AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Robust-augmentation nonlinear dynamic inversion control of over-actuated coaxial high-speed helicopter in transition mode

Yuqing QIU,Yan LIJinxi LANGYuxian LIUZhong WANG( )
School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

As the elevator and rudder can be used actively for control, in addition to the rotors, Coaxial High-speed Helicopters (CHHs) have the problems of control redundancy and changing control authority in the transition mode. This paper presents a robust-augmentation transitioning flight control design for a CHH under the adverse conditions of parametric uncertainties and external disturbances. First, based on control characteristic analysis, an Adaptive Filtered Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (AFNDI) controller is proposed for the angular rate to handle the effect of unknown unstructured uncertainties and external turbulence. Theoretical analysis proves that the presented angular rate controller can guarantee steady-state and transient performance. Furthermore, the attitude angle and velocity controllers are also added. Then, an Incremental-based Nonlinear Prioritizing Control Allocation (INPCA) method is designed to take into account control surface transition and changing control authority, which efficiently distributes the required moments between coaxial rotors and aero-surfaces, and avoids the control reversal problem of the yaw channel. In the proposed control architecture, the low-pass filter is introduced to alleviate the adverse influence of time delay and measurement noise. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed controller is demonstrated through nonlinear numerical simulations, and is compared with existing methods. Simulation results show that the proposed control law can improve both capabilities of disturbance rejection and fast response, and works satisfactorily for the CHH transitioning control characteristic.

References

1
Walsh D, Weiner S, Arifian K, et al. Development testing of the Sikorsky X2 technologyTM demonstrator. 65th American helicopter society annual forum. Beach: AHS: West Palm; 2009. p. 1–11.
2

Moodie AM, Yeo H. Design of a cruise-efficient compound helicopter. J Am Helicopter Soc 2012;57(3):1–11.

3

Qiu YQ, Li Y, Lang JX, et al. Dynamics analysis and control of coaxial high-speed helicopter in transition flight. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;137:108278.

4

Zhao YQ, Yuan Y, Chen RL. Influence of differential longitudinal cyclic pitch on flight dynamics of coaxial compound helicopter. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(9):207–20.

5
Berger T. Handling qualities requirements and control design for high-speed rotorcraft [dissertation]. Park: Pennsylvania State University; 2019.
6
Ozdemir GT, Horn JF, Thorsen AT. In-flight multi-variable optimization of redundant controls on a compound rotorcraft. Reston: AIAA; 2013. Report No.: AIAA-2013-5165.
7
Berger T, Horn J, AvMC UAC, et al. Flight control design and simulation handling qualities assessment of high speed rotorcraft. West Palm Beach: AHS; 2019. Report No.: F-0075-2019-14595.
8
Berger T, Horn J, AvMC UAC, et al. Outer-loop control design and simulation handling qualities assessment for a coaxial-compound helicopter and tiltrotor. West Palm Beach: AHS; 2020. Report No.: F-0076-2020-16392.
9
Knapp ME, Ivler CM, Horn JF, et al. Development and simulation of damage tolerant control laws for a compound helicopter. Reston: AIAA; 2020. Report No.: AIAA-2020-1831.
10

Lane SH, Stengel RF. Flight control design using non-linear inverse dynamics. Automatica 1988;24(4):471–83.

11
Lombaerts T, Kaneshige J, Schuet S, et al. Nonlinear dynamic inversion based attitude control for a hovering quad tiltrotor eVTOL vehicle. Reston: AIAA; 2019. Report No.: AIAA-2019-0134.
12

da Costa RR, Chu QP, Mulder JA. Reentry flight controller design using nonlinear dynamic inversion. J Spacecr Rockets 2003;40(1):64–71.

13

Deng WX, Zhou H, Zhou J, et al. Neural network-based adaptive asymptotic prescribed performance tracking control of hydraulic manipulators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2023;53(1):285–95.

14

Deng WX, Yao JY. Asymptotic tracking control of mechanical servosystems with mismatched uncertainties. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2021;26(4):2204–14.

15

Deng WX, Yao JY. Extended-state-observer-based adaptive control of electrohydraulic servomechanisms without velocity measurement. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2020;25(3):1151–61.

16

Wang X, Van Kampen E, Chu QP, et al. Flexible aircraft gust load alleviation with incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion. J Guid Contr Dyn 2019;42(7):1519–36.

17

Sieberling S, Chu QP, Mulder JA. Robust flight control using incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion and angular acceleration prediction. J Guid Contr Dyn 2010;33(6):1732–42.

18

Smeur EJJ, Chu QP, de Croon GCHE. Adaptive incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion for attitude control of micro air vehicles. J Guid Contr Dyn 2015;39(3):450–61.

