AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Editorial | Open Access

An anti-icing scaling method for wind tunnel tests of aircraft thermal ice protection system

Yu LIUaQiang WANGa,bXian YIa,b,( )Ningli CHENaJinghao RENaWeihao LIa
Key Laboratory of Icing and Anti/de-icing, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China
State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, Mianyang 621000, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The efficiency of the aircraft Ice Protection Systems (IPSs) needs to be verified through icing wind tunnel tests. However, the scaling method for testing the IPSs has not been systematically established yet, and further research is needed. In the present study, a scaling method specifically designed for thermal IPSs was derived from the governing equation of thin water film. Five scaling parameters were adopted to address the heat and mass transfer involved in the thermal anti-icing process. For method validation, icing wind tunnel tests were conducted using a jet engine nacelle model equipped with a bleed air IPS. The non-dimensional surface temperature and runback ice closely matched for both the reference and scaled conditions. The validation confirms that the scaling method is capable of achieving the similarity of surface temperature and the runback ice coverage. The anti-icing scaling method can serve as an important supplement to the existing icing similarity theory.

References

1
Jeck RK. Icing desing envelopes (14 CFR Parts 25 and 29, Appendix C) Converted to a distance-based format. Atlantic City: Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center; 2002.
2

Mason J. Engine power loss in ice crystal conditions. Aero Quart 2007;4:12–7.

3

Gent RW, Dart NP, Cansdale JT. Aircraft icing. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A: Math Phys Eng Sci 2000:2873–911.

4

Ruff GA. Analysis and Verification of the Icing Scaling Equations. Knoxville: University of Tennessee; 1986.

5
Anderson DN. Manual of scaling method. Washington, D.C.: NASA/CIRA; 2004. Report No.: 2004-212875.
6
Kind R, Oleskiw MM. Recent developments in scaling method for icing wind tunnel testing at reduced scale. In: ICAS congress conference; 2002.
7
Tsao JQ, Kreeger R. Further evaluation of scaling methods for rotorcraft icing. 2011. Report No.: 2011-38-0083.
8
Anderson DN, Tsao JC. Overview of icing physics relevant to scaling. In: FAA in-flight icing/ground de-icing international conference; 2003.
9
Whalen EA, Broeren AP, Bragg MB. Characteristics of runback ice accretions on airfoils and their aerodynamic effects. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit; 2005.
10
Papadakis M, Wong SH, Yeong HW, et al. Icing tunnel experiments with a hot air anti-icing system. In: 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reston: AIAA; 2008.
11
Addy HE, Broeren AP, Oleskiw M, et al. A study of the effects of altitude on thermal ice protection system performance. In: 5th AIAA atmospheric and space environments conference. Reston: AIAA; 2013.
12
Addy HE, Orchar D, Wright WB, et al. Altitude effects on thermal ice protection system performance: a study of an alternative approach. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 2016. Report No.: NASA/TM-2016-219081.
13
Lee S, Addy HE, Broeren AP, et al. Evaluation of alternative altitude scaling methods for thermal ice protection system in NASA icing research tunnel. In: AIAA aviation and aeronautics forum and exposition; 2017.
14

Orchard DM, Addy HE, Wright WB, et al. Altitude scaling of thermal ice protection systems in running wet operation. J Aircr 2019;56(2):607–20.

15
Bilanin AJ. Proposed modifications to the ice accretion/icing scaling theory. Reston: AIAA;1988. Report No.: AIAA-88-0803.
16
Bilanin AJ, Anderson DN. Ice accretion with varying surface tension. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1995. Report No.: NASA TM-106826.
17

Feo A, Urdiales M. Stagnation point probe in a water spray immersed in an airstream. Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial 1995.

18
Feo A. Icing scaling with surface film thickness similarity for high LWC conditions. Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial; 2000. Report No.: AE/PRO/4420/184/INTA/00.
19
Anderson DN, Feo A. Ice-accretion scaling using water-film thickness parameters. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 2003. Report No.: NACA/CR-2003-211826.
20

Chen NL, Yi X, Wang Q, et al. Numerical study on wind driven thin water film runback on an air-foil. AIAA J 2023;61(6):2517–25.

21

Myers TG. Extension to the messinger model for aircraft icing. AIAA J 2001;39(2):211–8.

22

Wang Q, Chen NL, Wang YB, et al. Scallop ice shape characteristics of swept wing based on large-scale icing wind tunnel experiment. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(12):214–30.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 1-6
Cite this article:
LIU Y, WANG Q, YI X, et al. An anti-icing scaling method for wind tunnel tests of aircraft thermal ice protection system. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.03.051

81

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 03 February 2024
Revised: 24 February 2024
Accepted: 11 March 2024
Published: 05 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return