AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Aerodynamic characteristics of a pitching airfoil with leading-edge morphing

Chaoyuan WENaYuting DAIa,b,( )Yuntao XUaChao YANGa
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Tianmushan Laboratory, Hangzhou 311115, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper focuses on the effect of the phase offset of Leading-Edge (LE) morphing on the aerodynamic characteristics of a pitching NACA0012 airfoil. Assuming an unstretched camber and using polynomial interpolation, an explicit expression for LE nonlinear morphing is proposed and implemented for the large pitching motion of the airfoil. Flow field results and aerodynamic forces are obtained by solving the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations for both the airfoil’s pitching motion and LE morphing. Furthermore, the index of instantaneous aerodynamic power is used to quantify the work done by the airflow in a dynamic process. According to the instantaneous aerodynamic power and energy map, which denotes the energy transfer between the airfoil’s oscillation and flow field, the airfoil is subject to stall flutter. The results show that LE morphing with an optimal phase offset of 315° reduces the energy extraction from the flow field, suppressing the stall flutter instability. This optimal phase offset is effective at different pitching axis positions of the airfoil. The results signify that LE morphing can suppress stall flutter by advancing the occurrence of the first LE vortex and increasing the nose-down moment during the upstroke period.

References

1
McCroskey WJ. The phenomenon of dynamic stall. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1981. Report No.: NASA-TM-81264.
2
Piziali R. 2-D and 3-D oscillating wing aerodynamics for a range of angles of attack including stall. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1994. Report No.: NASA-TM-4632.
3

Lee T, Gerontakos P. Investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil. J Fluid Mech 2004;512:313–41.

4

Dimitriadis G, Li J. Bifurcation behavior of airfoil undergoing stall flutter oscillations in low-speed wind tunnel. AIAA J 2009;47(11):2577–96.

5
Yabili S, Smith M, Dimitriadis G. Unsteady Navier-Stokes simulation of low-Reynolds stall flutter. Proceedings of the 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition; Nashville, Tennessee. Reston: AIAA; 2012.
6

Geng F, Kalkman I, Suiker ASJ, et al. Sensitivity analysis of airfoil aerodynamics during pitching motion at a Reynolds number of 1.35 × 105. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2018;183:315–32.

7

Gharali K, Johnson DA. Dynamic stall simulation of a pitching airfoil under unsteady freestream velocity. J Fluids Struct 2013;42:228–44.

8

Kaufmann K, Merz CB, Gardner AD. Dynamic stall simulations on a pitching finite wing. J Aircr 2017;54(4):1303–16.

9

Niu JP, Lei JM, Lu TY. Numerical research on the effect of variable droop leading-edge on oscillating NACA 0012 airfoil dynamic stall. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;72:476–85.

10

Geissler W, van der Wall BG. Dynamic stall control on flapping wing airfoils. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;62:1–10.

11

Kan Z, Li DC, Shen T, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of morphing wing with flexible leading-edge. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(10):2610–9.

12

Bashir M, Longtin-Martel S, Zonzini N, et al. Optimization and design of a flexible droop nose leading edge morphing wing based on a novel black widow optimization (B.W.O.) algorithm—part Ⅱ. Designs 2022;6(6):102.

13

Li YZ, Ge WJ, Zhou J, et al. Design and experiment of concentrated flexibility-based variable camber morphing wing. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(5):455–69.

14

Chandrasekhara MS. Optimum Gurney flap height determination for “lost-lift” recovery in compressible dynamic stall control. Aerosp Sci Technol 2010;14(8):551–6.

15

Kan Z, Li DC, Zhao SW, et al. Aeroacoustic and aerodynamic characteristics of a morphing airfoil. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 2021;93(5):888–99.

16

Wu Y, Dai YT, Yang C, et al. Effect of trailing-edge morphing on flow characteristics around a pitching airfoil. AIAA J 2023;61(1):160–73.

17

Gerontakos P, Lee T. Dynamic stall flow control via a trailing-edge flap. AIAA J 2006;44(3):469–80.

18

Joo W, Lee BS, Yee K, et al. Combining passive control method for dynamic stall control. J Aircr 2006;43(4):1120–8.

19
Martin P, Wilson J, Berry J, et al. Passive control of compressible dynamic stall. Proceedings of the 26th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference; Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston: AIAA; 2008.
20

Storms BL, Ross JC. Experimental study of lift-enhancing tabs on a two-element airfoil. J Aircr 1995;32(5):1072–8.

21

Liu JQ, Chen RQ, You YC, et al. Numerical investigation of dynamic stall suppression of rotor airfoil via improved co-flow jet. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(3):169–84.

22
Frankhouser MW, Gregory JW. Nanosecond dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator flow control of compressible dynamic stall. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA plasmadynamics and lasers conference; Dallas, TX. Reston: AIAA; 2015.
23

Huang GJ, Dai YT, Yang C, et al. Effect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator on the dynamic moment behavior of pitching airfoil at low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 2021;33(4):043603.

24

Woods BK, Bilgen O, Friswell MI. Wind tunnel testing of the fish bone active camber morphing concept. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2014;25(7):772–85.

25

Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994;32(8):1598–605.

26

Patankar SV, Spalding DB. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. Int J Heat Mass Transf 1972;15(10):1787–806.

27

Issa RI, Ahmadi-Befrui B, Beshay KR, et al. Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting. J Comput Phys 1991;93(2):388–410.

28

Kim Y, Xie ZT. Modelling the effect of freestream turbulence on dynamic stall of wind turbine blades. Comput Fluids 2016;129:53–66.

29

Bhat SS, Govardhan RN. Stall flutter of NACA 0012 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. J Fluids Struct 2013;41:166–74.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 81-92
Cite this article:
WEN C, DAI Y, XU Y, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of a pitching airfoil with leading-edge morphing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.036

73

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 17 July 2023
Revised: 07 September 2023
Accepted: 03 December 2023
Published: 28 March 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return