AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Uncertain process-based data integration and residual lifetime evaluation of PCB in airborne equipment with ADT and field data

Yu WANGRui KANGLinhan GUO,( )Xiaoyang LIZhe LIUXiaohui WANGWeifang ZHANG
Schoool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Accurately evaluating the lifespan of the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) in airborne equipment is an essential issue for aircraft design and operation in the marine atmospheric environment. This paper presents a novel evaluation method by fusing Accelerated Degradation Testing (ADT) data, degradation data, and life data of small samples based on the uncertainty degradation process. An uncertain life model of PCB in airborne equipment is constructed by employing the uncertain distribution that considers the accelerated factor of multiple environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, and salinity. In addition, a degradation process model of PCB in airborne equipment is constructed by employing the uncertain process of fusing ADT data and field data, in which the performance characteristics of dynamic cumulative change are included. Based on minimizing the pth sample moments, an integrated method for parameter estimation of the PCB in airborne equipment is proposed by fusing the multi-source data of life, degradation, and ADT. An engineering case illustrates the effectiveness and advantage of the proposed method.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-37-8-233_ESM.pdf (502.3 KB)

References

1

Hong WS, Oh C. Lifetime prediction of electrochemical ion migration with various surface finishes of printed circuit boards. J Electron Mater 2020;49(1):48–58.

2

Zhong XK, Chen LJ, Medgyes B, et al. Electrochemical migration of Sn and Sn solder alloys: a review. RSC Adv 2017;7(45):28186–206.

3

Elsayed EA. Overview of reliability testing. IEEE Trans Reliab 2012;61(2):282–91.

4

Zhou YL, Li Y, Chen YY, et al. Life model of the electrochemical migration failure of printed circuit boards under NaCl solution. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab 2019;19(4):622–9.

5

Zhou YL, Zhao YR, Yang L, et al. Data-driven life modeling of electrochemical migration on printed circuit boards under soluble salt contamination. IEEE Access 2020;8:182580–90.

6

Bahrebar S, Ambat R. Investigation of critical factors effect to predict leakage current and time to failure due to ECM on PCB under humidity. Microelectron Reliab 2021;127:114418.

7

Bahrebar S, Ambat R. Time to failure prediction on a printed circuit board surface under humidity using probabilistic analysis. J Electron Mater 2022;51(8):4388–406.

8

Chen YX, Jing HL, Liao X, et al. Methods to determine stress profile in ALT based on theoretical life models. Chin J Aeronaut 2015;28(3):729–36.

9

Hu CH, Zhou ZJ, Zhang JX, et al. A survey on life prediction of equipment. Chin J Aeronaut 2015;28(1):25–33.

10

Xie CN, Tang XQ, Chen JH, et al. Reliability analysis and accelerated statistical model of CNC PCB for electrochemical migration. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab 2014;14(1):90–8.

11

Zhuang LL, Xu AC, Pang JH. Product reliability analysis based on heavily censored interval data with batch effects. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021;212:107622.

12
Ren XM, Wang XH, Zhu R. Accelerated degradation testing of coating of PCB under humid heat env. In: 2015 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). Piscataway: IEEE Press; 2015.
13

Liu Y, Wang YS, Fan ZW, et al. Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021;213:107648.

14

Pan R. A Bayes approach to reliability prediction utilizing data from accelerated life tests and field failure observations. Qual Reliab Eng Int 2009;25(2):229–40.

15

Wang LZ, Pan R, Li XY, et al. A Bayesian reliability evaluation method with integrated accelerated degradation testing and field information. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013;112:38–47.

16

Liu L, Li XY, Jiang TM, et al. Utilizing accelerated degradation and field data for life prediction of highly reliable products. Qual Reliab Eng Int 2016;32(7):2281–97.

17

Guo JY, Li YF, Peng WW, et al. Bayesian information fusion method for reliability analysis with failure-time data and degradation data. Quality & Reliability Eng 2022;38(4):1944–56.

18

Wang LZ, Pan R, Wang XH, et al. A Bayesian reliability evaluation method with different types of data from multiple sources. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2017;167:128–35.

19

Zeng ZG, Kang R, Wen ML, et al. A model-based reliability metric considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. IEEE Access 1809;5:15505–15.

20

Moore RE, Kearfott RB, Cloud MJ. Introduction to interval analysis. Soc Ind Appl Math 2009.

21

Liu D, Wang SP. Reliability estimation from lifetime testing data and degradation testing data with measurement error based on evidential variable and Wiener process. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021;205:107231.

22

Gonzalez-Gonzalez DS, Praga Alejo RJ, Cantú-Sifuentes M, et al. A non-linear fuzzy regression for estimating reliability in a degradation process. Appl Soft Comput 2014;16:137–47.

23

Kang R, Zhang QY, Zeng ZG, et al. Measuring reliability under epistemic uncertainty: Review on non-probabilistic reliability metrics. Chin J Aeronaut 2016;29(3):571–9.

24
Liu BD. Uncertainty theory. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 1–79.
25

Liu BD. Fuzzy process, hybrid process and uncertain process. J Uncertain Syst 2008;2(1):3–16.

26

Zhang QY, Kang R, Wen ML. Belief reliability for uncertain random systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2018;26(6):3605–14.

27
Kang R. Belief reliability metric. In: Belief reliability theory andmethodology. Singapore: Springer; 2021:p.71–88.
28

Li XY, Wu JP, Liu L, et al. Modeling accelerated degradation data based on the uncertain process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2019;27(8):1532–42.

29

Wu JP, Kang R, Li XY. Uncertain accelerated degradation modeling and analysis considering epistemic uncertainties in time and unit dimension. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2020;201:106967.

30

Liu Z, Li XY, Kang R. Uncertain differential equation based accelerated degradation modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022;225:108641.

31

Bagley RL. Power law and fractional calculus model of viscoelasticity. AIAA J 1989;27(10):1412–7.

32

Panchenko YM, Marshakov AI, Igonin TN, et al. Long-term forecast of corrosion mass losses of technically important metals in various world regions using a power function. Corros Sci 2014;88:306–16.

33

Cai YK, Xu YM, Zhao Y, et al. Atmospheric corrosion prediction: A review. Corros Rev 2020;38(4):299–321.

34

Lall P, Thomas T, Blecker K. Remaining useful life estimation and prognostication of SAC305 printed circuit boards for dynamic conditions of temperature and vibration loads. J Electron Packag 2022;144(2):021111.

35

Lim H, Yum BJ. Optimal design of accelerated degradation tests based on Wiener process models. J Appl Stat 2011;38(2):309–25.

36

Liu BD. Some research problems in uncertainy theory. J Uncertain Syst 2009;3(1):3–10.

37

Liu Z. Generalized moment estimation for uncertain differential equations. Appl Math Comput 2021;392:125724.

38

Yao K, Chen XW. A numerical method for solving uncertain differential equations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2013;25(3):825–32.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 233-245
Cite this article:
WANG Y, KANG R, GUO L, et al. Uncertain process-based data integration and residual lifetime evaluation of PCB in airborne equipment with ADT and field data. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.018

21

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 03 September 2023
Revised: 05 October 2023
Accepted: 14 December 2023
Published: 20 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return