AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Coupled funnel control for supersonic tailless aerial vehicle on penetrating counter air

Yingyang WANGa,( )Peng ZHANGaJilian GUObJianbo HUa
Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China
Aviation Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Supersonic Tailless Aerial Vehicles (STAVs) will become an essential force in Penetrating Counter Air (PCA), but STAVs do not have the traditional horizontal and vertical tails, making pitch and yaw control difficult. The attack angle and the sideslip angle need to be limited to ensure that the engine inlet and the aerodynamic rudder at the rear of the vehicle can work properly, which is the so-called security constraints. In addition, the tracking error of the aerodynamic angle needs to be limited to achieve effective attitude control or high-accuracy tracking of trajectories, which is the so-called performance constraints. To this end, an attitude control method that meets the needs of PCA has been devised, based on constraint definition, coupled constraints handling, and control law design. Firstly, mathematical descriptions of the security constraints, performance constraints, and control constraints are given. Secondly, two treatment methods, coupled command filter and coupled funnel control are proposed for the aerodynamic angle coupled constraint problem. Finally, based on Nonlinear Dynamic Inverse (NDI) design, the coupled funnel controller is designed and validated by simulation for two typical mission scenarios, high-altitude penetration and low-altitude surprise defence. The proposed control method not only satisfies the security and performance constraints of STAV attitude control but also is highly robust.

References

1

Yang W. Development of future fighters. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 2020;41(6):524377 [Chinese].

2

Zacharias GL. Autonomous horizons: The way forward. Montgomery: Air University Press; 2019. p. 1–10.

3
Harris J, Elliott CM, Tallant GS. Stability and performance robustness of an L1 adaptive dynamic inversion flight control system. Reston: AIAA; 2019. Report No.: AIAA-2019-0141.
4
Elliott CM, Harris JA, Tallant G. Robust adaptive dynamic inversion with L1 control variable error regulation. 2019 IEEE aerospace conference. Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2019. p. 1–9.
5

An S, Yuan SZ. Relative position control design of receiver UAV in flying-boom aerial refueling phase. ISA Trans 2018;73:40–53.

6
Niestroy MA, Dorsett KM, Markstein K. A tailless fighter aircraft model for control-related research and development. Reston: AIAA; 2017. Report No.: AIAA-2017-1757.
7
Peijl IVD. Physical splines for aerodynamic modelling of innovative control effectors [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2017.
8
Oorspronk DJ. Upset recovery controller based on maximum control effectiveness for a high-performance over-actuated aircraft [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2018.
9

He ZH, Hu JB, Wang YY, et al. Incremental backstepping sliding-mode trajectory control for tailless aircraft with stability enhancer. Aerospace 2022;9(7):352.

10
Shayan K, Van Kampen EJ. Online actor-critic-based adaptive control for a tailless aircraft with innovative control effectors. Reston: AIAA; 2021. Report No.: AIAA-2021-0884.
11
Stolk ARJ. Minimum drag control allocation for the innovative control effector aircraft: optimal use of control redundancy on modern fighters [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2017.
12
Mollema M. Adaptive incremental nonlinear control allocation for the innovative control effectors aircraft [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2019.
13
Yin MZ, Chu QP, Zhang Y, et al. Probabilistic flight envelope estimation with application to unstable over-actuated aircraft. Reston: AIAA; 2019. Report No.: AIAA-2019-0951.
14
Douwes D. Direct force control for the ICE aircraft [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2019.
15
Hooij B. Online distributed approach for aerodynamic model identification of the ICE aircraft [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2020.
16
Harris J, Elliott CM, Tallant GS. L1 Adaptive nonlinear dynamic inversion control for the innovative control effectors aircraft. Reston: AIAA; 2022 Report No.: AIAA-2022-0791.
17

Cong JP, Hu JB, Wang YY, et al. Fault-tolerant attitude control incorporating reconfiguration control allocation for supersonic tailless aircraft. Aerospace 2023;10(3):241.

18
Smith G, Bixler B, Babcock JT, et al. System identification of the ICE/SACCON UAS aircraft. Reston: AIAA; 2020. Report No.: AIAA-2020-0289.
19
Hungs S. Finding trim points of the ICE model using interval analysis [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2018.
20
Segard CJ. Control law synthesis for lockheed Martin’s innovative control effectors aircraft concept [dissertation]. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University; 2019.
21

Sepulveda Palacios E, Smith H. Impact of mission requirements on the design of low observable UCAV configurations. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 2019;91(10):1295–307.

