AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Surface integrity evolution during creep feed profile grinding of γ-TiAl blade tenon

Tao CHEN,Xiaowei WANGBiao ZHAO( )Wenfeng DINGJiuhua XU
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Helicopter Transmission, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Gamma titanium-aluminum (γ-TiAl) intermetallic compounds are increasingly used in manufacturing key hot-end components (e.g., blade tenon) in aero engines due to their high specific strength and lightweight properties. Creep feed profile grinding (CFPG) as a crucial precision process that is applied to produce the final profile of the blade tenon. However, sudden surface burns and microcracks of machined γ-TiAl blade tenon often occur because of its low plasticity and high strength during grinding processes, leading to poor surface integrity. In this work, CFPG experiments based on the profile characteristics of γ-TiAl blade tenon were performed and an associated undeformed chip thickness model considering grain–workpiece contact condition was established to explore the evolution of the surface integrity. Subsequently, the surface integrity was analyzed at different positions of the blade tenon in terms of surface roughness and morphology, metallographic structure, microhardness, and residual stress. Results show that the profile characteristics of blade tenon have a significant influence on machined surface integrity because of the thermomechanical effect at various detecting positions. The residual stress was established based on the undeformed chip thickness model considering the profile structure, with a prediction error of 10%–15%. The thermomechanical effect is more obvious at the bottom area, where the surface roughness, work hardening degree, and subsurface plastic deformation range are the largest, while the values at the bevel area are the smallest. Based on the undeformed chip thickness model, a residual stress finite element simulation was conducted by employing thermomechanical coupled effects. In addition, the error between the simulation and the experiment was between 10%–15%. Strain and strain rate equations were established through the relationship between material displacement and depth. The average strain and strain rate of the ground surface when ap is 1.0 mm are 18.8% and 33.2% larger than when ap is 0.5 mm, respectively. This study deepens the understanding of surface integrity under the influence of CFPG γ-TiAl and provides a practical reference and theoretical basis for realizing high-quality profile grinding of other complex parts.

References

1

Klocke F, Zeis M, Klink A, et al. Experimental research on the electrochemical machining of modern titanium - and nickel-based alloys for aero engine components. Procedia CIRP 2013;6:368–72.

2

Wang B, Liu ZQ, Cai YK, et al. Advancements in material removal mechanism and surface integrity of high speed metal cutting: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2021;166:103744.

3

Liao ZR, Monaca LA, Murray JW, et al. Surface integrity in metal machining - Part Ⅰ: fundamentals of surface characteristics and formation mechanisms. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2021;162:103687.

4

Monaca LA, Murray JW, Liao ZR, et al. Surface integrity in metal machining - Part Ⅱ: functional performance. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2021;164:103718.

5

Monaca LA, Axinte DA, Liao ZR, et al. Towards understanding the thermal history of microstructural surface deformation when cutting a next generation powder metallurgy nickel-base superalloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2021;168:103765.

6

Klink A, Hlavac M, Herrig T, et al. Technological and economical assessment of alternative process chains for turbocharger impeller manufacture. Procedia CIRP 2018;77:586–9.

7

Beranoagirre ALDL. Grinding of gamma TiAl intermetallic alloys. Procedia Eng 2013;63:489–98.

8
Bentley SA, Aspinwall DK. A comparison of the grinding of IMI318 titanium alloy and a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Matador Conference; 1997. p. 331–6.
9

Aspinwall DK, Dewes RC, Mantle AL. The machining of γ-TiAl intermetallic alloys. CIRP Ann - Manuf Techn 2005;54(1):99–104.

10
Bentley SA, Goh NP, Aspinwall DK. Reciprocating surface grinding of gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic alloy. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies (AMPT99); 1999. p. 427–35.
11

Zeppenfeld C, Klocke F. Speed stroke grinding of γ-titanium aluminides. CIRP Ann - Manuf Techn 2006;55(1):333–8.

12
Jones PE, Smits D, Eylon D, et al. Centerless grinding of TiAl using conventional grinding wheels. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Gamma Titanium Aluminide (ISTGA 95); 1995.
13

Klocke F, Zeppenfeld C, Nachmani Z. Advanced grinding of titanium aluminides. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 2007;12(1–3):60–71.

14

Hood R, Lechner F, Aspinwall DK, et al. Creep feed grinding of gamma titanium aluminide and burn resistant titanium alloys using SiC abrasive. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2007;47(9):1486–92.

15

Hood R, Aspinwall DK, Voice W. Creep feed grinding of a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic alloy using SiC abrasives. J Mater Process Technol 2007;191(1–3):210–4.

16

Hood R, Cooper P, Aspinwall DK, et al. Creep feed grinding of γ-TiAl using single layer electroplated diamond superabrasive wheels. CIRP Manuf Sci Technol 2015;11:36–44.

17

Kong MC, Axinte D. Response of titanium aluminide alloy to abrasive waterjet cutting: Geometrical accuracy and surface integrity issues versus process parameters. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B - J Eng Manuf 2009;223(1):20–42.

18

Xi XX, Zhu YJ, Chen T, et al. Surface burn behavior in creep-feed deep grinding of gamma titanium aluminide intermetallics: characterization, mechanism, and effects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;113(3–4):985–96.

19

Xi XX, Ding WF, Wu Z, et al. Performance evaluation of creep feed grinding of γ-TiAl intermetallics with electroplated diamond wheels. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(6):100–9.

