AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Single-pilot operations in commercial flight: Effects on neural activity and visual behaviour under abnormalities and emergencies

Qinbiao LIa,bChun-Hsien CHENbKam K.H. NGa,( )Xin YUANaCho Yin YIUa
Human Factors and Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 100872, China
School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

With cutting-edge technologies and considering airline human-resource-saving, a single pilot in commercial jets could be technically feasible. Investigating changes in captains’ natural behaviours are initially required to comprehend the specific safe human performance envelope for safeguarding single-pilot flight, particularly in high-risk situations. This paper investigates how captains’ performance transforms for fixing emergencies when operating from Dual-Pilot Operations (DPO) to Single-Pilot Operations (SPO) through a physiological-based approach. Twenty pilots flew an emergency-included flight with/without first officers’ assistance. The neural activities and scanning behaviours were recorded using a 32-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG) and glasses-based eye tracker, with the observation and post-experiment questionnaires to evaluate the flight operations and pilots’ perception. Flying alone, there was a significantly increased cortical activity in θ and β waves over the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes during the more complicated emergencies, and pilots focused less on the primary flight display while spending significantly more time scanning the other interfaces. The physiological fluctuating patterns associated with risky operations in SPO were highlighted by cross-correlating multimodal data. The experimental-based noteworthy insights may wish to inform commercial SPO measures to lessen the persistent physiological fluctuation, assisting airlines in creating SPO-oriented intelligent flight systems to give captains adequate support for assuring safer air transportation.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-37-8-277_ESM.pdf (675 KB)

References

1

Don H. A human-centred design agenda for the development of single crew operated commercial aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 2007;79(5):518–26.

2

Fabre EF, Matton N, Beltran F, et al. Hierarchy in the cockpit: How captains influence the decision-making of young and inexperienced first officers. Saf Sci 2022;146:105536.

3

Faulhaber AK, Friedrich M, Kapol T. Absence of pilot monitoring affects scanning behavior of pilot flying: Implications for the design of single-pilot cockpits. Hum Factors 2022;64(2):278–90.

4
Railway Age. Are two-person crews less safe than a single engineer? [Internet]. Lincolnshire: Railway Age; 2013 [cited 2023 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.railwayage.com/news/aretwo-person-crews-less-safe-than-a-single-engineer/.
5
Niedermeier D, Papenfuß A, Wies M. Simulator study on a spatially separated airline crew in a complex decision-making scenario. Reston: AIAA; 2023. Report No: AIAA-2023-3474.
6

Stanton NA, Harris D, Starr A. The future flight deck: Modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Appl Ergon 2016;53(Pt B):331–42.

7
EASA. Extended minimum crew operations – Single pilot operations – Safety risk assessment framework [Internet]. Cologne: EASA; 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/research-projects/emco-sipoextended-minimum-crew-operations-single-pilot-operationssafety-risk.
8
Bailey RE, Kramer LJ, Kennedy KD, et al. An assessment of reduced crew and single pilot operations in commercial transport aircraft operations. 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th digital avionics systems conference (DASC). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2017. p. 1–5
9

Liu J, Gardi A, Ramasamy S, et al. Cognitive pilot-aircraft interface for single-pilot operations. Knowl Based Syst 2016;112:37–53.

10

Chen Y, Luo Y, Wang M, et al. DFCluster: An efficient algorithm to mine maximal differential biclusters for single pilot operations task synthesis safety analysis. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(5):400–18.

11
Aerotime Hub. Will commercial aircraft soon be flown by a single pilot? [Internet]. Vilnius: AeroTime; 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/willcommercial-aircraft-soon-be-flown-by-a-single-pilot.
12

Myers PL, Starr AW. Single pilot operations in commercial cockpits: Background, challenges, and options. J Intell Rob Syst 2021;102(1):19.

13
Faulhaber AK. Towards single-pilot operations in commercial aviation: A human-centered perspective [dissertation]. Niedersächsisches Forschungszentrum für Luftfahrt: Universitätsbibliothek Braunschweig; 2022.
14

Vu KPL, Lachter J, Battiste V, et al. Single pilot operations in domestic commercial aviation. Hum Factors 2018;60(6):755–62.

15
Battiste V, Lachter J, Brandt S, et al. Human-automation teaming: Lessons learned and future directions. In: Yamamoto S, Mori H, editors. Human interface and the management of information. Information in applications and services. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 479–93.
16
Maurino DE. Beyond aviation human factors: safety in high technology systems. London: Routledge; 2017.
17

Xu B, Wu Q, Xi C, et al. Recognition of the fatigue status of pilots using BF–PSO optimized multi-class GP classification with sEMG signals. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2020;199:106930.