19

Li Y, Liu XX, Ming RC, et al. A cascaded nonlinear fault-tolerant control for fixed-wing aircraft with wing asymmetric damage. ISA Trans 2023;136:503–24.

20

Pfeifle O, Fichter W. Cascaded incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion for three-dimensional spline-tracking with wind compensation. J Guid Contr Dyn 2021;44(8):1559–71.

21

Li Y, Liu XX, He QZ, et al. L1 adaptive structure-based nonlinear dynamic inversion control for aircraft with center of gravity variations. J Intell Rob Syst 2022;106(1):4.

22

Li Y, Liu XX, Ming RC, et al. Improved model reference-based adaptive nonlinear dynamic inversion for fault-tolerant flight control. Intl J Robust & Nonlinear 2023;33(17):10328–59.

23
Harris J, Elliott CM, Tallant GS. L1 adaptive nonlinear dynamic inversion control for the innovative control effectors aircraft. Reston: AIAA; 2022. Report No.: AIAA-2022-0791.
24

Ahmadi K, Asadi D, Pazooki F. Nonlinear L1 adaptive control of an airplane with structural damage. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2019;233(1):341–53.

25
Harris J, Valasek J. Direct L1-adaptive nonlinear dynamic inversion control for command augmentation systems. Reston: AIAA; 2018. Report No.: AIAA-2018-1575.
26

Yan YD, Liu CJ, Oh H, et al. Dual-layer optimization-based control allocation for a fixed-wing UAV. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;119:107184.

27

Johansen TA, Fossen TI. Control allocation—A survey. Automatica 2013;49(5):1087–103.

28
Virnig J, Bodden D. Multivariable control allocation and control law conditioning when control effectors limit. Reston: AIAA; 1994. Report No.: AIAA-1994-3609.
29

Durham WC. Constrained control allocation. J Guid Contr Dyn 1993;16(4):717–25.

30
Matamoros I, de Visser CC. Incremental nonlinear control allocation for a tailless aircraft with innovative control effectors. Reston: AIAA; 2018. Report No.: AIAA-2018-1116.
31

Su MY, Hu JB, Wang YY, et al. A multiobjective incremental control allocation strategy for tailless aircraft. Int J Aerosp Eng 2022;2022:6515234.

32
de Heer P, de Visser CC, Hoogendoorn ML, et al. Incremental nonlinear control allocation for an aircraft with distributed electric propulsion. Reston: AIAA; 2023. Report No.: AIAA-2023-1248.
33
Pollack T, Van Kampen EJ. Multi-objective design and performance analysis of incremental control allocation-based flight control laws. Reston: AIAA; 2023. Report No.: AIAA-2023-1249.
34

Su Y, Wang ZY, Cao YH. A hybrid trim strategy for coaxial compound helicopter. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2023;237(2):452–66.

35

Yuan Y, Thomson D, Chen RL, et al. Heading control strategy assessment for coaxial compound helicopters. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(9):2037–46.

36

Yuan Y, Thomson D, Chen RL. Propeller control strategy for coaxial compound helicopters. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2019;233(10):3775–89.

37

Ferguson K, Thomson D. Flight dynamics investigation of compound helicopter configurations. J Aircr 2014;52(1):156–67.

38
Pitt D. Rotor dynamic inflow derivatives and time constants from various inflow models [dissertation]. St. Louis: Washington University; 1980.
39

Cao YH, Wang MS, Li GZ. Flight dynamics modeling, trim, stability, and controllability of coaxial compound helicopters. J Aerosp Eng 2021;34(6):04021084.

40
Ferguson K. Towards a better understanding of the flight mechanics of compound helicopter configurations [dissertation]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2015.
41
Ferguson SW. A mathematical model for real time flight simulation of a generic tilt-rotor aircraft. Washington, D.C.: NASA; 1988. Report No.: CR-166536.
42

Yan K, Chen M, Wu QX, et al. Robust adaptive compensation control for unmanned autonomous helicopter with input saturation and actuator faults. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(10):2299–310.

43
Cao C. L 1 adaptive control theory: Guaranteed robustness with fast adaptation (advances in design and control). Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2010.
44
Lewis FL, Jagannathan S, Yeşildirek A. Neural network control of robot arms and nonlinear systems. Neural Systems for Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1997. p. 161–211.
45
Harkegard O. Efficient active set algorithms for solving constrained least squares problems in aircraft control allocation. Proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on decision and control. Piscataway: IEEE; 2003. p. 1295–300.
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 404-420
Cite this article:
QIU Y, LI Y, LANG J, et al. Robust-augmentation nonlinear dynamic inversion control of over-actuated coaxial high-speed helicopter in transition mode. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 404-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.05.004

20

Views

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 18 September 2023
Revised: 18 October 2023
Accepted: 01 January 2024
Published: 28 May 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return