AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Staring-imaging satellite pointing estimation based on sequential ISAR images

Canyu WANGaLibing JIANGaWeijun ZHONGbXiaoyuan RENaZhuang WANGa,( )
National Key Laboratory of Automatic Target Recognition, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
Xi’an Satellite Control Center, Xi’an 710600, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Pointing estimation for spacecraft using Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (ISAR) images plays a significant role in space situational awareness and surveillance. However, feature extraction and cross-range scaling of ISAR images create bottlenecks that limit performances of current estimation methods. Especially, the emergence of staring imaging satellites, characterized by complex kinematic behaviors, presents a novel challenge to this task. To address these issues, this article proposes a pointing estimation method based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and a numerical optimization algorithm. A satellite’s main axis, which is extracted from ISAR images by a proposed Semantic Axis Region Regression Net (SARRN), is chosen for investigation in this article due to its unique structure. Specifically, considering the kinematic characteristic of the staring satellite, an ISAR imaging model is established to bridge the target pointing and the extracted axes. Based on the imaging model, pointing estimation and cross-range scaling can be described as a maximum likelihood estimation problem, and an iterative optimization algorithm modified by using the strategy of random sampling-consistency check and weighted least squares is proposed to solve this problem. Finally, the pointing of targets and the cross-range scaling factors of ISAR images are obtained. Simulation experiments based on actual satellite orbital parameters verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. This work can improve the performance of satellite reconnaissance warning, while accurate cross-range scaling can provide a basis for subsequent data processes such as 3D reconstruction and attitude estimation.

References

1

Yang B, He F, Jin J, et al. DOA estimation for attitude determination on communication satellites. Chin J Aeronaut 2014;27(3):670–7.

2

Kawase S. Radio interferometer for geosynchronous-satellite direction finding. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2007;43(2):443–9.

3
Ma FH, Zhang M, Guo FC. A localization method based on TDOA self-calibrating of rotating short base line on single observer. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on signal and image processing (ICSIP). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2016. p. 368–73.
4

Xiang A, Zhang L, Fan L. Shadow removal of spacecraft images with multi-illumination angles image fusion. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;140:108453.

5

Pi YD, Li X, Yang B. Global iterative geometric calibration of a linear optical satellite based on sparse GCPs. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2020;58(1):436–46.

6
Sommer S, Rosebrock J, Cerutti-Maori D, et al. Temporal analysis of ENVISAT’s rotational motion. 7th European conference on space debris. 2017.
7

Pittet JN, Šilha J, Schildknecht T. Spin motion determination of the Envisat satellite through laser ranging measurements from a single pass measured by a single station. Adv Space Res 2018;61(4):1121–31.

8

Song C, Lin HY, Zhao CY. Analysis of Envisat’s rotation state using epoch method. Adv Space Res 2020;66(11):2681–8.

9

Yang XL, Wen GJ, Zhong JR, et al. A 3-D electromagnetic-model-based algorithm for absolute attitude measurement using wideband radar. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 2015;12(9):1878–82.

10
Lemmens S, Krag H, Rosebrock J, et al. Radar mappings of attitude analysis of objects in orbit. 6th European conference on space debris. 2013.
11
Stoiber M, Sundermeyer M, Triebel R. Iterative corresponding geometry: Fusing region and depth for highly efficient 3D tracking of textureless objects. Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2022.p.6845–55..
12
Stoiber M, Pfanne M, Strobl KH, et al. A sparse Gaussian approach to region-based 6DoF object tracking. Computer Vision – ACCV 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 666–82.
13

Zhang SJ, Liu FH, Cao XB, et al. Monocular vision-based two-stage iterative algorithm for relative position and attitude estimation of docking spacecraft. Chin J Aeronaut 2010;23(2):204–10.

14

Hu DY, Zhao XT, Zhang SJ. Robust image-based coordinated control for spacecraft formation flying. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(9):268–81.

15

Zhou JX, Shi ZG, Fu Q. Three-dimensional scattering center extraction based on wide aperture data at a single elevation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2015;53(3):1638–55.

16
Wang F, Xu F, Jin YQ. 3-D information of a space target retrieved from a sequence of high-resolution 2-D ISAR images. 2016 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2016. p. 5000–2.
17

Liu L, Zhou F, Bai XR, et al. Joint cross-range scaling and 3D geometry reconstruction of ISAR targets based on factorization method. IEEE Trans Image Process 2016;25(4):1740–50.

18

Zhong WJ, Wang JS, Ji WJ, et al. The attitude estimation of three-axis stabilized satellites using hybrid particle swarm optimization combined with radar cross section precise prediction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2016;230(4):713–25.

19

Li L, Yuan L, Wang L, et al. Recent advances in precision measurement & pointing control of spacecraft. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(10):191–209.

20

Song C, Fan CZ, Wang MM. Image-based adaptive staring attitude control for multiple ground targets using a miniaturized video satellite. Remote Sens 2022;14(16):3974.

