AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Design optimization and testing of a morphing leading-edge with a variable-thickness compliant skin and a closed-chain mechanism

Zhigang WANGa,bXiasheng SUNcYu YANGbWenjie GEdDaochun LIa,( )Jinwu XIANGaPanpan BAObQi WUbAndrea DA RONCHe
School of Aeronautical Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity, Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China, Xi’an 710065, China
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1JB, UK

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Climate warming and the increased demand in air travels motivate the aviation industry to urgently produce technological innovations. One of the most promising innovations is based on the smoothly continuous morphing leading-edge concept. This study proposes a two-step process for the design of a morphing leading-edge, including the optimization of the outer variable-thickness composite compliant skin and the optimization of the inner kinematic mechanism. For the compliant skin design, an optimization of the variable thickness composite skin is proposed based on a laminate continuity model, with laminate continuity constraint and other manufacturing constraints. The laminate continuity model utilizes a guiding sequence and a ply-drop sequence to describe the overall stacking sequence of plies in different thickness regions of the complaint skin. For the inner kinematic mechanism design, a coupled four-bar linkage system is proposed and optimized to produce specific trajectories at the actuation points on the stringer hats of the compliant skin, which ensures that the compliant skin can be deflected into the aerodynamically optimal profile. Finally, a morphing leading-edge is manufactured and tested. Experimental results are compared with numerical predictions, confirming the feasibility of the morphing leading-edge concept and the overall proposed design approach.

References

1
Air Transport Action Group [Internet]. Geneva: Air Transport Action Group; [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://aviationbenefits.org/environmental-efficiency/climate-action/waypoint-2050/.
2
International Civil Aviation Organization [Internet]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization; [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Pages/envrep2022.aspx.
3
Bolonkin A, Gilyard G. Estimated benefits of variable-geometry wing camber control for transport aircraft. Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Service (NTIS); 1999. Report No.: NASA/TM-1999-206586.
4
Reckzeh D. Multifunctional wing moveables: Design of the A350XWB and the way to future concepts. 29th congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences; St. Petersburg, Russia. 2014.
5
Strüber H. The aerodynamic design of the A350 XWB-900 high lift system. 29th congress of the international council of the aeronautical, sciences; St. Petersburg, Russia. 2014.
6
Streett C, Casper J, Lockard D, et al. Aerodynamic noise reduction for high-lift devices on a swept wing model. 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit; Reno, Nevada. Reston: AIAA; 2006.
7

Dobrzynski W. Almost 40 years of airframe noise research: What did we achieve? J Aircr 2010;47(2):353–67.

8
Wölcken PC, Papadopoulos M. Smart intelligent aircraft structures (SARISTU). Proceedings of the final project conference. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
9

Concilio A, Dimino I, Pecora R. SARISTU: Adaptive Trailing Edge Device (ATED) design process review. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(7):187–210.

10
Dimino I, Moens F, Pecora R, et al. Morphing wing technologies within the Airgreen 2 project. AIAA scitech 2022 forum; San Diego, CA & Virtual. Reston: AIAA; 2022.
11
De Gaspari A, Cavalieri V, Fonzi N, et al. Final validation and performance assessment of a full-scale morphing droop nose demonstrator. AIAA scitech 2023 forum; National Harbor, MD & Online. Reston: AIAA; 2023.
12

Contell Asins C, Landersheim V, Wacker JD, et al. Design of a morphing leading edge as a high lift device for a regional aircraft. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2021;1024(1):012033.

13
De Gaspari A, Gilardelli A, Ricci S, et al. Design of a leading edge morphing based on compliant structures in the framework of the CS2-AIRGREEN2 project. Proceedings of ASME 2018 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems; San Antonio, Texas, USA. New York: ASME; 2018.
14
Cavalieri V, De Gaspari A, Ricci S. Design and testing of a droop nose morphing for advanced regional aircraft: Numerical and experimental validation. 19th international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics (IFASD 2022); Madrid, Spain. 2022.
15
Ameduri S, Amoroso F, Carossa GM, et al. An overview of the AG2 Project: Latest achievements. AIAA scitech 2022 forum; San Diego, CA & Virtual. Reston: AIAA; 2022.
16
Concilio A, Ameduri S, Dimino I, et al. An overview of adaptive structures engineering activities at CIRA. AIAA scitech 2022 forum; San Diego, CA & Virtual. Reston: AIAA; 2022.
17

Sofla AYN, Meguid SA, Tan KT, et al. Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges. Mater Des 2010;31(3):1284–92.

18

Vasista S, Tong LY, Wong KC. Realization of morphing wings: A multidisciplinary challenge. J Aircr 2012;49(1):11–28.

19

Sun J, Guan QH, Liu YJ, et al. Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2016;27(17):2289–312.

20

Zhu LQ. Intelligent and flexible morphing wing technology: A review. J Mech Eng 2018;54(1):28.

