AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

A deformation criterion of pressurized non-circular cross-section cabin and its effects on cruise performance of BWB civil aircraft

Siyi GUOaZhenli CHENa,( )Xuanyu YAOb
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
Aero Engine Academy of China, Beijing 101304, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Blended-Wing-Body (BWB) aircraft is promoted as one of the most possible layouts to achieve more sustainable civil aviation. Due to the non-circular cross-section of the center-body, a bulge deformation forms over the upper surface of the body under the coupled loads of the internal pressurization of the cabin and the aerodynamic bending moments of the wing, which reduces the lift-to-drag ratio of BWB aircraft. Under a limited deformation, the relationship between the aerodynamic performance and the structural weight needs to be studied. In this work, the effects of stiffness constraints on the center-body deformation, structural weight of the airframe and aerodynamic performance were investigated by using an analytical model of the Pultruded Rod Stitched Efficient Unitized Structure (PRSEUS) for the airframe and the computational fluid dynamics method, respectively. The results show that as the stiffness constraint increases, the spacings between the rod stringers and the frame stiffeners decrease, and the structural weight increases inversely. A 5.2% reduction of the lift-to-drag ratio is encountered at cruise for a medium deformation design of 42.8 mm/m. A higher aerodynamic penalty is suffered when the stiffness constraint is further released. The final deformation criterion is different when the weight vector of the aerodynamic performance and structural weight is different.

References

1

Liebeck RH. Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport. J Aircr 2004;41(1):10–25.

2

Chen ZL, Zhang MH, Chen YC, et al. Assessment on critical technologies for conceptual design of blended-wing-body civil aircraft. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(8):1797–827.

3

Cui Z, Lai GJ, Wang QF, et al. Wind tunnel investigation of different engine layouts of a blended-wing-body transport. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(9):123–32.

4

Wang LX, Zhang N, Liu HL, et al. Stability characteristics and airworthiness requirements of blended wing body aircraft with podded engines. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(6):77–86.

5
Velicki A, Thrash P, Jegley D. Airframe development for the hybrid wing body aircraft. Proceedings of the 47th aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition; Orlando, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2009.
6

Mukhopadhyay V, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Kosaka I, et al. Analysis, design, and optimization of noncylindrical fuselage for blended-wing-body vehicle. J Aircr 2004;41(4):925–30.

7

Bishara M, Horst P, Madhusoodanan H, et al. A structural design concept for a multi-shell blended wing body with laminar flow control. Energies 2018;11(2):383.

8
Mukhopadhyay V. Blended wing body (BWB) fuselage structural design for weight reduction. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; Austin, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2005.
9
Mukhopadhyay V. Hybrid-wing-body pressurized fuselage modeling, analysis and design for weight reduction. Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; Honolulu, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2012.
10
Velicki A, Thrash P. Advanced structural concept development using stitched composites. Proceedings of the 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; Schaumburg, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2008.
11
Lovejoy A, Rouse M. Pressure testing of a minimum gauge PRSEUS panel. Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; Denver, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2011.
12
Velicki A, Jegley D. PRSEUS development for the hybrid wing body aircraft. Proceedings of the AIAA centennial of naval aviation forum “100 years of achievement and progress”. Virgina Beach, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2011.
13
Velicki A, Jegley DC. PRSEUS structural concept development. Proceedings of the 52nd aerospace sciences meeting; Maryland, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2014.
14
Lovejoy AE. Improved method for increased-rate stitched composites manufacturing. Proceedings of the AIAA scitech 2023 forum. Reston: AIAA; 2023.
15
Velicki A, Hoffman K, Linton KA, et al. Hybrid wing body multibay test article analysis and assembly final report. Huntington (CA): The Boeing Company; 2017. Report No.: NF1676L-27756.
16
Yovanof N, Jegley D. Compressive behavior of frame-stiffened composite panels. Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; Denver, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2011.
17
Mukhopadhyay V. Hybrid wing body pressurized fuselage and bulkhead design and optimization. Proceedings of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference; Boston, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2013.
18
Shanygin A, Fomin V, Zamula G. Multilevel approach for strength and weight analyses of composite airframe structures. Proceedings of the 27th congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences; Nice, FR. 2010;3:1970–8.
19
Mukhopadhyay V. Hybrid-wing-body vehicle composite fuselage analysis and case study. Proceedings of the 14th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference; Atlanta, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2014.
20
Mukhopadhyay V, Sorokach MR. Composite structure modeling and analysis of advanced aircraft fuselage concepts. Proceedings of the AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference; Dallas, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2015.
21
Timoshenko S, Krieger SW. Theory of plates and shells. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1959. p. 197–202, 364–77.
22

Paik JK, Thayamballi AK, Kim BJ. Large deflection orthotropic plate approach to develop ultimate strength formulations for stiffened panels under combined biaxial compression/tension and lateral pressure. Thin Walled Struct 2001;39(3):215–46.

23

Mader CA, Kenway GKW, Yildirim A, et al. ADflow: An open-source computational fluid dynamics solver for aerodynamic and multidisciplinary optimization. J Aerosp Inf Syst 2020;17(9):508–27.

24

Kenway GKW, Mader CA, He P, et al. Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 2019;110:100542.

25

Yildirim A, Kenway GKW, Mader CA, et al. A Jacobian-free approximate Newton-Krylov startup strategy for RANS simulations. J Comput Phys 2019;397:108741.

26
Lyu ZJ, Kenway GK, Paige C, et al. Automatic differentiation adjoint of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with a turbulence model. Proceedings of the 21st AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference; San Diego, CA. Reston: AIAA; 2013.
27
Coder JG, Pulliam TH, Hue D, et al. Contributions to the 6th AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop using structured grid methods. Proceedings of the 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting; Grapevine, USA. Reston: AIAA; 2017.
28
Zhang MH. The high and low-speed performance coordinated design of blended wing body civil transport [dissertation]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University; 2020 [Chinese].
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 78-88
Cite this article:
GUO S, CHEN Z, YAO X. A deformation criterion of pressurized non-circular cross-section cabin and its effects on cruise performance of BWB civil aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6): 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.02.016

49

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 05 July 2023
Revised: 11 September 2023
Accepted: 29 October 2023
Published: 28 February 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return