AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Complicated flow in tip flow field of a compressor tandem cascade using delayed detached eddy simulation

Botao ZHANGa,bXiaochen MAOa,( )Bo LIUaHejian WANGaZonghao YANGa
School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
Taihang Laboratory, Chengdu 610000, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The complex flow characteristics in the tip region of a tandem cascade with tip clearance have been calculated and analyzed using Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES). The coherent mechanism of the vortex structures near the blade tip was discussed, and the unsteady behaviors and features in the tip flow field were analyzed. Additionally, the interaction between the tip leakage flow and the gap jet was revealed. The results show that, compared to the datum cascade, the blade tip load of the rear blade increases while that of the front blade decreases. Unsteady fluctuations of the tandem cascade are mainly caused by the interaction between the tip leakage flow and gap jet, and by the mixing of the vortex structures, but there is no essential change in the spectrum feature of the tip leakage flow. Finally, a detailed analysis of the development of vortices in the tip region is conducted by the topological structures of the flow field. Combined with the three-dimensional vortex structures, the schematic diagram of the vortex system of the datum single-row cascade and tandem cascade is summarized.

References

1

Koch CC, Smith LH. Loss sources and magnitudes in axial-flow compressors. J Eng Power 1976;98(3):411–24.

2

Denton JD. Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. J Turbomach 1993;115(4):621–56.

3

Inoue M, Kuroumaru M. Structure of tip clearance flow in an isolated axial compressor rotor. J Turbomach 1989;111(3):250–6.

4

Tan CS, Day I, Morris S, et al. Spike-type compressor stall inception, detection, and control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2010;42:275–300.

5

Beselt C, Eck M, Peitsch D. Three-dimensional flow field in highly loaded compressor cascade. J Turbomach 2014;136(10):101007.

6

An GY, Wu YH, Lang JH, et al. Investigation of flow unsteadiness in a highly-loaded compressor cascade using a dynamic mode decomposition method. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(5):275–90.

7

Tang YM, Liu YW. VR helicity density and its application in turbomachinery tip leakage flows. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(11):1–17.

8

Zhang BT, Liu B, Mao XC, et al. Interaction mechanism between the tip leakage flow and inlet boundary layer in a highly loaded compressor cascade based on scale-adaptive simulation. Phys Fluids 2022;34(11):116112.

9

Mohsen M, Owis FM, Hashim AA. The impact of tandem rotor blades on the performance of transonic axial compressors. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;67:237–48.

10

Kumar A, Pradeep AM. Design and off-design behavior of a tandem rotor stage. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2020;234(4):927–42.

11

Kumar A, Pradeep AM. Design and off-design behavior of a tandem rotor stage. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2020;234(4):927–42.

12

McGlumphy J, Ng WF, Wellborn SR, et al. Numerical investigation of tandem airfoils for subsonic axial-flow compressor blades. J Turbomach 2009;131(2):021018.

13

McGlumphy J, Ng WF, Wellborn SR, et al. 3D numerical investigation of tandem airfoils for a core compressor rotor. J Turbomach 2010;132(3):031009.

14

Böhle M, Frey T. Numerical and experimental investigations of the three-dimensional-flow structure of tandem cascades in the sidewall region. J Fluids Eng 2014;136(7):071102.

15

Zhang LX, Wang ST, Zhu W. Application of endwall contouring in a high-subsonic tandem cascade with endwall boundary layer suction. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;84:245–56.

16

Liu BJ, Zhang CH, An GF, et al. Using tandem blades to break loading limit of highly loaded axial compressors. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(4):165–75.

17

Qian YP, Li ZP, Lu YJ, et al. Flow mechanics in tandem rotors. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2012: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2012.

18

Han L, Yuan W, Wang YR. Influence of tip leakage flow and ejection on stall mechanism in a transonic tandem rotor. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;77:499–509.

19

Madasseri Payyappalli M, Pradeep AM. Effect of tandem blading in contra-rotating axial flow fans. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2018: Turbomachinery technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2018.

20

Singh A, Mistry CS. Study on effect of axial overlap on tip leakage flow structure in tandem bladed low speed axial flow compressor. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2019: Turbomachinery technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2019.

21

Tucker PG. Trends in turbomachinery turbulence treatments. Prog Aerosp Sci 2013;63:1–32.

22

Spalart PR, Jou WH, Strelets M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. Proceedings of the first AFOSR international conference on DNS/LES.1997. p. 137–47.

23

Yamada K, Furukawa M, Tamura Y, et al. Large-scale detached-eddy simulation analysis of stall inception process in a multistage axial flow compressor. J Turbomach 2017;139(7):071002.

24

Liu YW, Zhong LY, Lu LP. Comparison of DDES and URANS for unsteady tip leakage flow in an axial compressor rotor. J Fluids Eng 2019;141(12):121405.

25

Wu JF. Improved delayed detached eddy simulation of compressor cascade tip leakage flow. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2021;22(1):17–32.

26

He X, Zhao FZ, Vahdati M. Detached eddy simulation: recent development and application to compressor tip leakage flow. J Turbomach 2022;144(1):011009.

27

Hou JX, Liu YW. Evolution of unsteady vortex structures in the tip region of an axial compressor rotor. Phys Fluids 2023;35(4):045107.

28

Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 2006;20(3):181–95.

29

Hergt A, Meyer R, Liesner K, et al. A new approach for compressor endwall contouring. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 turbo expo: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2011.

30

Hergt A, Grund S, Klinner J, et al. Some aspects of the transonic compressor tandem design. J Turbomach 2019;141(9):091003.

31

Yan H, Liu Y, Lu L. Assessment of predictive capability of various DDES methods in a highly loaded compressor cascade. J Eng Thermophys 2019;40(6):1240–9 [Chinese].

32
Spalart P, Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Reston: AIAA; 1992. Report No.: AIAA-1992-0439.
33

Liu CQ, Wang YQ, Yang Y, et al. New omega vortex identification method. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 2016;59(8):684711.

34

Dong XR, Wang YQ, Chen XP, et al. Determination of epsilon for Omega vortex identification method. J Hydrodyn 2018;30(4):541–8.

35
Kang S. Investigation of the three-dimensional flow within a compressor cascade with and without tip clearance [dissertation]. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel; 1993.
36

Kang S. An application of topological analysis to studying the three-dimensional flow in cascades; part Ⅰ—Topological rules for skin-friction lines and section streamlines. Appl Math Mech 1990;11(5):489–95.

37

Sachdeva A, Leboeuf F. Topological studies of three-dimensional flows in a high pressure compressor stator blade row without and with boundary layer aspiration. Chin J Aeronaut 2011;24(5):541–9.

38
Kan X. Research of three-dimensional vortex structure in a transonic compressor stator [dissertation]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime university; 2016 [Chinese].
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 63-78
Cite this article:
ZHANG B, MAO X, LIU B, et al. Complicated flow in tip flow field of a compressor tandem cascade using delayed detached eddy simulation. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.044

22

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 15 June 2023
Revised: 13 August 2023
Accepted: 21 September 2023
Published: 01 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return