AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

An improved high-fidelity adaptive model for integrated inlet-engine-nozzle based on mechanism-data fusion

Chen WANGa,bZiyang YUa,bXian DUa,b,( )Ximing SUNa,b
School of Control Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Optimization for Industrial Equipment, Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Nowadays, there has been an increasing focus on integrated flight propulsion control and the inlet-exhaust design for the aero-propulsion system. Traditional component-level models are inadequate due to installed performance deviations and mismatches between the real engine and the model, failing to meet the accuracy requirements of supersonic conditions. This paper establishes a quasi-one-dimensional model for the inlet-exhaust system and conducts experimental calibration. Additionally, a mechanism-data fusion adaptive modeling scheme using an Extreme Learning Machine based on the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA-ELM) is proposed. The study reveals the inlet model's efficacy in reflecting installed performance, flow matching, and mitigating pressure distortion, while the nozzle model accurately predicts flow coefficients and thrust coefficients, and identifies various operational states. The model's output closely aligns with typical experimental parameters. By combining offline optimization and online adaptive correction, the mechanism-data fusion adaptive model substantially reduces output errors during regular flights and varying levels of degradation, and effectively handles gradual degradation within a single flight cycle. Notably, the mechanism-data fusion adaptive model holistically addresses total pressure errors within the inlet-exhaust system and normal shock location correction. This approach significantly curbs performance deviations in supersonic conditions. For example, at Ma = 2.0, the system error impressively drops from 34.17% to merely 6.54%, while errors for other flight conditions consistently stay below the 2.95% threshold. These findings underscore the clear superiority of the proposed method.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-37-8-190_ESM.pdf (4 MB)

References

1

Moses PL, Rausch VL, Nguyen LT, et al. NASA hypersonic flight demonstrators—Overview, status, and future plans. Acta Astronaut 2004;55(3–9):619–30.

2

Wei ZY, Zhang SG, Jafari S, et al. Gas turbine aero-engines real time on-board modelling: A review, research challenges, and exploring the future. Prog Aerosp Sci 2020;121:100693.

3

Wen ZH, Hou JX, Atkin J. A review of electrostatic monitoring technology: The state of the art and future research directions. Prog Aerosp Sci 2017;94:1–11.

4

Mattingly JD. Elements of propulsion: Gas turbines and rockets. Reston: AIAA; 2006.

5

Seddon J, Goldsmith E. Intake aerodynamics. 2nd ed. Reston: AIAA; 1999.

6

Malan P, Brown EF. Inlet drag prediction for aircraft conceptual design. J Aircr 1994;31(3):616–22.

7

Sun FY, Du Y, Zhang HB. A study on optimal control of the aero-propulsion system acceleration process under the supersonic state. Chin J Aeronaut 2017;30(2):698–705.

8

Sun FY, Li YJ, Du Y, et al. A study on the high stability control for the integrated aero-propulsion system under supersonic state. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;76:350–60.

9

Jia LY, Chen YC, Xie JQ, et al. A simplified method to simulate supersonic inlet installed performance in terms of engine and inlet matching. J Propuls Technol 2017;38(3):510–58 [Chinese].

10

Wang YP, Jiang ZL. Theories and methods for designing hypersonic high-enthalpy flow nozzles. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(1):318–39.

11

Chen KS, Xu JL, Qin QH, et al. Modular design framework of an axisymmetric wrap-around thrust-optimized combined nozzle. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;127:107690.

12

Shen JM, Dong JG, Li RQ, et al. Integrated supersonic wind tunnel nozzle. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(11):2422–32.

13

Chen HY, Cai CP, Jiang SB, et al. Numerical modeling on installed performance of turbofan engine with inlet ejector. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;112:106590.

14

Kim S, Kim K, Son C. A new transient performance adaptation method for an aero gas turbine engine. Energy 2020;193:116752.

15

Qin HQ, Zhao J, Ren LK, et al. Aero-engine performance degradation evaluation based on improved L-SHADE algorithm. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2023;44(14):169–82 [Chinese].

16

Fang XD, Dai QM, Yin YX, et al. A compact and accurate empirical model for turbine mass flow characteristics. Energy 2010;35(12):4819–23.

17

Fang XD, Xu Y. Development of an empirical model of turbine efficiency using the Taylor expansion and regression analysis. Energy 2011;36(5):2937–42.

18

Tsoutsanis E, Meskin N, Benammar M, et al. A component map tuning method for performance prediction and diagnostics of gas turbine compressors. Appl Energy 2014;135:572–85.