22
Smith DR, Warsop C. NATO AVT-239 task group: ‘Innovative control effectors for manoeuvring of air vehicles’ –introduction and overview. Reston: AIAA; 2019. Report No.: AIAA-2019-0041.
23

Liu ZY, Luo L, Zhang BQ. An aerodynamic design method to improve the high-speed performance of a low-aspect-ratio tailless aircraft. Appl Sci 2021;11(4):1555.

24

Xiang H, Yang Y, Xie J, et al. Inlet aerodynamic characteristic of fighters under high angle of attack and post-stall maneuver. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 2020;41(6):523460 [Chinese].

25

Zhang L, Huang Y, Zhu ZL, et al. Virtual flight test of pitch and roll attitude control based on circulation control of tailless flying wing aircraft without rudders. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(6):52–62.

26

Xie R, Wang X, Cao Y, et al. Design of envelope protection controller for supermanoeuvrable aircraft. Flight Dyn 2018; 36(05): 39-42,48 [Chinese].

27

Kim C, Ji C, Koh G, et al. Review on flight control law technologies of fighter jets for flying qualities. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2023;24(1):209–36.

28

Ilchmann A, Ryan EP, Sangwin CJ. Tracking with prescribed transient behaviour. ESAIM Contr Optim Calc Var 2002;7:471–93.

29

Bechlioulis CP, Rovithakis GA. A low-complexity global approximation-free control scheme with prescribed performance for unknown pure feedback systems. Automatica 2014;50(4):1217–26.

30

Theodorakopoulos A, Rovithakis GA. Guaranteeing preselected tracking quality for uncertain strict-feedback systems with deadzone input nonlinearity and disturbances via low-complexity control. Autom J IFAC 2015;54(C):135–45.

31

Theodorakopoulos A, Rovithakis GA. A simplified adaptive neural network prescribed performance controller for uncertain MIMO feedback linearizable systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2015;26(3):589–600.

32

Wang YY, Hu JB. Robust control for a quadrotor aircraft with small overshoot and high-precision position tracking performance. J Frankl Inst 2020;357(18):13386–409.

33

Wang YY, Hu JB, Li J, et al. Improved prescribed performance control for nonaffine pure-feedback systems with input saturation. Intl J Robust & Nonlinear 2019;29(6):1769–88.

34

Wang YY, Hu JB, Zheng YJ. Improved decentralized prescribed performance control for non-affine large-scale systems with uncertain actuator nonlinearity. J Frankl Inst 2019;356(13):7091–111.

35

Shao XL, Shi Y, Zhang WD, et al. Prescribed fast tracking control for flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicles: An event-triggered case. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(11):200–15.

36
Mehdifar F, Bechlioulis CP, Dimarogonas DV. Funnel control under hard and soft output constraints. 2022 IEEE 61st conference on decision and control (CDC). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2022. p. 4473–8.
37

Bu XW. Prescribed performance control approaches, applications and challenges: A comprehensive survey. Asian J Contr 2023;25(1):241–61.

38

Li S, Guo Q, Shi Y, et al. Quasi-synchronous control of uncertain multiple electrohydraulic systems with prescribed performance constraint and input saturation. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(9):416–25.

39

Park J, Choi JY, Jo Y, et al. Stability and control of tailless aircraft using variable-fidelity aerodynamic analysis. J Aircr 2017;54(6):2148–64.

40

Hale LE, Patil M, Roy CJ. Aerodynamic parameter identification and uncertainty quantification for small unmanned aircraft. J Guid Contr Dyn 2017;40(3):680–91.

41

Wang L, Qi RY, Jiang B. Adaptive fault-tolerant control for non-minimum phase hypersonic vehicles based on adaptive dynamic programming. Chin J Aeronaut 2024;37(3):290–311.

42

Cao R, Liu YB, Lu YP. Robust optimization of control command for aerospace vehicles with aerodynamic uncertainty. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(12):226–41.

43

Guo Y, Song DY, Wang CQ, et al. Robust formation control for missiles with obstacle avoidance. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(1):70–80.

44

Wu CH, Yan JG, Shen JH, et al. Predefined-time attitude stabilization of receiver aircraft in aerial refueling. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Ⅱ Express Briefs 2021;68(10):3321–5.

45

Wang EM, Lu H, Zhang JC, et al. A novel adaptive coordinated tracking control scheme for a morphing aircraft with telescopic wings. Chin J Aeronaut 2024;37(2):148–62.

46

Sontag EMathematical control theory. 2nd ed. London: Springer London; 1998. p. 476–81.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 458-481
Cite this article:
WANG Y, ZHANG P, GUO J, et al. Coupled funnel control for supersonic tailless aerial vehicle on penetrating counter air. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 458-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.034

87

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 04 August 2023
Revised: 13 September 2023
Accepted: 14 December 2023
Published: 29 March 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return