AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Investigation of non-uniform leading-edge tubercles in compressor cascade: Based on multi-objective optimization and data mining

Jiezhong DONGWuli CHU,( )Haoguang ZHANGBo LUOTianyuan JIZiyun ZHANG
School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Corner stall receives noticeable attention in the aeroengine field as an important phenomenon in highly-load compressors. Non-uniform leading-edge tubercles, as an effective method to delay stall, are introduced into the compressor. In this paper, the shape of leading-edge tubercles was controlled by a third-order Fourier function. To judge corner stall, a more precise stall indicator for compressor cascade with flow control methods was defined. Besides, the total kinetic energy of the secondary flow at large incidence was adopted as a parameter for stall evaluation to save computing resources. The results of multi-objective optimization reveal that the loss coefficient exhibited negligible variation at design incidence, while the total kinetic energy of secondary flow showed a significant reduction at large incidence, resulting in a substantial increase in stall incidence. In the optimal profiling cases, thestall incidencewas delayed from 7.9° to 11.6°. The major purpose of the research is to provide proper design guidelines for non-uniform leading-edge tubercles and uncover the flow control mechanisms of leading-edge profiling. Hence, the geometric features that meet different optimization objectives were extracted through geometric analysis near the Pareto Front and through Self-Organizing Map (SOM) data mining methods in the optimization database. Besides, flow field analysis reveals the flow control mechanism of leading-edge tubercles. The convex-concave-convex structure at the 0%–70% blade height region can form two branches of leading-edge vortex pairs that are opposite in the rotation direction to the passage vortex. The two branches of leading-edge vortex pairs mixed with the leading-edge separation vortex to form two stronger mixed vortices, which can effectively suppress the development of passage vortex and delay stall incidence.

References

1
Cumpsty NA. Flow in the endwall regions of axial compressors. Compressor aerodynamics. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical; 1989. p. 355–6.
2

Greitzer EM. Review—Axial compressor stall phenomena. J Fluids Eng 1980;102(2):134–51.

3

Lei VM, Spakovszky ZS, Greitzer EM. A criterion for axial compressor hub-corner stall. J Turbomach 2008;130(3):031006.

4

Taylor JV, Miller RJ. Competing three-dimensional mechanisms in compressor flows. J Turbomach 2017;139(2):021009.

5

Reif WE. Morphogenesis and function of the squamation in sharks. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen 1982;164(1–2):172–83.

6

Choi H, Moin P, Kim J. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J Fluid Mech 1993;255:503–39.

7
Tamai M, Wang ZJ, Rajagopalan G, et al. Aerodynamic performance of a corrugated dragonfly airfoil compared with smooth airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. Reston: AIAA; 2007. Report No.: AIAA-2007-0483.
8

Wootton R. Functional morphology of insect wings. Annu Rev Entomol 1992;37:113–40.

9

Li F, Zhao G, Liu WX. Research on drag reduction performance of turbulent boundary layer on bionic jet surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ 2017;231(1):258–70.

10
Fish F. Flow control through bio-inspired leading-edge tubercles. Cham: Springer; 2020.
11

Fish FE, Battle JM. Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper. J Morphol 1995;225(1):51–60.

12

Fish FE, Howle LE, Murray MM. Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. Integr Comp Biol 2008;48(6):788–800.

13

Fish FE, Lauder GV. Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2006;38(1):193–224.

14

Miklosovic DS, Murray MM, Howle LE, et al. Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers. Phys Fluids 2004;16(5):L39-L42.

15
Pedro HC, Kobayashi M. Numerical study of stall delay on humpback whale flippers. Reston: AIAA; 2008. Report No.: AIAA-2008-0584.
16
Ibrahim I, New TH. Tubercle modifications in marine propeller blades. 10th pacific symposium on flow visualization and image processing. 2015.
17

Cai C, Zuo ZG, Maeda T, et al. Periodic and aperiodic flow patterns around an airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. Phys Fluids 2017;29(11):115110.