19

Pourbabaee B, Meskin N, Khorasani K. Sensor fault detection, isolation, and identification using multiple-model-based hybrid Kalman filter for gas turbine engines. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 2016;24(4):1184–200.

20

Lu F, Wang YF, Huang JQ, et al. Fusing unscented Kalman filter for performance monitoring and fault accommodation in gas turbine. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2018;232(3):556–70.

21

Chen Q, Sheng HL, Zhang TH. An improved nonlinear onboard adaptive model for aero-engine performance control. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(10):317–34.

22

Khorasani K, Tayarani-Bathaie SS, Sadough Vanini ZN. Dynamic neural network-based fault diagnosis of gas turbine engines. Neurocomputing 2014;125(C):153–65.

23

Sina Tayarani-Bathaie S, Khorasani K. Fault detection and isolation of gas turbine engines using a bank of neural networks. J Process Contr 2015;36:22–41.

24

Tavakolpour-Saleh AR, Nasib SAR, Sepasyan A, et al. Parametric and nonparametric system identification of an experimental turbojet engine. Aerosp Sci Technol 2015;43:21–9.

25

Kim S, Kim K, Son C. Transient system simulation for an aircraft engine using a data-driven model. Energy 2020;196:117046.

26

Lu F, Jiang JP, Huang JQ. Gas turbine engine gas-path fault diagnosis based on improved SBELM architecture. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2018;35(4):351–63.

27

Kim S. A new performance adaptation method for aero gas turbine engines based on large amounts of measured data. Energy 2021;221:119863.

28

Xu MJ, Wang J, Liu JX, et al. An improved hybrid modeling method based on extreme learning machine for gas turbine engine. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;107:106333.

29

Zhao YP, Hu QK, Xu JG, et al. A robust extreme learning machine for modeling a small-scale turbojet engine. Appl Energy 2018;218:22–35.

30

Xu MJ, Liu JX, Li M, et al. Improved hybrid modeling method with input and output self-tuning for gas turbine engine. Energy 2022;238:121672.

31

Xu MJ, Wang K, Li M, et al. An adaptive on-board real-time model with residual online learning for gas turbine engines using adaptive memory online sequential extreme learning machine. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;141:108513.

32

Li HH, Gou LF, Li HC, et al. Physics-guided neural network model for aeroengine control system sensor fault diagnosis under dynamic conditions. Aerospace 2023;10(7):644.

33

Huang YF, Tao J, Sun G, et al. A novel digital twin approach based on deep multimodal information fusion for aero-engine fault diagnosis. Energy 2023;270:126894.

34

Wang ZP, Wang Y, Wang XZ, et al. A novel digital twin framework for aeroengine performance diagnosis. Aerospace 2023;10(9):789.

35

Hu MH, He Y, Lin XZ, et al. Digital twin model of gas turbine and its application in warning of performance fault. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(3):449–70.

36

Mattingly JD, Heiser WH, Boyer KM, et al. Aircraft engine design. 3rd ed. Reston: AIAA; 2018.

37
Moeckel WE. Approximate method for predicting form and location of detached shock waves ahead of plane or axially symmetric bodies. Washington, D.C.: NACA; 1949. Report No.: NACA TN D-1921.
38

Oates GC. Aircraft propulsion systems technology and design. Reston: AIAA; 1989.

39

Li ZP, Wang MQ. Airworthiness certification method for aeroengine on stall and surge with inlet distortion. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2015;36(9):2947–57 [Chinese].

40
Braithwaite W, Graber E, Mehalic C. The effect of inlet temperature and pressure distortion on turbojet performance. Proceedings of the 9th propulsion conference; Las Vegas, NV, USA. Reston: AIAA; 1973.
41

Zhu GM, Liu XL, Yang B, et al. A study of influences of inlet total pressure distortions on clearance flow in an axial compressor. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2021;143(10):101010.

42

Huang G, Huang GB, Song SJ, et al. Trends in extreme learning machines: a review. Neural Netw 2015;61:32–48.

43

Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, et al. Salp swarm algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 2017;114:163–91.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 190-207
Cite this article:
WANG C, YU Z, DU X, et al. An improved high-fidelity adaptive model for integrated inlet-engine-nozzle based on mechanism-data fusion. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.037

22

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 25 August 2023
Revised: 07 October 2023
Accepted: 26 December 2023
Published: 30 March 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return