AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

High-efficiency prediction method for helicopter global/ground noise based on near-field acoustic holography

Mengxue SHAOYang LU,( )Xice XUJiaxin LU
National Key Laboratory of Helicopter Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Noise reduction program design is an effective approach that relies on efficient noise prediction for reducing ground noise during flight. The existing noise prediction methods have the limitations of being computationally expensive or only applicable to far-fields. In this paper, a High-Efficiency Prediction Method (HEPM) for helicopter global/ground noise based on near-field acoustic holography is proposed. The HEPM can predict the global noise based on acoustic modal analysis and has the advantages of high prediction accuracy and low time cost. The process is given as follows: firstly, the rotor noise on the holographic surface in the specified flight is obtained by simulations or experiments. Secondly, the global noise model, which maps time-domain noise to acoustic modes, is established based on near-field acoustic holography and Fourier acoustic analysis methods. Finally, combined with acoustic modal amplitude, the model established enables efficiently predicting the global/ground noise in the corresponding flight state. To verify the accuracy of the prediction method, a simulation study is conducted in hovering and forward flight states using a model helicopter with a 2-meter rotor and Rotor Body Interaction (ROBIN) fuselage. The comparison of HEPM with numerical results shows that the average prediction errors of the global and ground noise are less than 0.3 dB and 0.2 dB, respectively. For a region containing 100000 observers, the computation time of the HEPM is only one-fifth of that of the acoustic hemisphere method, demonstrating the rapidity of the proposed method.

References

1
Cox CR, Lynn RR. A study of the origin and means of reducing helicopter noise. Fort Eustis(VA): U.S. Army Transportation Research Command; 1962. Report No.: TCREC Technical Report 62-73.
2
Leverton JW, Pike ATC. Helicopter noise–what is important from a community prospective. Proceedings of the American helicopter society 63rd annual forum. 2007.
3
Snecma, Airbus Helicopters, Sikorsky Aircraft, et al. Helicopter noise reduction technology [Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Jul 9]. Available from: https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/Helicopter_Noise_Reduction_Technology_Status_Report_April_2015.pdf
4
Greenwood E, Center NLR. Dynamic replanning of low noise rotorcraft operations. Proceedings of the vertical flight society 75th annual forum. 2019.
5

Tsuchiya T, Ikaida H, Ishii H, et al. Real-time trajectory optimization for noise abatement of helicopter landings. J Mech Syst Transp Logist 2011;4(2):95–110.

6

Hartjes S, Visser HG. Optimal control approach to helicopter noise abatement trajectories in nonstandard atmospheric conditions. J Aircr 2019;56(1):43–52.

7

Farassat F. Linear acoustic formulas for calculation of rotating blade noise. AIAA J 1981;19(9):1122–30.

8

Hanson DB. Near-field frequency-domain theory for propeller noise. AIAA J 1985;23(4):499–504.

9

Brès GA, Brentner KS, Perez G, et al. Maneuvering rotorcraft noise prediction. J Sound Vib 2004;275(3–5):719–38.

10
Pascioni K, Watts M, Stephenson J, et al. Medium-sized helicopter noise abatement flight test. Proceedings of the vertical flight society 76th annual forum. 2020.
11
Conner DA, Burley CL, Smith CD. Flight acoustic testing and data acquisition for the rotor noise model (RNM). Proceedings of American helicopter society 62nd annual forum. 2006.
12
Conner DA, Page JA. A tool for low noise procedures design and community noise impact assessment: The rotorcraft noise model (RNM). Proceedings of Heli Japan. 2002.
13

Schmitz FH, Gopalan G, Sim BWC. Flight-path management/control methodology to reduce helicopter blade-vortex interaction noise. J Aircr 2002;39(2):193–205.

14

Wang F, Xu GH, Shi YJ. Efficient prediction of ground noise from helicopters and parametric studies based on acoustic mapping. Chin J Aeronaut 2018;31(2):273–84.

15

Gopalan G, Schmitz FH. Quasi-static flight path control of helicopter blade vortex interaction noise in a steady wind. J Am Helicopter Soc 2007;52(1):15–23.

16

Gennaretti M, Serafini J, Bernardini G, et al. Numerical characterization of helicopter noise hemispheres. Aerosp Sci Technol 2016;52:18–28.

17

Greenwood E, Rau R. A maneuvering flight noise model for helicopter mission planning. J Am Helicopter Soc 2020;65(2):1–10.

18

Vouros S, Goulos I, Pachidis V. Integrated methodology for the prediction of helicopter rotor noise at mission level. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;89:136–49.

19

Ffowcs Williams JE, Hawkings DL. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc London. Ser A, Math Phys Sci 1969;264:321–42.

20

Veronesi WA, Maynard JD. Digital holographic reconstruction of sources with arbitrarily shaped surfaces. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85(2):588–98.

21

Wu SF. On reconstruction of acoustic pressure fields using the Helmholtz equation least squares method. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107(5 Pt 1):2511–22.

22

Xu XC, Lu Y, Ma JC, et al. A global rotor noise control method based on near-field acoustic holography and sound field reproduction. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;124:107549.

23
Bagai A. Contributions to the mathematical modeling of rotor flow-fields using a pseudo-implicit free-wake analysis [dissertation]. Washington, D.C.: University of Maryland; 1995.
24
Weissinger J. The lift distribution of swept-back wings. Washington, D.C.: NACA; 1947. Report No.: NACA TM1120.
25

Brentner KS, Farassat F. Modeling aerodynamically generated sound of helicopter rotors. Prog Aerosp Sci 2003;39(2–3):83–120.

26

Williams EG, Mann JA. Fourier acoustics: Sound radiation and nearfield acoustical holography. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;108(4):1373.

27

Semenova T, Wu SF. The Helmholtz equation least-squares method and Rayleigh hypothesis in near-field acoustical holography. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115(4):1632–40.

28
Elliott JW, Althoff SL, Sailey RH, et al. Inflow measurements made with a laser velocimeter on a helicopter model in forward flight, VolumeⅠ, Rectangular planform blades at an advance ratio of 0.15. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1988. Report No.: NASA Technical Memorandum 100541.
29
Elliott JW, Althoff SL, Sailey H. Inflow measurements made with a laser velocimeter on a helicopter model in forward flight, VolumeⅡ, Rectangular planform blades at an advance ratio of 0.23. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1988. Report No.: NASA Technical Memorandum 100542.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 271-284
Cite this article:
SHAO M, LU Y, XU X, et al. High-efficiency prediction method for helicopter global/ground noise based on near-field acoustic holography. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.029

51

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 25 July 2023
Revised: 30 October 2023
Accepted: 26 December 2023
Published: 25 March 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return