AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Investigation of control effects of end-wall self-adaptive jet on three-dimensional corner separation of a highly loaded compressor cascade

Hejian WANGa,bBo LIUa,bXiaochen MAOa,b,( )Botao ZHANGcZonghao YANGa,b
School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
The National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerodynamic Design and Research, Xi’an 710129, China
Taihang Laboratory, Chengdu 610000, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

To overcome the limitations posed by three-dimensional corner separation, this paper proposes a novel flow control technology known as passive End-Wall (EW) self-adaptive jet. Two single EW slotted schemes (EWS1 and EWS2), alongside a combined (COM) scheme featuring double EW slots, were investigated. The results reveal that the EW slot, driven by pressure differentials between the pressure and suction sides, can generate an adaptive jet with escalating velocity as the operational load increases. This high-speed jet effectively re-excites the local low-energy fluid, thereby mitigating the corner separation. Notably, the EWS1 slot, positioned near the blade leading edge, exhibits relatively low jet velocities at negative incidence angles, causing jet separation and exacerbating the corner separation. Besides, the EWS2 slot is close to the blade trailing edge, resulting in massive low-energy fluid accumulating and separating before the slot outlet at positive incidence angles. In contrast, the COM scheme emerges as the most effective solution for comprehensive corner separation control. It can significantly reduce the total pressure loss and improve the static pressure coefficient for the ORI blade at 0°-4° incidence angles, while causing minimal negative impact on the aerodynamic performance at negative incidence angles. Therefore, the corner stall is delayed, and the available incidence angle range is broadened from −10°–−2° to −10°–4°.This holds substantial promise for advancing the aerodynamic performance, operational stability, and load capacity of future highly loaded compressors.

References

1

Mao CJ. Development of fan/compressor techniques and suggestions on further researches. J Aerosp Power 2002;17(1):1–15 [Chinese].

2

Wu YH, Wang B, Fu Y, et al. Research progress of corner separation in axial-flow compressor. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 2017;38(9):107–28 [Chinese].

3
Dixon SL, Hall CA. Axial-flow turbines. In: Fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of Turbomachinery. Amsterdam: Elsevier;2010:97–141.
4

Horlock JH, Louis JF, Percival PME, et al. Wall stall in compressor cascades. J Basic Eng 1966;88(3):637–48.

5
Lakshminarayana B, Horlock J. Leakage and secondary flows in compressor cascades. HM Stationery Office; 1967.
6

Lakshminarayana B, Horlock JH. Effect of shear flows on the outlet angle in axial compressor cascades—methods of prediction and correlation with experiments. J Basic Eng 1967;89(1):191–200.

7

Hanley WT. A correlation of end wall losses in plane compressor cascades. J Eng Power 1968;90(3):251–7.

8
Kang S, Hirsch C. Three dimensional flow in a linear compressor cascade at design conditions. New York: ASME; 1991. Report No.: GT1991-114.
9
Müller R, Sauer H, Vogeler K, et al. Influencing the secondary losses in compressor cascades by a leading edge bulb modification at the endwall. New York: ASME; 2002. Report No.: GT2002-30442.
10

Zhao XH, Wu Y, Li YH, et al. Separation structure and plasma flow control on highly loaded compressor cascade. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 2012;33(2):208–19 [Chinese].

11

Gbadebo SA, Cumpsty NA, Hynes TP. Three-dimensional separations in axial compressors. J Turbomach 2005;127(2):331–9.

12

Liu YW, Yan H, Liu YJ, et al. Numerical study of corner separation in a linear compressor cascade using various turbulence models. Chin J Aeronaut 2016;29(3):639–52.

13

Fu H, Zhou L, Ji LC. Influence of sub boundary layer vortex generator height and attack angle on cross-flows in the hub region of compressors. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(8):30–44.

14
Gannon AJ, Hobson GV, Shreeve RP, et al. Experimental investigation during stall and surge in a transonic fan stage and rotor-only configuration. New York: ASME; 2006. Report No.: GT2006-90925.
15
Thiam A, Whittlesey R, Wark C, et al. Corner separation and the on-set of stall in an axial compressor.Reston: AIAA; 2008. Report No.: AIAA-2008-4299.
16

Wu WJ, Hu JG, Pan TY, et al. Mechanism Study of stall triggered by hub region inception in a transonic compressor. J Propul Technol 2017;38(10):2340–3237 [Chinese].

