AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Novel data-driven sparse polynomial chaos and analysis of covariance for aerodynamics of compressor cascades with dependent geometric uncertainties

Zhengtao GUOWuli CHU,( )Haoguang ZHANGTianyuan JI
School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) has gained significant popularity among engineers across various engineering disciplines for uncertainty analysis. However, traditional PCE suffers from two major drawbacks. First, the orthogonality of polynomial basis functions holds only for independent input variables, limiting the model’s ability to propagate uncertainty in dependent variables. Second, PCE encounters the “curse of dimensionality” due to the high computational cost of training the model with numerous polynomial coefficients. In practical manufacturing, compressor blades are subject to machining precision limitations, leading to deviations from their ideal geometric shapes. These deviations require a large number of geometric parameters to describe, and exhibit significant correlations. To efficiently quantify the impact of high-dimensional dependent geometric deviations on the aerodynamic performance of compressor blades, this paper firstly introduces a novel approach called Data-driven Sparse PCE (DSPCE). The proposed method addresses the aforementioned challenges by employing a decorrelation algorithm to directly create multivariate basis functions, accommodating both independent and dependent random variables. Furthermore, the method utilizes an iterative Diffeomorphic Modulation under Observable Response Preserving Homotopy regression algorithm to solve the unknown coefficients, achieving model sparsity while maintaining fitting accuracy. Then, the study investigates the simultaneous effects of seven dependent geometric deviations on the aerodynamics of a high subsonic compressor cascade by using the DSPCE method proposed and sensitivity analysis of covariance. The joint distribution of the dependent geometric deviations is determined using Quantile-Quantile plots and normal copula functions based on finite measurement data. The results demonstrate that the correlations between geometric deviations significantly impact the variance of aerodynamic performance and the flow field. Therefore, it is crucial to consider these correlations for accurately assessing the aerodynamic uncertainty.

References

1
Garzón VE. Probabilistic aerothermal design of compressor airfoils [dissertation]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2003.
2

Garzón VE, Darmofal DL. Impact of geometric variability on axial compressor performance. J Turbomach 2003;125(4):692–703.

3
Dow EA, Wang QQ. Optimal design and tolerancing of compressor blades subject to manufacturing variability. Reston: AIAA; 2014. Report No.: AIAA-2014-1008.
4

Tang X, Luo JQ, Liu F. Adjoint aerodynamic optimization of a transonic fan rotor blade with a localized two-level mesh deformation method. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;72:267–77.

5

Luo JQ, Liu F. Statistical evaluation of performance impact of manufacturing variability by an adjoint method. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;77:471–84.

6

Zhang Q, Xu SR, Yu XJ, et al. Nonlinear uncertainty quantification of the impact of geometric variability on compressor performance using an adjoint method. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(2):17–21.

7

Wang JY, Wang BT, Yang HL, et al. Compressor geometric uncertainty quantification under conditions from near choke to near stall. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(3):16–29.

8
Kumar A, Nair PB, Keane AJ, et al. Probabilistic performance analysis of eroded compressor blades. Proceedings of ASME 2005 power conference. New York: ASME; 2008. p. 1175–83.
9

Ji TY, Chu WL, Liang CY, et al. Uncertainty quantification on the influence of blade thickness deviation at different rotational speeds based on flow dissipation analysis. Phys Fluids 2023;35(6):066126.

10

Guo ZT, Chu WL. Stochastic aerodynamic analysis for compressor blades with manufacturing variability based on a mathematical dimensionality reduction method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2022;236(10):5719–35.

11
Ghisu T, Shahpar S. Toward affordable uncertainty quantification for industrial problems: Part Ⅱ—turbomachinery application. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2017: Turbomachinery technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2017.
12
Panizza A, Rubino DT, Tapinassi L. Efficient uncertainty quantification of centrifugal compressor performance using polynomial chaos. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2014: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2014.
13

Ma C, Gao LM, Wang HH, et al. Influence of leading edge with real manufacturing error on aerodynamic performance of high subsonic compressor cascades. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(6):220–32.

14

Xia ZH, Luo JQ, Liu F. Performance impact of flow and geometric variations for a turbine blade using an adaptive NIPC method. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;90:127–39.

15
Ma C, Gao LM, Cai YT, et al. Robust optimization design of compressor blade considering machining error. New York: ASME; 2017. Report No.: GT2017-63157.
16

Wang HH, Gao LM, Yang G, et al. A data-driven robust design optimization method and its application in compressor blade. Phys Fluids 2023;35(6):066114.

17
Liu YM, Qin RH, Ju YP, et al. Impact of realistic manufacturing uncertainties on the aerodynamic performance of a transonic centrifugal impeller. New York: ASME; 2020. Report No.: GT2020-14784.
18

Wang XJ, Du PC, Yao LC, et al. Uncertainty analysis of measured geometric variations in turbine blades and impact on aerodynamic performance. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(6):140–60.

19

Guo ZT, Chu WL, Zhang HG, et al. Aerodynamic evaluation of cascade flow with actual geometric uncertainties using an adaptive sparse arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion. Phys Fluids 2023;35(3):036122.

