for 7-DOF serial manipulators with global configuration control, joint limit and singularity avoidance. Mech Mach Theory 2018;121:317–34.

40
Zhao JD, Tang JW, Zhao ZY, et al. Inverse kinematics of a reconfigurable redundant manipulator with lockable passive telescopic links. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation; 2022 Aug 7–10; Guilin, Guangxi, China. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Press; 2022. p. 557–62.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 435-459
Cite this article:
ZHAO Z, YANG X, LI Y, et al. Singularity analysis and avoidance for an SSRMS-type reconfigurable space manipulator with a non-spherical wrist and two lockable passive telescopic links. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 435-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.01.014

22

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 18 September 2023
Revised: 12 October 2023
Accepted: 14 December 2023
Published: 01 February 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return