17
Lord W, MacMartin D, Tillman G. Flow control opportunities in gas turbine engines. Reston: AIAA; 2000. Report No.:AIAA-2000-2234.
18

Suder KL, Hathaway MD, Thorp SA, et al. Compressor stability enhancement using discrete tip injection. J Turbomach 2001;123(1):14–23.

19

Kirtley KR, Graziosi P, Wood P, et al. Design and test of an ultralow solidity flow-controlled compressor stator. J Turbomach 2005;127(4):689–98.

20

Hecklau M, Gmelin C, Nitsche W, et al. Experimental and numerical results of active flow control on a highly loaded stator cascade. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 2011;225(7):907–18.

21

Steinberg SJ, Staats M, Nitsche W, et al. Iterative learning active flow control applied to a compressor stator cascade with periodic disturbances. J Turbomach 2015;137(11):111003.

22

Zander V, Hecklau M, Nitsche W, et al. Active flow control by means of synthetic jets on a highly loaded compressor cascade. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 2011;225(7):897–908.

23

Luo YH, Li J, Liang H, et al. Suppressing unsteady motion of shock wave by high-frequency plasma synthetic jet. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(9):60–71.

24
Roy B, Mulmule A, Puranam S. Aerodynamic design of a partspan tandem bladed rotor for low speed axial compressor. Reston: AIAA; 2009.Report No.: AIAA-2009-3964.
25

Hu JG, Wang RG, Huang DQ. Flow control mechanisms of a combined approach using blade slot and vortex generator in compressor cascade. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018;78:320–31.

26

Tang YM, Liu YW, Lu LP, et al. Passive separation control with blade-end slots in a highly loaded compressor cascade. AIAA J 2019;58(1):85–97.

27

Ma JC, Yang G, Zhou L, et al. Effect of a blade end slot on supersonic compressor cascade hub-corner separation. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;118:107032.

28

Wang HJ, Mao XC, Liu B, et al. Combined flow control with full-span slot and end-wall boundary layer suction in a large-camber compressor cascade. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;119:107121.

29

Wang HJ, Liu B, Mao XC, et al. Investigation of the controlling mechanisms of blade slotting technology on the shock-wave-induced corner separation. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;140:108491.

30

Wang HJ, Mao XC, Liu B, et al. Effect investigation of single-slotted and double-slotted configurations on the corner separation and aerodynamic performance in a high-load compressor cascade. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;135:108203.

31

Schulz HD, Gallus HD. Experimental investigation of the three-dimensional flow in an annular compressor cascade at large incidence. J Turbomach 1988;110(4):467–78.

32

Hah C, Loellbach J. Development of hub corner stall and its influence on the performance of axial compressor blade rows. J Turbomach 1999;121(1):67–77.

33

Lei VM, Spakovszky ZS, Greitzer EM. A criterion for axial compressor hub-corner stall. J Turbomach 2008;130(3):031006.

34
Sans J, Resmini M, Brouckaert JF, et al. Numerical investigation of the solidity effect on linear compressor cascades. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2014: Turbine technical conference and exposition. 2014 June 16–20;Düsseldorf, Germany.New York:ASME; 2014.
35

Denton JD. Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. J Turbomach 1993;115(4):621–56.

36
NUMECA International. Fine/Turbo v8.7, user manual. Brussels: NUMECA International; 2009.
37
Spalart P, Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows.Reston: AIAA; 1992.Report No.: AIAA-1992-0439.
38
NUMECA International. AutoGrid5 v8.7, user manual.Brussels: NUMECA International; 2009.
39
NUMECA International. IGG v8.7, user manual. Brussels: NUMECA International; 2009.
40

Li ZH, Agarwal RK. Numerical simulations and design optimization of compressor cascade flow using one equation and wray-agarwal turbulence model. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 2022;36(8):705–18.

41

Wang HJ, Liu B, Zhang BT. Characteristics prediction of transonic axial compressor based on one-dimensional model. J Propul Technol 2021;42(6):1256–64 [Chinese].

42

Ma YC, Teng JF, Zhu MM, et al. Influence of the inlet boundary layer on non-axisymmetric endwall contouring effects in a linear compressor cascade. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2022;236(12):6530–42.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 109-126
Cite this article:
WANG H, LIU B, MAO X, et al. Investigation of control effects of end-wall self-adaptive jet on three-dimensional corner separation of a highly loaded compressor cascade. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6): 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.009

54

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 23 October 2023
Revised: 02 January 2024
Accepted: 25 February 2024
Published: 12 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return