18

Aricò P, Borghini G, Di Flumeri G, et al. Human factors and neurophysiological metrics in air traffic control: A critical review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2017;10:250–63.

19

Dehais F, Lafont A, Roy R, et al. A neuroergonomics approach to mental workload, engagement and human performance. Front Neurosci 2020;14:268.

20

Li QB, Ng KKH, Fan ZJ, et al. A human-centred approach based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy for adaptive decision-making in the air traffic control environment: A case study. Adv Eng Inform 2021;49:101325.

21

Zhang T, Yang J, Liang ND, et al. Physiological measurements of situation awareness: a systematic review. Hum Factors 2023;65(5):737–58.

22

Lu ZJ, Happee R, de Winter JCF. Take over! A video-clip study measuring attention, situation awareness, and decision-making in the face of an impending hazard. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2020;72:211–25.

23

Li QB, Ng KKH, Yiu CY, et al. Securing air transportation safety through identifying pilot’s risky VFR flying behaviours: An EEG-based neurophysiological modelling using machine learning algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2023;238:109449.

24
Bilimoria KD, Johnson WW, Schutte PC. Conceptual framework for single pilot operations. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York: ACM; 2014. p. 1–8.
25

Jawabri KH, Sharma S. Physiology, cerebral cortex functions. StatPearls 2023.

26

Li QB, Ng KKH, Yu SCM, et al. Recognising situation awareness associated with different workloads using EEG and eye-tracking features in air traffic control tasks. Knowl Based Syst 2023;260:110179.

27

Dehais F, Duprès A, Blum S, et al. Monitoring pilot’s mental workload using ERPs and spectral power with a six-dry-electrode EEG system in real flight conditions. Sensors 2019;19(6):1324.

28

Borghini G, Aricò P, Di Flumeri G, et al. EEG-based cognitive control behaviour assessment: An ecological study with professional air traffic controllers. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):547.

29
Kropotov JD. Beta rhythms. Quantitative EEG, event-related potentials and neurotherapy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009. p. 59–76.
30
Dussault C, Jouanin JC, Philippe M, et al. EEG and ECGchanges during simulator operation reflect mental workload andvigilance. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005;76(4):344. p. 344–51.
31

Lyu MT, Li F, Xu GY, et al. Leveraging eye-tracking technologies to promote aviation safety- A review of key aspects, challenges, and future perspectives. Saf Sci 2023;168:106295.

32

Fernandez Rojas R, Debie E, Fidock J, et al. Electroencephalographic workload indicators during teleoperation of an unmanned aerial vehicle shepherding a swarm of unmanned ground vehicles in contested environments. Front Neurosci 2020;14:40.

33

Trapsilawati F, Herliansyah MK, Nugraheni ASANS, et al. EEG-based analysis of air traffic conflict: Investigating controllers’ situation awareness, stress level and brain activity during conflict resolution. J Navigation 2020;73(3):678–96.

34

Hu XY, Lodewijks G. Detecting fatigue in car drivers and aircraft pilots by using non-invasive measures: The value of differentiation of sleepiness and mental fatigue. J Safety Res 2020;72:173–87.

35

Sun JCY, Hsu KYC. A smart eye-tracking feedback scaffolding approach to improving students' learning self-efficacy and performance in a C programming course. Comput Hum Behav 2019;95:66–72.

36

Evans DC, Fendley M. A multi-measure approach for connecting cognitive workload and automation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2017;97:182–9.

37

Peißl S, Wickens CD, Baruah R. Eye-tracking measures in aviation: A selective literature review. Int J Aerosp Psychol 2018;28(3–4):98–112.

38

Yang HH, Wu JD, Hu ZX, et al. Real-time driver cognitive workload recognition: Attention-enabled learning with multimodal information fusion. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2024;71(5):4999–5009.

39

Chen J, Xue L, Rong J, et al. Real-time evaluation method of flight mission load based on sensitivity analysis of physiological factors. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(3):450–63.

40

Fan SQ, Yang ZL. Towards objective human performance measurement for maritime safety: A new psychophysiological data-driven machine learning method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2023;233:109103.

41

Blundell J, Scott S, Harris D, et al. Workload benefits of colour coded head-up flight symbology during high workload flight. Displays 2020;65:101973.

42

Wang GQ, Li M, Wang M, et al. A systematic literature review of human-centered design approach in single pilot operations. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(11):1–23.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 277-292
Cite this article:
LI Q, CHEN C-H, NG KK, et al. Single-pilot operations in commercial flight: Effects on neural activity and visual behaviour under abnormalities and emergencies. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.007

34

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 30 August 2023
Revised: 25 September 2023
Accepted: 29 October 2023
Published: 12 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return