18
Asghar A, Allan WDE, LaViolette M, et al. Influence of a novel 3D leading edge geometry on the aerodynamic performance of low pressure turbine blade cascade vanes. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2014: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2014.
19
Murray M, Gruber T, Fredriksson D. Effect of leading edge tubercles on marine tidal turbine blades. 63rd annual meeting APS division fluid dynamics. 1995.
20
Keerthi MC, Kushari A, De A, et al. Experimental investigation of effects of leading-edge tubercles on compressor cascade performance. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2014: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2014.
21
Watts P, Fish FE. The influence of passive, leading edge tubercles on wing performance. 12th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology. 2001.
22
Nayman MN, Perez RE. Improving dynamic stall effects using leading edge tubercles. Reston: AIAA; 2022. Report No.: AIAA-2022-3529.
23

Keerthi MC, Rajeshwaran MS, Kushari A, et al. Effect of leading-edge tubercles on compressor cascade performance. AIAA J 2016;54(3):912–23.

24

Zhao M, Zhang MM, Xu JZ. Numerical simulation of flow characteristics behind the aerodynamic performances on an airfoil with leading edge protuberances. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2017;11(1):193–209.

25

Zheng T, Qiang XQ, Teng JF, et al. Investigation of leading edge tubercles with different wavelengths in an annular compressor cascade. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2021;38(2):153–62.

26

Zheng T, Qiang XQ, Teng JF, et al. Numerical loss analysis in a compressor cascade with leading edge tubercles. J Theor Appl Mech 2018;56(4):1083–95.

27

Johari H, Henoch C, Custodio D, et al. Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance. AIAA J 2007;45(11):2634–42.

28

Favier J, Pinelli A, Piomelli U. Control of the separated flow around an airfoil using a wavy leading edge inspired by humpback whale flippers. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 2011;340(1/2):107–14.

29

Bolzon MD, Kelso RM, Arjomandi M. Tubercles and their applications. J Aerosp Eng 2016;29(1):04015013.

30

Hansen KL, Kelso RM, Dally BB. Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles. AIAA J 2011;49(1):185–94.

31

Rostamzadeh N, Hansen KL, Kelso RM, et al. The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil’s performance with undulating leading edge modification. Phys Fluids 2014;26(10):107101.

32

Seyhan M, Sarioglu M, Akansu YE. Influence of leading-edge tubercle with amplitude modulation on NACA 0015 airfoil. AIAA J 2021;59(10):3965–78.

33

Dong JZ, Chu WL, Zhang HG, et al. Flow control mechanism of compressor cascade: a new leading-edge tubercles profiling method based on sine and attenuation function. Phys Fluids 2023;35(6):066118.

34
Zhang YF, Mahallati A, Benner M. Experimental and numerical investigation of corner stall in a highly-loaded compressor cascade. New York: ASME; 2014. Report No.: GT2014-27204.
35

Li XJ, Chu WL, Wu YH, et al. Effective end wall profiling rules for a highly loaded compressor cascade. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 2016;230(6):535–53.

36

Hawthorne WR. Rotational flow through cascade. Quart J Mech Appl Math 1955;8(3):266–92.

37

Li XJ, Chu WL, Wu YH. Numerical investigation of inlet boundary layer skew in axial-flow compressor cascade and the corresponding non-axisymmetric end wall profiling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 2014;228(6):638–56.

38

Suder KL. Blockage development in a transonic, axial compressor rotor. J Turbomach 1998;120(3):465–76.

39

Schulz HD, Gallus HD. Experimental investigation of the three-dimensional flow in an annular compressor cascade. J Turbomach 1988;110(4):467–78.

40

Ma S, Chu WL, Zhang HG, et al. A combined application of micro-vortex generator and boundary layer suction in a high-load compressor cascade. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(5):1171–83.

41
Kohonen T. Self-organization and associative memory. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 134-152
Cite this article:
DONG J, CHU W, ZHANG H, et al. Investigation of non-uniform leading-edge tubercles in compressor cascade: Based on multi-objective optimization and data mining. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.04.026

60

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 20 July 2023
Revised: 14 August 2023
Accepted: 29 October 2023
Published: 01 May 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return