21

Heo H, Ju J, Kim DM. Compliant cellular structures: Application to a passive morphing airfoil. Compos Struct 2013;106:560–9.

22

Ozel C, Ozbek E, Ekici S. A review on applications and effects of morphing wing technology on UAVs. Int J Aviat Sci Technol 2020;1(1):30–40.

23

Li DC, Zhao SW, Da Ronch A, et al. A review of modelling and analysis of morphing wings. Prog Aerosp Sci 2018;100:46–62.

24

Barbarino S, Bilgen O, Ajaj RM, et al. A review of morphing aircraft. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2011;22(9):823–77.

25

Li YZ, Ge WJ, Zhou J, et al. Design and experiment of concentrated flexibility-based variable camber morphing wing. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(5):455–69.

26
Morishima R, Guo SJ, Ahmed S. A composite wing structure with a morphing leading edge. 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference; Orlando, Florida. Reston: AIAA; 2010.
27
Monner H, Kintscher M, Lorkowski T, et al. Design of a smart droop nose as leading edge high lift system for transportation aircrafts. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference; California Reston: AAA: Palm Springs; 2009.
28

Kintscher M, Wiedemann M, Monner HP, et al. Design of a smart leading edge device for low speed wind tunnel tests in the European Project SADE. Int J Struct Integr 2011;2(4):383–405.

29

Rudenko A, Hannig A, Monner HP, et al. Extremely deformable morphing leading edge: Optimization, design and structural testing. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2018;29(5):764–73.

30

Vasista S, Nolte F, Monner HP, et al. Three-dimensional design of a large-displacement morphing wing droop nose device. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2018;29(16):3222–41.

31

Radespiel R, Heinze W. SFB 880: Fundamentals of high lift for future commercial aircraft. CEAS Aeronaut J 2014;5(3):239–51.

32

Contell Asins C, Landersheim V, Laveuve D, et al. Analysis and design of a leading edge with morphing capabilities for the wing of a regional aircraft—gapless chord- and camber-increase for high-lift performance. Appl Sci 2021;11(6):2752.

33

Wang C, Haddad Khodaparast H, Friswell MI, et al. Conceptual-level evaluation of a variable stiffness skin for a morphing wing leading edge. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2019;233(15):5703–16.

34
Fortin F. Shape optimization of a stretchable drooping leading edge. AIAA scitech 2019 forum; San Diego, California. Reston: AIAA; 2019.
35

Zhang YQ, Ge WJ, Zhang ZA, et al. Design of compliant mechanism-based variable camber morphing wing with nonlinear large deformation. Int J Adv Rob Syst 2019;16(6):172988141988674.

36

Vasista S, De Gaspari A, Ricci S, et al. Compliant structures-based wing and wingtip morphing devices. Aircraft Eng & Aerospace Tech 2016;88(2):311–30.

37
Sodja J, Martinez MJ, Simpson JC, et al. Experimental evaluation of the morphing leading edge concept. 23rd AIAA/AHS adaptive structures conference; Kissimmee, Florida. Reston: AIAA; 2015.
38

Wang ZG, Yang Y. Design of a variable-stiffness compliant skin for a morphing leading edge. Appl Sci 2021;11(7):3165.

39

Yang Y, Wang ZG, Wang BW, et al. Optimization, design and testing for morphing leading edge. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2023;237(18):4100–11.

40

Yang Y, Wang ZG, Lyu SS. Comparative study of two lay-up sequence dispositions for flexible skin design of morphing leading edge. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(7):271–8.

41
Gebbink R, Wang GL, Zhong M. High-speed wind tunnel test of the CAE-AVM in DNW-HST for CFD validation purposes. Proceedings of the 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting; Grapevine, Texas. Reston: AIAA; 2017.
42

Hua J, Zhong M, Zheng S, et al. Design and database applications of CAE-AVM model cruise configuration. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica 2022;40(4):133–47,132 [Chinese].

43

Zhong M, Hua J, Wang H, et al. Design and verification of high-lift configuration of civil aircraft standard model CAE-AVM-HL. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica 2022;40(4):158–67 [Chinese].

44
Tsai SW. Composites design. Dayton: Think Composites; 1987.
45

Thuwis GA, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. Optimization of a variable-stiffness skin for morphing high-lift devices. Smart Mater Struct 2010;19(12):124010.

46

De Gaspari A, Riccobene L, Ricci S. Design, manufacturing and wind tunnel validation of a morphing compliant wing. J Aircr 2018;55(6):2313–26.

47
McCarthy JM, Soh GS. Geometric design of linkages. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
48
Daniel K, Roland S. Dynamic mechanism design. An introduction to the theory of mechanism design. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 204–34.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 285-300
Cite this article:
WANG Z, SUN X, YANG Y, et al. Design optimization and testing of a morphing leading-edge with a variable-thickness compliant skin and a closed-chain mechanism. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.021

69

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 17 November 2023
Revised: 08 January 2024
Accepted: 20 March 2024
Published: 27 April 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return