AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

A novel evasion guidance for hypersonic morphing vehicle via intelligent maneuver strategy

Xun LIaXiaogang WANGa,( )Hongyu ZHOUaYu LIb
Department of Aerodynamics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Beijing Aerospace Technology Institute, Beijing 100074, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper presents a novel evasion guidance law for hypersonic morphing vehicles, focusing on determining the optimized wing's unfolded angle to promote maneuverability based on an intelligent algorithm. First, the pursuit-evasion problem is modeled as a Markov decision process. And the agent's action consists of maneuver overload and the unfolded angle of wings, which is different from the conventional evasion guidance designed for fixed-shape vehicles. The reward function is formulated to ensure that the miss distances satisfy the prescribed bounds while minimizing energy consumption. Then, to maximize the expected cumulative reward, a residual learning method is proposed based on proximal policy optimization, which integrates the optimal evasion for linear cases as the baseline and trains to optimize the performance for nonlinear engagement with multiple pursuers. Therefore, offline training guarantees improvement of the constructed evasion guidance law over conventional ones. Ultimately, the guidance law for online implementation includes only analytical calculations. It maps from the confrontation state to the expected angle of attack and the unfolded angle while retaining high computational efficiency. Simulations show that the proposed evasion guidance law can utilize the change of unfolded angle to extend the maximum overload capability. And it surpasses conventional maneuver strategies by ensuring better evasion efficacy and higher energy efficiency.

References

1

Dai P, Yan BB, Huang W, et al. Design and aerodynamic performance analysis of a variable-sweep-wing morphing waverider. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;98:105703.

2

Wang JF, Cai JS, Duan YH, et al. Design of shape morphing hypersonic inward-turning inlet using multistage optimization. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;66:44-58.

3

Chen HL, Wang P, Tang GJ. Fuzzy disturbance observer-based fixed-time sliding mode control for hypersonic morphing vehicles with uncertainties. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2023;59(4):3521-30.

4

Bao CY, Wang P, Tang GJ. Integrated method of guidance, control and morphing for hypersonic morphing vehicle in glide phase. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(5):535-53.

5

Dai P, Feng DZ, Zhao JQ, et al. Asymmetric integral barrier Lyapunov function-based dynamic surface control of a state-constrained morphing waverider with anti-saturation compensator. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;131:107975.

6

Xu D, Hui Z, Liu YQ, et al. Morphing control of a new bionic morphing UAV with deep reinforcement learning. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;92:232-43.

7
Friedman A. Differential games. North Chelmsford : Courier Corporation; 2013.
8

Ho Y, Bryson A, Baron S. Differential games and optimal pursuit-evasion strategies. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1965;10(4):385-9.

9

Shinar J, Steinberg D. Analysis of optimal evasive maneuvers based on a linearized two-dimensional kinematic model. J Aircr 1977;14(8):795-802.

10

Shima T. Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile. J Guid Contr Dyn 2011;34(2):414-25.

11

Fonod R, Shima T. Multiple model adaptive evasion against a homing missile. J Guid Contr Dyn 2016;39(7):1578-92.

12

Weiss M, Shima T. Minimum effort pursuit/evasion guidance with specified miss distance. J Guid Contr Dyn 2016;39(5):1069-79.

13

Shen ZP, Yu JL, Dong XW, et al. Penetration trajectory optimization for the hypersonic gliding vehicle encountering two interceptors. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;121:107363.

14

Zhu JW, Liu LH, Tang GJ, et al. Optimal diving maneuver strategy considering guidance accuracy for hypersonic vehicle. Acta Astronaut 2014;104(1):231-42.

15

Zhu JW, He RZ, Tang GJ, et al. Pendulum maneuvering strategy for hypersonic glide vehicles. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;78:62-70.

16

Duan DD, Liu CS. Event-based optimal guidance laws design for missile-target interception systems using fuzzy dynamic programming approach. ISA Trans 2022;128:243-55.

17

Cheng L, Wang ZB, Gong SP. Adaptive control of hypersonic vehicles with unknown dynamics based on dual network architecture. Acta Astronaut 2022;193:197-208.

18

Zhao SW, Wang JC, Xu HT, et al. Composite observer-based optimal attitude-tracking control with reinforcement learning for hypersonic vehicles. IEEE Trans Cybern 2023;53(2):913-26.

19

Gaudet B, Furfaro R. Terminal adaptive guidance for autonomous hypersonic strike weapons via reinforcement metalearning. J Spacecr Rockets 2023;60(1):286-98.

20

Han X, Zheng ZZ, Liu L, et al. Online policy iteration ADP-based attitude-tracking control for hypersonic vehicles. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;106:106233.

21

Wang ZS, Liu L, Zhang HG, et al. Fault-tolerant controller design for a class of nonlinear MIMO discrete-time systems via online reinforcement learning algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2016;46(5):611-22.

22

Liu C, Dong CY, Zhou ZJ, et al. Barrier Lyapunov function based reinforcement learning control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicle with variable geometry inlet. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;96:105537.

23

Zhou HY, Li X, Bai YL, et al. Optimal guidance for hypersonic vehicle using analytical solutions and an intelligent reversal strategy. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;132:108053.

24

Wang G, An H, Wang YM, et al. Intelligent control of air-breathing hypersonic vehicles subject to path and angle-of-attack constraints. Acta Astronaut 2022;198:606-16.

25

Furfaro R, Scorsoglio A, Linares R, et al. Adaptive generalized ZEM-ZEV feedback guidance for planetary landing via a deep reinforcement learning approach. Acta Astronaut 2020;171:156-71.

26

Jiang XQ, Li S, Furfaro R. Integrated guidance for Mars entry and powered descent using reinforcement learning and pseudospectral method. Acta Astronaut 2019;163:114-29.

27

Liu B, Liang H, Han ZH, et al. Surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a morphing wing considering a wide Mach-number range. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;124:107557.

28

Carr RW, Cobb RG, Pachter M, et al. Solution of a pursuit-evasion game using a near-optimal strategy. J Guid Contr Dyn 2017;41(4):841-50.

29
Zarchan P. Tactical and strategic missile guidance: An introduction. Volume 1. 7th ed. Reston: AIAA; 2019.
30
Puterman M. Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
31
Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, et al. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint: 1707.06347,2017.
32
Schulman J, Moritz P, Levine S, et al. High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. arXiv preprint: 1506.02438, 2015.
33

Zhang QR, Zhang M, Chen TH, et al. Recent advances in convolutional neural network acceleration. Neurocomputing 2019;323:37-51.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 441-461
Cite this article:
LI X, WANG X, ZHOU H, et al. A novel evasion guidance for hypersonic morphing vehicle via intelligent maneuver strategy. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(5): 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.02.024

137

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 31 May 2023
Revised: 21 July 2023
Accepted: 08 September 2023
Published: 06 March 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return