20

Xi XX, Ding WF, Fu YC, et al. Grindability evaluation and tool wear during grinding of Ti2AlNb intermetallics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018;94(1–4):1441–50.

21
Gröning. Surface grinding of intermetallic titanium aluminides [dissertation] Aachen: RWTH Aachen; 2014.
22

Chen T, Zhu YJ, Xi XX, et al. Process parameter optimization and surface integrity evolution in the high-speed grinding of TiAl intermetallics based on grey relational analysis method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2021;117(9–10):2895–908.

23

Meng Q, Guo B, Zhao Q, et al. Modelling of grinding mechanics: a review. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(7):25–39.

24

Meng Q, Guo B, Wu G, et al. Dynamic force modeling and mechanics analysis of precision grinding with microstructured wheels. J Mater Process Technol 2023;314:117900.

25

Meng Q, Guo B, Wu G, et al. Accurate modeling and controlling of weak stiffness grinding system dynamics with microstructured tools. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2023;201:110659.

26

Jin T, Yi J, Peng S. Determination of burn thresholds of precision gears in form grinding based on complex thermal modelling and barkhausen noise measurements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;88(1–4):789–800.

27

Miao Q, Ding WF, Kuang WJ, et al. Tool wear behavior of vitrified microcrystalline alumina wheels in creep feed profile grinding of turbine blade root of single crystal nickel-based superalloy. Tribol Int 2020;145:106144.

28

Miao Q, Li HN, Ding WF. On the temperature field in the creep feed grinding of turbine blade root: simulation and experiments. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2020;147:118957.

29

Miao Q, Ding WF, Kuang WJ, et al. Grinding force and surface quality in creep feed profile grinding of turbine blade root of nickel-based superalloy with microcrystalline alumina grinding wheels. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(2):576–85.

30

Chen T, Miao Q, Xiong MY, et al. On the residual stresses of turbine blade root of γ-TiAl intermetallic alloys induced by non-steady-state creep feed profile grinding. J Manuf Process 2022;82:800–17.

31

Cao Y, Zhao B, Ding WF, et al. On the tool wear behavior during ultrasonic vibration-assisted form grinding with alumina wheels. Ceram Int 2021;47(18):26465–74.

32

Wu C, Li B, Liu Y, et al. Surface roughness modeling for grinding of silicon carbide ceramics considering co-existence of brittleness and ductility. Int J Mech Sci 2017;133:167–77.

33

Jin T, Yi J, Li P. Temperature distributions in form grinding of involute gears. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;88(9–12):2609–20.

34

Agarwal S, Venkateswara RP. Predictive modeling of undeformed chip thickness in ceramic grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2012;56:59–68.

35

Yi J, Li ZH, Zhou W. Experimental research on creep feed deep profile grinding of small-module gears. Diam Abrasive Eng 2023;43(3):332–9.

36

Kang KY, Yu GY, Yang WP, et al. Experimental study on creep-feed grinding burn of DD9 Nickel-based single crystal superalloy. Diam Abrasive Eng 2023;43(3):355–63.

37

Li HN, Yu TB, Wang ZX, et al. Detailed modeling of cutting forces in grinding process considering variable stages of grain-workpiece micro interactions. Int J Mech Sci 2017;126:319–39.

38

Tang Z, Huang C, Shi Z, et al. A new characterisation method for stress, hardness, microstructure, and slip lines using the stored energy field in the cutting deformation zones of workpiece. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2022;178:103891.

39

Kastenhuber M, Rashkova B, Clemens H, et al. Effect of microstructural instability on the creep resistance of an advanced intermetallic γ-TiAl based alloy. Intermetallics 2017;80:1–9.

40

Zhao B, Ding WF, Shan ZD, et al. Collaborative manufacturing technologies of structure shape and surface integrity for complex thin-walled components: Status, challenge and tendency. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(7):1–24.

41

Murtagian GR, Hecker RL, Liang SY, et al. Plastic deformation depth modeling on grinding of gamma titanium aluminides. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2010;49(1–4):89–95.

42

Klocke F, Soo SL, Karpuschewski B, et al. Abrasive machining of advanced aerospace alloys and composites. CIRP Ann - Manuf Techn 2015;64(2):581–604.

43

Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH. Residual stress, Part 2 - nature and origins. Mater Sci Technol 2001;17(4):366–75.

44

Zhao ZC, Qian N, Ding WF, et al. Profile grinding of DZ125 nickel-based superalloy: grinding heat, temperature field, and surface quality. J Manuf Process 2020;57:10–22.

45

Li HN, Axinte D. On a stochastically grain-discretised model for 2D/3D temperature mapping prediction in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2017;116:60–76.

46

Liu XC, Zhang HW, Lu K. Formation of nano-laminated structure in nickel by means of surface mechanical grinding treatment. Acta Mater 2015;96:24–36.

47

Xu Y, Gong Y, Zhang W, et al. Microstructure evolution and dynamic recrystallization mechanism induced by grinding of Ni-based single crystal superalloy. J Mater Process Technol 2022;310:117784.

48

Dang JJ, Zhang H, An QL, et al. On the microstructural evolution pattern of 300M steel subjected to surface cryogenic grinding treatment. J Manuf Process 2021;68:169–85.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 496-512
Cite this article:
CHEN T, WANG X, ZHAO B, et al. Surface integrity evolution during creep feed profile grinding of γ-TiAl blade tenon. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 496-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.01.020

24

Views

2

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 01 September 2023
Revised: 22 October 2023
Accepted: 02 November 2023
Published: 24 January 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return