AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Game theory based finite-time formation control using artificial potentials for tethered space net robot

Yifeng MAaYizhai ZHANGaPanfeng HUANGaYa LIUbFan ZHANGa,( )
The Research Center for Intelligent Robotics, School of Astronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The Tethered Space Net Robot (TSNR) is an innovative solution for active space debris capture and removal. Its large envelope and simple capture method make it an attractive option for this task. However, capturing maneuverable debris with the flexible and elastic underactuated net poses significant challenges. To address this, a novel formation control method for the TSNR is proposed through the integration of differential game theory and robust adaptive control in this paper. Specifically, the trajectory of the TSNR is obtained through the solution of a real-time feedback pursuit-evasion game with a dynamic target, where the primary condition is to ensure the stability of the TSNR. Furthermore, to minimize tracking errors and maintain a specific configuration, a robust adaptive formation control scheme with Artificial Potential Field (APF) based on a Finite-Time Convergent Extended State Observer (FTCESO) is investigated. The proposed control method has a key advantage in suppressing complex oscillations by a new adaptive law, thus precisely maintaining the configuration. Finally, numerical simulations are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

References

1

Shan MH, Guo J, Gill E. Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods. Prog Aerosp Sci 2016;80:18–32.

2

Benvenuto R, Salvi S, Lavagna M. Dynamics analysis and GNC design of flexible systems for space debris active removal. Acta Astronaut 2015;110:247–65.

3

Zhang YZ, Huang PF, Meng ZJ, et al. Precise angles-only navigation for noncooperative proximity operation with application to tethered space robot. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 2019;27(3):1139–50.

4

Zhang F, Huang PF. Releasing dynamics and stability control of maneuverable tethered space net. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2017;22(2):983–93.

5

Zhang F, Huang PF, Meng ZJ, et al. Dynamics analysis and controller design for maneuverable tethered space net robot. J Guid Contr Dyn 2017;40(11):2828–43.

6

Ambrose RO, Aldridge H, Askew RS, et al. Robonaut: NASA’s space humanoid. IEEE Intell Syst Appl 2000;15(4):57–63.

7

Sabatini M, Gasbarri P, Palmerini GB. Elastic issues and vibration reduction in a tethered deorbiting mission. Adv Space Res 2016;57(9):1951–64.

8

Liu Y, Zhang F, Huang PF. Coordinated control for constrained multiple spacecraft system. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2020;56(2):1189–201.

9

Zhang F, Huang PF. Fuzzy-based adaptive super-twisting sliding-mode control for a maneuverable tethered space net robot. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2021;29(7):1739–49.

10

Liu Y, Zhang F, Huang PF, et al. Fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multiagent systems under disturbance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2021;51(8):4883–94.

11

Ye D, Shi MM, Sun ZW. Satellite proximate interception vector guidance based on differential games. Chin J Aeronaut 2018;31(6):1352–61.

12

Ye D, Shi MM, Sun ZW. Satellite proximate pursuit-evasion game with different thrust configurations. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;99:105715.

13

Liang L, Deng F, Peng ZH, et al. A differential game for cooperative target defense. Automatica 2019;102:58–71.

14

Liang HZ, Wang JY, Liu JQ, et al. Guidance strategies for interceptor against active defense spacecraft in two-on-two engagement. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;96:105529.

15

Chao T, Wang XT, Wang SY, et al. Linear-quadratic and norm-bounded differential game combined guidance strategy against active defense aircraft in three-player engagement. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(8):331–50.

16

Ning BD, Jin J, Zheng JC, et al. Finite-time and fixed-time leader-following consensus for multi-agent systems with discontinuous inherent dynamics. Int J Contr 2018;91(6):1259–70.

17

Guan ZH, Sun FL, Wang YW, et al. Finite-time consensus for leader-following second-order multi-agent networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Ⅰ Regul Pap 2012;59(11):2646–54.

18

Li JL, Xi JX, He M, et al. Formation control for networked multiagent systems with a minimum energy constraint. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(1):342–55.

19

Hua YZ, Dong XW, Han L, et al. Finite-time time-varying formation tracking for high-order multiagent systems with mismatched disturbances. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2020;50(10):3795–803.

20

Zhao DJ, Yang DG. Model-free control of quad-rotor vehicle via finite-time convergent extended state observer. Int J Contr Autom Syst 2016;14(1):242–54.

21

Cai ZH, Lou J, Zhao J, et al. Quadrotor trajectory tracking and obstacle avoidance by chaotic grey wolf optimization-based active disturbance rejection control. Mech Syst Signal Process 2019;128:636–54.

22

Chen T, Wen H, Hu HY, et al. Output consensus and collision avoidance of a team of flexible spacecraft for on-orbit autonomous assembly. Acta Astronaut 2016;121:271–81.

23

Wen GX, Philip Chen CL, Liu YJ. Formation control with obstacle avoidance for a class of stochastic multiagent systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2018;65(7):5847–55.

24

Li SY, Liu C, Sun ZW. Finite-time distributed hierarchical control for satellite cluster with collision avoidance. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;114:106750.

25

Wang ZK, Xu Y, Jiang C, et al. Self-organizing control for satellite clusters using artificial potential function in terms of relative orbital elements. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;84:799–811.

26

Wu T, Wang J, Tian BL. Periodic event-triggered formation control for multi-UAV systems with collision avoidance. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(8):193–203.

27

Xu Y, Wang ZK, Zhang YL. Bounded flight and collision avoidance control for satellite clusters using intersatellite flight bounds. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;94:105425.

28

Ji J, Khajepour A, Melek WW, et al. Path planning and tracking for vehicle collision avoidance based on model predictive control with multiconstraints. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2017;66(2):952–64.

29
Zhang Z, Wang XH, Zhang QR, et al. Multi-robot cooperative pursuit via potential field-enhanced reinforcement learning. Piscataway: IEEE; 2022. p. 8808–14.
30

Khoo S, Xie LH, Zhao SK, et al. Multi-surface sliding control for fast finite-time leader-follower consensus with high order SISO uncertain nonlinear agents. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 2014;24(16):2388–404.

31

Tang X, Ye D, Huang L, et al. Pursuit-evasion game switching strategies for spacecraft with incomplete-information. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;119:107112.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 358-372
Cite this article:
MA Y, ZHANG Y, HUANG P, et al. Game theory based finite-time formation control using artificial potentials for tethered space net robot. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.011

20

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 06 September 2023
Revised: 11 October 2023
Accepted: 14 December 2023
Published: 13 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return