20

Wiener N. The homogeneous chaos. Am J Math 1938;60(4):897–936.

21

Xiu DB, Karniadakis GE. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 2002;24(2):619–44.

22

Oladyshkin S, Nowak W. Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2012;106:179–90.

23

Guo ZT, Chu WL, Zhang HG, et al. Statistical evaluation of stability margin of a multi-stage compressor with geometric variability using adaptive polynomial chaos-Kriging model. Phys Fluids 2023;35(7):076114.

24

Ahlfeld R, Montomoli F. A single formulation for uncertainty propagation in turbomachinery: SAMBA PC. J Turbomach 2017;139(11):111007.

25

Jakeman JD, Franzelin F, Narayan A, et al. Polynomial chaos expansions for dependent random variables. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2019;351:643–66.

26

Wu XJ, Zhang WW, Song SF, et al. Sparse grid-based polynomial chaos expansion for aerodynamics of an airfoil with uncertainties. Chin J Aeronaut 2018;31(5):997–1011.

27
Caniou Y. Global sensitivity analysis for nested and multiscale modelling [dissertation]. Clermont-Ferrand: Université Blaise Pascal; 2012.
28
Li Z, Lu Q, You F, et al. Qualitative influence of blade machining deviation on cascade critical angle of attack. J Aerosp Power [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.jasp.-com.cn/hkdlxb/article/doi/10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220202 [Chinese].
29

Guo Z, Chu W, Zhang H. Effects of inlet incidence perturbations on compressor cascade performance using adaptive sparse grid collocation. J Appl Fluid Mech 2023;16(6):1281–95.

30
Lange A, Voigt M, Vogeler K, et al. Probabilistic CFD simulation of a high-pressure compressor stage taking manufacturing variability into account. New York: ASME; 2010. Report No.: GT2010-22484.
31

Ju Y, Liu YM, Jiang W, et al. Aerodynamic analysis and design optimization of a centrifugal compressor impeller considering realistic manufacturing uncertainties. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;115:106787.

32

Fu CY, Sayed T. Multivariate Bayesian hierarchical Gaussian copula modeling of the non-stationary traffic conflict extremes for crash estimation. Anal Meth Accid Res 2021;29:100154.

33

Renard B, Lang M. Use of a Gaussian copula for multivariate extreme value analysis: some case studies in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 2007;30(4):897–912.

34

Cox DA, Little J, O’Shea D. Ideals, varieties, and algorithms: An introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2007.

35

Gill J, King G. What to do when your Hessian is not invertible—Alternatives to model respecification in nonlinear estimation. Sociol Methods Res 2004;33:54–87.

36

Guo ZT, Chu WL, Zhang HG. A data-driven non-intrusive polynomial chaos for performance impact of high subsonic compressor cascades with stagger angle and profile errors. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022;129:107802.

37

Blatman G, Sudret B. An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probab Eng Mech 2010;25(2):183–97.

38

Wang H, Chen LM, Ye F, et al. Global sensitivity analysis for fiber reinforced composite fiber path based on D-MORPH-HDMR algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2017;56(3):697–712.

39

Li GY, Rabitz H. D-MORPH regression: Application to modeling with unknown parameters more than observation data. J Math Chem 2010;48(4):1010–35.

40

Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R. Multivariate function approximations using the D-MORPH algorithm. Appl Math Model 2015;39(23–24):7155–80.

41
Yagle AE. Non-iterative reweighted-norm least-squares local l0 minimization for sparse solutions to underdetermined linear system of equations [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 4]. Available from: http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~aey/sparse/sparse11.pdf.
42

Xu CG, Gertner GZ. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2008;93(10):1563–73.

43
Marelli S, Sudret B. UQLab: The framework for uncertainty quantification [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.uqlab.com/#!sensitivity-analysis—high-dimensional-/cpvc.
44

Maria Mazzoni C, Ahlfeld R, Rosic B, et al. Uncertainty quantification of leakages in a multistage simulation and comparison with experiments. J Fluids Eng 2018;140(2):021110.

45
Hosder S, Walters R, Balch M. Efficient sampling for nonintrusive polynomial chaos applications with multiple uncertain input variables. Reston: AIAA; 2007. Report No.: AIAA-2007-1939.
46

Guo ZT, Chu WL, Zhang HG. Uncertainty analysis of global and local performance impact of inflow and geometric uncertainties using sparse grid-based non-intrusive polynomial chaos. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 2022;236(7):1239–56.

47

Goodhand MN, Miller RJ. Compressor leading edge spikes: a new performance criterion. J Turbomach 2011;133(2):021006.

48

Liu JX, Yu XJ, Meng DJ, et al. State and effect of manufacture deviations of compressor blade in high-pressure compressor outlet stage. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2021;42(2):423796 [Chinese].

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 89-108
Cite this article:
GUO Z, CHU W, ZHANG H, et al. Novel data-driven sparse polynomial chaos and analysis of covariance for aerodynamics of compressor cascades with dependent geometric uncertainties. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6): 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.001

58

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 24 September 2023
Revised: 17 October 2023
Accepted: 04 February 2024
Published: 04 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return