21

Cui KK, Xiang JH, Zhang YL. Mission planning optimization of video satellite for ground multi-object staring imaging. Adv Space Res 2018;61(6):1476–89.

22

Sheng JL, Xing MD, Zhang L, et al. ISAR cross-range scaling by using sharpness maximization. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 2015;12(1):165–9.

23

Liu L, Zhou F, Tao ML, et al. Cross-range scaling method of inverse synthetic aperture radar image based on discrete polynomial-phase transform. IET Radar Sonar Navig 2015;9(3):333–41.

24

Zhang SH, Liu YX, Li X, et al. Fast ISAR cross-range scaling using modified Newton method. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2018;54(3):1355–67.

25

Lindsay JE. Angular glint and the moving, rotating, complex radar target. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1968;AES-4(2):164–73.

26

Yin HC, Huang PK. Further comparison between two concepts of radar target angular glint. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2008;44(1):372–80.

27
Li G, Zou JW, Xu SY, et al. A method of 3D reconstruction via ISAR Sequences based on scattering centers association for space rigid object. Proc SPIE 9252, millimetre wave and terahertz sensors and technology Ⅶ. 2014. p. 111–6.
28

Cherif AA, Wang Y. Imaging of target with complicated motion using ISAR system based on IPHAF-TVA. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(2):252–64.

29

Liu L, Zhou F, Bai XR, et al. A modified EM algorithm for ISAR scatterer trajectory matrix completion. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2018;56(7):3953–62.

30

Du RZ, Liu L, Bai XR, et al. A new scatterer trajectory association method for ISAR image sequence utilizing multiple hypothesis tracking algorithm. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2021;60:5103213.

31
Yang S, Jiang WD, Tian B. ISAR image matching and 3D reconstruction based on improved SIFT method. 2019 international conference on electronic engineering and informatics (EEI). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2019. p. 224–8.
32

Karine A, Toumi A, Khenchaf A, et al. Radar target recognition using salient keypoint descriptors and multitask sparse representation. Remote Sens 2018;10(6):843.

33

Wang JD, Li YC, Song M, et al. Joint estimation of absolute attitude and size for satellite targets based on multi-feature fusion of single ISAR image. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2022;60:5111720.

34

Wang JD, Li YC, Du L, et al. Joint estimation of satellite attitude and size based on ISAR image interpretation and parametric optimization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2022;60:5103817.

35

Zhou YJ, Zhang L, Cao YH, et al. Attitude estimation and geometry reconstruction of satellite targets based on ISAR image sequence interpretation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2019;55(4):1698–711.

36

Kou P, Liu YX, Zhong WJ, et al. Axial attitude estimation of spacecraft in orbit based on ISAR image sequence. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 2021;14:7246–58.

37

Zhou YJ, Zhang L, Cao YH. Attitude estimation for space targets by exploiting the quadratic phase coefficients of inverse synthetic aperture radar imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2019;57(6):3858–72.

38
Ruiter D. Spacecraft dynamics and control: An introduction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
39

Jiang L, Yang XB. Study on enlarging the searching scope of staring area and tracking imaging of dynamic targets by optical satellites. IEEE Sens J 2021;21(4):5349–58.

40

Lian YJ, Gao YD, Zeng GQ. Staring imaging attitude control of small satellites. J Guid Contr Dyn 2017;40(5):1278–85.

41
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 34–241.
42
Coughlan JM, Yuille AL. Manhattan World: Compass direction from a single image by Bayesian inference. Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision. Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2002. p. 941–7.
43
Guo HY, Peng SD, Lin HT, et al. Neural 3D scene reconstruction with the Manhattan-world assumption. 2022 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2022. p. 5501–10.
44

Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1979;9(1):62–6.

45

Boag A. A fast physical optics (FPO) algorithm for high frequency scattering. IEEE Trans Anntenas Propag 2004;52(1):197–204.

46

Zhang L, Qiao ZJ, Xing MD, et al. High-resolution ISAR imaging with sparse stepped-frequency waveforms. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2011;49(11):4630–51.

47

Chen J, Fu T, Chen DF, et al. Observation angle and plane characterisation for ISAR imaging of LEO space objects. Adv Space Res 2016;58(1):30–44.

48
Kingma DP, Ba JL. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 3rd international conference on learning representations, ICLR 2015 - conference track proceedings (2015); 2015.
49

Schmid C, Biegler LT. Quadratic programming methods for reduced hessian SQP. Comput Chem Eng 1994;18(9):817–32.

50

Anastassi ZA, Simos TE. An optimized Runge-Kutta method for the solution of orbital problems. J Comput Appl Math 2005;175(1):1–9.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 261-276
Cite this article:
WANG C, JIANG L, ZHONG W, et al. Staring-imaging satellite pointing estimation based on sequential ISAR images. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.02.021

28

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 28 August 2023
Revised: 25 October 2023
Accepted: 14 December 2023
Published: 05 March 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return